University of Southern California Barriers to Global Trade Through Marine Ports Country Reports University of Southern California Marshall School of Business.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IBM Governmental Programs © 2003 IBM Corporation IBMs Global Supply Chain Evolution in Post ITA Environment Douglas Gregory VP IBM Governmental Programs.
Advertisements

Manitoba International Gateway Strategy Manitoba Infrastructure & Transportation.
Trends in Port Labour Regulations and Tools to Increase Competitiveness  Ports have historically been highly labour intensive and operated largely through.
The Trade Growth Challenge Liner Shipping Responses to the Growth of Global Freight.
NCFRP 04: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight System Mobility Constraints Presenter: Joan Yim (CH2MHill) Project.
STUNBICH STUNBICH INVESTMENT LIMITED ADVANCED LOGISTICS AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES RC:
1 The Propeller Club of Los Angeles & Long Beach January 26, 2011 David Arsenault Vice President Hyundai Merchant Marine.
Use of hubs in the Container Terminal Industry Carl Jensen, Vice President APM Terminals International (Singapore Regional Office) IAPH Forum, HCMC Vietnam.
Supply Chain Management
Freight Action Strategy for the Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor February 2003.
Africa Trade Forum II 24 September 2012
Intermodal Transportation and Terminal Operations Transportation Logistics Spring 2008.
World Bank Port Reform Toolkit Module 2 The Evolution of Ports in a Competitive World.
Global Business. Drivers of Globalization Business Needs 1.Lower cost factors of production (labor, natural resources) 2.Larger market size to support.
The Clean Trucks Program CEE 587 Spring  Steamship lines (APL, Cosco)  Terminal Operators (MTC, SSA)  Port Authorities (Port of Seattle)  County.
Logistics and Regions. Trends The regions are becoming integrated in large-scale network economies (new markets conditions, reliance on global supply.
Freight Security and the World Economic Forum December 5, 2002.
TRB CFS Session 414 January Freight Data for the Future Report From the TRB CFS Conference July 8-9, 2005 Joseph L. Schofer Northwestern University.
Intermodal terminals Unit 1: Defining the Freight System.
Pharma & Healthcare Logistics Development Roadmap for Luxembourg T h e r e i s s o m e t h i n g g o i n g o n i n L u x e m b o u r g ! T A S T r u s.
Los Angeles Transportation Club May 14, 2013 Scott Satterlee C.H. Robinson Senior Vice President.
Supplier Selection & Evaluation
Field Operations U.S. Customs and Border Protection Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) Texas Broker and Freight Forwarder Conference.
Presented By: POTENTIAL WEST COAST DOCK STRIKE. Agenda The Issues The Issues Parties Involved Parties Involved Speculations Speculations Learning from.
Perspective on the Trucking Industry Jim Gill California Cartage Company March 23, 2006.
21st Century Customs Solution
California Integrated Logistics Center. A BART TRAIN FOR FREIGHT Moving freight through the Port of Oakland without increasing highway congestion Faster.
Global Project Management April 23, 2008 Challenges and Opportunities By Wafa Bunney.
Transportation—Managing the Flow of the Supply Chain Lecture 8.
Collaborative Cross-Border Transportation Planning & Strategies
Transportation Infrastructure
University of Southern California Barriers to Global Maritime Trade University of Southern California Marshall School of Business Busan, Korea November.
Chapter 16 Global Logistics and Distribution. Definition of Global Logistics (P. 514) Global logistics is defined as the design and management of a system.
ATHENS PROGRAMME Stijn Koshari & Tom Van der Voorde KU Leuven – Chemical Engineering.
Learning Goals Know why companies use distribution channels and understand the functions that these channels perform. Learn how channel members interact.
1 Todays Challenges for transport corridors The perspective of the Interreg IVC project PORT Integration Michael Stange.
SANDLER AND TRAVIS TRADE ADVISORY SERVICES, INC. © Sandler & Travis Trade Advisory Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved Trade Facilitation.
California Marine Transportation System: Challenges and Potential Solutions Presented to: Western Cargo Conference San Diego, CA October 16, 2004 Gill.
RAIL TRANSPORT SEMINAR: RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE – KEY TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT Operation on the Bulgarian railway market – current situation and.
Chapter 16 Global Logistics and Materials Management.
Roadmap to Bogor Goals Industry Report Roadmap Taskforce – Australia, Brunei Darussalam and Singapore.
May Draft list Freight Policy Barriers. State Submitted by Mike Moore State Legislative proposals: – State tax policies threaten increased costs.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
Security Challenges Facing Seaport Operations Day 1 - Module 3.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
5 th Annual International Business Research Forum Globalization of the Pharmaceutical Industry Implications to Information Technology Bruce Fadem March.
MULTI MODALISM CHAPTER 11. INTRODUCTION Multi-modalism / Combined Transport Operation: Process of operating a door-to-door/ warehouse-to-warehouse service.
Public Private Partnership Discussion IFAC, Kansas City April 7, 2009.
Chapter 14 Global Production, Outsourcing and Logistics 1.
Interim Report on Cutting Cost and Time in Maritime Container Transport Maritime Experts Group 23 May 2006 Hanoi, Viet Nam 27th APEC Transportation Working.
Logistics Management CHAPTER ELEVEN McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Global Production, Outsourcing, and Logistics 11.
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative 2006.
Page 1 5th Meeting of the Inter-American Committee on Ports Organization of American States Wednesday, September 12, 2007 “Supply Chain Security and Trade.
1 California’s Global Gateways: Trends and Issues Jon Haveman Public Policy Institute of California.
Supply Chain and Security 17 November Cubic ©2009 All Rights Reserved 2 Security Challenges – Supply Chain 9/11 heightened fear of terrorist attacks.
CROSS BORDER TRADE October, 2004 M O V I N G F O R W A R D 2004.
Copyright © Crown Agents 2013 International and Intra-regional trade in the 21 st century – transport issues/ Borderless Conference 26/27 February 2014.
Chapter 13 Transportation in the Supply Chain
GLOBAL DIMENSIONS OF SUPPLY CHAINS Chapter 3 GLOBAL DIMENSIONS OF SUPPLY CHAINS MANAGING SUPPLY CHAINS A LOGISTICS APPROACH 9e COYLE | LANGLEY | NOVACK.
Chapter 3 Global Dimensions of Supply Chains Learning Objectives  After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following: Describe the scope.
PORT OF TACOMA. Request adoption of Resolution , developing a Port of Tacoma Drayage Truck Improvement Program to improve the local and regional.
Global Dialogue on Customs Capacity Building 04 April 2007 © 2007 IBM Corporation Benefits of Supply Chain Security and Trade Facilitation: The IBM Experience.
Gateways & Trade Corridors FLUIDITY INDICATOR June 2014.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Chapter 13 Transportation in a Supply Chain
Blair Morris – GM Commercial 9 August 2016
Best Practices Consortium
Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Presentation transcript:

University of Southern California Barriers to Global Trade Through Marine Ports Country Reports University of Southern California Marshall School of Business Busan, Korea November 15, 2005

University of Southern California China Key Findings –Measures in place to inspect containers since the early 1990s target duty–not security–concerns –Local, city, and provincial governments have significant influence on the flow of goods –Declaring export goods for the US markets through AMS has improved data efficiency within the supply chain

University of Southern California China Barriers / Frictions –24 hours AMS rule, while beneficial to shippers, has resulted in less flexibility for manufacturers and freight forwarders –Elimination of the quota system in 2005 has been disruptive to the smooth flow of goods Trends –Strong government initiative help expand port capabilities and develop the inter-modal structure –MNCs are pushing the freight forwarders to extend themselves into the inter-modal system Best Practices –The Chinese government plays a central role in developing infrastructure to support the flow of goods

University of Southern California China Barriers / Frictions –24 hours AMS rule, while beneficial to shippers, has resulted in less flexibility for manufacturers and freight forwarders –Elimination of the quota system in 2005 has been disruptive to the smooth flow of goods Trends –Strong government initiative help expand port capabilities and develop the inter-modal structure –MNCs are pushing the freight forwarders to extend themselves into the inter-modal system Best Practices –The Chinese government plays a central role in developing infrastructure to support the flow of goods

University of Southern California Japan Key Findings –24 hour rule is exceedingly expensive for Japanese manufacturers, setting some back as much as 10 years in efficiency improvement efforts –CTPAT has neither a positive nor negative effect on most businesses –Growth of business in China affecting Japan in complex ways, primarily in the form of increased competition –Ports could be optimized through around-the-clock operation, shortened delays, etc –In general, US business practices are seen as somewhat short term and would benefit from a more relationship focused approach when doing business with Japanese companies

University of Southern California Japan Key Findings –24 hour rule is exceedingly expensive for Japanese manufacturers, setting some back as much as 10 years in efficiency improvement efforts –CTPAT has neither a positive nor negative effect on most businesses –Growth of business in China affecting Japan in complex ways, primarily in the form of increased competition –Ports could be optimized through around-the-clock operation, shortened delays, etc –In general, US business practices are seen as somewhat short term and would benefit from a more relationship focused approach when doing business with Japanese companies

University of Southern California Japan Barriers / Frictions –24 hr Rule/Less than around the clock operation of Ports –US companies’ 1 month grace period for payment despite frequent late deliveries –Empty containers/freighters on return trip to port of embarkation –Lack of security standardization in container yards Trends –Chinese currency controls putting pressure on Japanese manufacturers Best Practices –Customer Broker/Shipper informal rating system –Organized and detailed bookkeeping, information gathering, and use of IT helps facilitate trade –Geographic concentration of trade related companies near ports increases efficiency

University of Southern California Korea Key Findings –Security requirements are not an issue in Port of Busan –43% of cargo in Busan is transshipment (60% of that cargo is China bound) –Use of RFID is in testing phase Barriers / Frictions –The ports of Busan are currently operating at overcapacity. New Port, set to complete in 2011, will more than double its capacity –Information flow is not smooth due to various IT systems involved along the supply chain

University of Southern California Korea Trends –Threat of transshipment cargo business moving to new ports in China Best Practices –Port-MIS, a centralized IT system, provides efficient transfer of information between related parties at the port of Busan –Hutchison is the most efficient terminal operator in Busan

University of Southern California Mexico Key Findings –Ports have recently experienced dramatic rise in volume but overall flow is still relatively small compared to other world ports –Inter-modal transportation is a bottleneck due to poor infrastructure but significant emphasis on improving the railroads to Texas is underway –Huge discrepancy exists between private and public companies, particularly with technology sophistication –Bureaucracy is still a major concern and many transactions are influenced by relationships

University of Southern California Mexico Key Findings –Ports have recently experienced dramatic rise in volume but overall flow is still relatively small compared to other world ports. –Inter-modal transportation is a bottleneck due to poor infrastructure but significant emphasis on improving the railroads to Texas is underway –Huge discrepancy exists between private and public companies, particularly with technology sophistication –Bureaucracy is still a major concern and many transactions are influenced by relationships

University of Southern California Mexico Barriers / Frictions –Ports and inter-modal transportation are bottlenecks to flow of goods –Bureaucracy and conflicts of interest e.g. between customs and shipping companies due to variety of regulations cause information barriers –Security barriers such as 50 mile trucking rule, crime/corruption

University of Southern California Mexico Trends –Increased manufacturing in Mexico –Open economy leading to foreign competition Best Practices –Some private companies have IT systems that allow information to be sent directly into the customs database –Port operator has efficient turn around times by getting trucks in and out of their yard within 10 minutes

University of Southern California Peru Key Findings –Modernization of the Port is critical to the economy of Peru –No coordination between government and stakeholders to minimize transaction costs, set regulations or make decisions related to the port –Drugs and contraband are the main security threats –Customs is viewed as a collection agency rather than a trade facilitator

University of Southern California Peru Barriers / Frictions –There is no cranes at the port so ships must have their own crane –Lack of equipment to efficiently move goods within and out of the port –Inconsistent or lack of IT programs delays the flow of information Trends –Privatization of port, increase concessions within the port –Consolidation of shipping companies, with the 10 largest shipping companies control 60% of the market

University of Southern California Singapore Key Findings –The governmental, regulatory and operating authorities of Singapore work collaboratively to ensure an extremely efficient port –Singapore has been at the forefront of technology, enabling it to consistently improve port efficiencies and meet the challenges of changing regulatory environment. –Capacity constraints and deficient intermodal infrastructure at the US West Coast ports leads to increased costs at all points along the containerized supply chain

University of Southern California Singapore Barriers / Frictions –Multiple user interfaces to intermediary IT systems further burden business users –Ever evolving trade regulations require additional resources to ensure compliance –Capacity constraints and congestion at ports in other countries have a trickle down effect on Singapore Trends –Expansion of port facilities to facilitate increase in future cargo flows –Proactive role in helping shape international regulations and testing emerging technologies

University of Southern California Singapore Best Practices –Centralized IT system, TradeNet allows efficient transfer of information between related parties –Locating port related facilities in close proximity to the port reduces inter- modal costs –Advanced IT systems maintain real-time knowledge of all containers in stacked container yards –Upgrading to advanced heavy equipment and port technologies to improve port efficiencies

University of Southern California USA Key Findings –Already fully utilizing the space at ports. Port expansion plans are unlikely due to pollution concern –There is a system-wide (truck, rail & port access) capacity issue –Powerful labor union (ILWU) have significant influence on future plans and changes at the ports

University of Southern California USA Barriers / Frictions –Inland inter-modal facilities are not correspondingly developed –Port employees know technology could reduce jobs and are reluctant to apply technology –Lack of consistent regulation and awareness of these regulations among economies impede movement of goods –24-hour rule impacts manufacturers both through process information flow and the physical flow of goods –Increase in random container checks cause greater delay due to personnel issues

University of Southern California USA Trends –Ocean carriers plan to transfer some business to other ports (Seattle, Houston, Vancouver, North Mexico) to avoid the congestion at ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach –Standardize rules and regulations among Canada, Mexico, and US to allow more efficient flow of goods –GPS and RFID usage in container tracking will increase. –Technology will help utilize space better and identify exactly where goods are (container management) –Surprisingly, the USA is not pursuing strategies to deploy technology to scan of every container Best Practices –CSI (Customs Security Initiative) and Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (CT-PAT) deployed successfully with trading partners

University of Southern California USA Trends –Ocean carriers plan to transfer some business to other ports (Seattle, Houston, Vancouver, North Mexico) to avoid the congestion at ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach –Standardize rules and regulations among Canada, Mexico, and US to allow more efficient flow of goods –GPS and RFID usage in container tracking will increase. –Technology will help utilize space better and identify exactly where goods are (container management) –Surprisingly, the USA is not pursuing strategies to deploy technology to scan of every container Best Practices –CSI (Customs Security Initiative) and Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (CT-PAT) deployed successfully with trading partners