By: Becky Gardner, Lucy Monigle, Tinus van Wyk, T.J. White.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Choosing a Journal APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Advertisements

Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Getting published in academic publications Tips to Help you Publish Successfully June 2004.
How to publish a case report
Tips for Publishing Qualitative Research Sandra Mathison University of British Columbia Editor-in-Chief, New Directions for Evaluation.
What happens after submission? Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
The Publishing Cycle Closing the Ethical Loop October 2011, University of Maryland Gert-Jan Geraeds, Executive Publisher
ASV Education and Career Development Workshop Put down the pipette and pick up the pen: Getting your work published The third part of the story... The.
From Pipedreams to Pipelines Scholarly Publishing and the Art of Having Fun.
Getting Your Article Published: The Mysteries of Peer-Review and the Decisions of Journals Howard Bauchner, MD, FAAP, FRCPCH Editor-in-Chief, ADC Professor.
Reviewing Papers: What Reviewers Look For Session 19 C507 Scientific Writing.
Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Publications Master Class Marge Wilson (Pro-Dean for Research in Environment & Alan Haywood (Postgraduate Research.
Experiences from Editing a Journal: Case EJOR Jyrki Wallenius Helsinki School of Economics EJOR Editor Outgoing Editor till June 30, 2005 EJOR.
ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication Week 11: Addressing Reviews/Revisions.
Reasons of rejection Paolo Russo Università di Napoli Federico II Dipartimento di Fisica Napoli, Italy 8th ECMP, Athens, Sep. 13th,
Peer Review for Addiction Journals Robert L. Balster Editor-in-Chief Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
Geoethics in Publishing: Some Ideas for Classroom Discussion Overview: Looking at ethics involved in publishing research in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
5. Presentation of experimental results 5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
Authorship and the reviewer process Joana Pinto Vieira Matthieu Delincé Nicole Zürcher Responsible Conduct in Biomedical Research, EPFL, April 13 th 2012.
How to do Quality Research for Your Research Paper
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
Preparing papers for International Journals Sarah Aerni Special Projects Librarian University of Pittsburgh 20 April 2005.
Publishing in English Language Social Science Journals Daniel T. Lichter Cornell University November 19, 2009.
Dr. Geleana Drew Alston Editorial Assistant, Adult Education Quarterly Former Assistant to the Co-Editor of New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education.
Publication Ethics Hooman Momen, Editor Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
How to Get Published in (better) International Journals Hui Wang, MD, PhD Editorial Director John Wiley & Sons.
Ian White Publisher, Journals (Education) Routledge/Taylor & Francis
Acknowledgements and Conflicts of interest Dr Gurpreet Kaur Associate Professor Dept of Pharmacology Government Medical College Amritsar.
What Does it Take to Publish in the AJAE? Get a good idea. Turn the idea into a well-posed, answerable question. Do the research right. Write Effectively.
How to Satisfy Reviewer B and Other Thoughts on the Publication Process: Reviewers’ Perspectives Don Roy Past Editor, Marketing Management Journal.
5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can not be combined together at one time -
Maximizing the Probability of Journal Article Acceptance By Ron C. Mittelhammer.
Authorship, peer review and conflicts of interest.
Developing a successful journal One editor’s Tweets Struggle between editor and scientist Manami Inoue, MD, PhD Graduate School of Medicine, The University.
Copernicus Gesellschaft © Copernicus Gesellschaft The Two-Stage Publication Process for Journals published by Copernicus Gesellschaft Foster scientific.
The peer-review process. The Peer-Review Process Refereeing Practices and Policies My focus will be on the situation at The Astrophysical Journal, but.
Scientific Peer Review Yixin Chen, Associate Professor Computer & Information Science University of Mississippi April 9, 2013.
B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department of Plant Physiology FS CU RNDr. Jan Petrášek, Ph.D. 5. Presentation.
DISSECTING A RESEARCH PAPER. WHAT IS A PERIODICAL? Period: amount of time –Magazines (every week or month) –Newspapers (every day) –Journals (every month.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING How a manuscript becomes an article.
Selecting a Journal. Choosing a journal before doing the research My advice is to not pick a target journal before doing the research – Lot’s of people.
HOW TO WRITE A PAPER FOR PUBLICATION IN A SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL.
Jim Neaton PubH 8400 December 12, Perspective of an Editor: How it Works Controlled Clinical Trials (now Clinical Trials) –25 Associate Editors;
JOURNAL ARTICLES AN INTRODUCTION. WHAT IS A PERIODICAL? Period: amount of time Magazines (every week or month) Newspapers (every day) Journals (every.
How does publication in psychological science work?
Evaluating a paper (Part 2): Peer review.
VII Ethics considerations
GETTING PUBLISHED IN URBAN LIBRARY JOURNAL
Publishing a paper.
RCR Workshop on Authorship and Peer Review
From PhD chapter to article
Writing for Publication: It’s Easier Than You Think
CSC 682: Advanced Computer Security
Academic Writing and Publishing
Information Literacy Peer Reviewed Sources
Writing for Publication
Researching Physics Web-based Research.
Business The test… The peer reviews….
5. Presenting a scientific work
5. Presenting a scientific work
For physicists, by physicists, since 1986
Chapter 18: Submitting a paper
Scholarly Writing: Term Papers to Publication
Launch And Information Session
Presentation transcript:

By: Becky Gardner, Lucy Monigle, Tinus van Wyk, T.J. White

R esearch! 1 st author writes the draft E dited by coauthors C oauthors make comments D rafts are revised M anuscript ready for submission P rocess can take months but, the shorter the better!

Things to consider when choosing a Scientific Journal Quality Popularity Reputation Reviews Prestige We like to think of choosing a journal like applying to college, the better the journal, the more it benefits your reputation.

Submit Manuscript Journal editor sends manuscript to 2 anonymous peer reviewers. (extremely critical readers) There are 3 options:  Accept (Rare)  Accept with Revision (Common)  Rejection (Some)

Peer Reviewers and Anonymous Reviewers  Anonymous reviews are important for both social and professional reasons.  Good science is inevitable when anonymity is imposed and reviewers can be as honest and critical as need be without having to worry about being disliked.  Peer reviewers are chosen by the editors based on their credentials and qualifications. “Peers”, are usually scientist who have ample experience and expertise.

Bad Science Bad Writing Duplications Dull Not what the Journals’ customers want to read

Scooping is a common phrase used in the scientific journal editorial process. Scooping occurs when the competition beats you to the chase.

While it seems as though this would be an expensive process it actually does not involve money. Having a paper published is strictly to get ones name and ideas publicized. Being published is an honor that comes with both respect and resignation. So despite the fact you do not get paid it is important to broadcast your work. Peer reviewers are also not paid. It is an honor to review someone’s paper because it means you yourself have been recognized as a creditable, trusted scientist. Your job is to make sure “bad science” is not published and that in itself is admirable.

1 What does one consider when choosing a scientific journal? 2 What is the importance of an anonymous review? 3. How is someone chosen to be a peer reviewer? 4. What is scooping? 5. How much do reviewers get paid? 6. Up to how long can the whole process take? 7. What are reasons for rejection? 8. Why is the importance of getting published?