The Effect of Time To Know Environment on Math and English Language Arts Learning Achievements: Initial Findings from USA* Yigal Rosen, Ph.D. Time To Know.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.

Advertisements

Middle School 8 period day. Rationale Low performing academic scores on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) - specifically in mathematics.

Grading and Reporting Grade PLUS 4 th and 5 th Grade.

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) is the current state assessment program that began in spring For students in grades.

Smarter Balanced Assessment: What do parents need to know?

ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.

SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation

A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.

WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.

Smarter Balanced Assessment: What do parents need to know? Paramount Unified School District Parent Presentation, Grades Great Things Are.

Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.

Provincial Achievement Tests June 2009 Captain John Palliser School.

What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.

COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart

1 SAISD Vision 2009: Fulfilling the Promise SAISD Board Presentation October – 2006 District Improvement Plan: District Performance Objectives.

Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Eagle Ridge Elementary Data Presentation. Eagle Ridge: CRCT Data Review (3-5) Subject Gains/Losses Reading86%87%+1 Language Arts86%82%-4 Math81%69%-12.

TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common.

Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.

Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.

Michigan MSPs June 2007 Wendy Tackett, PhD, iEval

Report on Progress Board of Education Meeting September 13, 2011.

Professional development is “a focus on and responsibility for student learning and the formation of professional community inside and outside the school.”

Metairie Academy for Advanced Studies WELCOME LEAP Information February 18, 2014.

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?

What is Interact? Active learning projects that: use authentic situations engage students challenge students.

By: Jaqueline Lundie & Darren West EDIT 6900 Spring 2011.

Jackson Elementary School Title I Information

Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.

NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.

Professional Development in Challenged Environments Project: Making Mathematics Matter (PM³) A Model for Effective PD Conversations Among Colleagues March.

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2004 Office of Research, Evaluation,

Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.

Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.

James A. Farley School Report Card Presentation May 19, 2008 High Achieving School.

Dear Parents and Guardians: Soon you will be receiving a Score Report from the California Assessment of Performance and Progress (CAASPP) that will provide.

Cambrian School District September 17, 2015

Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE River Edge School District December 16, 2015.

Division of Academic Reform and Innovation Instructional Improvement Initiatives Maryland State Department of Education.

Creative Classroom Collaboratives (C 3 ): Research Update December 1, 2011 Sponsored B y: Eastern Suffolk BOCES Presented By: Susanne Hartnett.

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation,

PARENT UNIVERSITY: Preparing Your Child for Success Presented by: Dr. Alicia Scelso, Principal, Pequannock Township High School Richard M. Hayzler, Principal,

LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETING October 30, Bell Ringer Choose four formative assessment practices that research reviews suggest lead to improved student.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 15, 2015 Dr. Gina Cinotti, CSA.

Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals

Video Games in Education Alanna Bradley March 10, 2010 EDU 527.

Student Assessment Results Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) Spring Dashboard prepared by Ellis Ott, Ph.D., Research & Accountability.

Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals

+ SCC March 17, CSIP Plan 3 areas – which we changed to 4 Literacy STEM Math Science PBIS.

Presented to West Manor Administration and Faculty By: Felicia Belcher April 16, 2014.

Millbrae Elementary School District

The Ethical Community Charter School

Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)

Woodside Elementary School District

Mount Holly Township School District September 2016

20 Reasons Why Music is Important in Education

CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT

PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations

Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)

ELEMENTARY CURRICULUM OVERVIEW BILINGUAL PROGRAM

What can be learned from CAL’s latest research on the SIOP model?

Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBA) Results for PGUSD

Texas Regional Collaboratives

Education Services October 3, 2017.

History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Presentation transcript:

The Effect of Time To Know Environment on Math and English Language Arts Learning Achievements: Initial Findings from USA* Yigal Rosen, Ph.D. Time To Know and University of Haifa Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research The Open University, Israel February 2011 * Based on data from Rockman et al evaluation study

2 1:1 Laptop Teaching and Learning Environment (Bebell, 2007; Lei & Zhao, 2008; O'Dwyer et al., 2008; Weston & Bain, 2010; Zucker & Light, 2009)

3 Time To Know Digital Teaching Platform (Walters, Dede & Richard, 2009; Weiss & Bordelon, 2010)

4 Teacher-Led Constructivist Learning

5 Creative Animations for Each Lesson (Rosen, 2009) You see, its so easy to multiply

6 Collaborative Learning Games

7 Formative and Summative Assessment

8 Research Questions  What is the impact of Time To Know environment on reading, writing and mathematics academic achievements, as measured by Texas Assessment of Knowledge Skills (TAKS) tests, compared to the traditional settings?  Do Time To Know students demonstrate greater mathematics reasoning skills than control students? Participants 127 4th grade students from four elementary schools from the Dallas-area district (59 experimental and 68 control students).

9 Impact on Reading Knowledge and Skills Reading Scores **p<.01 “Time To Know” vs. Control Students’ Comparison by Average Scores “Time To Know” students far out-performed the control students in reading.

10 Impact on Writing Knowledge and Skills Writing Scores **p<.01 “Time To Know” vs. Control Students’ Comparison by Average Scores “Time To Know” students out-performed the control students in writing.

11 Impact on Math Knowledge and Skills Mathematics Scores *p<.05 “Time To Know” vs. Control Students’ Comparison by Average Scores “Time To Know” students out-performed the control students in mathematics.

12 Percentage of Students in Each TAKS Category: Reading “Time To Know” vs. Control Students’ Distribution by Standard Levels BelowMetCommendedBelowMetCommended 90% of the students on met standard or commended performance.

13 Percentage of Students in Each TAKS Category: Writing “Time To Know” vs. Control Students’ Distribution by Standard Levels BelowMetCommendedBelowMetCommended 98% of the students on met standard or commended performance

14 Percentage of Students in Each TAKS Category: Math BelowMetCommendedBelowMetCommended “Time To Know” vs. Control Students’ Distribution by Standard Levels 93% of the students on met standard or commended performance.

15 Impact on Math Reasoning “Time To Know” vs. Control Students’ Comparison by Average Scores Advantage of 40% in math reasoning skills among “Time To Know” students.

16 Implementation of Differentiated Learning Teaching and learning in Time To Know environment is closing the gap between students. “Time To Know” vs. Control Students’ Distribution by Standard Levels Below StandardMet StandardCommended Performance