Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC Medium Range Grid Improvements Mike Schichtel, Chris Bailey, Keith Brill, and David Novak.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
SNPP VIIRS green vegetation fraction products and application in numerical weather prediction Zhangyan Jiang 1,2, Weizhong Zheng 3,4, Junchang Ju 1,2,
Gridded MOS – A Prototype System
KMA will extend medium Range forecast from 7day to 10 day on Oct A post processing technique, Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS), was developed.
Weather-Climate Linkage Dave Novak (WPC) & Jon Gottschalck (CPC) January 21,
Seth Linden and Jamie Wolff NCAR/RAL Evaluation of Selected Winter ’04/’05 Performance Results.
2014 WAF/NWP Conference – January 2014 Precipitation and Temperature Forecast Performance at the Weather Prediction Center David Novak WPC Acting Deputy.
Upcoming Changes in Winter Weather Operations at the Weather Prediction Center (WPC) Great Lakes Operational Meteorological Workshop Dan Petersen, Wallace.
WPC Winter Weather Desk Operations and Verification Dan Petersen Winter weather focal point Keith Brill, David Novak, Wallace Hogsett, and Mark.
“Where America’s Climate, Weather and Ocean Services Begin” NCEP CONDUIT UPDATE Brent A Gordon NCEP Central Operations January 31, 2006.
Weather Prediction Center (WPC) 2014 Review Tony Fracasso Acting Science and Operations Officer Contributions by Chris Bailey, Keith Brill, Jim Hayes,
Improving Excessive Rainfall Forecasts at HPC by using the “Neighborhood - Spatial Density“ Approach to High Res Models Michael Eckert, David Novak, and.
Instituting Reforecasting at NCEP/EMC Tom Hamill (ESRL) Yuejian Zhu (EMC) Tom Workoff (WPC) Kathryn Gilbert (MDL) Mike Charles (CPC) Hank Herr (OHD) Trevor.
Participation in MAP D-PHASE / COPS Description of MAP D-PHASE project Implementation strategy Key relevant features of GEM v3.3.0 Overview of verification.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Hydrometeorlogical Prediction Center (HPC) Forecast Operations Branch Winter Weather Desk Dan Petersen.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
HPC Winter Weather Desk Operations and 2011 and 2012 Winter Weather Experiments Dan Petersen Winter weather focal point with contributions from.
National Blend of Global Models An Overview
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Exploitation of Ensemble Output (and other operationally cool stuff) at NCEP HPC Peter C. Manousos NCEP HPC Science & Operations Officer
A Regression Model for Ensemble Forecasts David Unger Climate Prediction Center.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
UMAC data callpage 1 of 25North American Ensemble Forecast System - NAEFS EMC Operational Models North American Ensemble Forecast System Yuejian Zhu Ensemble.
National Weather Service Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Post-Tropical Cyclone Sandy Rain, Snow, and Inland Wind Impacts David Novak Jim Hoke, Wallace.
UMAC data callpage 1 of 28Operational wave modeling suite EMC Operational Models NCEP WAVE MODELING SUITES Arun Chawla and Jose-Henrique Alves NCEP Wave.
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center (HPC) Forecast Operations Branch Michael Eckert Senior Branch Forecaster.
1 Ensemble Reforecasts Presented By: Yuejian Zhu (NWS/NCEP) Contributors:
Pacific Predictability: Perspective of a NWS Forecast Office Brad Colman NOAA/National Weather Service Seattle, Washington
Evaluation of a Challenging Warm Season QPF month at HPC: June 2009 Brendon Rubin-Oster Richard Otto (with contributions from Mike Bodner, Keith Brill,
June 19, 2007 GRIDDED MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS –Essentially the same MOS that is in text bulletins –Number and.
VERIFICATION OF NDFD GRIDDED FORECASTS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES John Horel 1, David Myrick 1, Bradley Colman 2, Mark Jackson 3 1 NOAA Cooperative Institute.
By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist WFO Corpus Christi.
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Hydrometeorological Prediction Center 2011 Review Kenny James Forecaster With contributions from Faye Barthold, Mike.
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS (MOS) TEMPERATURE FORECAST VERIFICATION JJA 2011 Benjamin Campbell April 24,2012 EAS 4480.
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC Experimental PQPF: Method, Products, and Preliminary Verification 1 David Novak HPC Science and Operations Officer.
Verification of Global Ensemble Forecasts Fanglin Yang Yuejian Zhu, Glenn White, John Derber Environmental Modeling Center National Centers for Environmental.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Application of Numerical Weather Prediction Prognoses to Operational Weather Forecasting in Hong Kong Pre-CAS Technical Conference on "Environmental Prediction.
APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL MODELS IN THE FORECAST PROCESS - FROM NATIONAL CENTERS TO THE LOCAL WFO David W. Reynolds National Weather Service WFO San Francisco.
Meteorology 485 Long Range Forecasting Friday, January 16, 2004.
Statistical Post Processing - Using Reforecast to Improve GEFS Forecast Yuejian Zhu Hong Guan and Bo Cui ECM/NCEP/NWS Dec. 3 rd 2013 Acknowledgements:
Predictability of High Impact Weather during the Cool Season over the Eastern U.S: CSTAR Operational Aspects Matthew Sardi and Jeffrey Tongue NOAA/NWS,
NCEP Vision: First Choice – First Alert – Preferred Partner NOAA Hydrometeorological TestBed at the NCEP Hydrometeorological Prediction Center (HPC) Faye.
Kris Shrestha James Belanger Judith Curry Jake Mittelman Phillippe Beaucage Jeff Freedman John Zack Medium Range Wind Power Forecasts for Texas.
Impacts of Rossby Wave Packets on Forecast Uncertainties and Errors
Exploring Multi-Model Ensemble Performance in Extratropical Cyclones over Eastern North America and the Western Atlantic Ocean Nathan Korfe and Brian A.
Overview of WG5 activities and Conditional Verification Project Adriano Raspanti - WG5 Bucharest, September 2006.
MOS and Evolving NWP Models Developer’s Dilemma: Frequent changes to NWP models… Make need for reliable statistical guidance more critical Helps forecasters.
MDL Requirements for RUA Judy Ghirardelli, David Myrick, and Bruce Veenhuis Contributions from: David Ruth and Matt Peroutka 1.
10th COSMO General Meeting, Cracow, Poland Verification of COSMOGR Over Greece 10 th COSMO General Meeting Cracow, Poland.
Weather Prediction Center (WPC) Winter Weather Desk Operations Dan Petersen, Mike Bodner, Mark Klein, Chris Bailey, Dave Novak.
Verification of operational seasonal forecasts at RA-VI Regional Climate Center South East European Virtual Climate Change Centre Goran Pejanović Marija.
Kathryn Gilbert, Project Manager David Myrick, Deputy Project Manager Wednesday, February 18, 2015 Co-Authors: Jeff Craven, Dave Novak, Tom Hamill, Jim.
Aviation Products from the Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory Presented.
Translating Advances in Numerical Weather Prediction into Official NWS Forecasts David P. Ruth Meteorological Development Laboratory Symposium on the 50.
Encast Global forecasting.
Medium Range Forecasting at the Weather Prediction Center (WPC) –
Xuexing Qiu and Fuqing Dec. 2014
Hydrometeorological Predication Center
Dan Petersen Bruce Veenhuis Greg Carbin Mark Klein Mike Bodner
A Review of the CSTAR Ensemble Tools Available for Operations
Model Post Processing.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
Post Processing.
Atmospheric Sciences 452 Spring 2019
Presentation transcript:

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC Medium Range Grid Improvements Mike Schichtel, Chris Bailey, Keith Brill, and David Novak

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Staffed UTC by two forecasters -Temperatures/Pop Desk Max/MinT and PoP Grids -Pressure/Fronts Desk Winds Grids Medium Range Desk Preliminary grids issued by 1415 UTC (15 UTC deadline) -including 00 UTC ECMWF ensemble Final grids usually issued by 18 UTC (20 UTC deadline) -incorporating 12 UTC guidance suite without ECMWF Temps/PoP Pressure/Fronts Sky, Dewpoint, and Wx derived

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPCGuide Medium Range 5 km Grids DEWPOINTS CLOUD COVER WEATHER TYPE MIN TEMPS MAX TEMPS WINDS 12 HOUR POPS

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Day 7 Skill 2008 = Day 5 Skill 2001! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Anomaly correlation die-off scores of Model and Ensemble Mean Forecasts

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Total: 288 individual runs per day! ModelCycle (UTC)Run Duration (Days) Members per Day ECMWF00, DGEX06, 1882 ECMWF Ens.00, GFS00, 06, 12, GEM Global00, UKMET00, 1262 NOGAPS00, 06, 12, 1884 NAEFS00, FNMOC Ens.0010 GFS Ens.00, 06, 12, GEM Ens.00, Primary Medium Range Models/Ensembles at HPC

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Full International Guidance Suite including ECMWF deterministic and ensemble and bias- corrected NAEFS Medium Range Data GEFS Member ECMWF Member CMC Member ECMWF Mean NAEFS Mean GEFS Mean GFS ECMWF 90 Ensemble members

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Maximum Temps vs. GFS MOS HPC Continuity NDFD Continuity HPCICTDGEX GFSECMWFMSC ECMWF Ens Forecaster compares an international guidance suite, GFS MOS, climatology, and HPC and NDFD (NWS) continuity Forecaster chooses blends and weights Forecast Process Blender Final Product

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Improvements Made Td and Sky April 15, 2010: Methods to derive Dew Point and Sky Changed. MAE improved up to 20%. Sky: Model guidance weighted according to forecaster’s PoP blends. No downscaling. Dew Point: Model guidance weighted according to forecaster’s Max/MinT blends. Downscaled by using a GDAS-RTMA difference accumulated by applying a decaying weight through time. Testing June 09 – Jan 2010 (green = new) Testing Feb 2010 (green = new) Better in Cool Season

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Improvements Made Td Comparison Before MDL Verification Comparison of April-Sept (00 UTC cycle) HPC (green) highest medium range MAE

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Improvements Made Td Comparison After Change MDL Verification Comparison April-Sept (00 UTC cycle) HPC (green) now lowest MAE Given longer history verification shown in slide #9, HPC skill should be better during cool season

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Latest Improvements Operational as of November 2: Increased use of model guidance downscaled using RTMA instead of PRISM. New Day 7 skill equals = Old method Day 5.5 _ _ _ _ This new HPC DS_FNL score does not yet reflect additional benefits from bias corrections and forecaster modifications

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center New Day 7 skill equals = Old method Day 5.5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ This new HPC DS_FNL score does not yet reflect additional benefits from bias corrections and forecaster modifications

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Other Elements Wind Speed Jul ‘09 – Jul ‘10 HPC similar to NDFD

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Other Elements 12 h PoP Jul ‘09 – Jul ‘10 HPC better than MOS and similar to NDFD

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Improvements Prototyped 6 h Floating Pop Real-time prototyped images available at: Which can be compared to the operational suite at: h statistical PoPs generated from international model suite The 6 h period with the higher PoP is set to the HPC 12 h PoP (consistent with floating PoP principles) The remaining 6 h period is assigned the statistical 6 h PoP value Renamed “Precipitation Likelihood Index” to avoid public confusion.

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Improvements Prototyped Weather Grid Enhancements Real-time prototyped images available at: Which can be compared to the operational suite at: Time resolution increased from 12 h to 6 hourly Precipitation Type Algorithm improved (top-down approach) Slight chance, chance, and likely qualifiers added (based on HPC PoP)

Hydrometeorological Prediction CenterCollaboration Academia / Publications Conferences (like NROW) CSTAR »Rossby Wave Packets etc. EMC / THORPEX -Adaptive Observations »Targeting Observation Program WFOs/RFCs -12Planet Chatroom and coordination calls

Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC uses full suite of international model guidance Given limited forecaster resources, increasingly relying on forecaster blending input coupled with post processing Improvements to Td and Sky have been made Improvements to PoP and Wx grids prototyped Improvements to Max/MinTemps November 2010 (now!) Open to suggestions for improvement Summary