1 RS-1 G  750GeV 0.1 Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QCD Background… and the Resolution Saminder Dhaliwal August 30 th 2005.
Advertisements

N-1 Plots. 2 N-1 Plots – Lead Photon Mass Cut at 100 GeV applied Lead Photon – More plots in Backup.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
10/14/20051 Tau reconstruction and H/A →  H/A →  MC events: PYTHIA ⇒ OSCAR ⇒ DIGI (mass 120 GeV ?) 10k events overnight DIGI ⇒ DST: crashes DIGI ⇒
L. Perera LPC physics meeting 11/17/ Search for H/A →  Lalith Perera Rutgers University for Rutgers CMS Group Amit Lath, Keith Rose, Sunil Somalvar,
Overview of results on trigger efficiencies for ttbar CSA07 samples (Part of the work towards AN note: Trigger performance for top events: evaluation,
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech QCD Meeting 03 July 2007.
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech WG3/WG4 Meeting 29 June 2007.
TRIGGER EFFICIENCIES IN 20X. Semileptonic events 1 lepton from W 1 lepton from W p T gen >10 GeV, || 10 GeV, ||20 GeV,||
1 High energy photon pairs from RS-1 Gravitons: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS HEEPP Group Meeting 24 March 2007.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Semileptonic events 1 lepton from W p T gen >10 GeV, ||20 GeV,||13,||
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech 04 December 2007.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
1 High energy photon pairs: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS Group Meeting 13June 2007.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
1 High energy photon pairs from RS-1 Gravitons: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS WG4 Group Meeting 01 June 2007.
Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.
Stefan Kasselmann Bad Honnef, August 2006 RWTH Aachen, III. Phys. Inst. B Semileptonic tt decays with 0.1/fb Stefan Kasselmann III. Physikalisches Institut.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
1 Hgg Cut based Analysis update Jim Branson, Chris Palmer, Marco Pieri, Matteo Sani, Sean Simon.
A Study of Electron Identification Jim Branson UCSD with collaborators from FNAL, UCSB & UCSD.
María Cepeda (CIEMAT, Madrid) Valencia, II CPAN days 1.
Commissioning and Performance of the CMS High Level Trigger Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago for the CMS collaboration.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
28 July 2006 CERN REU Status Report 1 Lindsey Gray, University of Florida RCT Trigger Supervisor and Database Project Status Lindsey Gray Advisors: Dr.
Studies of the Electron charge misidentification rate DPG/PH egamma meeting 7/20/09 W. Andrews, D. Evans, F. Golf, J. Mülmenstädt, S. Padhi, Y. Tu, F.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
29,30 July 2010 India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai 1 Update on Z’-> τ τ->τ jet+ τ jet analysis Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Status and Prospects of the H → γγ Analysis Jim Branson - Marco Pieri - Sean Simon UCSD Meeting March 11 th 2008.
Reconstruction of Z->tt->e+t jet events with early data in CMS Konstantinos A. Petridis IOP Conference Lancaster 31st March 2008 Overview Motivation.
28/4/2006Chris Collins-Tooth tth, (h → bb) with EventViews Chris Collins-Tooth, Christian Shaw 03-May-2006.
Dijet Mass and Calibration1 H C A L Z(700) Data and Calibration Dan Green Fermilab June, 2001.
29 Sep QCD backgrounds in charged Higgs searches Alexandros Attikis University of Cyprus (UCY) for the CMS Collaboration cH ± arged 2010 Uppsala,
Status Update: Search for Low Mass Strings at CMS Andy Yen.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.
Fixing Tau HLT (Part 1.5/2) ‏ M.Bachtis. 2 L1 Seeding Fix L1: Seeding with High Et Jet paths to increase efficiency with High Et Still using corrected.
Electron Identification Efficiency from Z→ee Maria Fiascaris University of Oxford In collaboration with Tony Weidberg and Lucia di Ciaccio ATLAS UK SM.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Eff. determination WANG Zheng Mar Feb.2008WANG Zheng2 The method  Eff. Determined from MC sample.  Eff. Determined from data. Object id/efficiency:
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Converted photon and π 0 discrimination based on H    analysis.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
Feb. 4,2009 Jongseok Lee (Sungkyunkwan University)
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction
Interactions of hadrons in the Si-W ECAL
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
Study of Gamma+Jets production
Update: High energy photon pairs Search for RS-1 Gravitons
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS
 discrimination with converted photons
EGAMMA HLT Marco Pieri UCSD Meeting 12 June 2007.
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Converted photon and π0 discrimination based on H  cut-based analysis Zhen Zhang IHEP
 discrimination with converted photons
Higgs  update Catalin and Tony May 22, 2007
Presentation transcript:

1 RS-1 G  750GeV 0.1 Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS

2 MC Sample ~46k RS-1 G  MC events Produced at Caltech with CMSSW_1_3_1 m=750GeV & c=0.1 Candidates reconstructed from two Island Basic Clusters from ECAL Barrel/Endcap with pt>100GeV

3 Invariant Mass Plots MC Candidates:Reco Candidates: Mean = GeV BW width = 10.6 Mean = GeV Sigma = 16.3 pt_photon1>100 && pt_photon2>100

4 L1 Trigger bits

5 L1 Egamma Trigger Efficiency BitNevtEffName A_SingleIsoEG A_SingleIsoEG A_SingleIsoEG A_SingleIsoEG A_SingleIsoEG A_SingleEG A_SingleEG A_SingleEG A_SingleEG A_SingleEG A_DoubleIsoEG A_DoubleEG A_Mu7_IsoEG A_Mu7_EG A_IsoEG10_EG A_IsoEG15_Jet A_IsoEG15_TauJet50 BitNevtEffName A_EG15_Jet A_EG15_TauJet A_IsoEG15_HTT A_EG15_HTT A_IsoEG15_ETM A_EG15_ETM A_TripleIsoEG A_TripleEG A_DoubleMu7_IsoEG A_DoubleMu7_EG A_DoubleIsoEG5_Mu A_DoubleEG5_Mu A_DoubleIsoEG5_HTT A_DoubleEG5_HTT A_DoubleIsoEG5_ETM A_DoubleEG5_ETM15 From total events

6 L1 Trigger bits (cuts) Events that pass reco cuts (3  mass window + pt_photon1&2 > 100)

7 L1 Trigger bits (cuts + MC Truth) Events that pass reco cuts + MC Truth match

8 HLT Trigger bits BitNevt Eff Name HLT1Electron HLT2Electron HLT2ElectronRelaxed HLT1Photon HLT2Photon HLT2PhotonRelaxed From total events HLT Word: 91.0% eff

9 HLT bits (cuts) Events that pass reco cuts (3  mass window + pt_photon1&2 > 100)

10 HLT bits (cuts + MC Truth) Events that pass reco cuts + MC Truth match

11 S1/S9 Pt_photon > 100 Pt_photon > 10 Note: this is only for Barrel Higher energy photonLower energy photon

12 S9/S25 Pt_photon > 100 Pt_photon > 10 Note: this is only for Barrel Higher energy photonLower energy photon

13 ECAL Isolation Higher energy photonLower energy photon Energy from basic clusters summed within  R cone of 0.3 around basic cluster of photon candidate Pt_photon > 100 Pt_photon > 10

14 HCAL Energy Deposit Higher energy photonLower energy photon Energy from HBHE Rechits summed within  R cone of 0.3 around basic cluster of photon candidate Pt_photon > 100 Pt_photon > 10

15 Tracker Isolation Higher energy photonLower energy photon Number of tracks within  R cone of 0.3 around basic cluster of photon candidate Pt_photon > 100 Pt_photon > 10

16 Jets Pt > 100Pt < 100 nJetsetaphi

17 More plots Next steps: Study QCD background samples Energy correction

18 L1 Trigger bits 0 A_SingleMu3 1 A_SingleMu10 2 A_SingleMu14 3 A_SingleMu20 4 A_SingleMu25 5 A_SingleIsoEG5 6 A_SingleIsoEG10 7 A_SingleIsoEG15 8 A_SingleIsoEG20 9 A_SingleIsoEG25 10 A_SingleEG5 11 A_SingleEG10 12 A_SingleEG15 13 A_SingleEG20 14 A_SingleEG25 15 A_SingleJet20 16 A_SingleJet60 17 A_SingleJet A_SingleJet A_SingleJet A_SingleTauJet20 21 A_SingleTauJet60 22 A_SingleTauJet A_SingleTauJet A_SingleTauJet A_HTT A_HTT A_HTT A_HTT A_HTT A_ETM20 31 A_ETM40 32 A_ETM60 33 A_ETM80 34 A_ETM A_DoubleMu7 36 A_DoubleIsoEG10 37 A_DoubleEG20 38 A_DoubleJet A_DoubleTauJet50 40 A_Mu7_IsoEG15 62 A_TripleIsoEG5 63 A_TripleEG10 64 A_TripleJet70 65 A_TripleTauJet50 66 A_DoubleMu7_IsoEG5 67 A_DoubleMu7_EG5 68 A_DoubleIsoEG5_Mu7 69 A_DoubleEG5_Mu7 70 A_DoubleMu7_HTT A_DoubleIsoEG5_HTT A_DoubleEG5_HTT A_DoubleJet50_HTT A_DoubleTauJet50_HTT A_DoubleMu7_ETM15 76 A_DoubleIsoEG5_ETM15 77 A_DoubleEG5_ETM15 78 A_DoubleJet50_ETM15 79 A_DoubleTauJet50_ETM15 80 A_QuadJet50 81 A_MinBias_HTT10 82 A_ZeroBias 41 A_Mu7_EG15 42 A_Mu7_Jet A_Mu7_TauJet50 44 A_IsoEG10_EG10 45 A_IsoEG15_Jet A_IsoEG15_TauJet50 47 A_EG15_Jet A_EG15_TauJet50 49 A_Jet100_TauJet50 50 A_Mu7_HTT A_IsoEG15_HTT A_EG15_HTT A_Jet100_HTT A_TauJet50_HTT A_Mu7_ETM30 56 A_IsoEG15_ETM30 57 A_EG15_ETM30 58 A_Jet100_ETM40 59 A_TauJet50_ETM40 60 A_HTT200_ETM40 61 A_TripleMu7

19 HLT Trigger bits 0 HLT1jet 1 HLT2jet 2 HLT3jet 3 HLT4jet 4 HLT1MET 5 HLT2jetAco 6 HLT1jet1METAco 7 HLT1jet1MET 8 HLT2jet1MET 9 HLT3jet1MET 10 HLT4jet1MET 11 HLT2jetvbfMET 12 HLT1MET1HT 13 HLT1jetPE1 14 HLT1jetPE3 15 HLT1jetPE5 16 HLT1Electron 17 HLT2Electron 18 HLT2ElectronRelaxed 19 HLT1Photon 20 HLT2Photon 21 HLT2PhotonRelaxed 22 HLT1MuonIso 23 HLT1MuonNonIso 24 HLT2MuonIso 25 HLT2MuonNonIso 26 HLT2MuonJPsi 27 HLT2MuonUpsilon 28 HLT2MuonZ 29 HLTNMuonNonIso 30 HLT1MuonStartup 31 HLTB1Jet 32 HLTB2Jet 33 HLTB3Jet 34 HLTB4Jet 35 HLTB1JetMu 36 HLTB2JetMu 37 HLTB3JetMu 38 HLTB4JetMu 39 HLT1Tau 40 HLT2Tau 41 HLTPixelTau 42 HLTXElectronBJet 43 HLTXMuonBJet 44 HLTXMuonBJetSoftMuon 45 HLTZeroBias 46 HLTMinBias 47 HLTMinBiasPixel