Stat 470-13 Today: Finish Chapter 3 Assignment 3: 3.14 a, b (do normal qq-plots only),c, 3.16, 3.17 Additional questions: 3.14 b (also use the IER version.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14, part D Statistical Significance. IV. Model Assumptions The error term is a normally distributed random variable and The variance of  is constant.
Advertisements

CHAPTER 2 Building Empirical Model. Basic Statistical Concepts Consider this situation: The tension bond strength of portland cement mortar is an important.
Chapter 7Design & Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1 Design of Engineering Experiments Blocking & Confounding in the 2 k Text reference, Chapter.
Chapter 14Design and Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1.
2 n Factorial Experiment 4 Factor used to Remove Chemical Oxygen demand from Distillery Spent Wash R.K. Prasad and S.N. Srivastava (2009). “Electrochemical.
Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs
1 Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Introduction The special cases of the general factorial design (Chapter 5) k factors and each factor has only.
Stat Today: Start Chapter 4 Assignment 4:.
Lecture 11 Today: 4.2 Next day: Analysis of Unreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs For cost reasons, 2 k factorial experiments are frequently unreplicated.
Stat Today: Start Chapter 10. Additional Homework Question.
Stat Today: Finish Chapter 3; Start Chapter 4 Assignment 3: 3.14 a, b (do normal qq-plots only),c, 3.16, 3.17 Additional questions: 3.14 b (also.
Today Today: Chapter 10 Sections from Chapter 10: Recommended Questions: 10.1, 10.2, 10-8, 10-10, 10.17,
Lecture 8 Last day: 3.1 Today: Next day: , Assignment #2: Chapter 2: 6, 15 (treat tape speed and laser power as qualitative factors),
Stat Today: More Chapter 3. Assessing Effect Significance For replicated experiments, can use regression to determine important effects Can also.
Lecture 14 Today: Next day: Assignment #4: Chapter (a,b), 14, 15, 23, additional question on D-optimality.
Lecture 12 Today: 4.2, Next day: more Assignment #4: Chapter (a,b), 14, 15, 23, additional question at end of these notes Due in.
Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2k Factorial Design
Analysis of Variance Chapter 3Design & Analysis of Experiments 7E 2009 Montgomery 1.
1 Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2 k Factorial Design.
Stat Today: Start Chapter 4 Assignment 4:.
= == Critical Value = 1.64 X = 177  = 170 S = 16 N = 25 Z =
Stat Today: More Chapter 3. Analysis of Location and Dispersion Effects The epitaxial growth layer experiment is a 2 4 factorial design Have looked.
Lecture 10 Last day: 3.5, , 3.10 Today: , Talk about mid-term Next day: Assignment #3: Chapter 3: 3.6, 3.7, 3.14a (use a normal probability.
Lecture 9 Last day: Today: Finish last day and start , Next day: Assignment #2: Chapter 2: 6, 15 (treat tape speed and laser power.
Incomplete Block Designs
Hypothesis Testing and T-Tests. Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Tests of Differences One.
Correlation and Regression
Text reference, Chapter 14, Pg. 525
Chapter 8Design and Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1 Design of Engineering Experiments The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference,
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Comparing Three or More Means 13.
Correlation.
DOX 6E Montgomery1 Design of Engineering Experiments Part 7 – The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference, Chapter 8 Motivation for fractional.
Chapter 4 Fractional factorial Experiments at two levels
1 Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 6 Solving Normal Equations and Estimating Estimable Model Parameters.
Design of Engineering Experiments Part 5 – The 2k Factorial Design
Two-level Factorial Designs Bacteria Example: Bacteria Example: –Response: Bill length –Factors:  B: Bacteria (Myco, Control)  T: Room Temp (Warm, Cold)
1 Blocking & Confounding in the 2 k Factorial Design Text reference, Chapter 7 Blocking is a technique for dealing with controllable nuisance variables.
Design Of Experiments With Several Factors
Analysis of Variance 1 Dr. Mohammed Alahmed Ph.D. in BioStatistics (011)
1 The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference, Chapter 8 Motivation for fractional factorials is obvious; as the number of factors becomes large.
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means.
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections Description Experiment with r treatments, and 2 blocking factors: rows (r levels) and columns (r levels)
II.3 Screening Designs in Eight Runs: Other Screening Designs in 8 runs  In addition to 5 factors in 8 runs, Resolution III designs can be used to study.
Introduction to Basic Statistical Tools for Research OCED 5443 Interpreting Research in OCED Dr. Ausburn OCED 5443 Interpreting Research in OCED Dr. Ausburn.
Lecture 13 Today: Next day: Assignment #4: Chapter (a,b), 14, 15, 23, additional question on D-optimality.
Chapter 13 Design of Experiments. Introduction “Listening” or passive statistical tools: control charts. “Conversational” or active tools: Experimental.
1 Prof. Indrajit Mukherjee, School of Management, IIT Bombay High (2 pounds ) Low (1pound) B=60 ( ) Ab=90 ( ) (1)=80 ( ) A=100.
VII. Introduction to 2 k Factorial Based Experiments A. An Overview of Experimental Design In my experience, the absolute best way to teach the text's.
The Mixed Effects Model - Introduction In many situations, one of the factors of interest will have its levels chosen because they are of specific interest.
Stat Today: More Chapter 3. Full Factorial Designs at 2 Levels Notation/terminology: 2 k experiment, where –k is the number of factors –each factor.
1 Design of Engineering Experiments – The 2 k Factorial Design Text reference, Chapter 6 Special case of the general factorial design; k factors, all at.
2 k factorial designs l Examine the response for all possible combinations of k factors at two levels l Are carried out as replicated or unreplicated experiments.
When the means of two groups are to be compared (where each group consists of subjects that are not related) then the excel two-sample t-test procedure.
Factorial Experiments
Comparing Three or More Means
Using an Add-In Based on a JMP Script to Analyze
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means
Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs
Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2k Factorial Design
Standard Normal Calculations
t distribution Suppose Z ~ N(0,1) independent of X ~ χ2(n). Then,
Comparing Three or More Means
CONCEPTS OF ESTIMATION
Design of Engineering Experiments Blocking & Confounding in the 2k
I=ABD=ACE=BCF=BCDE=ACDF=ABEF=DEF
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James.
Text reference, Chapter 8
ENM 310 Design of Experiments and Regression Analysis Chapter 3
14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors CHAPTER OUTLINE
Presentation transcript:

Stat Today: Finish Chapter 3 Assignment 3: 3.14 a, b (do normal qq-plots only),c, 3.16, 3.17 Additional questions: 3.14 b (also use the IER version of Lenth’s method and compare to the qq-plot conclusions), 3.19 Important Sections in Chapter 3: – (Read these) –3.8 (don’t bother reading), – (Read these)

Analysis of Unreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs For cost reasons, 2 k factorial experiments are frequently unreplicated Can assess significance of the factorial effects using a normal or half- normal probability plot May prefer a formal significance test procedure Cannot use an F-test or t-test because there are no degrees of freedom for error

Lenth’s Method Situation: –have performed an unreplicated 2 k factorial experiment –have 2 k -1 factorial effects –want to see which effects are significantly different from 0 If none of the effects is important, the factorial effects are an iid sample of size n= 2 k -1 from a N(, ) Can use this fact to develop an estimator of the effect variance based on the median of the absolute effects

Lenth’s Method s 0 = PSE= PSE=“pseudo standard error” t PSE,i =

Lenth’s Method Both s 0 and the PSE are estimates of the variance of an effect Use s 0 to screen out important effects from the calculation of the PSE Once you have an estimate of the standard error, can construct a t-like statistic Appendix H of text gives critical values for the t-stats Will use the IER version of Lenth’s method

Example: Original Growth Layer Experiment Effect Estimates and QQ-Plot:

Lenth’s Method s 0 = PSE= t PSE,i = Cut-off:

Blocking in 2 k Experiments The factorial experiment is an example of a completely randomized design Often wish to block such experiments As an example, you may wish to use the same paper helicopter for more than one trial But which treatments should appear together in a block?

Blocking in 2 k Experiments Consider a 2 3 factorial experiment in 2 blocks

Blocking in 2 k Experiments What is the relationship between ABC interaction and block? What if estimate block effect?

Blocking in 2 k Experiments Can use an interaction to determine which trials are performed in which blocks Drawback:

Blocking in 2 k Experiments What do the columns in the table mean for a regression model? If there was a column for the mean, what would it look like?

Blocking in 2 k Experiments What would the interaction column between the block and ABC interaction look like? Can write as:

Blocking in 2 k Experiments Presumably, blocks are important. Effect hierarchy suggest we sacrifice higher order interactions Which is better: –b=ABC –b=AB Can write as:

Blocking in 2 k Experiments Suppose wish to run the experiment in 4 blocks b 1 =AB and b 2 =BC These imply a third relation Group is called the defining contrast sub-group

Blocking in 2 k Experiments Identifies which effects are confounded with blocks Cannot tell difference between these effects and the blocking effects

Which design is better? Suppose wish to run the 2 3 experiment in 4 blocks b 1 =AB and b 2 =BC I=ABb 1 =BCb 2 =ACb 1 b 2 Suppose wish to run the 2 3 experiment in 4 blocks b 1 =ABC and b 2 =BC I=ABCb 1 =BCb 2 =Ab 1 b 2

Ranking the Designs Let D denote a blocking design g i (D) is the number of i-factor interactions confounded in blocks (i=1,2,…k) For any 2 blocking schemes (D 1 and D 2 ), let r be the smallest i such that

Ranking the Designs Effect hierarchy suggests that the design that confounds the fewest lower order terms is best So, if then D 1 has less aberration A design has minimum aberration (MA) if no design has less aberration