Carbon Meeting Joann Rice Sacramento, CA January 22-23, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OIL AWAY S-200 Oil Treatment. One Month Old Oil Spill On Concrete - Section 1 Oil is ½ “ thick in some areas.
Advertisements

Report of the IMPROVE/CSN Organic Carbon Artifact Adjustment Committee Ann M. Dillner, Mark Green Marc Pitchford, Bret Schichtel, Bill Malm, Warren White,
STN Carbon Field Blank Analysis, Derived Organic Carbon Analysis and IMPROVE blank corrected artifact analysis Bret Schichtel.
PM 2.5 Carbon Measurements in EPA Region 10 Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
What are the important parameters that need to be defined for a carbonaceous aerosol analysis ? Hélène CACHIER Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
MASS EMISSION RATES AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PM 2.5 EMISSIONS FROM TWO MOTORCYCLES Deniz Karman and Colin Welburn Department of Civil and Environmental.
ORD PM Methods Research Proposed Plans Paul Solomon ORD/NERL OC/EC Meeting Durango, CO March 4-5, 2003 This presentation has been subject to.
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
Chemical Composition of Organic Carbon Fractions Barbara Zielinska.
Example Conceptual Models for Organic Sampling Artifacts on Quartz Fiber Filter Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the IMPROVE/CSN Carbon Monitoring Workshop.
Carbon artifact adjustments for the IMPROVE and CSN speciated particulate networks Mark Green, Judith Chow, John Watson Desert Research Institute Ann Dillner.
Gas/Particle Partitioning. Why is gas/particle partitioning important? Dispersion of Pollutants Introduced into the Atmosphere as Determined by Residence.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop PM 2.5 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) Carbon Conversion Joann Rice.
STN/IMPROVE Comparison Study Preliminary Results Paul Solomon, ORD Tracy Klamser-Williams, ORIA Peter Egeghy, ORD Dennis Crumpler, OAQPS Joann Rice, OAQPS.
Overview of CSN Data Relevant to OC/EC Artifact Adjustments presented by James Flanagan RTI International Davis, CA January 22-23, 2008.
Alliance RtI Intervention Project Due on or before January 10, 2012.
Diesel Particulate Matter Sampling MSHA Outreach Program.
Charring Minimization in Thermal Analysis of Aerosol Carbon Jian Zhen Yu and Qianfeng Li Department of Chemistry Hong Kong University of Science & Technology.
Carbon Measurements and Adjustments Measurement of organics by IMPROVE & STN networks, Use of blank data to correct carbon concentration measurements,
Use of National PM2.5 and Speciation Network Measurements for Model Evaluation For presentation at PM Model Performance Workshop February 10-11, 2004:
Predicting TOR OC and EC from FT-IR Spectra of IMPROVE samples Ann M. Dillner Assoc. Research Scientist University of California, Davis Satoshi Takahama.
Measurement of Carbonate Minerals in Aerosol Samples- A Preliminary Study Johann Engelbrecht Desert Research Institute.
Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham.
6 City CSN/IMPROVE Comparison. IMPROVE/CSN Organic Carbon URG MASS – 16.7 LPM; IMPROVE ~22 LPM; Other STN 6-7 LPM IMPROVE OC un-adjusted for blank IMP.
Carbon Artifact Adjustment in IMPROVE Lowell Ashbaugh Crocker Nuclear Lab University of California, Davis January 22, 2008.
Phase Difference = Phase Difference = 0.05.
1 Collocated STN-CSN and IMPROVE carbon measurements WHW, UCD 1/22/08.
1 CONTINUITY OF IMPROVE CARBON DATA THROUGH THE 1 JANUARY 2005 INTRODUCTION OF NEW ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTATION* WHW, 10/2/07 *Chow et al. (2007) JA&WMA.
Comparison of the STN and IMPROVE Networks for Mass and Selected Chemical Components (Preliminary Results) Paul Solomon, ORD Tracy Klamser-Williams, ORIA.
Buckhorn Disinfection Byproducts / Backwash Disposal Project Board of Directors Meeting June 14, 2012.
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
Quality assurance of sampling and analytical instruments
State of the Science on Sources of Carbonaceous Aerosols and Their Contribution to Regional Haze John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research.
1 Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe.  Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting  QC (routine checks, audits, and method-
WBEA Passive Sampler Validation Study for NH3 and HNO3 Operation of the dual-channel Annular Denuder System (ADS)
Measuring OM/OC on individual IMPROVE Teflon filters using FT-IR analysis Ann M. Dillner, Travis C. Ruthenburg Lake Tahoe IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting,
CMAS special session Oct 13, 2010 Air pollution exposure estimation: 1.what’s been done? 2.what’s wrong with that? 3.what can be done? 4.how and what to.
CARB Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Activity (BAM’s) Reggie Smith California Air Resources Board.
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
SPACCS 2008 summary meeting 1 Storm Peak Aerosol and Cloud Characterization Study May 12, 2008.
Data Analysis/Monitoring Session OAQPS Updates Neil Frank RPO National Workgroup Meeting Dallas TX December 3-4, 2002.
Metra System On-Time Performance Annual On-Time Performance
Regional Air Quality Modeling Results for Elemental and Organic Carbon John Vimont, National Park Service WRAP Fire, Carbon, and Dust Workshop Sacramento,
WP coordinator meeting June 17/ WP3 progress report.
C hemical characterisation of boundary layer aerosols during the LBA/CLAIRE/SMOCC-2002 campaign W. Maenhaut 1, J. Cafmeyer 1, X. Chi 1, S. Dunphy 1, N.
CYWD 2007 QAQC Results Sarah Hogg Conservation Halton.
Phase II Malé Declaration on control and prevention of transboundary air pollution and its likely transboundary effects for South Asia Nepal Ministry of.
CHEMISTRY OF AEROSOLS Analyzing the composition of aerosols collected on Mt. Pico Photo: L. Harkness.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
The reading is 7.38 mm. The reading is 7.72 mm.
RUG sampling activities at Fazenda Nossa Senhora Willy Maenhaut Ghent University (RUG) Institute for Nuclear Sciences Department of Analytical Chemistry.
IMPROVE/STN Comparison & Implications for Visibility and PM2.5
Ann M. Dillner, Mark C. Green
Relative contributions of NH3, NO2, NH4+ and NO3- to dry deposition of Nitrogen at an agricultural site in the Indo-Gangetic Plain of India Saumya Singh,
National Wildlife Refuge
Speciation Update: URG 3000N Carbon Sampler
“all you ever asked us for, and more”
Back To Basics: PM2.5 NESCAUM MAC Meeting Newport, RI May 16-17, 2006
Anhydrosugars in Biomass Smoke Preliminary Data from FLAME 2006
IMPROVE – CSN Carbon Monitoring Workshop: Overview
ВОМР Подмярка 19.2 Възможности за финансиране
Споразумение за партньорство
with EUSAAR NA2 Partners
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Rationalizing the differences between thermo-optical OC/EC methods.
' · · ,.-.., '' !'",. -,..._ ·-.·-...;.· -
Challenges with Integrated Measurements of OC and BC (or EC)
Jean-Philippe Putaud, Fabrizia Cavalli
The UC Davis Semi-Annual Report on Quality Assurance IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting October 16, 2018 | Fort Collins, Colorado Xiaolu Zhang*, Katrine.
Introduction to IMPROVE and Regional Haze Data
Presentation transcript:

Carbon Meeting Joann Rice Sacramento, CA January 22-23, 2008

“Old” CSN  MetOne SASS sampler 6.7 LPM flow rate with active flow control 46.2-mm QMA Quartz filter  CSN TOT analysis by RTI OC in He (900C); EC in He/O2 (920C) “New” CSN  URG3000N sampler (IMPROVE-like) 22 LPM flow rate with active flow control 25-mm Pallflex Quartz filter  IMPROVE_A TOR analysis by DRI OC in He (580C); EC in He/O2 (840C) SOPs posted at “Old” versus “New” CSN Carbon

Two months (May-June 2007) of collocated old and new CSN at all Phase 1 sites  Collocation was resource restricted  For purposes of overlap only to minimize data loss  About collocated observations per site No artifact adjustments made to either old or new CSN data No data screening for MDL or other outliers “Old” versus “New” CSN Carbon First Look

“Old” versus “New” CSN OC

“Old” versus “New” CSN EC

Collocated “Old” CSN OC

Collocated “Old” CSN EC