1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul-9-2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Advertisements

Single-Cell Standing Wave Structures: Design
Single cell standing wave tests data analysis Jiaru Shi Sep 27, 2011 LCWS11, Granada, Spain.
Choke-mode Damped X-band Structure for CLIC Main Linac Hao ZHA, Jiaru SHI CERN Sep 27, 2011 Jiaru Shi, LCWS11 Workshop, Granada1.
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
Report from KEK High gradient study results from Nextef (+ other related activities) LCWS2011, Granada Sep. 27, 2011 T. Higo.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
X-band Structures Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen, Christopher Nantista 9-Feb-11.
July Alexej Grudiev, Improvement of CLIC structure. Possible improvement of the CLIC accelerating structure. From CLIC_G to CLIC_K Alexej.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC LCLS RF Gun Thermal Analysis John Schmerge, SLAC November 3,
Dual Mode Cavity for Testing Effects of RF Magnetic field on Breakdown Properties A. Dian Yeremian, Valery Dolgashev, Sami Tantawi SLAC National Accelerator.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Report from NLCTA CERN Built T18’s degC Vacuum Braze degC H2 Braze (SLAC procedure) - New T24s 1.CERN Built (cells pre-fired) 2.KEK/SLAC Built.
HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.
Christopher Nantista ILC 2 nd Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC January 18, …… …… …… … ….
Particle-in-Cell Modeling of Rf Breakdown in Accelerating Structures and Waveguides Valery Dolgashev, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Breakdown physics.
日米協力 US/Japan cooperation Research of High Gradient Acceleration Technology for Future Accelerators progress report New proposal 7.
J. Haimson and B. Mecklenburg Haimson Research Corporation FG02-05ER84362 Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy SBIR Grant.
Test Facilities and Component Developments Sami Tantawi SLAC May 15, 2008.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
X-Band Deflectors Development at SLAC
NLC Status and Milestones D. L. Burke ISG9 KEK December 10-13, 2002.
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
FERMI LINAC O VERVIEW The 1.5 GeV 50 Hz Upgrade July 2013 C. Serpico.
PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.
Recent high-gradient results, rf testing, places and plans Steffen Döbert, CLIC Workshop, Test facilities High gradient results Future testing.
Summary of progress towards CLIC goals and next steps for structure testing 6 th X-band collaboration workshop, April 18 th- 20 th 2012 Steffen Döbert,
Measurements of the X-ray/pump laser pulse timing Valery Dolgashev, David Fritz, Yiping Feng, Gordon Bowden SLAC 48th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop.
The CLIC accelerating structure development program Walter Wuensch CARE05 23 November 2005.
EnEfficient RF Sources Workshop. June 2014 I. Syratchev X-band high RF power testing activity at CERN I.Syratchev.
PETS TESTING ANALYSIS 4 th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting 3 rd May 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for CLIC collaboration.
Progress of X-Band Accelerating Structures LINAC10, Tsukuba 17 Sep T. Higo (KEK)
KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.
TD18 High Power Test Results Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen May 3, 2010.
W. Wuensch CLIC project meeting High-power rf structure testing.
Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK.
Optimization of CLIC-G structure & Design of CLIC open structure Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) Valery Dolgashev (SLAC) 27/01/2015.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
GHz High Gradient Testing of a T18 TW StructureUsing a Fast Response Protection and Power Recirculating System GHz High Gradient Testing.
Review of the rf working group of the ICFA Mini Workshop on Novel Accelerators and Colliders which was associated with the Bob Siemann Memorial Symposium.
Detuning of T18 after high power test Jiaru Shi
1 Design and objectives of test accelerating structures Riccardo Zennaro.
The US High Gradient Collaboration Vision for Research and Development on Ultra High Gradient Accelerator Structures Sami Tantawi, SLAC ( on behalf of.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
Update on SLAC experiments with High Gradient Accelerators and RF Components M.Franzi, V.A. Dolgashev, S. Tantawi June 6, 2016.
High Power Crab Cavity Testing Ben Woolley HG2016 Argonne National Lab. 8 th June 2016.
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
Test Accelerating Structures Designs, Objectives and Critical Issues
Multi-stage pulse compressor
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
New test structures for CLIC (RF design)
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
NC Accelerator Structures
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
Review of rf structure test results
Developments on Proposed
Testing Infrastructure, Program and Milestones
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Status of T18 in resonant ring processing
Few Slides from RF Deflector Developments and Applications at SLAC
Dual mode bph 30 bph TMF TMR TMF TMR TEF TER.
5th X-Band Structure Collaboration Meeting
A proposal for a pulsed surface heating experiment in a CLIC accelerating structure using variable pulse length Alexej Grudiev.
Presentation transcript:

1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul

2 Single cell SW structure test result Breakdown with constant gradient but different pulse heating Breakdown with constant pulse heating but gradient 2 nd SLAC made T18 test result

3 1C-SW-A3.75-T2.60-Cu6N-KEK structure parameters ParametersUnitValue Frequency GHz (Nitrogen, 20 o C) Cells 1+matching cell + mode launcher Q (loaded) 4661 Coupling 0.97 Iris Thickness T mm2.6 Iris Dia. a mm3.75 Phase Advance Per Cell deg180 E s /E a 2.03 Maximum surface electric field for 10 MW MV/m398.9 Maximum surface magnetic field for 10 MW A/m Peak pulse heating for 1 μs pulse with flat field of 100 MV/m oCoC24 from Valery Dolgashev and James Lewandowski

4 RF In Two 3 dB hybrid 45 dB coupler Structure Half cooling jacket X-band Current Monitor Small load Big load Ion pump To big load Ran cooling water through a quadrupole magnet adjust structure temperature.

5 Input RF Pulse Maximized initial pulse to reduce fill time

6 RF Processing History During First 100 Hours Detect breakdown from the large (> 0.8 on above scale) current produced

7 RF Power and Heating Measurements and Simulations Pulse Heating Simulations based only on measured input power

8 Input Power Reflected Power Peak Pulse Heating Breakdown Study with Constant Gradient but Different Pulse Heating from the Pre-Fill ‘Warm-up’

9 Breakdown Rate for Fixed Gradient

10 Comparison of these results with those from a similar structure (same a/  tested at the Klystron Test Lab where the pulse shape was fixed so the gradient varies with pulse heating

11 Breakdown Study with Constant Pulse Heating

12 Flat top gradient for 160 ns. (139/129)^25 =6.5 (139/119)^25 = 48.6 Breakdown Rate for Fixed Peak Pulse Heating

13 Cumulated Phase Change Test Results from Second SLAC T18 Disk Structure 120° Field Amplitude Freq.: GHz Cells18+input+output Filling Time: ns36 Length: cm29 Iris Dia. a/λ(%)15.5~10.1 Group Velocity: v g /c (%) S 11 / S /0.8 Phase Advace Per Cell2π/3 Power Needed =100MV/m55.5MW Unloaded E a (out)/E a (in)1.55 E s /E a 2 Pulse Heating ΔT: K High Power Test Time: hrs1400 Total Breakdwon Events2148

14 This time, processed structure by progressively lengthening the pulse at constant gradient (110 MV/m)

15 Comparison of current BDR rate (blue circle) with the rate curves from the First SLAC T18 structure at different processing times T18_SLAC_2

16 RF Breakdown Locations Blue dot: T18_SLAC_2 after 250 hrs running Red square: T18_SLAC_1 after 1200 hrs running T18_SLAC_2

17 Summary Reduce fill time with SLED for SW cavity test It is possible to separate pulse heating and gradient with SLED for the same structure. T18 is a good structure, however it is not clear why there is a hot cell.