Seal Analysis Jeremy Osguthorpe Mitchell Woolf Jon Blotter 7 / 12 / 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanics of Materials II
Advertisements

Optimal Shape Design of Membrane Structures Chin Wei Lim, PhD student 1 Professor Vassili Toropov 1,2 1 School of Civil Engineering 2 School of Mechanical.
Parameterizing a Geometry using the COMSOL Moving Mesh Feature
Forging Oldest metal working process. History : Sponge iron was heated and beat into a useful implement by hammering with a stone. Now : High powered hammers.
Normal Strain and Stress
Chapter 3 Mechanical Properties of Materials
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
Mesh, Loads & Boundary conditions CAD Course © Dr Moudar Zgoul,
MASTERS PROJECT FALL 2014 DAN FLAVIN 29 SEPTEMBER Springfield Rifle Bolt Analysis.
Some Ideas Behind Finite Element Analysis
Circular Plates Moments acting on an element of a deformed circular plate.
Torsional Shaft Function: transmit torques from one plane to the other. Design of torsional shafts: stress and deformation T T T.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part V
AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part III
Hydro-Forming a Steel Tube Finite Element Model Design Greg Wilmes Finite Element Method MIE 605 – Spring 2003.
Copyright © 2002J. E. Akin Rice University, MEMS Dept. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress.
Design of Scintillator Die Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Department of Mechanical Engineering Northern Illinois University.
Identified Company (CompositeX) to manufacture Custom Composite Pressure Vessel ● Working pressure 1000psi ● Holds 8 kg Nitrous Oxide ● 700 cubic inch.
Status of Coil Structural Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: ORNL: D. Williamson UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray.
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
CHAP 6 FINITE ELEMENTS FOR PLANE SOLIDS
Can Bottom Snap-through
Physics. Properties of Matter Session Session Objectives.
A Comparison of Numerical Methods and Analytical Methods in Determination of Tunnel Walls Displacement Behdeen Oraee-Mirzamani Imperial College London,
Finite Element Analysis of Mini Baja Frame Ariana L. Gonzalez April 29, 2003 MECE.
Elasticity and Strength of Materials
Project M.E.T.E.O.R. P07109: Flying Rocket Team Andrew Scarlata, Geoff Cassell, Zack Mott, Garett Pickett, Brian Whitbeck, Luke Cadin, David Hall.
Suitability of a structure or machine may depend on the deformations in the structure as well as the stresses induced under loading. Statics analyses.
Prediction of Temperature Distribution of Steady State Rolling Tires
ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis
1 Calorimeter Thermal Analysis with Increased Heat Loads September 28, 2009.
Chapter 2 Stress and Strain -- Axial Loading
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Linear Buckling Analysis
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Features: 1. 2D structural analysis (plane stress) 2. Static analysis 3. Quarter symmetric 4. SI units 5. Only the yoke is modeled 6. Material properties.
Problem 1: Structural Analysis of Signs Post University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Department of Mechanical Engineering Modified by (2008): Dr. Vijay K.
Project M.E.T.E.O.R. P07109: Flying Rocket Team
9.0 New Features Metal Shaft with Rubber Boot Workshop 7 Load Steps in Workbench.
LANDING GEAR STRUT ANALYSIS
WS8C-1 WORKSHOP 8C TENSION COUPON NAS120, Workshop 8C, November 2003.
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
Workshop 5-1 NAS101 Workshops Copyright  2001 MSC.Software Corporation WORKSHOP 5 Stiffened Plate Subjected to Pressure Load.
KAYLA KRUPER 11/30/2015 FINITE ELEMENT STUDY TO COMPARE THE PERFORMANCE OF COMPOSITE AND STEEL ANGLE BARS.
WS9A-1 WORKSHOP 9A 2½ D CLAMP – SWEEP MESHER NAS120, Workshop 9A, November 2003.
Two loading Conditions
General Analysis Procedure Chapter 4. Training Manual October 30, 2001 Inventory # Chapter 4 - General Analysis Procedure Overview The objective.
Workshop 2 Steel Bracket Modified by (2008): Dr. Vijay K. Goyal Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Puerto Rico at.
WORKSHOP 15 PARASOLID MODELING NAS120, Workshop 15, November 2003 WS15-1.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
Sri Harsha Garapati 1 Analysis of Single Fiber Pushout Test of Fiber Reinforced Composite with a Nonhomogeneous Interphase By Sri Harsha Garapati MS Mechanical.
COUPLED ANALYSES Chapter 7. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Fluid-Structure Analysis “One Way” Analysis –Structural deformation effect.
WS8A-1 WORKSHOP 8A TENSION COUPON NAS120, Workshop 8A, November 2003.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Collagen Structure and Mechanical Properties of the Human Sclera: Analysis for.
Chapter 12 Lecture 22: Static Equilibrium and Elasticity: II.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic of wafer geometry and loading considered in the analytical and 2-D finite.
Presentation Overview
Multi-objective optimization of nitinol stent design
WORKSHOP 11 PRESS FIT CAT509, Workshop 11, March 2002 WS11-1.
POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance
Outer Shell (fuel grain housing) Inner Shell (NOS/rocket housing)
Performance Evaluation of Wood and Aluminum Baseball Bats Using Finite Element Analysis James Cain 12/4/14.
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
Nonlinear Analysis: Riks Analysis.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
ENFORCED MOTION IN TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
326MAE (Stress and Dynamic Analysis) 340MAE (Extended Stress and Dynamic Analysis)
POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance
Finite Element Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Seal Analysis Jeremy Osguthorpe Mitchell Woolf Jon Blotter 7 / 12 / 2007

Project Objectives Develop a finite element model of the seal using the geometry model provided. Using generic material properties determine the displacement and stress as functions of time using 80 psi and 100 psi instantaneous pressure loads. 2

Model Assumptions Constraining Seal –The metal cage was removed from the model and the effects of the cage were applied as boundary conditions. Diaphragm Material Properties –Density = lbm/in^3 –Modulus of Elasticity = 3,500 psi –Poisson’s Ratio ≈ 0.50 –Damping Coefficient = 0.1 –Isotropic Material

Model Assumptions Loading –The pressure will reach a maximum value within sec. and then remains constant throughout the analysis. This is a perfect (instantaneous) pressure loading. A flow analysis could be done to verify this result. –A uniform pressure distribution is applied over the diaphragm

Analysis Procedure Meshed Seal –The seal was meshed using a 2D surface mesh followed by a solid tetra mesh. –The mesh element size is a result of refining the seal until there was a convergence of results.

Analysis Procedure Constraining Seal –The seal was constrained as shown in the figures. Appropriate surfaces were selected to represent the effect of the gun barrel and cage on the seal. -Constraints A were constrained in the direction of the barrel -Constraints B were constrained in the radial direction -Constraints C were constrained in all directions

Analysis Procedure Applying Pressure to the Seal –A dynamic load was applied to the appropriate surfaces of the seal as shown. The figure is a profile view of how the pressure is applied to the entire seal. –Uniform pressure loads of 80 psi and 100 psi were used in the static and transient analysis.

Static Analysis Results Original ShapeDeformed Shape

Static Analysis Results The yellow mesh represents the deformed shape and the purple represents the undeformed shape

Static Analysis Results Figure- Side view of deformed shape Figure- The yellow mesh represents the deformed shape and the purple represents the undeformed shape

Static Analysis Results Stress on the Seal –The stresses throughout the seal are shown in the figures according to color contour on the following slide –The maximum stress experienced by the seal is 3,430 psi.

Static Analysis Results Isometric view of stress contours

Transient Analysis Results Transient analysis requires large amounts of computer processing resulting in large amounts of computation time. Transient analysis of the entire seal is redundant and is avoidable due to the symmetrical geometry. A single point inside of the seal was chosen for analysis. This point was chosen because it experiences the largest displacement and is a point of interest in relation to the paintball.

Transient Analysis Results The transient results are plotted on the following slide. The load is applied at a time of seconds. The load is nearly instantaneous. The maximum displacement of the diaphragm is reached approximately 0.001sec later at a time of sec. The diaphragm oscillates for approximately 15 milliseconds and then finally settles at a displacement of 0.328”. This displacement value was also confirmed using static analysis.

Static Analysis Results Isometric view of stress contours – 100 psi

Static Analysis Results Top view of stress contours – 100 psi

Static Analysis Results Side view of stress contours – 100 psi

Transient Analysis Results Dynamic displacements - inside of the seal with a load psi

Transient Analysis Results Dynamic displacements - inside of the seal - 80 psi

Transient Analysis Nominal dimensions of seal

Transient Analysis Maximum displacement with 100 psi Seal will fully close under these conditions (inner diameter = 0.0”)

Transient Analysis Final displacement values for 100 psi Inner Diameter = 0.093”

Transient Analysis Maximum displacement values for 80 psi Inner Diameter = 0.147”

Transient Analysis Final displacement values for 80 psi Inner Diameter = 0.223”

Analysis Summary Conclusions For the 100 psi load, the maximum displacement of 0.376” was reached in ~1 msec. The steady state displacement reached at ~12 msec is ~ 0.325”. The maximum stress experienced by the seal was 3,430 psi. For the 80 psi load, the maximum displacement of 0.310” was reached in ~1 msec. The steady state displacement reached at ~10 msec is ~ 0.262”.