Student Learning and Effective Teaching Criterion Three.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Learning Outcomes at PCC Adapted from a presentation to the PCC Board of Trustees in 2007.
Advertisements

Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Criterion 4 Subcommittee Report The Highfalutenist – Rootentootenist Criterion Group You Ever Saw!
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) Standard One Institutional Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness Task Force Members Juanita.
QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.
Outcomes, Assessment and Improvement Student Learning Outcomes Implementation at Crafton Hills College.
Student Success Factors Faculty In-Service Program Tuesday, August 25.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Shared with campus constituencies Mission, Vision, Values Goals – Revised on 5-year cycle with MSCHE review. Vision Budget Strategic Plan Goal Strategy.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
THE SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE SOTL FELLOWS PROGRAM Margaret Waterman May 1, 2012 cstl.semo.edu/sotl.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Augustana’s Five Year Goals To Create a Campus Climate that Fosters Student Learning through Effective Assessment To Articulate Learning Objectives for.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Opening Doors to the Future Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Building a Program Assessment Plan Jack McGourty Associate Dean Fu Foundation School.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
Academic Year.  Still working well 17 reports submitted, 1 missing  9 of 18 departments expressed concerns about assessment 4 departments reported.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-
Resource Sharing Begins at Home Opportunities for Library Partnerships on a University Campus Robert A. Seal Dean of University Libraries Loyola University.
Strengthening Communities Awarded to support the development and implementation of collaborate and innovative community projects that address economic.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Focus Session: Transformative Assessment Educational Technology Strategic Planning at The University of Colorado, Boulder Lecia J. Barker Alliance for.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
Board Structure & Responsibilities Governing Board Online Training Module.
Student Affairs Division Meeting September 19, 2012.
Undergraduate Experiential Inquiry and Research at Rice.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Kimberlee Pottberg.  Part 1: Why we use WEAVEonline  Part 2: How to enter components.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
HLC
Identification of Areas for Growth
University Community Briefing
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

Student Learning and Effective Teaching Criterion Three

Committee Members: Jerilyn Bach Jerilyn Bach Mike Cappelli Mike Cappelli Sharon Connor Sharon Connor Joy Jewett Joy Jewett Herb Johnson Herb Johnson Joanne Kersten Joanne Kersten Nan Muhovich Timothy Myers Kari J. Nelson Mike Nosser Farella Shaka JoAnn Smith Jesse Winkler

NCU provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission. Evidence of student learning Evidence of teaching effectiveness Demonstrates the fulfilling of its educational mission

Evidentiary Sources NCU Catalogue NCU Catalogue Faculty Manual Faculty Manual Academic Affairs Minutes Academic Affairs Minutes Program Self-Assessment Survey (PSAS) Program Self-Assessment Survey (PSAS)  Alumni surveyed and published by the Educational Testing Service  and includes all majors

Student Satisfaction Inventory developed by Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory developed by Noel-Levitz  Research comparisons were conducted by using the 2000 and 2004 survey responses  2002 report lost  Departmental Learning Assessments  Faculty Surveys  Institutional Documents

Component 3a: NCU’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible. Three organizational levels: The University Academic and Co Curricular Programs Specific Courses within each program

The University Vision/Mission Statement Biblical Support Goals Curricular Support Goals Seven Strands *Each of these are fully articulated in the University catalog

Academic and Co Curricular Programs  Using the seven strands, each academic program created their end sought statements - printed in the catalog  PSAS - NCU averages fall within the U.S. norms.  Scholarly excellence  Quality of teaching  Program procedures  Internship/Fieldwork/Clinical Experience

Co Curricular Programs New Plan Implemented in 2000  Eleven Objectives  Character Development takes precedence  Graduation rate increased significantly - 20% to 45.29%  Noel-Levitz - Student Satisfaction Inventory Scales of student centeredness, concern for individuals, and campus life all slightly increased from 2000 to 2004

Assessment of Outcomes and Goals Departmental goals are assessed in a variety of ways that are appropriate to the departmental vision statement. Departmental goals are assessed in a variety of ways that are appropriate to the departmental vision statement. Course Assessments measure whether or not course objectives are met. Course Assessments measure whether or not course objectives are met. Concerns:  No single cohesive vision for spiritual, cognitive, and affective development.  Not every department has addressed the issue of how these goals are addressed/assessed within the program.

Component 3b: NCU values and supports effective teaching. Effective Teaching Evidenced  Faculty Development Funds  Faculty Development/in-service sessions  Faculty Self-evaluation process  Faculty yearly evaluation process with Dean  Student Course Evaluations  Identification as a ‘teaching institute”  Hiring process emphasizes teaching skill

NCU Values Effective Teaching: Monthly Dean Luncheons Monthly Dean Luncheons Course Evaluations Course Evaluations Academic Affairs Committee Meetings Academic Affairs Committee Meetings Departmental Mtgs Departmental Mtgs Website for Alumni and Student feedback Website for Alumni and Student feedback Faculty Affairs Faculty Open Forums Co Curricular Opportunities for Students and Faculty Department Chair Mentoring Faculty Promotions process

Supports Effective Teaching: Faculty access to Minitex & Interlibrary Loans Faculty access to Minitex & Interlibrary Loans Faculty access to new technology Faculty access to new technology Student Success Center Student Success Center Service Learning Opportunities (Connection Trips) Service Learning Opportunities (Connection Trips) Increase in Laboratories Increase in Laboratories Summer Reading Requirements for Faculty Summer Reading Requirements for Faculty Faculty Retreats Faculty Retreats Unused Faculty Development Funds Distributed Unused Faculty Development Funds Distributed Faculty Development In-Service Opportunities Faculty Development In-Service Opportunities

Concerns: Limited resources for teaching technology Limited resources for teaching technology No ongoing opportunities for professional development for either new or seasoned faculty members. No ongoing opportunities for professional development for either new or seasoned faculty members. Faculty Development funds increased to $400. (too little - too late) Faculty Development funds increased to $400. (too little - too late) Limited Departmental Budgets Limited Departmental Budgets

Component 3c: NCU creates effective learning environments: PSAS Alumni Report  Our averages are within the Nation’s norms. New academic facilities. Reconstruction of the Pastoral Ministries Major NCU Graduates Survey  Over 50% stated the Chapel was a significant part of their educational experience.  Woven

SSI Results show a slight increase in student satisfaction between 2000 and except in the area of safety and security - slight decrease. SSI Results show a slight increase in student satisfaction between 2000 and except in the area of safety and security - slight decrease. CYL CYL Co Curricular programs addressing commuter needs Co Curricular programs addressing commuter needs Student Development programming see an increase in participation in the Antioch Student Lead Committee. Demographic evidence of an increase in student population of students of color. (11% currently)

Component 3d: NCU learning resources support student learning and effective teaching. This area is somewhat incomplete. This area is somewhat incomplete.

Dings to Dodge: Assessment Faculty Development