An XMM-Newton International Survey (AXIS): A progress report Xavier Barcons & Francisco Carrera Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC) on behalf of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI X-ray broad--band study A. De Rosa, L. Piro Ginga/ROSAT/ASCA IASF-Roma Universita' di Roma La Sapienza Institute of.
Advertisements

The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys Andrea Comastri (INAF – Osservatorio di Bologna – Italy) The XRB as a tracer of SMBH mass density Hard X-ray.
CAHA, 5 Feb 2005XMM-Newton Surveys Xavier Barcons.
Tracing cosmic accretion through the XMM-Newton Medium Survey (XMS) Xavier Barcons On behalf of the AXIS/XMS/SSC team.
Sean Farrell XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre University of Leicester, UK In collaboration with… N. Webb, D. Barret, O. Godet & B. Plazolles – CESR, France.
Statistical analysis of the X-ray emission properties of type-1 AGN in the XMM-2dF Wide Angle Survey Silvia Mateos Leicester University (UK) Leicester.
COSMOS Kyoto meeting May 2005 Obscured AGN in the COSMOS field Andrea Comastri (INAF – Bologna) on behalf of the XMM-COSMOS team.
Extragalatic Surveys, Cambridge MA, Nov 6-8, 2006 Vincenzo Mainieri G. Hasinger, N. Cappelluti, M. Brusa, F. Civano, A. Comastri, M. Elvis, A. Finoguenov,
Swift/BAT Hard X-ray Survey Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
Normal Galaxies Sample From 2dF-XMM Wide Angle Survey Jonathan Tedds, Silvia Mateos, Mike Watson, Matthew Page, Francisco Carrera, Mirko Krumpe, Jacobo.
Probing the X-ray Universe: Analysis of faint sources with XMM-Newton G. Hasinger, X. Barcons, J. Bergeron, H. Brunner, A. C. Fabian, A. Finoguenov, H.
Boston, November 2006 Extragalactic X-ray surveys Paolo Tozzi Spectral analysis of X-ray sources in the CDFS.
AXIS programme status n AXIS-I: uApproved November 1999 uObservations started April 2000 u19 nights so far u19.5 nights remaining n AXIS-II uApproved November.
1 AXIS programme status n Data: uObservations & reduction uArchival/delivery to XID-DB n Science: uImaging programme uSpectroscopic ids n Public output.
The spatial clustering of X-ray selected AGN R. Gilli Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna On behalf of the CDFS.
Ringberg Meeting, Apr 05 2dF Spectroscopic Identification of a Southern XMM-Newton Serendipitous Sample Jonathan Tedds (Leicester), Mat Page (MSSL) & XMM-Newton.
JENAM, 13 Sep 2004 AGN and Surveys with the new X-ray observatories Xavier Barcons Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC)
1 XID Programme n Imaging Programme: multiband optical/NIR imaging of XMM fields n Core programme: spectroscopic/archival identification of u1000 high.
Early Results from SWIFT's BAT AGN Survey: XMM Follow-up Observations for 22 BAT AGNs Lisa Winter Lisa Winter (Grad Student at UMD) Richard Mushotzky (GSFC),
Obscured and unobscured growth of Super-massive Black Holes Francisco J. Carrera, X. Barcons, J. Bussons, J. Ebrero, M. Ceballos, A. Corral (IFCA, CSIC-UC,
The XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre identifdication (XID) programme Xavier Barcons Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC) Santander, Spain.
FMOS and UKIDSS Galactic Astronomy Phil Lucas UHerts.
The XMM-Newton hard band wide angle Survey Nicoletta Carangelo and Silvano Molendi (IASF-MI(CNR)) Epic Consortium Meeting Palazzo Steri, Palermo,
Obscured AGN and the synthesis of the cosmic X-ray background
Automated Classification of X-ray Sources R. J. Hanisch, A. A. Suchkov, R. L. White Space Telescope Science Institute T. A. McGlynn, E. L. Winter, M. F.
X/  -ray Instrumentation The development of high-energy astrophysics X-ray and  -ray instrumentation 4. The development of high- energy Astrophysics.
X-ray Surveys with Space Observatory Khyung Hee University Kim MinBae Park Jisook.
RAS National Astronomy Meeting April 2006, University of Leicester, UK The XMM-Newton Slew Survey The excellent sensitivity of the XMM-Newton.
Obscured AGN and XRB models Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Roberto Gilli (INAF-OABologna-Italy) F. Fiore (INAF-OARoma-Italy) G. Hasinger (MPE-Garching-
Supersoft sources in M 31: Comparing the XMM-Newton Deep Survey, ROSAT and Chandra catalogues Holger Stiele SuperSoft X-ray Sources – New Developments.
Introduction - Aims 1948 X-ray sources XMM-Newton EPIC observations of the largest Local Group spiral galaxy M 31, taken between June 2006 and February.
The X-ray Universe September 2005, El Escorial, Madrid, Spain The XMM-Newton Slew Survey XMM-Newton Slew 1 (XMMSL1) Fig 1. Slew observation.
X-ray astronomy 7-11 September 2009, Bologna, Italy XMM-Newton slew survey hard band sources XMM-Newton slew survey hard band sources R.D. Saxton a, A.M.
Spectral Energy Distributions of 2XMM-selected AGN & VO-tools Rodrigo Gil-Merino Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC) Santander, Spain MAVO workshop,
The nature of X-ray selected Broad Absorption Line Quasars Alex Blustin With Tom Dwelly (Southampton), Mat Page (UCL-MSSL)‏ UCL-MSSL and IoA, Cambridge.
The XMM SSC Bright Source sample * November 2006 Report to the SSC XID R. Della Ceca A. Caccianiga T. Maccacaro P. Severgnini F. Cocchia * on behalf of.
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration
On behalf of the XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre Roberto Della Ceca INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera,Milan The Cosmological properties of AGN.
Extreme soft X-ray emission from the broad-line quasar REJ R.L.C. Starling 1*, E.M. Puchnarewicz 1, K.O. Mason 1 & E. Romero- Colmenero 2 1 Mullard.
1 A. Streblyanska, G. Hasinger, A. Finoguenov, X. Barcons, S. Mateos, A. C. Fabian A relativistic Fe line in the mean X-ray spectra of type-1 and type-2.
The X-ray view of absorbed INTEGRAL AGN A. De Rosa On behalf of the INTEGRAL/AGN survey team.
MMT Science Symposium1 “false-color” keV X-ray image of the Bootes field Thousands of AGNs in the 9.3 square degree Bootes field * X-ray and infrared.
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration
X-ray emission properties of BLAGN in the XMM-2dF Wide Angle Survey S. Mateos, M.G. Watson, J. A. Tedds and the XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre Department.
X-ray sky survey of bright, serendipitous sources with 2XMMi at the AIP Speaker: Alexander Kolodzig Origin: Humboldt-Uni Berlin, Germany Institute:AIP.
NGC 3147: a 'true' type 2 Seyfert galaxy without the broad-line region THE X-RAY UNIVERSE Granada, May 28 th 2008 Stefano Bianchi A. Corral 1, F.
Lockman Hole (XMM PV) PN CCD (MPE Garching) MOS1 CCD (Leicester U) PN CCD (MPE Garching) MOS1 CCD (Leicester U) PV Observations ksec.
The NuSTAR Extragalactic Survey: A 1 st Look at the Distant High-Energy X-ray Background D.R. Ballantyne (Georgia Tech) on behalf of M. Ajello, D. Alexander,
HST Workshop Bologna Jan 31, 2008 Heavily obscured SMBH at high redshift Andrea Comastri INAF - OABologna C. Vignali, R. Gilli, K. Iwasawa, F. Civano,
START. The population of high-redshift type-2 quasars found in deep Chandra and XMM-Newton surveys The Formation and Early Evolution of Galaxies, Irsee.
Obscured and unobscured growth of Super-massive Black Holes from the XMM-Newton Medium Survey Francisco J. Carrera, X. Barcons, J. Bussons, J. Ebrero,
XMM slew survey Richard Saxton 1, Andy Read 2, Pili Esquej 3, Michael Freyberg 3, Bruno Altieri 1 1. ESAC 2. University of Leicester 3. MPE XMM slew survey.
RGS observations of cool gas in cluster cores Jeremy Sanders Institute of Astronomy University of Cambridge A.C. Fabian, J. Peterson, S.W. Allen, R.G.
21 Aug 2014HEAD Meeting Chicago Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection Wilkes, Kuraszkiewicz, Atanas, Haas, Barthel, Willner,
XMM-Newton observations of open clusters and star forming regions R. Pallavicini and E. Franciosini INAF- Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Italy S.
I. Georgantopoulos NATIONAL OBSERVATORY OF ATHENS A. Georgakakis, O. Giannakis, S. Kitsionas, A. Akylas, D. Gaga, M. Plionis, V. Kolokotronis, S. Basilakos.
Venezia - June 5, 2006S.Mereghetti - Swift and GRBs Conference1 Dust scattering X-ray expanding rings around GRBs Sandro Mereghetti Andrea Tiengo Giacomo.
The XMM Distant Cluster Project: Survey limits and Pilot Survey Georg Lamer A. Schwope, V. Hambaryan, M. Godolt (AIP) H. Böhringer, R. Fassbender, P. Schücker,
Multiwavelength AGN Number Counts in the GOODS fields Ezequiel Treister (Yale/U. de Chile) Meg Urry (Yale) And the GOODS AGN Team.
X-RAY PROPERTIES OF FR II/NLRG X-RAY PROPERTIES OF FR II/NLRG E. Trussoni 1, A. Capetti 1, B. Balmaverde 2 1 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino,
New XMM-Newton deep Survey in the Lockman Hole Vincenzo Mainieri MPE Workshop on AGN Surveys, Puebla, June 23- July 11, 2003 Guenther Hasinger Hans Boehringer.
Why is the BAT survey for AGN Important? All previous AGN surveys were biased- –Most AGN are ‘obscured’ in the UV/optical –IR properties show wide scatter.
The X-ray Universe September 2005, El Escorial, Madrid, Spain Extended Sources in the XMM-Newton slew survey V. Lazaro a, R. Saxton a, A.M.Read.
Seeking type 2 QSO amongst bright X-ray selected EXOs Agnese Del Moro University of Leicester, UK In collaboration with: M.G. Watson (UoL), S. Mateos (UoL),
Average Fe Kα emission from distant AGN
X-ray Surveys Lockman Hole Team Giacconi (JHU) Gunn (Princeton)
The Space Density of Compton Thick AGN
Andrea Comastri (INAF- Oss. Astr. Bologna)
Hard X-ray observations of Extremely Red Objects
The spectral properties of Galactic X-ray sources at faint fluxes
Presentation transcript:

An XMM-Newton International Survey (AXIS): A progress report Xavier Barcons & Francisco Carrera Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC) on behalf of the AXIS consortium and the XMM Survey Science Centre XID wg

The AXIS team Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam (Germany): Y. Hashimoto, G. Hasinger, G. Lamer, G. Szokoly, A. Schwope Centre d'Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements (France): N. Webb Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge (UK): R.G. McMahon, A.C. Fabian, C.S. Crawford Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Tenerife (Spain):I. Pérez-Fournon Instituto de Física de Cantabria, Santander (Spain): X. Barcons, F.J. Carrera, M.T. Ceballos, S. Mateos Laboratorio de Astrofísica Espacial y Física Fundamental, Madrid (Spain): J.M. Mas-Hesse Max-Planck-Institut fuer extraterrestriche Physik (Germany): T. Boller Mullard Space Science Laboratory, UCL (UK): M.S. Cropper, K.O. Mason, J.P.D. Mittaz, M.J. Page, S. R. Rosen Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg (France): C. Motch, P. Guillout, L. Mirioni, I. Negueruela Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Milano (Italy): T. Maccacaro, R. Della Ceca, P. Severgnini University of Bristol (UK): D.M. Worrall, M. Bremer, M. Birkinshaw University of Central Lancashire (UK): G.E. Bromage, B.J.M. Hassall University of Leicester, (UK): M.G. Watson, J.P. Pye, G.C. Stewart, T. Roberts, J.P. Osborne, N. Schurch, P.J. Wheatley, M.J. Ward, R.S. Warwick XMM Science Operations Centre, (Spain): N. Schartel

The XMM Survey Science Centre XID programme n Expect 50,000 new X-ray sources/year n Core programme (1000 sources/sample): –High b faint sample ( erg cm -2 s -1 ) –High b medium sample ( erg cm -2 s -1 ) –High b bright sample ( erg cm -2 s -1 ) –Galactic Plane Sample n Imaging programme (u,g’,r’,i’,Z,H) n Statistical identifications based on X-ray properties & imaging programme.

The Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos JKT (1.0) GTC (10) TNG (3.5) INT (2.5) WHT (4.2) NOT (2.5)

AXIS:Breakdown of observing nights We are here now!

AXIS instruments used

AXIS wide-field imaging Optical: INT/WFC Near IR: INT/CIRSI (includes M. Watson’s PATT Imaging proposal)

AXIS: Search for candidate counterparts i’-band sources within either: 5  (statistical) or 5 arcsec Clusters? Reddened sources? AGNs beyond the Galaxy?

Candidate counterparts & systematics Count rate > ct s -1 |b|>10º Single candidate counterpart 108 sources 66% x 1 =2 , 33% P(x|x 0 )=|x-x 0 |* exp(-|x-x 0 | 2 /2) P obs (x)=f 0 *P(x|0)+ f 1 *P(x|x 1 ) f 0 =0.67; x 0 =0 (fixed) f 1 =0.33; x 1 =2.0 

AXIS identifications (as of March 1, 2001)

The AXIS medium sample n 35 sources brighter than erg cm -2 s -1 in the keV band (2 XMM fields, excluding targets). n 32/35 identified (>90%); remaining 3 have i’>22.5

Medium sample: offsets

Medium sample: L-z

Medium sample: z distribution Most objects at z~1-2 as expected from XRB synthesis models

Medium sample: type 1 vs type 2 AGN n Expect ~60% of AGN to be unabsorbed in the Comastri et al XRB model n We find 22/34 (65%) BLAGN among the extragalactic sources

Medium Sample: BAL QSOs n BAL QSOs in previous X-ray surveys: –1 in Chandra deep survey (Giacconi et al 2001) –1 in hard X-ray selected ROSAT sample (Page et al 2001) –1 in ISO/BeppoSAX survey (Alexander et al 2001) n In the medium sample we have 1 confirmed and 2 highly suggestive BAL QSOs (~5-10% of BLAGN): –Higher sensitivity of XMM-Newton –Harder photon energies 4.5 keV)

Medium sample: BAL QSO spectra Medium sample: BAL QSO spectra Z=1.82 z=1.91 z=0.79? z=1.82

AXIS Galactic Plane sample: the G field (b=-1º) SS279

A Be+NS/WD? accreting binary

AXIS Galactic Plane sample: Active Coronae Higher sensitivity highlights AC with very weak e.l.s

AXIS expectations We are here now!

Conclusions n Sensitivity & response to hard X-rays of XMM-Newton make it sensitive to new classes of objects n Medium sample (> erg cm -2 s -1 ): –68% of sources are BLAGNs (consistency with unified XRB models) –z-distribution peaks at z~1-2 –5-10% of BLAGNS are BALs n Galactic Plane: –Active Coronae with very weak emission lines –Accreting binaries