Physics of fusion power

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Advertisements

First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 4: Cylindrical concepts.
Chapter 28. Magnetic Field
Physics of Fusion Lecture 1: The basics Lecturer: A.G. Peeters.
PhD studies report: "FUSION energy: basic principles, equipment and materials" Birutė Bobrovaitė; Supervisor dr. Liudas Pranevičius.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 6: Conserved quantities / Mirror device / tokamak.
Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2005PHYS , Fall 2005 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1444 – Section 003 Lecture #16 Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2005 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Charged Particle.
Chapter 23 Gauss’ Law.
Nuclear Physics Year 13 Option 2006 Part 2 – Nuclear Fusion.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
Fyzika tokamaků1: Úvod, opakování1 Tokamak Physics Jan Mlynář 3. Tokamak field equilibrium Solovjev solution of the Grad-Shafranov equation, Shafranov.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 11: Diagnostics / heating.
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power Lecture 4: Cylindrical concepts.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8: Conserved quantities / mirror / tokamak.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture3 : Force on the plasma / Virial theorem.
Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Electrostatics #3 The Electric Field
Power of the Sun. Conditions at the Sun’s core are extreme –temperature is 15.6 million Kelvin –pressure is 250 billion atmospheres The Sun’s energy out.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10 : Running a discharge / diagnostics.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / some plasma physics.
1 Lecture #24 Fusion ENGR 303I. 2 Outline Fusion →Definition →Atoms usually used Previous attempts at fusion Current attempts at fusion →International.
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / Approaches to fusion.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
ELECTRICITY & MAGNETISM (Fall 2011) LECTURE # 4 BY MOEEN GHIYAS.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions G M McCracken Hefei, October 2007.
Physics of fusion power
Nils P. Basse Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA USA ABB seminar November 7th, 2005 Measurements.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
1 Electric Field – Continuous Charge Distribution As the average separation between source charges is smaller than the distance between the charges and.
Monday, Mar. 27, 2006PHYS , Spring 2006 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1444 – Section 501 Lecture #16 Monday, Mar. 27, 2006 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Sources of Magnetic.
12/03/2013, Praga 1 Plasma MHD Activity Observations via Magnetics Diagnostics: Magnetic island Analysis Magnetic island Analysis Frederik Ostyn (UGent)
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
Tritium burnup fraction C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project meeting, July 27-28, 2011 Gaithersburg, MD.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 9 : The tokamak continued.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
4. Mg islands, electric fields, plasma rotation
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 12: Diagnostics / heating.
Wednesday, Sep. 14, PHYS Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 04 Lecture #5 Chapter 21: E-field examples Chapter 22: Gauss’ Law Examples.
Electrostatics #3 The Electric Field HW #2, last page of handout.
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
1 PFC requirements  Basic requirements  Carbon based  Provisions for adding (interface design included in research prep budget)  NBI armor  Trim coil.
Plasma MHD Activity Observations via Magnetic Diagnostics Magnetic islands, statistical methods, magnetic diagnostics, tokamak operation.
The mass of the nuclei produced is less than the mass of the original two nuclei The mass deficit is changed into energy We can calculate the energy released.
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 5 Sputtering.
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
AP Physics Summer Institute Free-Response-Questions MAGNETISM.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT FUSION Zack Draper | Physics 485 November 23, 2015.
Physics of fusion power
Construction and Status of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus at SNU
Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS
UPDATE ON  LIMITS FOR ARIES-CS
Physics of fusion power
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
Figure 16.1: Illustration of a fusion reaction.
Presentation transcript:

Physics of fusion power Lecture 12: tokamak – continued

A tokamak Plasma (purple) Notice the shape Surrounded by plates Vessel (pumps) Coils mostly outside vessel (finite reaction time) Ohmic transformer / toroidal field coils (green) Schematic Drawing of the poloidal cross section of the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak

The tokamak Magnetic surfaces are the surfaces traced out by the magnetic field They are nested (best confinement) Centre is shifted outward Large passive coils Magnetic field ends on a set of plates Large set of small coils for diagnostic purposes Schematic Drawing of the poloidal cross section of the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak

Reason 1 for plasma elongation Plasma can be diverted onto a set of plates Close to the coils the field of the coils dominates In between the field is zero resulting in a purely toroidal field line This shows up as an X-point in the figure of the magnetic surfaces Surfaces outside the one with the X-point are not close with the field ending on the plates Shaping coils allow for plasma to be diverted onto the divertor-plates

Plasma limiter Without divertor the plasma needs to be limited by a material (referred to as limiter) The plasma touching the limiter is still several 1000 of Kelvin Sputtering or melting leads to the release of material into the plasma These unwanted components are referred to as impurities Schematic picture of a plasma limiter

Impurities are no good news Given a fixed electron density, impurities dilute the fuel Acceleration of electrons by the ions in the plasma lead to radiation losses known as ‘Bremstrahlung’ The radiation scales with the average charge. High Z impurities enhance the radiation High Z-impurities also lead to energy loss through line radiation Density of the impurity with charge Z Effective charge

Preventing impurities Plasma facing components have to be chosen carefully Carbon / Beryllium have a low Z Carbon does not melt but has the problem that it binds well with Tritium (contamination of the machine) Tungsten has very high Z, but takes the heat loads very well

Divertor Using a divertor the particles that leave the plasma flow along the magnetic field and hit the target plates These plates are far away from the plasma such that any impurity released at the plate has a smaller chance ending up in the plasma Furthermore, one can try to cool the plasma further through special arangements in front of the plates Plasma flow in divertor configuration

Divertor The divertor has a disadvantage : it takes space In general only one divertor is used, usually at the bottom (easier to construct)

Picture of the plasma Shows that most of the line radiation (one of the lines of Hydrogen) comes from the divertor structure Real plasma so hot that it does not have Hydrogen line radiation So thin that you look right through it

The divertor A modern divertor design looks something like this Note that it has, as far as possible a closed structure. This to allow the efficient pumping of the neutral particles Note also that the angle between the magnetic field and the plate is as small as possible. This makes that the energy carried by the particles to the plate is distributed over the largest possible area Modern divertor design (ITER)

Reason II : Plasma elongation Distance to go around poloidally is larger If q = 3 is the limit of operation one can run a larger current in an elliptically shaped plasma For the same plasma current

Reason III : Plasma elongation A transition phenomenon is observed in Divertor plasmas known as the L (low) to H (high confinement) transition In this transition a steep pressure profile is generated at the plasma edge Not very well understood Confinement improvement is roughly a factor 2 !!!!

Equilibrium / Vertical instability Magnetic field due to the coil follows form Assume d<<R one finds This leads to a force on the plasma

Vertical stability Integrating the force Thus

Vertical stability Forces Equilibrium requires Such that the forces balance

Vertical stability The forces Are in equilbrium when the coil currents are the same. But when the plasma is shifted upward by a small amount d

Vertical instability Small shift d << d When total mass of the plasma is M Growth rate of the vertical instability

Back to the picture Plasma vertical instability with growth rates of the order 106 s-1 For this reason the passive coils have been placed in the plasma When the plasma moves it changes the flux through the coils which generates a current that pushes the plasma back Growth rate is reduced to the decay time of the current in the coils (ms)

Why more current? One of the reasons is related to the equilibrium The surfaces of the tokamak are shifted outward

Outward shift ??? The surfaces of the tokamak are shifted outward This effect will be investigated starting from circular concentric surfaces, i.e. no outward shift The pressure is constant on a magnetic surface Circular concentric magnetic surfaces

Outward force Force = pressure x area Considering the inboard and outboard side the areas are not the same This lead to an outward force Equivalent to inflating a tire

The force leads to an outward shift The pressure force leads to an outward shift This shift compresses the surfaces on the outboard side The poloidal magnetic field increases (distance between surfaces is smaller) The increased tension and magnetic pressure can then balance the outward force

After some mathematics The shift can be estimated to be roughly equal to Where Is the plasma beta connected with the poloidal field Picture of the Shafranov shift

But the shift can be too large The solution stops to give a physically reasonable equilibrium when the shift is equal to the plasma radius From which it follows Loosely speaking it is only the poloidal field that confines the plasma

Relation between the beta values The relation Directly yields a maximum beta well below 1 Typical value 3 Ratio of the field strengths is roughly 0.1