A. Bay Beijing October 20051 Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Advertisements

1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Discovering the Unknown at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Amy Gladwin University of Arizona.
Neil Collins Birmingham Masterclass Tuesday 24 April 2007 ATLAS and the LHC.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
1 Where to Search for the Higgs  A direct search for the Higgs was carried out by the four LEP experiments from CMS energy of GeV The.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Introduction to Accelerators Eric Torrence University of Oregon QuartNet 2005 Special Thanks to Bernd Surrow
The Linear Collider – accelerator design A particle beam accelerator is a microscope – the resolution is inversely proportional to the energy of the beams.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Physics of Particle Accelerators Kalanand Mishra Department of Physics University of Cincinnati.
Chapter 2 Particle accelerators: From basic to applied research Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Version E1.0.
Particle Physics: Status and Perspectives Part 3: Accelerators Manfred Jeitler.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex.
Partikeldagarna, Göteborg 21 September 2007 LHC: Status and Plans Lyn Evans.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 The Large Hadron Collider LHC is located at CERN CERN is located near Geneva Part of CERN is in France The LHC collides.
High gradient acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Rüdiger Schmidt1 The LHC collider project I Rüdiger Schmidt - CERN SUSSP Sumer School St.Andrews Challenges LHC accelerator physics LHC technology Operation.
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Adams Accelerator Institute 10 - E. Wilson - 1/24/ Slide 1 Lecture 14 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2004 E. J. N. Wilson.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh 15th Novemebr 2008 Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Unit 2 Magnets for circular accelerators: the interaction regions Ezio Todesco European Organization for.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Photon-Photon Colliders ( Photon-Photon Colliders (  C) Mayda M. Velasco.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Please check out: K. Ohmi et al., IPAC2014, THPRI003 & THPRI004 A. Bogomyagkov, E. Levichev, P. Piminov, IPAC2014, THPRI008 Work in progress FCC-ee accelerator.
CERN’s Large Hadron Collider
CERN Large Hadron Collider
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
contribution to the round table discussion
Particle Colliders at CERN present and future
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Future Collider Projects at CERN
Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?
The Status of the LHC machine
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Hunting the Higgs Boson at the CERN Large Hadron Collider
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Lecture 3 - Magnets and Transverse Dynamics I
Other issues and concepts under study Conclusions References
CSP Meeting CERN CERN Accelerators in th November 2010
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
potential CERN facilities to study proton-driven plasma acceleration
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
LS 1 start date 12th June Schedule Extension 2012 run Extension of 2012 run approved by the DG on 3rd July 2012.
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength = 1/p => increase energy of probes. target r p probe The collider is the most efficient way to get the max usable energy: collider with fixed target of mass m 2 (E cm ) 2 =

A. Bay Beijing October General structure RF from Klystrons In addition: sophisticated instrumentation for the control of the orbit

A. Bay Beijing October A cavity 

A. Bay Beijing October Energies of Colliders vs time LHC: starting date 2007

A. Bay Beijing October Max Energy limiting factors * Need powerful magnets to curb the orbit * Synchrotron radiation in a machine of radius r and energy E goes like E 4 : Suppose you want an energy of 500 GeV. With electrons you must increase the klystron power by ~ (500/50) 4 ! Consider like baseline design the LEP machine with a radius of 4.3 km. At 50 GeV/beam the power dissipated is of the order of W per electron. There are ~ electrons in the LEP => 10 5 W needed from the klystrons. 2 possibilities: use protons (m p =2000m e ) or increase r.

A. Bay Beijing October The proton collider Because the p is a composite particle the total beam E cannot be completely exploited. The elementary collisions are between quarks or gluons which pick up only a fraction x of the momentum: proton quarks spectators quarks spectators p2p2 p1p1 x1p1x1p1 x2p2x2p2 momentum available is only x 1 p 1 + x 2 p 2

A. Bay Beijing October Luminosity Interaction rate for a process of cross-section  rate [s  ] =  L The luminosity of a collider is proportional to the currents of the 2 beams I 1, I 2, and inversely proportional to their section A, n i are the number of particles per bunch, b the number of bunches, f the frequency of the orbit. For gaussian bunch profiles: yy xx

A. Bay Beijing October Example: LEP

A. Bay Beijing October Example of L calculation for LEP I= 1.38 and 1.52 mA e=  C b = 8... close to the real (measured) value of ~

A. Bay Beijing October Example of rate calculation for LEP Cross sections for processes at the Z peak: where from rate [s  ] =  L assuming we obtain an hadronic rate of 0.3 s  In one year 3x10 7 s, assuming that the system is on duty for 1/3 of the time, we have an "integrated luminosity" of 10 7 x = cm   10 5  nb  The number of hadronic events/year is ~

A. Bay Beijing October Luminosity vs time

A. Bay Beijing October The Large Hadron Collider Build a 7 GeV/beam machine in the LEP tunnel.

A. Bay Beijing October LHC LHCb point 8 LHCb Pb Geneva jet d'eau Alps Leman lake

A. Bay Beijing October viewed from the sky on July 13, 2005 Jet d’eau ALTAS surface buildings CERN Genève Salève new wood building

A. Bay Beijing October LHC magnets ~1650 main magnets (~1000 produced) + a lot more other magnets 1232 cryogenic dipole magnets (~800 produced, 70 installed): –each 15-m long, will occupy together ~70% of LHC’s circumference ! Lowering of 1st dipole into the tunnel (March 2005) B fields of 8.3 T in opposite directions for each proton beam Cold mass (1.9 K) Joining things up Cryogenic services line

A. Bay Beijing October LHC schedule —Beam commissioning starting in Summer 2007 —Short very-low luminosity “pilot run” in 2007 used to debug/calibrate detectors, no (significant) physics —First physics run in 2008, at low luminosity (10 32 –10 33 cm –2 s –1 ) —Reaching the design luminosity of cm –2 s –1 will take until 2010

A. Bay Beijing October LHC parameters —Ecm = 14 TeV —Luminosity ~ cm -2 s -1 generated with — protons/bunch —  t = 25 ns bunch crossing —bunch transverse size ~15  m —bunch longitudinal size ~ 8cm — crossing angle  =200 mrad The proton current is ~1A, ~500 Mjoules/beam (100kg TNT) 25 ns  detector

A. Bay Beijing October CLIC The Compact LInear Collider CLIC is the name of a novel technique to produce the RF required for acceleration, based on a Two Beam Acceleration (TBA) system. The goal is to have a gradient of acceleration of the order of 150 MeV/m. Aa GeV machine would be 5 km long sub-nanometer beam !!!!!!!!! 30 GHz

A. Bay Beijing October CLIC electron beam to be accelerated Low E, very high intensity beam used to produce RF

A. Bay Beijing October The CLIC idea A gradient of 150 MeV/m requires a RF of ~30 GHz. Klystrons are limited at ~10 GHz => go to TBA: 1) create a beam of ~ 1 GeV electrons made of bunches 64 cm apart 2) reorganize in time the bunches so that they are 2 cm apart: this corresponds to 0.67 ns at the speed of light 3) send the bunches into passive microwave devices (Power Extraction and Transfer Structure, PETS) where a 30 GHz radio-wave is excited and then transferred by short waveguides to the main accelerator.

A. Bay Beijing October CLIC Test Facility 3 CTF3 Produce a bunched 35 A electron beam to excite 30 GHz PETS. Accelerate a 150 MeV electron beam up to 0.51 GeV

A. Bay Beijing October CTF3 first phase has proven the possibility to reduce the pulse spacing to the nominal value of 0.67 ps.

A. Bay Beijing October Nanometer size beam Requires a nanometric stability of all the components, in particular the last quadrupole. geophone Need to fight (hard) against several possible sources of vibrations (ex.: cooling liquid), ground motion, etc.

A. Bay Beijing October ground motion Stabilization Use a combination of active and passive stabilization techniques quadrupole motion 1

A. Bay Beijing October Luminosity gain w/wo stabilization ~70% of the nominal luminosity has been obtained Simulation of the beam collision behaviour

A. Bay Beijing October The experiments e + e  collisions and  collisions