Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University Constructing a Case for the Proposition 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Monitoring Requirement Article 31 Article 33(2) Article 35.
Advertisements

Elements of Successful Global Fund Proposals Mazuwa Banda Department of HIV.
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I) A N INTRODUCTION TO P OLICY D EBATE - The Minnesota Urban Debate League -
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Improving Water Quality: Controlling Point and Nonpoint Sources Chapter 15 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion.
The world is too big for us. Too much is going on, too many crimes, too much violence and excitement. Try as you will, you get behind in the race in spite.
Constructing a Case for the Proposition International Debate Education Association.
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
DIA 1. Balancing expertise, societal input and political control in the production of policy advice: the Flemish Education Council as an actor of change.
Building Government Cases. Preliminary Steps Follow critical decision making. –Analyze the proposition. Look at all alternatives with as much knowledge.
INTRODUCTION TO DEBATING DBAT 101. What is a Debate?  Contest of ideas:  In relation to a change in policy – Normative debate  Assessment of past or.
Chris Girouard, Mississippi House of Representatives Refutation 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette University.
Constructing a Case for a Proposition International Debate Education Association.
Kris Stroup, Longview Community College Constructing Opposition Arguments 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Master Budgeting Chapter 8
Debate Notes: Arguments Building the Affirmative and the Negative Constructive Arguments.
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Basics of Argumentation 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette University.
1.4.1 Poverty Alleviation Project Management 1 POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROJECT MANAGEMENT UPA Package 1, Module 4.
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for the Prime Minister.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for the Prime Minister.
Advocacy Impact for Health A workshop on policy advocacy strategy development Clockwise from Top Left: PATH/Monique Berlier, PATH/Mike Wang, PATH/Mike.
HSA 171 CAR. 1436/ 7/4  The results of activities of an organization or investment over a given period of time.  Organizational Performance: ◦ A measure.
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
TAKING ACTION TO MANAGE ENERGY TAME Buildings Initiative.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
Building Leadership Capacity to Remove Racial Barriers to Student Achievement.
China Debate Education Network Combining Arguments Coherently.
Stock Issues of Proposition of Policy. Stock issues: are hunting grounds for arguments. They provide the general phrasing of potential issues that correspond.
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for Leader of Opposition Note: Constructing arguments is not the only job of the First Opposition,
Community Resources Assessment Training 3-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 3-2.
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Building Opposition Cases In Parliamentary Debate
GRANT WRITING Find the right grant and win the funding!!
School Development Goal Development “Building a Learning Community”
Profit Planning Chapter 9 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
10 February “FP6 Networks of excellence” Colette Renier Research DG.
Profit Planning Chapter 8 PowerPoint Authors:
Constructing a Case for the Opposition International Debate Education Association.
Building Leadership Capacity to Remove Racial Barriers to Student Achievement.
H. B. A. Olaiya, M.A. University of the West of England
Developing a national governance framework for health promotion in Scottish hospitals Lorna Smith Senior Health Improvement Programme Officer NHS Health.
Types of Information P1 – Explain how organisations use information By.
Constructing Opposition Arguments International Debate Education Association Prepared for IDEA Youth Forum Summer, 2010 Prepared by Robert Trapp Willamette.
Higher Education: An Investment in West Virginia’s Future
THE AFF – BURDEN AND STRUCTURE
Project Management Processes
Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation
Advocacy Impact for Health
The Gender Analysis Process in Food For Peace Development Programs
Overview of funding opportunities Calls
Debate: The Basics.
TIP E-Studies: Macroeconomics
The Affirmative Adapted from:.
12/8/2018 Title Page.
Four Step Refutation International Debate Education Association
Constructing a Case for a Proposition
Constructing a Case for a Proposition
Lobby and Advocacy of Business Chambers and Associations
Research for advocacy.
Negative Attacks.
Advocacy Impact for Health
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I)
Building Affirmative Case Template
Recommendations from HIPSSA Forum on UAS
Debate.
The British Parliamentary Debate Format
Presentation transcript:

Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University Constructing a Case for the Proposition 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette University

Principles of Case Construction A case for the proposition is one or more arguments that support the framework presented by the team defending the proposition Two common methods of constructing a case: – Comparative Advantages Case – Need—Plan—Benefits Case

Comparative Advantages Case Present a plan of action Present the advantages of your plan – Name the advantage (your claim) – Show why the current system is unable to achieve the advantage – Show why your plan is able to achieve the advantage – Demonstrate the importance of your advantages

Plan of Action Who or what is the appropriate actor? Who or what should implement your plan? What specific actions do you propose? What other important details are needed? (Funding, enforcement, etc.)

Present the Advantages of the Plan Show that the current system cannot attain your advantages. What is the cause of the problem (who or what is to blame)? How is the cause of the problem associated with current policy? – Does the current policy contain gaps? – Does the current policy contain barriers?

Show that your plan of action creates the advantages. How does your plan alleviate the cause of the problem? How does your plan fill the “gap” or eliminate the “barriers?”

Demonstrate the importance of your advantages... Quantitatively Qualitatively