T-527 Fall 2009 How to Teach for Understanding Perspectives on Educational Technology 10 September 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 21st Century Context for
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Stage 3
and assessment for learning
Constructivist Learning versus Explicit Teaching: A personal discovery of balance Tara Tetzlaff Spring 2009.
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
T-527 Fall 2009 Back to Cool How to Teach For Understanding.
What should learners understand? Defining Understanding Goals for Disciplined Inquiry.
English fluency in Ikumbo, Kenya By Dianne Denton T527- How to Teach for Understanding Harvard Graduate School of Education.
T-527 How to Teach For Understanding Perspectives on Curriculum and Pedagogy Session 1.
Connecting Theory and Practice seeing the forest and the trees with credit to Ansel Adams Aspens in New Mexico.
Welcome to E-126 Instructor: Lisa Breit Phone: Office Hours: By appointment Class will meet at: 53 Church St., Room.
Bao Jun Tan T527 Project Presentation. Bilingual Education Policy in Singapore Bilingual Education Policy in Singapore Increasing trend of English-speaking.
Session 4 Here we are already at.... E-126 Week Four How Can New Technologies Support Understanding?
T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning T September 2005.
Digital Storytelling: Exploring Immigration Through Personal Experiences November 12, 2009 Lindsay Bellino.
Back to Cool How to Teach For Understanding T-527.
T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning T-527 Fall 2005 Thursdays 1-4 PM Instructor: Stone Wiske Teaching Fellows: Lisa Breit and Marielle.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
How is understanding developed and demonstrated? Performances of Understanding using multiple intelligences How to Teach for Understanding T527 on 15 October.
T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning How is understanding developed? Performances of Understanding using multiple intelligences 3 November.
T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning Perspectives on Educational Technology 29 September 2005.
LEARNING FOR THE 21st CENTURY
Fostering Student Engagement in an Online Unmediated Course Leslie Stebbins T November 2009.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Orientation to the Social Studies K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Technology Leadership
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Presented by: Joseph Ginotti PLN Director
KRISTEN SHAND, PH.D. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Project-Based Learning Intel © Essentials Online.
E-126 Week 3 Understanding Goals. Understanding Goals for This Week  How are understanding goals different from other kinds of goals and objectives?
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM Shalene Herron, Dave Carter & Donna Duriez & Donna Duriez © 2007 Creating Classroom Connections.
Content Area Reading, 11e Vacca, Vacca, Mraz © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 0 Content Area Reading Literacy and Learning Across the.
Let’s Talk Assessment Rhonda Haus University of Regina 2013.
“Tele” = at a distance (far) Collaboration = co-labor (shared labor) Tele-collaboration = sharing labors at a distance Telecollaboration.
Educational Technology
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Constructivism A learning theory for today’s classroom.
Qualities needed among science teachers- A perspective from Taiwan Huann-shyang Lin National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
“…the ability to think and act flexibly with what one knows.” David Perkins in Teaching for Understanding, Wiske et al (1998)
Increasing Rigor in the Classroom Natalie Redman.
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Integrating Content for More Authentic Student Learning Suzy Myers Language Arts and Literacy Consultant Kansas State Department of Education
T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning How is learning assessed? Ongoing assessment and educative evaluation 10 November 2005.
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Multiple literacy Standards for the 21st-Century learner
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Secondary
Lesson 3: The Roles of Technology
MYP planning: the unit planner
Implementing Research-Informed Assessment Feedback Practice
Presentation transcript:

T-527 Fall 2009 How to Teach for Understanding Perspectives on Educational Technology 10 September 2009

T-527 Fall 2009 Last week What is understanding?... a flexible performance capability How is it developed and demonstrated?…through performances of understanding What is curriculum: product? process? How do I unfreeze my current thinking without drowning in uncertainty? How do I balance my passions, my partner’s interests, the T527 agenda, and feasibility to define a project that is generative for me?

T-527 Fall 2009 Goals for today What are some alternative perspectives on the role of new educational technologies in teaching and learning for understanding? How can we make sense of readings to guide analysis and the design of effective curriculum plans and technology integration? How can I develop my project plans?

T-527 Fall 2009 Activities for today Analyze readings about potential and problems of educational technologies Analyze practice in relation to readings Learn about project possibilities Consult about your own project plans

T-527 Fall 2009 T527 Ecology 30K feet View

T-527 Fall 2009 I T527 Landscape 30K feet View Thou It Instructional Core

T-527 Fall 2009 Technology as a Force Technology as a Tool

T-527 Fall 2009 “Book schools” reproduce inert knowledge Don’t map new technology on old curricula: Yelland

T-527 Fall 2009 Multimodal, hyperlinked networked media reshape: Curriculum Learning Literacies Pedagogy Institutions

T-527 Fall 2009 Transforming Schools with Technology Zucker’s Goals Student Achievement Relevant, engaging schools High quality education for all Attract, prepare, support, retain good teachers Support families and communities Promote accountability of schools

T-527 Fall 2009 Use Technology Wisely-Zenglinsky Constructive pedagogy is superior to didactic instruction alone Technology can support constructivism Technology use improves test scores when it is used to promote higher order skills: metacognition, data analysis, analysis of simulations, revision of work

T-527 Fall 2009 Teaching for Understanding with Technology—Wiske et al. Use elements of the Teaching for Understanding framework to guide design of technology-enhanced curriculum Review uses of technology with the Framework elements to take full advantage of educational technology

T-527 Fall 2009 Active (manipulative/observant) Constructive (articulative/reflective) Intentional (goal directed/regulatory) Authentic (complex, contextual) Cooperative (collaborative, conversational) Jonassen-Meaningful Learning with Technology Vehicle, authentic context, social medium, intellectual partner

T-527 Fall 2009 SubjectsObject/  Outcome Motive Mediating Tools: (e.g. books, talk, computers, schedules, etc.) Rules (norms and values) Community Division of Labor The instructional core is part of a larger system Yelland An Activity System Engstrom 1987

T-527 Fall 2009 Cuban doubts the impact of technology in schools Policy makers buy technology; few teachers use them Schools resist change –Must serve multiple purposes: moral, social, civic, economic, academic –Structures and practices are resilient –Not enough technical support Technology does not change pedagogy Technology use does not improve learning

T-527 Fall 2009 How do and should technologies affect what and how we teach?  Where do the authors that we read this week (Zucker, Wenglinsky, Wiske Yelland. Cuban) stand on this matrix?  Where do you stand and what affects your position?  How do this week’s readings influence your position and ideas?  How does national/cultural context affect positions?

T-527 Fall 2009 Teaching for Understanding Generative Topics Build the curriculum around important, accessible topics related to learners’ interests and experience Understanding Goals Publicize explicit goals for what learners will not just learn but really understand (flexpertise) Performances of Understanding On-going Assessment Offer multiple and varied opportunities for learners to perform in ways that develop, demonstrate, and apply their understanding Assess performances frequently, using public criteria tied to learning goals and provide helpful feedback and coaching Support reflective, collaborative communities where everybody shares responsibility for teaching and learning The Teaching for Understanding Framework Generative Topics Performances of Understanding On-Going Assessment Understanding Goals

T-527 Fall 2009 Contrasting Views of Education Norton and Wiburg Teachers present Students listen Collaboration is cheating Subjects are separate Learning is fact-centered Teacher and texts are the sources of knowledge Assessment is based on reproduced knowledge Schools are isolated Teachers facilitate Students construct Collaboration fuels learning Subjects are integrated Learning is problem-centered Many people and resources are sources of knowledge Assessment is based on flexible performance capabilities Technology links schools with the world Didactic Instruction: Few intelligences Constructivist Learning: Multiple Intelligences

T-527 Fall How does this example fit with your criteria for high-quality learning and teaching with technology?

T-527 Fall 2009 New technologies for T527 to support our learning T527 Website –Announcements –Class session slides and readings –Discussion –Communally Assembled Resources –Office hours sign up Multimedia Case Study –Dynamic Earth: A Case of Teaching for Understanding with Technology Collaborative Curriculum Design Tool

T527 Project Process Develop relationships Frame a project Sketch Purposes Make a proposal Cycles of design: think, consult, draft, review, revise

T-527 Fall 2009 Preparing for class next week Readings: compare the authors’ perspectives on clarifying the overall purposes of learning-- curriculum goals, desired results, big ideas, targets of difficulty--and consider them in relation to your own and your partner’s views NOTE Additional reading in the website Project: clarify plans with your project partner(s). Use the course website discussion forum to exchange ideas and plans. Review guidelines to prepare a draft proposal, due September 18 Explore Shamsa’s case Meet Stone and Shane in office hours