GCSS BLCWG update Chris Bretherton, BLCWG Chair Thanks to Andy Ackerman (LES case leader) Margreet vanZanten/Bjorn Stevens SCM and LES case participants.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Advertisements

BBOS meeting on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, 7 November 2008 De Roode, S. R. and A. Los, QJRMS, Corresponding paper available from
Veldhoven, Large-eddy simulation of stratocumulus – cloud albedo and cloud inhomogeneity Stephan de Roode (1,2) & Alexander Los (2)
A new unified boundary-layer scheme for RACMO: The DualM-TKE scheme Stephan de Roode with contributions from Geert Lenderink Roel Neggers Reinder Ronda.
Impacts of Large-scale Controls and Internal Processes on Low Clouds
Modeling Stratocumulus Clouds: From Cloud Droplet to the Meso-scales Stephan de Roode Clouds, Climate & Air Quality Multi-Scale Physics (MSP), Faculty.
A Cloud Resolving Model with an Adaptive Vertical Grid Roger Marchand and Thomas Ackerman - University of Washington, Joint Institute for the Study of.
GFDL Geophysical Fluid Dynamics GFDL Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey AM2 cloud sensitivity to details of convection and cloud.
Preliminary Experiments with a Dynamics-Based PDF Parameterization for Boundary Layers and Associated Clouds in GCMs Leo Donner, Huan Guo, and Chris Golaz.
Simulation of Cloud Droplets in Parameterized Shallow Cumulus During RICO and ICARTT Knut von Salzen 1, Richard Leaitch 2, Nicole Shantz 3, Jonathan Abbatt.
What controls the climatological PBL depth? Brian Medeiros Alex Hall Bjorn Stevens UCLA Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences 16th Symposium on.
© Crown copyright Met Office Cloud parametrization: current issues relating to microphysics Adrian Lock.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Effect of Turbulence on Cloud Microstructure,
IACETH Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science Boundary Layer parametrisation in the climate model ECHAM5-HAM Colombe Siegenthaler - Le Drian, Peter.
Boundary layer parameterization and climate Chris Bretherton University of Washington.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 RF01/RF02: LES sensitivity studies Adrian Lock and Eoin Whelan.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Stratocumulus Adrian Lock.
RF02 SCM Intercomparison Coordinators: Matt Wyant and Chris Bretherton, UW Results submitted to date by: Andreas Chlond, MPI-Hamburg Hitoru Kitagawa, JMA.
Large-Eddy Simulation of a stratocumulus to cumulus transition as observed during the First Lagrangian of ASTEX Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen.
The representation of stratocumulus with eddy diffusivity closure models Stephan de Roode KNMI.
A dual mass flux framework for boundary layer convection Explicit representation of cloud base coupling mechanisms Roel Neggers, Martin Köhler, Anton Beljaars.
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Introduction 2) The methodology of the inter-comparison 3) Phase 1 : cases study Inter-comparison of numerical models.
Stephan de Roode (KNMI) Entrainment in stratocumulus clouds.
Update on model developments: Meteo-France NWP model / clouds and turbulence CLOUDNET workshop / Paris 27-28/05/2002 Jean-Marcel Piriou Centre National.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise 9-24 October 2001 Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University of Washington) Chris Fairall, Taneil.
Budgets of second order moments for cloudy boundary layers 1 Systematische Untersuchung höherer statistischer Momente und ihrer Bilanzen 1 LES der atmosphärischen.
Yanjun Jiao and Colin Jones University of Quebec at Montreal September 20, 2006 The Performance of the Canadian Regional Climate Model in the Pacific Ocean.
The ASTEX Lagrangian model intercomparison case Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen TU Delft, Netherlands.
Corrective Dynamics for Atmospheric Single Column Models J. Bergman, P. Sardeshmukh, and C. Penland NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center With special.
Forecast simulations of Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus with CAM3 and CAM3-UW. Cécile Hannay (1), Jeffrey Kiehl (1), Dave Williamson (1), Jerry Olson (1),
Lecture 15, Slide 1 Physical processes affecting stratocumulus Siems et al
Evaluating forecasts of the evolution of the cloudy boundary layer using radar and lidar observations Andrew Barrett, Robin Hogan and Ewan O’Connor Submitted.
RICO Modeling Studies Group interests RICO data in support of studies.
1. Introduction Boundary-layer clouds are parameterized in general circulation model (GCM), but simulated in Multi-scale Modeling Framework (MMF) and.
1 Large Eddy Simulation of Stable Boundary Layers with a prognostic subgrid TKE equation 8 th Annual Meeting of the EMS, Amsterdam, 2008 Stephan R. de.
Sensitivity to the PBL and convective schemes in forecasts with CAM along the Pacific Cross-section Cécile Hannay, Jeff Kiehl, Dave Williamson, Jerry Olson,
T. Bergot - Météo-France CNRM/GMME 1) Methodology 2) Results for Paris-CdG airport Improved site-specific numerical model of fog and low clouds -dedicated.
Simulating Stratocumulus clouds sensitivity to representation of: Drizzle Cloud top entrainment Cloud-Radiation interaction Large scale subsidence Vertical.
© Crown copyright Met Office CGILS: Met Office LES results Adrian Lock, Met Office, UK.
Yuqing Wang and Chunxi Zhang International Pacific Research Center University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
A dual mass flux scheme for shallow cumulus convection Results for GCSS RICO Roel Neggers, Martin Köhler, Anton Beljaars.
The set up of the RICO intercomparison case Louise Nuijens, A. Pier Siebesma and Margreet van Zanten Photo courtesy Bjorn Stevens KNMI and Wageningen University,
LES modeling of precipitation in Boundary Layer Clouds and parameterisation for General Circulation Model O. Geoffroy J.L. Brenguier CNRM/GMEI/MNPCA.
A Thermal Plume Model for the Boundary Layer Convection: Representation of Cumulus Clouds C. RIO, F. HOURDIN Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, CNRS,
Development and testing of the moist second-order turbulence-convection model including transport equations for the scalar variances Ekaterina Machulskaya.
CGILS Updated Results GCSS-BLCWG Meeting, September 29-30, 2010 KNMI Minghua Zhang, Chris Bretherton, Peter Blossey Phil Austin, Julio Bacmeister, Sandrine.
CGILS Updated Results GCSS-BLCWG Meeting, September 29-30, 2010 KNMI Minghua Zhang (Stony Brook University) Julio Bacmeister, Sandrine Bony, Chris Bretherton,
Observational constraints on aerosol indirect effects and controlling processes Robert Wood, Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington.
Limits to Aerosol Indirect Effects in marine low clouds
MODELING OF SUBGRID-SCALE MIXING IN LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF SHALLOW CONVECTION Dorota Jarecka 1 Wojciech W. Grabowski 2 Hanna Pawlowska 1 Sylwester Arabas.
Stephan de Roode The art of modeling stratocumulus clouds.
© Crown copyright Met Office CFMIP-GCSS Intercomparison of SCM/LES (CGILS) Results for the HadGEM2 SCM Mark Webb and Adrian Lock (Met Office) EUCLIPSE/GCSS.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Precipitating Shallow Cumulus Case Intercomparison For the 9th GCSS Boundary Layer Cloud Workshop, September 2006, GISS.
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Methodology 2) The assimilation procedures at local scale 3) Results for the winter season Improved Site-Specific.
Integration of models and observations of aerosol-cloud interactions Robert Wood University of Washington Robert Wood University of Washington.
Forecasts of Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus with the NCAR, GFDL and ECMWF models. Cécile Hannay (1), Dave Williamson (1), Jim Hack (1), Jeff Kiehl (1),
Investigating Cloud Inhomogeneity using CRM simulations.
Multiscale aspects of cloud-resolving simulations over complex terrain
Vertical resolution of numerical models
Understanding warm rain formation using CloudSat and the A-Train
Integration of models and observations of aerosol-cloud interactions
VEPIC Update Goals and methods Targeted extended time observations
Group interests RICO data required
Entrainment rates in stratocumulus computed from a 1D TKE model
The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison
Cloud-topped boundary layer response time scales in MLM and LES
Integration of models and observations of aerosol-cloud interactions
VEPIC Update Goals and methods Targeted extended time observations
Group interests RICO data in support of studies
Presentation transcript:

GCSS BLCWG update Chris Bretherton, BLCWG Chair Thanks to Andy Ackerman (LES case leader) Margreet vanZanten/Bjorn Stevens SCM and LES case participants Other BLCWG attendees

RF01 case: LES (Stevens et al MWR) 10 groups submitted 16 LES runs. Observed cloud deepens and thickens very slightly in 8 hrs with well-constrained w e = 0.35 cm s -1. Almost all LES models predict w e to within 30% (good) but most considerably underestimate LWP.

A subset (4 of 16 LESs) predicted LWP better. These models used subgrid schemes which strongly inhibited SGS vertical mixing within the inversion layer. Their w e and turbulent velocity variance profiles were also most consistent with observations. Red obs GreenLES full range BlueLES interquartile range LES mean UCLA-0 (no SGS) UCLA-1 (Smagorinsky SGS)

RF01 SCM LWP and entrainment evolution Within an hour, 10 SCMs diverge toward a wide range of LWP bracketing obs. After this time, in most SCMs, LWP quasisteady with w e within 50% of observed. Most SCMs similar at high vs. normal resolution, correctly predict no drizzle.

DYCOMS RF02 nocturnal drizzling stratocumulus N d ~ cm -3

Participating SCMs NameSCMTurbulenceCld. Frac. Microphys. AustinCCCMa4? ChlondECHAM4-5 moist TKE + w e pdfSundquist KitagawaJMA 1 st -order KRH-pdfSundquist LappenCAM3 [CAM3+UW] Nonlocal, sfc-based. K-profile, explicit-w e RH/stab RH Autoconv./coll., N = 65 cm -3 Larson2GPDF-HOC From pdfKhair.-Kogan w. joint pdf LockUKMO Nonlocal, explicit-w e RH-pdfAutoconv./coll., N = 100 cm -3 MenonGISS SCM Dry adjustmentRH/stabAutoconv./coll. (del Genio) Roode RACMO [EC CY23R4] K-profile, explicit-w e Tiedtke Sundquist, P  LWC

Surface drizzle vs. LWP Diverse sensitivities. Microphysical parameterizations or droplet size assumptions?

Cloud-base drizzle vs. LWP

Precip vs. no-precip sensitivity studies In drizzly models (except JMA), LWP increased substantially by drizzle suppression.

Discussion Small revisions to case (N d, u, fixed fluxes); revised submissions due Aug. 1 (must include real drizzle). WG preferred not to initiate new case or meeting yet; better to digest results we have and try to improve model performance on these two cases. Provides an opportunity for simplified microphysics-only intercomparison in a specified flow field. Lots of interest in a RICO case when obs. are mature, and in some global GCM sensitivity studies (perhaps in intercomparison mode, perhaps using Pacific x-sect) to drizzle and sedimentation in boundary layer cloud.