JEFS Project Update And its Implications for the UW MURI Effort Cliff Mass Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
PRESENTS: FORECASTING FOR OPERATIONS AND DESIGN February 16 th 2011 – Aberdeen.
A Brief Guide to MDL's SREF Winter Guidance (SWinG) Version 1.0 January 2013.
SPC Potential Products and Services and Attributes of Operational Supporting NWP Probabilistic Outlooks of Tornado, Severe Hail, and Severe Wind.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006ESWWIII, Royal Library of Belgium, Brussels, Nov 15 th 2006 Forecasting uncertainty: the ensemble solution Mike Keil, Ken Mylne,
Mesoscale Probabilistic Prediction over the Northwest: An Overview Cliff Mass Adrian Raftery, Susan Joslyn, Tilmann Gneiting and others University of Washington.
2012: Hurricane Sandy 125 dead, 60+ billion dollars damage.
Mesoscale Probabilistic Prediction over the Northwest: An Overview Cliff Mass University of Washington.
Mesoscale Probabilistic Prediction over the Northwest: An Overview Cliff Mass University of Washington.
Description and Preliminary Evaluation of the Expanded UW S hort R ange E nsemble F orecast System Maj. Tony Eckel, USAF University of Washington Atmospheric.
Real-Time ROMS Ensembles and adaptive sampling guidance during ASAP Sharanya J. Majumdar RSMAS/University of Miami Collaborators: Y. Chao, Z. Li, J. Farrara,
1 WRF Development Test Center A NOAA Perspective WRF ExOB Meeting U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. 28 April 2006 Fred Toepfer NOAA Environmental.
Performance Characteristics of a Pseudo-operational Ensemble Kalman Filter April 2006, EnKF Wildflower Meeting Greg Hakim & Ryan Torn University of Washington.
Update on the Regional Modeling System NASA Roses Meeting April 13, 2007.
Update on the Regional Modeling System NASA Roses Meeting April 13, 2007.
ASSIMILATION of RADAR DATA at CONVECTIVE SCALES with the EnKF: PERFECT-MODEL EXPERIMENTS USING WRF / DART Altuğ Aksoy National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Update on the Regional Modeling System Cliff Mass, David Ovens, Richard Steed, Mark Albright, Phil Regulski, Jeff Baars, David Carey Northwest Weather.
Statistics, data, and deterministic models NRCSE.
Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington
Update on the Regional Modeling System Cliff Mass, David Ovens, Richard Steed, Mark Albright, Phil Regulski, Jeff Baars, Eric Grimit.
Joint Ensemble Forecast System (JEFS) NCAR Sep 2005.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
The Puget Sound Regional Environmental Prediction System: An Update.
JEFS Status Report Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Cliff Mass, Jeff Baars, David Carey JEFS Workshop, August
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Francesca Marcucci, Lucio Torrisi with the contribution of Valeria Montesarchio, ISMAR-CNR CNMCA, National Meteorological Center,Italy First experiments.
1 LAM EPS Workshop, Madrid, 3-4 October 2002 Ken Mylne and Kelvyn Robertson Met Office Poor Man's EPS experiments and LAMEPS plans at the Met Office.
Grid for Coupled Ensemble Prediction (GCEP) Keith Haines, William Connolley, Rowan Sutton, Alan Iwi University of Reading, British Antarctic Survey, CCLRC.
SRNWP workshop - Bologne Short range ensemble forecasting at Météo-France status and plans J. Nicolau, Météo-France.
Forecasting and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) NOWcasting Description of atmospheric models Specific Models Types of variables and how to determine.
Warn on Forecast Briefing September 2014 Warn on Forecast Brief for NCEP planning NSSL and GSD September 2014.
ESA DA Projects Progress Meeting 2University of Reading Advanced Data Assimilation Methods WP2.1 Perform (ensemble) experiments to quantify model errors.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Interactive Forecast Visualization Tools for the U.S. Armed Forces
Fly - Fight - Win 16 th Weather Squadron Evan Kuchera Fine Scale Models and Ensemble 16WS/WXN Template: 28 Feb 06 Air Force Weather Ensembles.
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
Forecasting Streamflow with the UW Hydrometeorological Forecast System Ed Maurer Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington Pacific Northwest.
Celeste Saulo and Juan Ruiz CIMA (CONICET/UBA) – DCAO (FCEN –UBA)
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM 27th EWGLAM & 12th SRNWP Meetings Ljubljana, October 2005.
Course Evaluation Closes June 8th.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
. Outline  Evaluation of different model-error schemes in the WRF mesoscale ensemble: stochastic, multi-physics and combinations thereof  Where is.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
The Challenge of Mesoscale Probabilistic Weather Prediction and Communication Cliff Mass University of Washington.
POTENTIAL THESIS TOPICS Professor Russell L. Elsberry January 26, 2006 Graduate School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Department of Meteorology, Naval.
APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL MODELS IN THE FORECAST PROCESS - FROM NATIONAL CENTERS TO THE LOCAL WFO David W. Reynolds National Weather Service WFO San Francisco.
Slides for NUOPC ESPC NAEFS ESMF. A NOAA, Navy, Air Force strategic partnership to improve the Nation’s weather forecast capability Vision – a national.
Insights from CMC BAMS, June Short Range The SPC Short-Range Ensemble Forecast (SREF) is constructed by post-processing all 21 members of the NCEP.
Statistical Post Processing - Using Reforecast to Improve GEFS Forecast Yuejian Zhu Hong Guan and Bo Cui ECM/NCEP/NWS Dec. 3 rd 2013 Acknowledgements:
Adaptive Observation Techniques ENSEMBLE TRANSFORM KALMAN FILTER SINGULAR VECTORS Sensitive areas for adaptive sampling include both the hurricane core.
Fly - Fight - Win 2 d Weather Group Mr. Evan Kuchera HQ AFWA 2 WXG/WEA Template: 28 Feb 06 Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited AFWA Ensemble.
1 Aviation Forecasting – Works in Progress NCVF – Ceiling & Visibility CoSPA – Storm Prediction A Joint Effort Among: MIT Lincoln Laboratory NCAR – National.
MPO 674 Lecture 2 1/20/15. Timeline (continued from Class 1) 1960s: Lorenz papers: finite limit of predictability? 1966: First primitive equations model.
Fly - Fight - Win 2 d Weather Group Mr. Evan Kuchera HQ AFWA 2 WXG/WEA Template: 28 Feb 06 Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited AFWA Ensemble.
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
The application of ensemble Kalman filter in adaptive observation and information content estimation studies Junjie Liu and Eugenia Kalnay July 13th, 2007.
DET Module 1 Ensemble Configuration Linda Wharton 1, Paula McCaslin 1, Tara Jensen 2 1 NOAA/GSD, Boulder, CO 2 NCAR/RAL, Boulder, CO 3/8/2016.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
Figures from “The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System”
1 James D. Doyle and Clark Amerault Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA James D. Doyle and Clark Amerault Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA Sensitivity.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
University of Washington Ensemble Systems for Probabilistic Analysis and Forecasting Cliff Mass, Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
University of Washington Modeling Infrastructure Available for Olympex
A Northwest Consortium for Regional Climate Modelling
Model Post Processing.
Mesoscale Probabilistic Prediction over the Northwest: An Overview
WMO NWP Wokshop: Blending Breakout
Presentation transcript:

JEFS Project Update And its Implications for the UW MURI Effort Cliff Mass Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington

ENSEMBLES AHEAD

Joint Ensemble Forecast System (JEFS) NCAR

Prove the value, utility, and operational feasibility of ensemble forecasting to DoD operations. Deterministic Forecasting ? Ignores forecast uncertainty Potentially very misleading Oversells forecast capability Reveals forecast uncertainty Yields probabilistic information Enables optimal decision making Ensemble Forecasting …etc JEFS’ Goal

JEFSTEAMJEFSTEAM & AFIT

Description: Combination of current GFS and NOGAPS global, medium-range ensemble data. Possible expansion to include ensembles from CMC, UKMET, JMA, etc. Initial Conditions: Breeding of Growing Modes 1 Model Variations/Perturbations: Two unique models, but no model perturbations Model Window: Global Grid Spacing: 1.0  1.0  (~80 km) Number of Members: 40 at 00Z 30 at 12Z Forecast Length/Interval: 10 days/12 hours Timing Cycle Times: 00Z and 12Z Products by: 07Z and 19Z 1 Toth, Zoltan, and Eugenia Kalnay, 1997: Ensemble Forecasting at NCEP and the Breeding Method. Monthly Weather Review: Vol. 125, No. 12, pp. 3297–3319. Joint Global Ensemble (JGE)

5 km 15 km Description: Multiple high resolution, mesoscale model runs generated at FNMOC and AFWA Initial Conditions: Ensemble Transform Filter 2 run on short-range (6-h), mesoscale data assimilation cycle driven by GFS and NOGAPS ensemble members Model variations/perturbations: Multimodel: WRF-ARW, COAMPS Varied-model: various configurations of physics packages Perturbed-model: randomly perturbed sfc boundary conditions (e.g., SST) Model Window: East Asia Grid Spacing: 15 km for baseline JME 5 km nest later in project Number of Members: 30 (15 run at each DC site) Forecast Length/Interval: 60 hours/3 hours Timing Cycle Times: 06Z and 18Z Products by: 14Z and 02Z ~7 h production /cycle 2 Wang, Xuguang, and Craig H. Bishop, 2003: A Comparison of Breeding and Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter Ensemble Forecast Schemes. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences: Vol. 60, No. 9, pp. 1140–1158. Joint Mesoscale Ensemble (JME)

UW MURI Contributions UW team making major contributions to the JEFS mesoscale system including: Observation-based bias correction on a grid Localized BMA Work on a variety of output products

NCAR Contributions Ensemble Model Perturbations a. Improvement of multi-model approach (0.5 FTE) The current method to account for model uncertainty in the JME, developed by NCAR in FY06, includes a multi-model component (i.e., each ensemble member represents a unique model configuration or combination of physics schemes) and perturbations to the surface boundary conditions (SST, albedo, roughness length, moisture availability). This method will be further improved by the following additions. 1) Incorporation of additional physics schemes. 2) Tuning of sea surface temperature (SST) perturbation. 3) Addition of soil condition perturbation. (0.25 FTE)

NCAR Contributions Development of new approaches 1) Multiple-parameter (single-model) approach. NCAR shall examine the representation of model uncertainty through the use of a single, fixed set of model physics schemes in which various internal parameters and "constants" of each scheme are varied among the ensemble members. 2) Stochastic-model approach. NCAR shall adapt to WRF a stochastic modeling approach (stochastic physics or stochastic kinetic energy backscatter). 3) Hybrid approach. As the most straightforward hybrid method, NCAR shall apply the developed stochastic-model approach on top of the multi-model approach.

NCAR Evaluation of approaches (0.4 FTE) MMM shall evaluate the different approaches for diversity that properly represent model uncertainty. Determination of best approach and assistance with implementation

UW Contributions 2007 Ensemble Post-processing Calibration The University of Washington Atmospheric Sciences Department (UW) on developing algorithms for post-processing calibration of mesoscale ensembles. This development effort is crucial for optimizing the skill of ensemble products and maximizing JME utility. The UW shall: a. Expand model bias correction. The observation- based, grid bias correction developed in FY06 for 2-m temperature will be extended to additional variables of interest to include, but not be limited to, 2-m humidity, 10-m winds, and cumulative precipitation (rain and snow). b. Develop ensemble spread correction. The prototype Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) post-processing system developed in FY06 shall be fully developed for the same variables as noted for bias correction. c. Evaluate developments. The UW shall evaluate these calibration techniques to determine the gain in ensemble forecast skill.

UW JEFS 3.3 Ensemble Products and Applications For FY07, NCAR/MMM shall continue subcontract work with UW on developing JME products and applications. The UW, under direction of NCAR, shall develop the following prototypes. These deliverables are initial efforts that do not require delivery of finalized software and documentation. a. Extreme forecast index. The UW shall research state- of-art methods for calculating an ensemble-based extreme forecast index and develop a prototype capability for the JME. This essentially is the process of comparing the current ensemble forecast with the ensemble model’s “climatology” to determine the likelihood of an extreme event, one that might not even be represented within the ensemble. b. General user interface. The UW shall build a web- based, interactive JME interface for the general DoD user designed to provide basic stochastic weather forecast information. This will be similar in nature to the current Probcast interface ( except geared to address the specific interests of military operations (e.g., probability of low ceiling and visibility).

UW Contributions The UW team will expand in 2007 to include several members of the UW Statistics Deparment. Potential for further expansion in FY 2008.

Tailor products to customers’ needs and weather sensitivities Forecaster Products/Applications  Design to help transition from deterministic to stochastic thinking Warfighter Products/Applications  Design to aid critical decision making (Operational Risk Management) Product Strategy UW will aid in developing some of these products

PACIFIC AIR FORCES Forecasters 20 th Operational Weather Squadron 17 th Operational Weather Squadron 607 Weather Squadron Warfighters PACAF 5 th Air Force Naval Pacific Meteorological and Oceanographic Center Forecasters Yokosuka Navy Base Warfighters 7 th Fleet FIFTH Air Force SEVENTH Fleet Operational Testing & Evaluation

Forecaster Products/Applications

Consensus (isopleths): shows “best guess” forecast (ensemble mean or median) Model Confidence (shaded) Increase Spread in Less Decreased confidence the multiple forecasts Predictability in forecast Maximum Potential Error (mb, +/-) <1 Consensus & Confidence Plot

Probability of occurrence of any weather phenomenon/threshold (i.e., sfc wnds > 25 kt ) Clearly shows where uncertainty can be exploited in decision making Can be tailored to critical sensitivities, or interactive (as in IGRADS on JAAWIN) % Probability Plot

Current Deterministic Meteogram Show the range of possibilities for all meteogram-type variables Box & whisker, or confidence interval plot is more appropriate for large ensembles Excellent tool for point forecasting (deterministic or stochastic) Multimeteogram

Probability of Warning Criteria at Osan AB What is the potential risk to the mission? When is a warning required? 11/18 12/ / /00 06 Valid Time (Z) 90% CI Extreme Min Extreme Max Surface Wind Speed at Misawa AB Mean Valid Time (Z) Requires paradigm shift into “stochastic thinking” Sample JME Products

Warfighter Products/Applications

Integrated Weather Effects Decision Aid (IWEDA) Deterministic Forecast > 13kt 10-13kt 0-9kt Weapon System Weather Thresholds* Drop Zone Surface Winds 6kt *AFI ? Stochastic Forecast Binary Decisions/Actions Bombs on Target Go / No Go AR Route Clear & 7 Crosswinds In / Out of Limits T-Storm Within 5 Flight Hazards IFR / VFR GPS Scintillation Bridging the Gap 10% 20% 70% Stochastic Forecast Drop Zone Surface Winds 6kt kt Probabilistic IWEDA -- for Operational Risk Management (ORM)

Method #2: Weather Risk Analysis and Portrayal (WRAP)