We infer a flow field, u(x,y,) from magnetic evolution over a time interval, assuming: Ideality assumed:  t B n = -c(  x E), but E = -(v x B)/c, so.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SDO/HMI multi-height velocity measurements Kaori Nagashima (MPS) Collaborators: L. Gizon, A. Birch, B. Löptien, S. Danilovic, R. Cameron (MPS), S. Couvidat.
Advertisements

Probing Magnetic Reconnection with Active Region Transient Brightenings Martin Donachie Advisors: Adam Kobelski & Roger Scott.
Flare-Associated Magnetic Field Changes Observed with HMI by Brian T. Welsch & George H. Fisher Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley Permanent changes in photospheric.
Estimating Surface Flows from HMI Magnetograms Brian Welsch, SSL UC-Berkeley GOAL: Consider techniques available to estimate flows from HMI vector magnetograms,
Energy and Helicity in Emerging Active Regions Yang Liu, Peter Schuck, and HMI vector field data team.
Inductive Flow Estimation for HMI Brian Welsch, Dave Bercik, and George Fisher, SSL UC-Berkeley.
Q: How is flux removed from the photosphere? Each 11-year cycle, c active regions, each with c Mx, emerge. What processes remove all this.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
Can We Determine Electric Fields and Poynting Fluxes from Vector Magnetograms and Doppler Shifts? by George Fisher, Brian Welsch, and Bill Abbett Space.
6/9/2015Digital Image Processing1. 2 Example Histogram.
Photospheric Flows and Solar Flares Brian T. Welsch 1, Yan Li 1, Peter W. Schuck 2, & George H. Fisher 1 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley 2 Naval Research.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
HMI, Photospheric Flows and ILCT Brian Welsch, George Fisher, Yan Li, & the UCB/SSL MURI & CISM Teams HMI Team Mtg., 2006M3: Mag Data Products Correlation.
HMI & Photospheric Flows 1.Review of methods to determine surface plasma flow; 2.Comparisons between methods; 3.Data requirements; 4.Necessary computational.
Free Energies via Velocity Estimates B.T. Welsch & G.H. Fisher, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
D. Roberts PHYS 121 University of Maryland Physics 121: Fundamentals of Physics I September 13, 2006.
Inductive Local Correlation Tracking or, Getting from One Magnetogram to the Next Goal (MURI grant): Realistically simulate coronal magnetic field in eruptive.
Finding Photospheric Flows with I+LCT or,“Everything you always wanted to know about velocity at the photosphere, but were afraid to ask.” B. T. Welsch,
How are photospheric flows related to solar flares? Brian T. Welsch 1, Yan Li 1, Peter W. Schuck 2, & George H. Fisher 1 1 SSL, UC-Berkeley 2 NASA-GSFC.
Magnetogram Evolution Near Polarity Inversion Lines Brian Welsch and Yan Li Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA , USA.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
NLFFF Energy Measurement of AR8210 J.McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Detection of Emerging Sunspot Regions in the Solar Interior Stathis Ilonidis, Junwei Zhao, and Alexander Kosovichev Stanford University LoHCo Workshop.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
Magnetic Reconnection Rate and Energy Release Rate Jeongwoo Lee 2008 April 1 NJIT/CSTR Seminar Day.
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
SH31C-08: The Photospheric Poynting Flux and Coronal Heating Some models of coronal heating suppose that convective motions at the photosphere shuffle.
Modeling and Data Analysis Associated With Supergranulation Walter Allen.
Seething Horizontal Magnetic Fields in the Quiet Solar Photosphere J. Harvey, D. Branston, C. Henney, C. Keller, SOLIS and GONG Teams.
Observational Criteria for Small-Scale Turbulent Dynamo in the Solar Photosphere Valentina Abramenko, Philip Goode, Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Kwangsu Ahn Big Bear.
Multiscale magnetic pattern in the quiet photosphere Francesco Berrilli (1) Dario Del Moro (1), Silvia Giordano (2), Stefano Scardigli (1) 1.Department.
Small scale magnetic energy release driven by supergranular flows Hugh Potts, Joe Khan and Declan Diver How to automatically detect and analyse supergranular.
1 Statistics, Data Analysis and Image Processing Lectures Vlad Stolojan Advanced Technology Institute University of Surrey.
Using Realistic MHD Simulations for Modeling and Interpretation of Quiet Sun Observations with HMI/SDO I. Kitiashvili 1,2, S. Couvidat 2 1 NASA Ames Research.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
Valentina Abramenko 1, Vasyl Yurchyshyn 1, Philip R. Goode 1, Vincenzo Carbone 2, Robert Stein Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT, USA; 2 – Univ.
Is there any relationship between photospheric flows & flares? Coupling between magnetic fields in the solar photosphere and corona implies that flows.
Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Philip R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT SH31C-18 06: Size and Lifetime Distributions of Bright Points.
Three-Dimensional Power Spectra of GONG++ High- Cadence Magnetograms F. Hill, J. Bolding, R. Clark, K. Donaldson-Hanna, J. Harvey, G. Petrie, C. Toner.
Inherent Length Scales and Apparent Frequencies of Periodic Solar Wind Number Density Structures Nicholeen Viall 1, Larry Kepko 2 and Harlan Spence 1 1.
Scientific Interests in OVSA Expanded Array Haimin Wang.
SH13A-2243: Evolution of the Photospheric Vector Magnetic Field in HMI Data by Brian T. Welsch & George H. Fisher Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley We discuss.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic representation of the near-infrared (NIR) structured illumination instrument,
NLFFF Energy Measurement of AR8210
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Calcium Dynamics of Spines Depend on Their Dendritic Location
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
A Map for Horizontal Disparity in Monkey V2
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2002)
Singular Behavior of Slow Dynamics of Single Excitable Cells
Magnetic connection between the photosphere and the corona
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Critical Timing without a Timer for Embryonic Development
Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation
Will J. Eldridge, Zachary A. Steelman, Brianna Loomis, Adam Wax 
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2001)
Soothing Massage of HMI Magnetic Field Data
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Directional Persistence of Cell Migration Coincides with Stability of Asymmetric Intracellular Signaling  Michael C. Weiger, Shoeb Ahmed, Erik S. Welf,
End-Stopping and the Aperture Problem
How Cells Tiptoe on Adhesive Surfaces before Sticking
The Mechanism of Phagocytosis: Two Stages of Engulfment
Valentina Abramenko and Kwangsu Ahn
106.13: A Makeover for HMI Magnetic Field Data
Presentation transcript:

We infer a flow field, u(x,y,) from magnetic evolution over a time interval, assuming: Ideality assumed:  t B n = -c(  x E), but E = -(v x B)/c, so perpendicular flows drive all evolution. Démoulin & Berger (2003) argue u = v h – (v z /B z ) B h, but Schuck (2006, 2008) argues u ≃ v h.

Motivation: What is the optimal Δt? What can we learn from the coherence time of flows? Caption: Autocorrelation of LOS magnetic field (black) and flow components (u x, u y ). Thick: frame-to-frame autocorrelation, at 96 minute lag. Thin: initial-to-n th frame autocorrelation. Welsch et al. (2009) autocorrelated active region flows in MDI magnetograms and found flow lifetimes of ~6 hours on super- granular scales (c. 15 Mm). But what about other, smaller scales?

What constrains choice of time interval, Δt? There are two regimes for which inferred flows u do not accurately reflect plasma velocities v: 1)Noise-dominated: If Δt is very short, then B is ~constant, so ΔB n is due to noise, not flows. But all changes in B are interpreted as flows! ==> estimates of u are noise-dominated. 2) Displacement-dominated: If Δt is too long, then v will evolve significantly over Δt; so u is inferred from displacements due to the average of the velocity over Δt.

We tracked Stokes’ V/I images at 2 min. cadence, w/0.3’’/pix, from Hinode NFI, over Dec 12-13, Left: Initial magnetogram in the ~13 hr. sequence, at full resolution (0.16” pixels) with the saturation level set at ±500 Mx cm−2. Right: Red (blue) is cumulative frame-to-frame shifts in x (y) removed in image co- registration prior to tracking. Total flux (unsigned in thin black, negative of signed in thick black) is overplotted. Note periodicty similar to Hinode 98-minute orbital freq.

We estimated flows with several choices of tracking parameters. We varied the time interval ∆t between tracked magnetograms, with ∆t ∈ {2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256} minutes. We varied the apodization (windowing) parameter, σ ∈ {2,4,8,16} pixels. We re-binned the data into macropixels, binning by ∆x ∈ {2,4,8,16,32,64} 0.3’’ pixels.

Histogramming the magnetograms shows a “noise core” consistent with a noise level around 15 G. Accordingly, we tracked all pixels with |B LOS | > 15 G. Pixels from “the bubble” in the filter were excluded from all subsequent quantitative analyses.

We also co-registered a resampled vector magnetogram from the SP instrument, produced by Schrijver et al. (2008). This enables a crude calibration of |B z | and |B| for each flow, at least at low spatial resolution.

To baseline flow coherence times, we investigated magnetic field coherence times. Colored: autocorrelation coeffs. over a range of lags with 2 n x2 n binning. Black: frame-to-frame autocorr. coeffs. at full res., linear = dashed, rank-order.

We autocorrelated field structure in subregions, and fitted decorrelation as e -t/ τ ; “lifetime” is τ at e -1. Red: rank-order autocorrelations of B LOS, in (32 x 32)-binned subregions vs. lag time. The the vertical range in each cell is [-0.5, 1.0], with a dashed black line at zero correlation. Blue: one-parameter fits to the decorrelation in each subregion, assuming exponential decay, with the decay constant as the only free parameter. Only subregions with median occupancy of at least 20% of pixels above our 15 G threshold were fit. Background gray contours show 50 G and 200 G levels of |B LOS | in full-resolution pixels. As expect- ed, field structures persist longer in stronger-field regions.

Lifetimes of magnetic field structures are longer in subregions with higher field strengths. This trend is true for B_LOS, B_z, and |B|. This is entirely consistent with convection reconfiguring fields, but strong fields inhibiting convection.

For short ∆t, frame-to-frame flow correlations can increase with increasing ∆t’s, and averaging prior to tracking. Dashed lines show frame- to-frame correlation coeffs for un-averaged magnetograms. Solid lines show correlations for averaged magnetograms. Note complete lack of correlation at ∆t = 2 min.

Rapid decorrelation of noise-dominated flows can be seen by comparing overlain flow vectors from successive flow maps with short ∆t. Note: these magnetograms were not averaged prior to tracking.

Flows are much more consistent from one frame to the next for longer ∆t, and averaging magneto- grams prior to tracking.

Flow lifetimes can be estimated via autocorrelation of flow maps. Flows decorrelate on longer timescales when a larger apodization window, σ, is used.

Rebinning the data mimics use of a larger σ --- compare solid black with dashed blue. Rebinning speeds tracking; using a larger σ slows it. The product of macropixel size ∆x and σ defines a spatial scale of the flow, (∆x * σ). The decorrelation time is longer for longer ∆t, but saturates at ∆t = 128 min.

We also fitted exponentials to autocorrelations of flows to determine flow lifetimes in subregions. Red & Blue: rank-order autocorrelations of u x and u y, in (32 x 32)-binned subregions vs. lag time. The the vertical range in each cell is [-0.5, 1.0], with a dashed black line at zero correlation. Only subregions with median occupancy of at least 20% of pixels above our 15 G threshold were fit. Background gray contours show 50 G and 200 G levels of |B LOS | in full-resolution pixels. As expected, field structures persist longer in stronger-field regions.

Lifetimes of flows are also longer in subregions with higher field strengths. This trend is true for B LOS, B z, and |B|. This is consistent with the influence of Lorentz forces active region flows. Lorentz forces such as buoyancy (e.g., Parker 1957) and torques (e.g., Longcope & Welsch 2000) can be longer-lived than convective effects. Lifetimes for u x in subregions are shown with red +’s, u y are blue x’s, and fits to these are red and blue solid lines. The red ∆’s (green ∇ ’s) are lifetimes of u x versus subregion-averaged |B z | (|B|) from the SP data, and the red dashed (green solid) line is a fit.

Black numerals correspond to log 2 (binsize), and show that average speed decreases with increasing ∆t and spatial scale (∆x * σ). Red and blue numerals correspond to curl and divergences, which behave similarly.

Flow lifetimes for u x (+) and u y (x) as a function of ∆t and spatial scale (∆x* σ). Power-laws were fit over a limited range of spatial scales for each ∆t.

Averaged over all spatial scales (∆x* σ) at a given ∆t, speeds decrease with ∆t. Fitted slope: Error bars are standard deviations in ∆t over all spatial scales (∆x* σ). Lifetimes of faster flows tend to be shorter, for all spatial scales. For a given average speed, peak lifetime scales approximately as -2.

Lifetimes of flow divergences and curls are also longer in subregions with higher field strengths. This trend is true for B LOS, B z, and |B|, and the correlation is independent of the number of tracked pixels in each subregion (the “occupancy”). This is entirely consistent with Lorentz forces driving curls and divergences in magnetized regions.

We also fitted power laws to the lifetimes of curls and divergences as function of spatial scale for each value of ∆t we used. Lifetimes scale less than linearly with spatial scale.

Practical Conclusions, for tracking: Flow estimates with a given choice of tracking parameters (∆t, ∆x, σ ) are sensitive to flows on particular length and time scales. Long-lived magnetic structures imply ∆t is less constrained in tracking magnetograms than intensities. It’s unwise to track with a ∆t that’s either too short (noise dominated) or too long (displacement dominated). Average speeds are lower for longer ∆t.

Scientific Conclusions: Flows operate over a range of length and time scales; the term “the flow” is imprecise. Magnetic structures, flows, and curls/divergences are longer- lived in stronger-field regions. This is consistent with both: – magnetic fields inhibiting convection, and – Lorentz forces driving photospheric flows. Flows with faster average speeds typically exhibit shorter peak lifetimes. The product of mean speed squared and peak lifetime is approximately constant, with units of a diffusion coefficient, cm 2 /sec.