Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Advertisements

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Plans and Status MUTAC Review FNAL March 17, 2006.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Meson Production at 8 GeV for IDS120h X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Dec. 27, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between Hg and Ga at 8 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 04, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between HG and GA at 8 GeV (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 18, 2011.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory High-Power Targets H.G. Kirk Applications of High-Intensity Proton Accelerators FNAL October 20, 2009.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
1 Meson Production Simulations X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL N u F a c t th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NMFCC Friday Meeting 10 Apr 2009 Neutrino Factory Nozzle Layouts V.B. Graves NFMCC Friday Meeting.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Calculations 1 st Princeton/Oxford High-Power Targets Workshop Oxford May 1-2, 2008.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
The MERIT experiment at the CERN PS Leo Jenner MOPC087 WEPP169 WEPP170.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
IDS120h POWER DEPOSITION AND Hg POOL STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas (7/26/2011) 1.
STUDY II: m1507 vs. m1510 IDS120f: m1507/MCNP vs. M1510/MCNP vs. FLUKA IDS120f vs. IDS20g GEOMETRY IDS90f: B10/B11 SHIELDING RING(S) STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas.
Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory A MW Class Target System for Muon Beam Production AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July 14-18, 2014.
Target R&D Kirk T McDonald Princeton University Feb. 19, 2014 February 19, 2014 KT McDonald | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1 Scope of.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
Energy deposition for intense muon sources (chicane + the rest of the front end) Pavel Snopok Illinois Institute of Technology and Fermilab December 4,
KT McDonald MAP Winter Meeting (SLAC) December 5, Solid Target Options for an Intense Muon Source K. McDonald Princeton U. (December 5, 2014) MAP.
Review of Recent IDS120 Target Concepts Van Graves October 31, 2013.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Concept for a Neutrino Factory Muon Meeting BNL January 26, 2004.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS EFFECTS OF Be WINDOW WATER.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Considerations for Nufact and Superbeams ISS Meeting RAL April 26, 2006.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET STATION. Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012) 1 DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Finalizing the C- and Hg-Target Configurations for 6.75-GeV Proton Beams Present studies are for a carbon.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The E951 Targetry Program Targetry Meeting CERN September 19, 2003.
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review (Update Aug 12) Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Ids120h_side. ids120h_top ids120h_iso ids120h_end.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Muon Production and Capture for a Neutrino Factory European Strategy for Future Neutrino Physics CERN October.
Horn and Solenoid options in Neutrino Factory M. Yoshida, Osaka Univ. NuFact08, Valencia June 30th, A brief review of pion capture scheme in NuFact,
BNL solenoid capture workshop: magnet challenges are not trivial Summarized by Tengming Shen
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
1 Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/15/2011)
1 Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012)
Meson Production Efficiencies
Presentation transcript:

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011

Harold G. Kirk 2 Target Baseline: Proton Beam Assumptions Proton Beam Energy 8 GeV Rep Rate 50 Hz Bunch Structure 3 bunches, 240  sec total Bunch Width 2  1 ns Beam Radius 1.2 mm (rms) Beam β * ≥ 30 cm Beam Power 4 MW (3.125  protons/sec)

Harold G. Kirk 3 Target System Baseline Target type Free mercury jet Jet diameter 8 mm Jet velocity 20 m/s Jet/Solenoid Axis Angle 96 mrad Proton Beam/Solenoid Axis Angle 96 mrad Proton Beam/Jet Angle 27 mrad Capture Solenoid Field Strength 20 T

Harold G. Kirk 4 Coil and Shielding Concept (IDS120h) Superconducting Coils Resistive Coils SC1 Shielding Key Parameters: SC1 IR = 120 cm Stored Energy 3 GJ B = 20 T

Harold G. Kirk 5 20 Secondary Particle Production Black=p, Green=n, Red/Blue=π ±, Orange/Turquoise=e ±, Gray=γ.

Harold G. Kirk 6 PEAK ENERGY DEPOSITION (mW/g) 18 FROM ITER peak DE ≤ 0.15 mW/gr IDS90f

Harold G. Kirk 7 The Target Module Concept – V. Graves Target Module consists of: Beam/Jet Delivery Cartridge Resistive Coil Package Primary Containment Vessel Hg Collection/Beam Dump

Harold G. Kirk 8 Dimensions in cm Inserting the Hg System – V. Graves, ORNL

Harold G. Kirk 9 BEAM PIPES BP1: Surrounding Target BP2/BP3: Field Taper Section 5 cm gap between vessels and SC coils reserved for cryogenic shields SHIELFONG VOLUMES SH1: Surrounding Target SH2, 3: Surrounding Decay Pipe SH4: Inside SC Coils SC1-7 W 10 cm 6 cm 2 cm 3 cm 10 cm 15 cm 3 cm 10 cm 2 cm 1 cm 3 Shielding Studies: Bob Weggel, N. Souchlas 4 cm 5 cm 2 cm 5 cm SH2 SC7 SH 1 SH4 SH 3 RS:1- 5 SC 1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SC 5 SC 6 BP1 BP 3 BP2 2 cm

Harold G. Kirk 10 Energy Deposition (N. Souchlas)

Harold G. Kirk 11 SH1 Peak Energy Deposition 5 W/g

Harold G. Kirk 12 SH2 Peak Energy Deposition 2 W/g

Harold G. Kirk 13 SH4 Peak Energy Deposition 5 mW/g

Harold G. Kirk 14 Shielding Cooling Scenario - Bob Weggel Current Baseline: 60% WC beads + 40% H 2 O Evaluate gas cooling—then can consider W instead of WC V(%)v(m/s)Press. Drop (atmos) SF Air H Ar10, He Hg (If Hg is considered)

Harold G. Kirk 15 Pion/muon yields for different atomic Z’s and beam energies (J.Back) Study 2 NF geometry and B- map Acceptance probability histogram used at z=6m (based on ICOOL)

Harold G. Kirk 16 What about Gallium? Ga (Z=31) is near the Cu (Z=29) peak. Gallium is a metal (chemically like Al) Physical Properties: ρ = 6.1 g/cm 3 (as a liquid) Melting Point = C Boiling Point = C

Harold G. Kirk 17 Optimized Target Geometry –X. Ding Gallium r = 4.2cm Beam angle = 77 mrad Beam/Jet crossing angle = 9 mrad Meson Production: 15% less than Hg

Harold G. Kirk 18 Targetry Tasks for 2012 In progress Iterate Coils/Shielding configuration Design Hg Handling System Finalize Coil/Shielding Configuration What needs yet to be done before costing exercise Define Beam Windows (Up and Down Stream) Define Remote Handling System Define Target Hall configuration Begin Costing (July 2012)

Harold G. Kirk 19 SUMMARY l Coil configuration baseline is IDS120h l Baseline shielding is 60% WC + 40% H 2 O l Current target activities focus on: n Establishing a Hg system configuration n Establish a thermal management shielding scenario (gas cooling is being considered) l We are exploring Ga as a possible target alternative

Harold G. Kirk 20 Backup Slides

Harold G. Kirk 21 The Study 2 Target System Neutrino Factory Study 2 Target Concept

Harold G. Kirk 22 STUDY II SOLENOID GEOMETRY SC#1 -120<z<57.8 cm R in =63.3 cm R out =127.8 cm SC#2 67.8<z<140.7 cm R in =68.6 cm R out =101.1 cm SC# cm (TOTAL # SC=13)‏ 5 SHIELDING SC# 2-13 SC#1 IRON PLUG RESISTIVE COILS SC #1 IR

Harold G. Kirk 23 Peak Energy Deposition 5.5 mW/g ITER Limit: 1m W/cc  0.15 mW/g

Harold G. Kirk 24 Capture Systems Comparisons IDS-120 Study 2

Harold G. Kirk 25 Key Target Challenges General Target Issues l Thermal management (~3 MW power deposited) l Shielding (SC solenoids required) l Target integrity (thermal shock) l Target regeneration (50 Hz rep-rate) l 20T environment Liquid Hg specific issues l Stable fluid flow (Nnzzle performance) l Hg handling system