Scaling Up ? from Collaborative to Collective activities in Web-Based Training Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA, University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ETL339: E-Learning Is it all just smoke and mirrors... bells and whistles?
Advertisements

P. Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva Creating e-Learning activities DESIGN BUILD TEST DESIGN BUILD TEST 1.Structure content activities 2.Design learning.
Fostering Learners’ Collaborative Problem Solving with RiverWeb Roger Azevedo University of Maryland Mary Ellen Verona Maryland Virtual High School Jennifer.
D2.1. PEDAGOGICAL FRAMEWORK Matjaž Debevc UM FERI.
IRMA DOES OPTIONAL WEB- BASED SEMINAR SUPPORT BETTER (CONSTRUCTIVIST) LEARNING IN THE BASICS OF INFORMATICS? Pekka Makkonen Jyväskylä FINLAND.
SELF-REGULATED LEARNING Arttu Mykkänen & Kristiina Kurki Contact:
Voyager Virtual Learning Environment ( Overview of the Voyager Learner Suite (runs automatically)
INFLUENCING OTHERS. To Build Skill in Using Constructive Forms of Persuasion and Influence to Align and Mobilize Others.
1 ICT-based Paradigm Shifts Dave Moursund Teacher Education.
Presentation Tecfa Mandate - Bern - 19/11/ /12/01 TECFA Team Daniel Peraya, co-ordinator, Jacques Viens (1/1, from the 1 rst term of 2002), Nathalie.
COMPLETING THE TRAINEESHIP PICTURE Using a learning community to put the pieces together. Reflection Content Activity Interaction Experts Community Project.
Learning Technologies at EPFL 1.Evolution of e-learning 2.Strategy & Funding CRAFT P. Dillenbourg,
DISCLAIMER The intensive usage of PowerPoint may damage your understanding of a pedagogical relationship. DISCLAIMER.
TECFA Research and Teaching unit in Educational and Learning technologies OverviewPeopleTeachingResearch May 2006.
TECFA Research and Teaching unit in Educational and Learning technologies OverviewPeopleTeachingResearch January 2004.
Jermann & Dillenbourg, Jermann & Dillenbourg, TECFA Tecfa Virtual Campus Collective Activities in TECFA (Educational Technology Lab) School of Education.
Learner's arguments in a collective learning environment: Argue & Graph Patrick.Jermann, Is different from collaborative.
__________________ Engineering Education Systems for Environmental Project Management - Example of the Amise Simulation Program François Baillon School.
Web-based Learning 網上學習 Learning from the Internet: Information to knowledge through inquiry.
Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon Social Cognitive and Constructivist Views of Learning: Chapter 9.
Campus Virtual No Problem ? DISCLAIMER The abusive usage of PowerPoint may seriously damage your understanding of a.
: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva.
By Tani. What is Constructivism? Based on a type of learning in which the learner forms, or constructs, much of what he comprehends Constructivists agree.
Cognitive Development and Jean Piaget
Pierre Dillenbourg, On-Line Educa, Berlin 2005 Should mobile learning be as boring as e-learning ?
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
MTTS & NETS Maryland Technology Standards for Teachers & National Technology Standards How Standards Will Influence Teaching…
UNIVIRTUAL FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Versione 00 del 29/07/2009.
"Split Where Interaction Should Happen", a model for designing CSCL scripts Pierre Dillenbourg, Patrick Jermann, Fabien Girardin CRAFT Centre de recherche.
Tilly Harrison University of Warwick 27 th January 2012.
L EV V YGOTSKY Socialization Language Variety of Learners Gribbin- Week 2.
Teaching for Self-Regulation, Creativity and Tolerance Cluster 13 What is self regulation? Barry Zimmerman (2002) defines it as the process we use to activate.
Chapter 8 Use of New Technologies in Training. Chapter 8 Multimedia Training Technique: Combines audiovisual and computer-based training. Integrates text,
Jalongo & Isenberg, Exploring Your Role, 3e Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 8.1 Chapter 8: Exploring Your Role in Planning.
A Vygotskian Model of Leveled Success for Candidates and Students
1 Multimedia-Supported Metaphors for Meaning Making in Mathematics Moreno & Mayer (1999)
Guideline for Language Classroom Instruction. Language presentation Objectives Materials (modalities) Rule presentations and Explanations.
MJM22 Digital Practice and Pedagogy Week 9 Collaboration Tools.
An introduction to WebQuests Making the best use of existing web- based resources through WebQuests
 Information resourses, exercises, activities you create yourself for students to use on a computer ( web page, CD-ROM content, … )  The kinds of materials.
P. Dillenbourg TECFA1/25 Would you go on board if pilots were trained by surfing on the Net ? Would you go on board if pilots were.
MANA 3320 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Malcolm Knowles Background Born in 1913 in Livingston, Montana Worked 9 years as Practioner/Administrator with YMCA Worked 8 years as Executive.
November 18, 2000ICTCM-13 Atlanta1 Learning about Online Learning: How Do Students Use Interactive Web-Based Materials? Jack Bookman, David Malone, Lawrence.
Constructivism By Andrea Egense Unit 2 Learning Theory June 11, 2007.
Unit 1 Day 2 – 4 FOCS – Human Computer Interaction.
CLTA-GNY 2014 Enhancing Learner Autonomy and Motivation by Learners In Front Teaching (LIFT) with Web 2.0 Applications Raymond Pai Defense Language Institute.
International computer supported collaborative learning for public health content Anouk Berger Geneva Medical School & TECFA.
Teaching Philosophy: CONSTRUCTIVISM Prepared By: Group III.
Self Regulation presentation Submitted To Submitted By.
CONSTRUCTIVISM “I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.”~Confucius By: W.H.
And avoiding the Pitfalls. “if done correctly E-learning can be a very effective tool for organizations that need to improve staff development or provide.
Reading Take-Aways 1.Which of the four C’s do you think is most critical for student preparation for PJL? Why? 2.How does a driving question facilitate.
指導教授: Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者: Tsai, Yu-ting 報告日期: 2006/12/19 Kathleen, I. & Deborah, C. (2004). Scenario-based e-learning design. Performance Improvement,43(1)16-23.
Collaborative Learning is not a recipe Professor Pierre Dillenbourg Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne EPFL, Switterland.
SOCIAL MEDIA TRAINING PLAN STACEY KERNISAN AET/570 JUNE 13, 2016 DR. PATRICK OLDENBURGH JR.
, 15-18: E-Learning and Mobile Learning Kopp, Schulze, Mandl Design Principles in E-Learning Which Design Principles Influence Acceptance and.
جيسيكا تحت المجهر عن كتاب تعليم العلوم لجميع الاطفال
Use the Table of Integrals to evaluate the integral
Choose Your Own Adventure
21st Century Learning Collaborative Work
National Food Service Management Institute
Social media training plan
Piaget’s Stage Theory formal operations concrete operations
הוראת מיומנויות של עבודה בקבוצה מחקר פעולה
Overview of the Conjoint Behavioral Consultation Training Model
CS160: Lecture 6 John Canny Fall /9/2018.
Emergency telephone in Russia is 112.
Chapitre 5: Collecticiels
Learners’ eLearning competency 1/1
Presentation transcript:

Scaling Up ? from Collaborative to Collective activities in Web-Based Training Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA, University of Geneva

Is (1) Is collaborative learning effective ? … Often, but… When (2) When is collaborative learning effective ? … conditions: group, task, medium, Why (3) Why does collaboration produce learning? … interactions: explanation, negotiation,…. How (4) How to trigger productive interactions? … structure & regulate Research on collaborative learning

Structure Regulate Collective Scénarios

Scenario "ArgueGraph" Phase1

Phase 2 Scenario "ArgueGraph"

Phase 3 Scenario "ArgueGraph"

Design choices Immediate FB Delayed FB Microworld FB Theories Behavioursim Constructivism Metacognition Phase 4 Scenario "ArgueGraph"

ArgueGraph Data (Exp.3) Reformulation Justification Solo57 % 43 % Duo15 % 85 %

AcceptCondition Discard No Conflict28 13 Conflict "We answer 3 because motivation is important" "We answer 3 because motivation is important" "We choose 3 because 2 does not work" "We choose 3 because 2 does not work" ArgueGraph Data (Exp.3) "We answer 2 if the learner is a child but we answer 3 for adult learners" "We answer 2 if the learner is a child but we answer 3 for adult learners"

NewUnion Victory No Conflict Conflict X 2 =6.2, p<.05) ArgueGraph Data (Exp.3) Arg(AB) <> Arg(A) & Arg(AB) <> Arg(B) Arg(AB) <> Arg(A) & Arg(AB) <> Arg(B) Arg(AB) =Arg(A) or Arg(AB) =Arg(B ) Arg(AB) =Arg(A) or Arg(AB) =Arg(B ) Arg(AB)=Arg(A) U Arg(B )

New version of ArgueGraph

What's the problem with exp 4 ? pseudo-task debriefing Coffee-break 1 week Exp 1-3 Exp 4 pseudo-task

So what? Collaboration has to be structured. –Web environments provide the structure by making a scenario (phases & roles) concrete. –Scenario are hard to generalize –Integrate communication in the task. Collaboration has to be regulated (…)

Explanation Abstraction Grounding Argumentation Mutual Regulation Mutuality Structuration Regulation... COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING