Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop 24-25 April 2005 M. S. Tillack.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Summary Slides on FNST Top-level Technical Issues and on FNSF objectives, requirements and R&D Presented at FNST Meeting, UCLA August 18-20, 2009 Mohamed.
Advertisements

FES International Collaboration Program: Vision and Budget Steve Eckstrand International Program Manager Office of Fusion Energy Sciences U.S. Department.
ASIPP Zhongwei Wang for CFETR Design Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto University.
Need for Fusion Nuclear Science and Technology Program Mohamed Abdou Distinguished Professor of Engineering and Applied Science (UCLA) Director, Center.
PhD studies report: "FUSION energy: basic principles, equipment and materials" Birutė Bobrovaitė; Supervisor dr. Liudas Pranevičius.
Conceptual design of a demonstration reactor for electric power generation Y. Asaoka 1), R. Hiwatari 1), K. Okano 1), Y. Ogawa 2), H. Ise 3), Y. Nomoto.
1 Failure modes, effects and rates and remote maintenance/downtime Introduction –Failure is defined as the ending of the ability of a design element to.
ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, 3-4 April 2007 Page 1 How to Achieve High Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability L. Waganer June 2007.
A Roadmap to the realization of fusion energy Francesco Romanelli European Fusion Development Agreement EFDA Leader and JET Leader 17 May 2013 Acknoledgments:
1/11 Maintenance Scheme for Post-ITER Power Reactors S.NISHIO for Reactor Design Team JAERI ; Naka Fusion Research Establishment Naka-machi, Naka-gun Ibaraki-ken.
FNSF Blanket Testing Mission and Strategy Summary of previous workshops 1 Conclusions Derived Primarily from Previous FNST Workshop, August 12-14, 2008.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 8 th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology Heidelberg, Germany 01–
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
June 14-15, 2007/ARR 1 Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code Presented by A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego With contribution.
Goals of the “Town Meeting” Mark Tillack ARIES Tritium Town Meeting March 6-7, 2001 Livermore, CA.
March 3-4, 2008/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: TRL for Heat and Particle Flux Handling A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
Characteristics of Commercial Fusion Power Plants Results from ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting & Symposium July.
Prospect for Attractive Fusion Power (Focus on tokamaks) Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Mini-Conference on Nuclear Renaissance 48th.
Environmental, Safety, and Economics Studies of Magnetic Fusion, Including Power Plant Design Studies Robert W. Conn Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.
September 6-7, 2007/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: Status and Documentation A. René Raffray Mark Tillack University of California, San.
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 9 th International Symposium on Fusion.
Thoughts on Fusion Nuclear Technology Development and the Role of ITER TBM Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Y. ASAOKA, R. HIWATARI and K
Alternative Energy Sources
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/2 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
Developing a Vendor Base for Fusion Commercialization Stan Milora, Director Fusion Energy Division Virtual Laboratory of Technology Martin Peng Fusion.
The Fission-Fusion Hybrid At last! A solution that has found a problem Jeff Freidberg MIT.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego US-Japan Workshop on Power Plants Study and Related Advanced Technologies with.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, Dec 2007 Page 1 Restructuring System Cost Accounts and Algorithms L. Waganer December 2007 ARIES Project.
An Expanded View of RAMI Issues 02 March 2009 RAMI Panel Members: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Tom Burgess (ORNL), Lee Cadwallader (INL), Wayne Reiersen (PPPL),
An evaluation of fusion energy R&D gaps using Technology Readiness Levels M. S. Tillack and the ARIES Team International High Heat Flux Components Workshop.
* Backup materials can be found at
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.
Page 1 of 11 Progress developing an evaluation methodology for fusion R&D ARIES Project Meeting March 4, 2008 M. S. Tillack.
RAMI Requirements for DEMO, Gaps, and Thrusts 03 March 2009 RAMI Panel Members: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Tom Burgess (ORNL), Lee Cadwallader (INL), Wayne.
Page 1 of 16 ARIES Issues and R&D Needs – Technology Readiness for Fusion Energy – M. S. Tillack ARIES Project Meeting 28 May 2008.
IFETritium Collection, and Purification System IFE Tritium Collection, and Purification System Abstract In support of The High Average Power Laser (HAPL)
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
KIT Objectives in Fusion by 2020 Workshop on the European Fusion Roadmap for FP8 and beyond April 13 – 14, 2011; IPP Garching.
Fusion Test Facilities Catalyzed D-D with T-removal John Sheffield ISSE - University of Tennessee ReNeW Meeting UCLA March 3, 2009 With thanks to Mohamed.
ARIES- Pathways, October 25-26, 2010 Bethesda, MD Page 1 L. Waganer Consultant for The Boeing Company ARIES-Pathways Project Meeting October 2010.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION ARIES Pathways Study Kick-off Meeting Ken Schultz 3 April 2007 Determining the.
Page 1 of 9 Power Management Technical Working Group Structure and Goals ARIES Project Meeting June 2007 M. S. Tillack and A. R. Raffray.
Future Direction of the U.S. Fusion Materials Program Dr. Pete Pappano US Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
Advanced Design Activities in US Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants & Related Technologies.
Towards An Attractive Fusion Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi Forum on Next Step Device April 27, May 1, 1998 U. Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Fuel Cycle Research Thrust Using A Full Fusion Nuclear Environment
1 Discussion with Drs. Kwon and Cho UCLA-NFRC Collaboration Mohamed Abdou March 27, 2006.
The tritium breeding blanket in Tokamak fusion reactors T. Onjun1), S. Sangaroon2), J. Prasongkit3), A. Wisitsorasak4), R. Picha5), J. Promping5) 1) Thammasat.
HARNESSING FUSION POWER POWER EXTRACTION Power Extraction Panel Preliminary Research Thrust Ideas Robust operation of blanket/firstwall and divertor systems.
US Participation in the
Pilot Plant Study Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting 19 May 2010.
Fusion power: Visions and the Development Path in the ITER Era
Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program
Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering
Advanced Design Activities in US
US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
TWG goals, approach and outputs
Presentation transcript:

page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack

page 2 of 14 “ITER is the experimental step between today’s studies of plasma physics and tomorrow’s electricity-producing fusion power plants” ( ) Is this credible?

page 3 of 14 Fusion energy development should be guided by requirements for a fusion energy source  No public evacuation plan is required  Generated waste can be returned to environment or recycled in less than a few hundred years ( i.e., not geological time-scales)  No disturbance of public’s day-to-day activities  No exposure of workers to a higher risk than other power plants  Closed tritium fuel cycle on site  Ability to operate at partial load conditions (50% of full power)  Ability to efficiently maintain power core for acceptable plant availability  Ability to operate reliably with less than 0.1 major unscheduled shut-down per year Above requirements must be achieved consistent with a competitive life-cycle cost-of-electricity goal.

page 4 of 14 Existing and planned facilities fail to address essential features of a fusion energy source

page 5 of 14 Existing and planned facilities fail to address essential features of a fusion energy source

page 6 of 14 ITER/ FIRE ARIES “next step” Starlite

page 7 of 14 An experimental power reactor is needed to establish the credibility of fusion as a competitive ENERGY SOURCE Essential features:  Power plant relevant materials  Full nuclear operations  Reasonable lifetime fluence (1-10 MW-yr/m 2 )  Closed fuel cycle operation  Etc  Fill these in…  Etc Parameters do not need to replicate a power plant; rather, the device should be optimized to meet the requirements of a device on the pathway to a power plant.

page 8 of 14 Our study should emphasize holistic R&D needs and their design implications Holistic : relating to or concerned with wholes or with complete systems rather than with the analysis of, treatment of, or dissection into parts. Plasma Blankets Divertors Magnets Vacuum vessel Power management Reactor control Fuel management Maintenance Safety Waste

page 9 of 14 Examples of holistic issues for system studies of experimental power reactors Thermal power management: Demonstrate divertor power and particle handling, extraction of power core high-grade heat, nuclear performance of ancillary equipment (rf, magnets, etc. ) Fuel management: Demonstrate “birth to death” tritium management in a closed loop with self-sufficient breeding. Safety: Demonstrate public and worker safety of the integral facility, capturing system to system interactions. Plant operations: Establish the operability of a fusion energy facility, reliability of components, inspectability and maintainability of a power plant relevant tokamak. Flexibility: Explore alternative operating modes and power core technologies with high duty cycle, but flexible operations.

page 10 of 14 Thermal power management: Demonstrate divertor power and particle handling, extraction of power core high-grade heat, nuclear performance of ancillary equipment (rf, magnets, etc.) 1-f rad,div P fusion P neutron PP Divertor First wall P rad,chamb P div 80% 20% P cond P rad,div f rad,core 1-f rad,core f rad,div F div,peak

page 11 of 14 Fuel management: Demonstrate “birth to death” tritium management in a closed loop with self-sufficient breeding. inventory pumps breeder coolant breeder processing coolant processing vacuum processing fueling D+T D+T+  n T Fuel processing

page 12 of 14 Plant operations: Establish the operability of a fusion energy facility, reliability of components, inspectability and maintainability of a power plant relevant tokamak. If power plant blankets can be replaced in 1-2 months, then a test reactor blanket should be replaceable too.

page 13 of 14 Challenges for an ARIES interface with domestic energy R&D programs The US is not actively pursuing energy technologies for fusion. EU and Japan have serious technology programs; coordination between ARIES and international activities (including the “ITER broad approach”) will be essential. R&D R&D needs Design This part is absent

page 14 of 14 Summary The time is right to explore remaining facilities on the path to fusion energy ARIES is accepted as an appropriate venue to explore fusion energy, even in an era emphasizing “basic science”. Any device on the path to fusion energy should advance features that lead to a commercially attractive end product. A strength of the ARIES team is our integrated “holistic” approach to design studies. Key device features and mission elements should reflect overarching goals of fusion energy. The mission should complement existing and planned facilities, including consideration of the “ITER broad approach”