Authoring Assessment-Rich Learning Environments: A Faculty Development Tool to Drive Transformation EDUCAUSE NLII Conference, New Orleans, 29 January 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
Advertisements

Project-Based Learning and Performance-Based Assessment.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Listening to the Future Presented by Larry Johnson and Kristi Nelson Transforming Lives, Education, and Knowledge.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Problem Based Lessons. Training Objectives 1. Develop a clear understanding of problem-based learning and clarify vocabulary issues, such as problem vs.
Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Andrea L. Beach,
Authoring Assessment-Rich Learning Environments: A Faculty Development Tool to Drive Transformation The Advanced Educational Computing Project: A Boutique.
Authoring Assessment-Rich Learning Environments: A Faculty Development Tool to Drive Transformation EDUCAUSE NLII Conference, New Orleans, 29 January 2001.
Assessment-rich instructional technology to promote learning-centered and inquiry-oriented pedagogies: Coupling transformation and scalability
Fostering learning-centered experiences with web-based technology. Fostering learning-centered experiences with web-based technology. Donald P. Buckley,
The Role of Assessment in Learning-centered Instructional Technology > Donald P. Buckley, Ph.D. Associate.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
Teaching With Technology So That Students Learn With Understanding Donald P. Buckley, Ph.D. Professor of Biology Director of Learning Technology, School.
Innovative Instruction Transformation Team Jeffrey Bartkovich, Monroe Community College Kim Scalzo, SUNY Center for Professional Development Carey Hatch,
Faculty Instructional Support Moving beyond putting courses online to curriculum redesign Leila Lyons, University of Delaware.
University of Delaware Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs. Instructor-Centered Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George.
University of Delaware Workshop at Kutztown University January 6, 2003 Experience It Yourself: An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning Institute for.
University of Delaware Plenary Presentation at September Institute Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning University of Cincinnati September.
The Yellow Brick Road for Educators? Assessment-Rich Instructional Technology to Advance Learning-centered and Inquiry-oriented Pedagogies in Science.
Best Practices IIEngineering Engineering Education1 use active learning.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Microsoft 2013 All Rights Reserved. Partners in Learning School Research Background.
Course Portfolio: Making Pedagogy Visible Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) Queensborough Community College, CUNY Spring 2008.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Buckley, D EDUCAUSE Review 37(1): (Jan/Feb)
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
5. How to Amass Evidence (Evaluation) of Change and its Effects? How does assessment drive transformative change in the classroom, at the department level,
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Presentation by D. McDonald. A Dose of Magic This resource for general education teachers describes 60 strategies for helping learners with special needs.
Faculty as Agents of Change – Group 2 Professional development workshops centers for teaching and learning PFF and GTA programs Creating curricula interdisciplinary.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Institutional Transition to the Learning Paradigm: Coupling Transformation and Scalability Through Instructional Technology
Faculty Professional Development Center Board Presentation January 2005.
Project-Based Learning Training What is the problem with current education methods?
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
In Pursuit of the Learning Paradigm: Promoting Institutional Change Through Collaboratoria and STEM Digital Libraries Joyce Cadwallader, Ph.D. Professor.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Small Group Teaching Key Educational Skills Faculty Development Workshop December 9, 2014 Katherine M. Hyland, PhD Marieke Kruidering-Hall, PhD.
Tapio Varis Teleworking for the Media and Culture Tapio Varis Professor and Unesco Chair in Global e-Learning
Using Instructional Technology to Promote Student Learning With Understanding > Donald P. Buckley,
Innovations 2003, Phoenix, AZ Ned D. Young, Ph.D. Professor, Management Sinclair Community College Using an interactive SCANS simulation to improve student.
ELearning Challenges for the Future. Silicon Valley.
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Science Case Network How an RCN-UBE on Case Studies and PBL Can Help You Pat Marsteller and Ethel Stanley Channeling Margaret Watrerman Networking Conference.
The Learning Cycle as a Model for Science Teaching Reading Assignment Chapter 5 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
The Transformation of Undergraduate Education through Faculty Development and Course Design – Part 1 George Watson (with acknowledgement to.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Chapter 10 Learning and Development in a Knowledge Setting
Students Centered Learning as a Behaviour Change Approach: Practices in Our Institutions of Higher Learning, Opportunities and Challenges Dr. Faisal H.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Service Learning: What is it and how can it enhance student learning? Kim Buch Psychology.
Charlotte Nirmalani Gunawardena, Regents’ Professor, University of New Mexico, USA PARADIGM SHIFT TO ONLINE LEARNING: FACILITATING A LEARNING COMMUNITY.
Module 5: Questioning, Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Introduction and Module Overview Standards Knowledge and skills Assignments.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
E-learning and E-assessments
Redesigning College Teaching at Sacramento State University
Pat Conole (315) My Showcase Portfolio Pat Conole (315) t687.
NJCU College of Education
Advising Doctoral Students
The Heart of Student Success
Presentation transcript:

Authoring Assessment-Rich Learning Environments: A Faculty Development Tool to Drive Transformation EDUCAUSE NLII Conference, New Orleans, 29 January > Donald P. Buckley, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Biology Director of Instructional Technology, School of Health Sciences Quinnipiac University; Hamden, CT Smithsonian Institution Laureate Apple Distinguished Educator WWW: >

In memory of Dr. Karen L. Smith Director, Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning University of Central Florida

Overview Pedagogical Feature Set of Interactive Multimedia LearningWare Interactivity fosters active learning Sensory rich information formats enable brain-based teaching/learning Communication tools promote social construction of knowledge Computers facilitate routine assessment Course Management Systems Web-delivered content Routine formative assessment Communication tools to promote cooperative learning styles Faculty Development Technology integration …to serve learning-centered pedagogies Transition to the Learning Paradigm Faculty development should be transformational & community wide Transformation Scalability

Institutional Change Is Necessary, But Faculty Populations Have Structure: Institutional change means that transformational experiences must be enticing to individuals less tolerant of complexity, ambiguity or failure …mid and late adopters (Conservatives and Skeptics).

Technology Often Heralded as a Solution Instructional Paradigm Learning Paradigm Faculty PracticesPedagogical Potential of the Technology Faculty still operating within the Instructional Paradigm will not recognize the value of advanced instructional technology, which is best suited to supporting learning centered pedagogies.

Also, most Faculty are Naive about Pedagogical Feature Set Interactive Multimedia: Interactive Multimedia: interactivity fosters active-learning interactivity fosters active-learning Interactive Multimedia: Interactive Multimedia: different information formats engage different cognitive different information formats engage different cognitive processes and therefore open different learning opportunities processes and therefore open different learning opportunities Communication Tools: Communication Tools: promote cooperative learning and the social construction of promote cooperative learning and the social construction of knowledge knowledge Computing components: simulations provide experience in the process of inquiry simulations provide experience in the process of inquiry authoring tools promote student construction of meaning authoring tools promote student construction of meaning powerful formative assessment tools are multi-faceted powerful formative assessment tools are multi-faceted

Traditional Technology Training Limited training (e.g., slide show authoring) oBecause “faculty don’t have the time to commit to deeper efforts” Problem: making a better lecture is not transformational oIt doesn’t foster transition to learning-centered pedagogies oFaculty wonder “why spend all that effort for limited gains?” Result: limited faculty willingness to participate in more training

Solution: Up the Ante Capture the pedagogical high ground …focus on learning & inquiry. Focus on genuinely transformational faculty development …change faculty attitudes and behaviors …authoring technology can make a tremendous difference here But keep the technology transparent ! ! ! Effective faculty development requires formative development cycles, faculty use and refinement, & long-term scalable support. Value faculty learners: Heroes and Heroines take risks …create a versatile reward structure, promote pedagogical scholarship. Build collaborations and communities. Promote a culture of teaching reform. Foster institutional transition to the Learning Paradigm.

U N I V E R S I T Y O F H A R T F O R D Advanced Educational Computing A Tool To Foster Student-Centered Learning Advanced Educational Computing A Tool To Foster Student-Centered Learning

Deep Authoring Is Transformational Experience It was enormously stimulating for most participants to create learning environments that would enable them to teach things that they could not teach well before.

Full-fledged Interactive Multimedia Authoring Chosen for Training … Programming Required To customize interfaces that allow students to explore the content areas in intuitive ways To build simulations that emulate the real world To build formative assessment tools

Major Features of Faculty Development Program 1. Full-fledged Interactive Multimedia Authoring Chosen for Training. 2. Pedagogical Emphasis …this is not about “learning technology.’’ 3. Keep the Technology Transparent ! 4.Faculty Mentoring Faculty. 5. Collaborative Cluster Training. 6. Promote a culture of teaching reform 7. Create a versatile faculty reward structure that values innovation

Train the Faculty to Author Learning Activities Our goal was NOT to create multimedia authors Focus on pedagogy and faculty content areas Essential to keep the technology transparent Need to educate faculty about possibilities & limits of advanced educational technology Creates a forum on learning & pedagogical innovation Enables faculty to reach challenging goals Institutional Transition to the Learning Paradigm

AEC Faculty Development Program Design Focus on Pedagogical Innovation & Student Learning Train clusters of 3-4 faculty from a discipline (interdisciplinary next time) First, 30 hours of group introduction (1:1 trainee:trainer ratio) First, 30 hours of group introduction (1:1 trainee:trainer ratio) Then, committed and prolonged individual mentoring Then, committed and prolonged individual mentoring Let each faculty member build a tool to solve a problem in their content area Author small projects to ensure success and formative development Author small projects to ensure success and formative development Don’t let faculty fail Don’t let faculty fail Build a faculty reward structure …development, class, grants, presentations

Authoring Tool Feature Set WYSIWGEnvironment ScriptingEnvironment MediaIntegration for example: SuperCard or ToolBox Ease of Use Comprehensive Content Editing Tool Set WWWAuthoring AuthoringMetaphor

Core Training Concepts Keep the Technology Transparent Focus on Pedagogical Innovation Build Collaborations Seek the Eager-Beavers Keep the Technology Transparent Focus on Pedagogical Innovation Build Collaborations Seek the Eager-Beavers

Preconceptions Humanists would be reluctant...wrong! Specialists would be naturals...wrong!  educational specialists  cognitive types  techies...including toy-collectors REALITY  train the eager-beavers  eager-beavers pop up in surprising places  look for people with a history of service...risk takers, “altruists” Humanists would be reluctant...wrong! Specialists would be naturals...wrong!  educational specialists  cognitive types  techies...including toy-collectors REALITY  train the eager-beavers  eager-beavers pop up in surprising places  look for people with a history of service...risk takers, “altruists”

Which Way to Institutionalization? Media Center Faculty Development Slide show presentations Faculty Development Slide show presentations GOAL: sophisticated practitioners & pedagogical innovators Faculty Development Multimedia authoring Faculty Development Multimedia authoring

Scale of Faculty Participation in AEC Program Art 5 4 Biology2 Business4 Chemistry4 Communication7 Computer Science4 Education5 Engineering/Technology6 English/Humanities6 Foreign Languages2 Health Professions5 Hillyer College/Humanities3 Judaic Studies1 Music3 Physics1 Political Science3 Psychology5 Sociology4 Two Year Total (1 June 1996) 74 Number of faculty trained: 74 out of a population of 320 Art History

Faculty Self-Description of Developmental Stage No significant differences were observed between AEC-trained faculty and other faculty. This suggests that AEC outcomes are not based on preferential recruitment of evangelists into the program.

Faculty Attitudes About Student Motivation AEC Faculty tend to be more optimistic that educational technology can improve student motivation to learn.

Faculty Attitudes About Student Ability AEC Faculty tend to be more optimistic that educational technology can improve student ability to learn.

Faculty Multimedia Use AEC Faculty were trained in interactive multimedia authoring. These data indicate that AEC-trained faculty exhibit much greater tendency to use multimedia.

Overall Information Technology Use

1. Faculty report ability to teach new things 2. Early data indicate improved student learning...e.g., class means increased by as much as 3 grade levels 3. AEC has created a forum on active-learning styles 4. Greatly increased cross-disciplinary collaboration 5. Changed faculty culture...increased adoption of advanced educational technology tools & learning centered pedagogies 1. Faculty report ability to teach new things 2. Early data indicate improved student learning...e.g., class means increased by as much as 3 grade levels 3. AEC has created a forum on active-learning styles 4. Greatly increased cross-disciplinary collaboration 5. Changed faculty culture...increased adoption of advanced educational technology tools & learning centered pedagogies AEC Project Outcomes

Edward Klonoski ◊ UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ◊ Donald Buckley Project Outcomes: Institutional Change in Faculty Attitudes and Technology Use in Teaching

Overview Pedagogical Feature Set of Interactive Multimedia LearningWare Interactivity fosters active learning Sensory rich information formats enable brain-based teaching/learning Communication tools promote social construction of knowledge Computers facilitate routine assessment Course Management Systems Web-delivered content Routine formative assessment Communication tools to promote cooperative learning styles Faculty Development Technology integration …to serve learning-centered pedagogies Transition to the Learning Paradigm Faculty development should be transformational & community wide Transformation Scalability

Problem with IMM Training: Scalability Authoring IMM LearningWare is a deep experience Problem …very effort intensive Faculty do become sophisticated consumers of LearningWare Another kind of authoring experience needed, to scale up and integrate pedagogies/technologies Course Management Systems?

Institutional DB CMS Database Course Management Systems: The Enabling Technology Infrastructure? Faculty ContentComm ToolsAssessment Student Experience on the Web

Some Emergent Goals for Utilizing CMS Technology: Technology-assisted Facilitation of Learning-centered Teaching Styles Content Delivery Communication Assessment Lecture Content delivery Activities Problem-based Project-based Case-based Episodic Pervasive Routine reflection within and among teams SummativeFormative Teacher-centeredLearner-centered CMS Pedagogical Tools A Continuum of Teaching Styles

A model for coupling the feature set of course management systems to learning centered principles. Smart Tutor Web-based Homework System: routine formative assessment out of class time Research Simulation Emulating the Process of Professional Investigation Revision of Class Time content delivery system from Lecture to Discovery Activities Mitigating the Coverage DilemmaDevelop Epistemological Skills Students Need to Build Meaning

The Coverage Dilemma Coverage Learning & Inquiry NOW Emphasis on Delivery of Content Emphasis on Effective Learning

A Solution to the Dilemma? GOAL Coverage Emphasis on Delivery of Content Learning & Inquiry Emphasis on Effective Learning

Can we use technology to mitigate the Coverage Dilemma ? Routine Online AssessmentIn Class Traditional Approach Web Assisted Foundational Information Inquiry-orientation and powerful pedagogies smart tutor homework