W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 19 Mar 04 Separating the luminosity background from the non-colliding beam-gas contribution  Principle  the problem  the beam-gas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IP angle scan Results Martin Simard Silke Nelson Mike Kelsey.
Advertisements

IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Slide 0 Results from EMMA Injection Line BPM-02 measurements on May 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman, James Jones.
June 28, 2004 BBBTF Steven H. Robertson McGill University, Institute of Particle Physics 1 Beam Background Simulation with B A B AR with B A B AR June.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 5 May 06 Slide 1 Online DCH background analysis  Compare on-line DCH background ratio to Martin's offline analysis  Can we identify.
LER thermal outgassing is back again with us Significant increase in East Diamond signal since May 12, ~3 pm due to thermal outgassing in two pumps VP3044,
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 8 Mar 07  MD goals  Experimental procedure  HER-only x & y scans + high-current extrapolation  [LER only X & y scans +
1 Secondary Particle Data Observations Marcus Palm CERN 11 Dec
W. KozaneckiPEP-II MAC meeting, Dec 04Slide 1 Run-4 Beam-beam Performance Summary  Time evolution of beam currents, spot sizes, tunes & luminosity.
Initial rough Background comparisons between Run5 and Run 4 Guy Wormser LAL Orsay.
W. KozaneckiMD planning meeting, 20 Jan 04 Background characterization strategy  MD goals  Background sources  Operational procedures  Open questions.
Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 1 Current Background Situation in BaBar “Always a concern, often an issue but never a showstopper” zThe background.
Parasitic parametrization of LER, HER and Lumi sensitivty in Trickle injection mode Very simple idea: use the very different variation with time of HER.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Web-Based ILC Multi-Bunch Simulation Database Glen White (SLAC / QMUL) ILC MDI Workshop SLAC, Jan 8th 2005.
Lausanne, Generator Miniworkshop, March 2001 Massimiliano Ferro-Luzzi, CERN/EP Beam-gas background in LHCb What nuisances for LHCb from p-A background.
HER vacuum study June 2006 J. Kaminski weekly MDI meeting 7/13/2006.
M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 16 Jan 2004 BaBar-wide Background monitoring  Motivation  institutionalize...  through a weekly report to PEP-II/BBR meeting.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 9 Mar 07  MD goals  Experimental procedure  HER-only x & y scans + high-current extrapolation  [LER only X & y scans] + high-current.
1 Background Monitoring in the DIRC MDI meeting, May 25 th 2006 Nicolas Arnaud  Automatic monitoring  A few plots  What’s next?
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 24 Apr 06 Slide 1 Using the gas-induced beam blowup to measure vertical IP beam sizes  Principle  heat PR02 VP8020.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meetiing, 20 May 04 Serendipitous measurement of beam-beam tune shift in the LER  Principle  measure colliding tunes (tune tracker.
Boost Analysis Status Matt Weaver MDI Meeting March 31, 2006.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
S. White, LBS 17 May Van Der Meer Scans: Preliminary Observations.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 29 July 04  Goal: measure the luminosity degradation associated with  parasitic crossings  horizontal crossing angle  Principle.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
W. KozaneckiIR summary, BES-III workshop Interaction Region: a terse summary  Accelerator issues  Parameter comparison with PEP-II/KEKB  IR layout 
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Experimental background at the presence of pressure rise in RHIC Angelika Drees, Ubaldo Iriso-Ariz RHIC How to measure collision rates Vacuum and collision.
M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review, Dec 04  Operational issues  radiation aborts  radiation-dose and background monitoring  Background characterization.
Run 8 Polarization measurements from STAR BBC Andrew Gordon September 12, 2008.
Analysis of HF optimization scan data 21 July 2015 Monika Grothe (Wisconsin) 1 21 July 2015 HF optimization scan analysis.
1 Mode Parameter Variations from GONG Ring Diagrams: An Update Rachel Howe, NSO.
Afterglow Studies Eric Torrence University of Oregon 183 nd LMTF Meeting 10 October 2013.
BSRT CALIBRATION MD SUMMARY LSWG #6-15/09/2015 BSRT TEAM.
Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY Summary of new FLASH CSR studies Bolko Beutner, DESY Beam Dynamics Meeting
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Beam-beam deflection during Van der Meer scans
Title Authors Introduction Text, text, text, text, text, text Background Information Text, text, text, text, text, text Observations Text, text, text,
J.Feltesse1 Measurement of F L the longitudinal structure function at HERA Low x meeting, Lisbon, Portugal 28 June 2006.
Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry and Cross Section of Inclusive  0 Production in Polarized p+p Collisions at 200 GeV Outline  Introduction  Experimental.
Measurement of the Double Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Inclusive Jet Production in Polarized p+p Collisions at 200 GeV Outline Introduction RHIC.
Pressure data from SPS MDw35 H.Neupert, M.Taborelli For SPSU, 23/09/2010.
M. WeaverB-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006 BaBar Backgrounds Matt Weaver B-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006.
Beam-Beam head-on Limit J. Barranco, X. Buffat, T. Pieloni, C. Tambasco, J. Qiang, K. Ohmi, M. Crouch for the Beam-Beam team BI BSRT Team George and Enrico.
Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the Coulomb Nuclear Interference Region September 30, 2006 RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting RIKEN, Wako, Japan.
Criteria for dynamic aperture limits and impact of the multipolar errors: summary of the simulations with beam-beam for levelling scenarios at 5 and 7.5x10.
High Luminosity LHC Robustness & tolerances Catia Milardi HL LHC Task 2.2, September 19 th 2012.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
(Towards a) Luminosity model for LHC and HL-LHC F. Antoniou, M. Hostettler, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Papotti Acknowledgements: Beam-Beam and Luminosity studies.
1 Impact de l’effet faisceau-faisceau sur la precision de la mesure de la luminosité à l’ILC Cécile Rimbault, LAL Orsay SOCLE,19-20 Novembre 2007, Clermont-Ferrand.
Results of TCL scans D. Mirarchi, M. Deile, S. Redaelli, B. Salvachua, Collimation Working Group, 22 nd February 2016.
Effect of high synchrotron tune on Beam- Beam interaction: simulation and experiment A.Temnykh for CESR operating group Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
dependence on QL can not longer be seen
Beam-beam limits: MD proposal
BBBTF: where do we go from here? – a personal viewpoint -
Machine Background Status & issues in BaBar/PEP-II
COMPARING EXPONENTIAL AND LINEAR FUNCTIONS
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Trickle Background Investigation
UVIS Calibration Update
ECMbias in the presence of Beamstrahlung
Long term projections summary
Turn-By-Turn Emittance Tracking in CesrTA with Space Charge
Imperial laser system and analysis
Background characterization: MD plan
ATLAS full run-2 luminosity combination
Presentation transcript:

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 19 Mar 04 Separating the luminosity background from the non-colliding beam-gas contribution  Principle  the problem  the beam-gas cross-term background scales with I L * I H (always)  under physics conditions, L ~ I L * I H as long as the bunch pattern does not change neglecting beam-beam blow up   decorrelate L variations from beam-current variations by  modifying the constant current accidentaly (L dips) deliberately (beam-beam scans)  modifying the bunch pattern: L ~ [ I L * I h / n b ] / [  x *  y ]  See for a summary of the 16 March MD and of the available datasets W. Kozanecki

MDI meeting, 19 Mar 04 Beam-beam scans 143 x 107 mA 1600 b 2172 x 1300 mA 1415 b 610 x 395 mA 801 colldg b

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 19 Mar 04 Scaling: L or I L * I H ? 1320 bunches (27 Jan 04) 801 bunches (16 Mar 04) 1320 bunches (27 Jan 04) 801 bunches (16 Mar 04) I L * I H Lumi

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 19 Mar 04 Conclusions  After subtraction of the single-beam contributions, the DCH current measured in the 800-bunch pattern during the 16 Mar 04 MD  does not scale with the product of beam currents I L * I H  scales linearly with L. The measured sensitivity (52  A/10 33 ) equals that observed in the February 2002 background-characterization runs (53  A/10 33 ).  The L sensitivity measured in the Jan 04 background runs is 60  A/10 33   one cannot exclude that the DCH L term measured in 2004 receives a 5-10% contribution from non-colliding beam-gas.  however, the spread of fitted sensitivities is sufficiently large that it may be responsible for this apparent excess  The same method should be applicable to other background measures (SVT occupancy, diamonds/pin diodes, EMC occupancy, DIRC scaler rates)