McDaniels – Oct 10, 2008. Outline Geometric Uncertainty Uncertainty in average intensity due to lesion placement ADC uncertainty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WMH Replacement and Image Warping Evan Fletcher. Purpose of method Use warping to compile statistical profiles of WMH distributions Use warping to compile.
Advertisements

VBM Voxel-based morphometry
Linear Subspaces - Geometry. No Invariants, so Capture Variation Each image = a pt. in a high-dimensional space. –Image: Each pixel a dimension. –Point.
MRI preprocessing and segmentation.
QR Code Recognition Based On Image Processing
Gordon Wright & Marie de Guzman 15 December 2010 Co-registration & Spatial Normalisation.
Automatic determination of skeletal age from hand radiographs of children Image Science Institute Utrecht University C.A.Maas.
OverviewOverview Motion correction Smoothing kernel Spatial normalisation Standard template fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map General Linear.
Geometric Morphometrics
Coregistration and Normalisation By Lieke de Boer & Julie Guerin.
McDaniels – Sept 12, Outline Uncertainty in ADC value Correction Manuscript.
Using Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Image (DWMRI) scans, it is possible to calculate an Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) for a Region of Interest.
MIPR Lecture 5 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Medical Imaging and Pattern Recognition Lecture 5 Image Measurements and Operations Oleh Tretiak.
Bimonthly Meeting on September 12, 2008 Uncertainty in Transcription of Lesion Contours to Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images Amarjeet Bhullar.
1 Research Update LAE 9/26/08. 2 Uncertainty in Apparent Diffusion Coefficients Determined from Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
1 Research Update/Review LAE 5/23/08. 2 RIN/Recurrent Disease: The Problem T1 weighted contrast enhanced MRI taken 16 months after completion of radiotherapy.
Motion Analysis (contd.) Slides are from RPI Registration Class.
1 ADC Calculations Lars Ewell Radiation Oncology University of Arizona Medical Center 2/8/08 1.
McDaniels – Oct 24, Outline MRI Image uncertainty Point uncertainty ADC uncertainty.
ADC Change with Pixel Shift Joshua Kim June 12, 2009.
1 Research Update LAE 8/22/08. 2 Uncertainty in Transcription of Lesion Contours to Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images
McDaniels – Dec 19, Outline ADC Calculations – Estimation of placement uncertainty – Effect on Set 1 and Set 2 values.
McDaniels – Sept 26, Outline Patient 5 Exam 6 ADC uncertainty Manuscript.
DWMRI ADC Patient – Rhodes Four Exams. Rhodes 10 Contours 2 Lesions Exclusion Contour – Brain Stem.
1 Comparison of Different Diffusion Weighting Techniques Using Mutual Information Registration LAE 2/29/07.
Image Registration Narendhran Vijayakumar (Naren) 12/17/2007 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 1.
ADC Calculations Joshua Kim. I. Objective and Goals II. Current ADC Results III. Current Progress on MatLab Program Outline.
McDaniels – Feb 29, Outline Patient 6 question Patient 11 ADC results Abstract for AAPM conference.
McDaniels – April 25, Outline Patient 13 ADC Values Progress Update Patient 7 issues.
ADC Change with Pixel Shift Joshua Kim. I.Review II.Analysis Procedure III.ADC and Error Calculations IV.Current ADC Variation Results V.Future Work Outline.
McDaniels – Dec 5, Outline ADC Calculations – Estimation of placement uncertainty – Effect on Set 1 and Set 2 values.
Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
Circular statistics Maximum likelihood Local likelihood Kenneth D. Harris 4/3/2015.
McDaniels – Feb 8, Outline Patient 12 ADC results Whole lesion plots – Contour weighting factor.
Area, buffer, description Area of a polygon, center of mass, buffer of a polygon / polygonal line, and descriptive statistics.
Method for Determining Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Cerebral Lesions from Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examinations T.H.
Introduction --Classification Shape ContourRegion Structural Syntactic Graph Tree Model-driven Data-driven Perimeter Compactness Eccentricity.
Methods in Medical Image Analysis Statistics of Pattern Recognition: Classification and Clustering Some content provided by Milos Hauskrecht, University.
05 - Feature Detection Overview Feature Detection –Intensity Extrema –Blob Detection –Corner Detection Feature Descriptors Feature Matching Conclusion.
OBJECT RECOGNITION. The next step in Robot Vision is the Object Recognition. This problem is accomplished using the extracted feature information. The.
Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation
1 Statistics, Data Analysis and Image Processing Lectures Vlad Stolojan Advanced Technology Institute University of Surrey.
By Brian Lam and Vic Ciesielski RMIT University
EE459 I ntroduction to Artificial I ntelligence Genetic Algorithms Practical Issues: Selection.
: Chapter 5: Image Filtering 1 Montri Karnjanadecha ac.th/~montri Image Processing.
Bounds Bingo. Pick 8 from the list percentagelower error bound upper bound.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
Level Set Segmentation ~ 9.37 Ki-Chang Kwak.
CIVET seminar Presentation day: Presenter : Park, GilSoon.
ASP algorithm Image term Stretch term Bending term Self-proximity term Vertex-vertex proximity constraints.
A Bayesian Approach for Transformation Estimation Camille Izard and Bruno Jedynak Landmark Detection in brain MRI Laboratoire Paul Painlevé Université.
By Brian Lam and Vic Ciesielski RMIT University
图像处理技术讲座(3) Digital Image Processing (3) Basic Image Operations
Estimation and Rounding
REMOTE SENSING Digital Image Processing Radiometric Enhancement Geometric Enhancement Reference: Chapters 4 and 5, Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis.
CS 4501: Introduction to Computer Vision Sparse Feature Detectors: Harris Corner, Difference of Gaussian Connelly Barnes Slides from Jason Lawrence, Fei.
Means & Medians Chapter 4.
Means & Medians Chapter 5.
A, Regions of interest (region of interest) are drawn on axial images that show calcifications. A, Regions of interest (region of interest) are drawn on.
What is the function of the graph? {applet}
Volume 109, Issue 10, Pages (November 2015)
Preprocessing: Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation
What is the function of the graph? {applet}
Comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative T2* maps and synthetic contrasts  Riikka Ruuth, Linda Kuusela, Teemu Mäkelä, Susanna.
Means & Medians.
MultiModality Registration using Hilbert-Schmidt Estimators
ADC imaging. ADC imaging. A, Delineation of the ROI (left, green limits), intensity versus b value graph of a representative pixel (right), and a parametric.
A, Plots showing the signal-intensity behavior as a function of flip angle for gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) at field strengths 1.5T and 3T. A,
Segmentation Algorithm
Typical images of a patient without brain metastases derived via automatic segmentation software. Typical images of a patient without brain metastases.
Presentation transcript:

McDaniels – Oct 10, 2008

Outline Geometric Uncertainty Uncertainty in average intensity due to lesion placement ADC uncertainty

Geometric Uncertainty Uncertainty in number of voxels – Transcription from contour to DW image, 4 contour voxels for each DW voxel – Algorithm rounds to nearest voxel – Voxels in center of lesion certain – Voxels on perimeter of lesion uncertain – Estimate each DW voxel on average has +/- ¼ – Affects weighted calculation of whole lesion

Geometric uncertainty Lesion geometry, roughly circular section Area => n = πr 2 Perimeter => n p = 2πr +/- ¼*(2πr ) σ n = πr/2 = √(n/ π) For n = 150, σ n ≈ 7 Typical uncertainty about 2-3% Doesn’t include 2-3% scaling from Contour to DW

Geometric uncertainty Slice matching – Contour – 4mm slice, 4mm spacing – DW – 5mm slice, 7mm spacing Not all contour slices have a matching DW slice All DW slices have matching contour slice DW slice overlaps contour slice

Lesion Placement Estimated by placing ROI and analyzing histogram, then shifting and reanalyzing Variation in average intensity for shifts of 1-2 pixels was about 2-3%

Uncertainty in ADC Values Statistical uncertainty in image intensity – Statistical fluctuation – Structure (GM, WM, CSF) Typically 15-30% -ln(I/Io) => σ = √( ) ≈ 0.21 Linear fit from fixed point and two points with uncertainty

Uncertainty in ADC Values Uncertainty in linear fit from Bevington σ 2 = 1/Δ*Σ1/σ i 2 Δ = Σ 1/σ i 2 * Σx i 2 / σ i 2 -(Σ x i / σ i 2 ) 2 e.g. for σ 2 =σ 3 =.2, x 2 =520, x 3 =850 Δ = (1/.04 +1/.04)*(520 2 / /.04)- (520/ /.04) 2 = 6.8e7 σ = √(1/6.8e7*(1/.04+1/.04)) = ADC ≈ / (57%)

ADC uncertainty Patient 5 Minimum +/-43% Maximum +/-215% Average +/-104%