Carlson et al. ‘01 Three Characteristic Acceleration Regions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MHD Simulations of the January 10-11, 1997 Magnetic Storm Scientific visualizations provide both scientist and the general public with unprecedented view.
Advertisements

M-I Coupling Physics: Issues, Strategy, Progress William Lotko, David Murr, John Lyon, Paul Melanson, Mike Wiltberger The mediating transport processes.
M-I Coupling Scales and Energy Conversion Processes Gerhard Haerendel Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics 04 July 2013 MPE-JUB Symposium.
Auroral dynamics EISCAT Svalbard Radar: field-aligned beam  complicated spatial structure (
The Structure of the Parallel Electric Field and Particle Acceleration During Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake M.Swisdak M. Shay M. Hesse C. Cattell University.
Simulated Response of the Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System to Empirically Regulated Ionospheric H + Outflows W Lotko 1,2, D Murr 1, P Melanson 1, J Lyon.
Thayer School of Engineering Dartmouth College Ph.D. Thesis Defense “Effects of the Active Auroral Ionosphere on Magnetosphere - Ionosphere Coupling” Dimitri.
LFM-RCM Coupling F. Toffoletto 1, S. Sazykin 1,V. Merkin 2,J. Lyon 2,3, M. Wiltberger 4 1. Rice University, 2. Boston University, 3. Dartmouth College,
Generation of intense quasistatic fields at high altitudes by the Ionospheric Alfvén Resonator Bill Lotko, Jon Watts, Anatoly Streltsov Thayer School of.
Issues A 2 R E spatial “gap” exists between the upper boundary of TING and TIEGCM and the lower boundary of LFM. The gap is a primary site of plasma transport.
(1)How is the mass of the atmosphere processed to constitute the outflow? (2)How is the energy from the magnetosphere processed through the system resulting.
Simulated Response of the Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System to Empirically Regulated Ionospheric H + Outflows W Lotko 1,2, D Murr 1, P Melanson 1, J Lyon.
Prob, % WinterSummer Probability of observing downward field-aligned electron energy flux >10 mW/m 2 in winter and summer hemispheres.
Geospace Gap: Issues, Strategy, Progress Cosponsored by NASA HTP Lotko - Gap region introduction Lotko - Outflow simulations Melanson - LFM/SuperDARN/Iridium.
Thermospheric Control Lühr et al. 04 CHAMP thermospheric density enhancement Liu et al. 05 Causes of upwelling Large-scale Joule heating Ion upflow Soft.
MI Coupling Physics: Issues, Strategies, Progress William Lotko 1, Peter Damiano 1, Mike Wiltberger 2, John Lyon 1,2, Slava Merkin 3, Oliver Brambles 1,
Coupling the RCM to LFM Frank Toffoletto (Rice) and John Lyon (Dartmouth)
Alfvén Wave Generation and Dissipation Leading to High-Latitude Aurora W. Lotko Dartmouth College Genesis Fate Impact A. Streltsov, M. Wiltberger Dartmouth.
Quasi-Static Alfvén Wave Dynamics
The tribulations and exaltations in coupling models of the magnetosphere with ionosphere- thermosphere models Aaron Ridley Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic.
Expanded Observatory support (redundancy, verification) CME (Empirical) propagation (Cone Model) (ICME strength and arrival time) Electrodynamics model.
M AGNETOSPHERE -I ONOSPHERE C OUPLING M ORE I S D IFFERENT William Lotko, Dartmouth College System perspective  qualitative differences Life cycle of.
Keiling et al. ‘03 VisibleFUV Downward Poynting Flux Upward Poynting Flux Auroral Morphology as seen in.
Relation Between Electric Fields and Ionospheric/magnetospheric Plasma Flows at Very Low Latitudes Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research University.
Global Distribution / Structure of Aurora Photograph by Jan Curtis Synthetic Aurora pre- midnight,multi-banded Resonant ULF waves produce pre- midnight,
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March Ionosphere-Thermosphere Modeling Tim Killeen, Stan Solomon, and the CISM Ionosphere-Thermosphere Team.
R. L. Lysak GEM 2003 Tutorial Electrodynamic Coupling of the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Bob Lysak, University of Minnesota Auroral particle acceleration.
Grid Specification MM RCM TIM MIC CHART LEGEND Source of Numerical Data Magnetospheric Model Ring-Current Model Thermosphere-Ionosphere Model M-I Coupler.
Aurora, Alfvén Waves and Substorms: A Tutorial Bob Lysak, University of Minnesota Auroral particle acceleration is the result of the transmission.
Importance of the Height Distribution of Joule Heating for Thermospheric Density Arthur D. Richmond and Astrid Maute NCAR High Altitude Observatory.
Overview of CISM Magnetosphere Research Mary Hudson 1, Anthony Chan 2, Scot Elkington 3, Brian Kress 1, William Lotko 1, Paul Melanson 1, David Murr 1,
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling through Plasma Turbulence at High- Latitude E-Region Electrojet Y. Dimant and M. Oppenheim Tuesday, April 13, 2010 Center.
Inductive-Dynamic Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling via MHD Waves Jiannan Tu Center for Atmospheric Research University of Massachusetts Collaborators:
Chapter 5 Diffusion and resistivity
Tangential discontinuities as “roots” of auroral arcs: an electrostatic magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling mode M. Echim (1,2), M. Roth (1), J.de Keyser.
Modeling the Magnetosphere Dr. Ramon Lopez. The Magnetosphere  When the solar wind encounters a magnetized body, it is slowed and deflected  The resulting.
ESS 7 Lectures 15 and 16 November 3 and 5, 2008 The Atmosphere and Ionosphere.
ESS 200C Aurora, Lecture 15.
Thursday, May 14, 2009Cluster Workshop – UppsalaR. J. Strangeway – 1 The Auroral Acceleration Region: Lessons from FAST, Questions for Cluster Robert J.
Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Auroral Region: A Cluster Perspective Octav Marghitu Institute for Space Sciences, Bucharest, Romania 17 th.
Lecture 16 Simulating from the Sun to the Mud. Space Weather Modeling Framework – 1 [Tóth et al., 2007] The SWMF allows developers to combine models without.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Large-Amplitude Electric Fields Associated with Bursty Bulk Flow Braking in the Earth’s Plasma Sheet R. E. Ergun et al., JGR (2014) Speaker: Zhao Duo.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
In Situ Measurements of Auroral Acceleration Regions Wu Tong
Ionospheric Research at USU R.W. Schunk, L. Scherliess, J.J. Sojka, D.C. Thompson & L. Zhu Center for Atmospheric & Space Sciences Utah State University.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © Ionosphere II: Radio Waves April 19, 2012.
Ionospheric Current and Aurora CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 12 Spring 2007 April 24, 2007 References: Prolss: Chap , P (main) Tascione: Chap.
17th Cluster Workshop May 2009 R. Maggiolo 1, M. Echim 1,2, M. Roth 1, J. De Keyser 1 1 BIRA-IASB Brussels, Belgium 2 ISS Bucharest, Romania Quasi-stationary.
Mass Transport: To the Plasma Sheet – and Beyond!
Session SA33A : Anomalous ionospheric conductances caused by plasma turbulence in high-latitude E-region electrojets Wednesday, December 15, :40PM.
ESS 200C Lecture 13 The Earth’s Ionosphere
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
Satellites and interactions
1 ESS200C Pulsations and Waves Lecture Magnetic Pulsations The field lines of the Earth vibrate at different frequencies. The energy for these vibrations.
Auroral energy flow budget as a function of altitude: How does energy arrive from the magnetosphere? Pekka Janhunen, FMI/Space/Helsinki Annika Olsson,
Numerical simulations of wave/particle interactions in inhomogeneous auroral plasmas Vincent Génot (IRAP/UPS/CNRS, Toulouse) F. Mottez (LUTH/CNRS, Meudon)
Substorms: Ionospheric Manifestation of Magnetospheric Disturbances P. Song, V. M. Vasyliūnas, and J. Tu University of Massachusetts Lowell Substorms:
Multi-Fluid/Particle Treatment of Magnetospheric- Ionospheric Coupling During Substorms and Storms R. M. Winglee.
Lecture 15 Modeling the Inner Magnetosphere. The Inner Magnetosphere The inner magnetosphere includes the ring current made up of electrons and ions in.
Energy inputs from Magnetosphere to the Ionosphere/Thermosphere ASP research review Yue Deng April 12 nd, 2007.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling: Alfven Wave Reflection, Transmission and Mode Conversion P. Song and V. M. Vasyliūnas Center for Atmospheric Research.
Cluster observation of electron acceleration by ULF Alfvén waves
GEM Student Tutorial: GGCM Modeling (MHD Backbone)
The Ionosphere and Thermosphere GEM 2013 Student Tutorial
Dynamic Coupling of Magnetosphere and Ionosphere/Thermosphere
Magnetospheric Modeling
ESS 154/200C Lecture 17 The Auroral Ionosphere
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
Three Regions of Auroral Acceleration
Presentation transcript:

Carlson et al. ‘01 Three Characteristic Acceleration Regions

Carlson et al. ‘01 Alfvén Wave Induced Outflow

OUTFLOW Strangeway et al. ’02 Ponderomotive Lifting via Alfvén Waves a p|| = ¼  || (E  /B 0 ) 2 > GM E /r 2 for E  > 200 mV/m at 1000 km altitude

Li and Temerin ‘93 Ponderomotive Force (in a cold magnetized plasma)

Electrodynamic Coupling: Energy Dissipation ̶ Joule heating ̶ Current-Voltage relation (  Knight;  ?) ̶ Alfvén wave induced dissipation (?) Inertial Coupling: Mass Exchange ̶ Bulk outflows – polar wind ̶ Fractional outflows – energization (O + )

MIC LFM RCM LFM RCM LFM RCM TING MIC TING MIC seconds iterate minutes 1½-way LFM-RCM coupling w/ convergent, iterative, 2-way TING coupling LFM TING Empirical SWM Precip W ||, E 0 j || s m B RCM s TING M-I Coupler

minutes LFM TING SWM  B  2 >  j || s m B RCM s M-I Mass Coupler minutes Gravity = Ponderomotive Force at 1000-km altitude for n O+ = /m 3 and  B  = 80 nT MIC LFM RCM LFM RCM TING

 || = j || / K K = (n eff /n ps ) K Knight Banks and Holzer ‘69 Lemaire and Scherer ‘73 Field-Aligned Potential Drop Effects of Loss Cone n eff /n ps = 1 – (1 – B ps /B) ½ Bohm Criterion v ||i = c s into  || Neutral Gas Temperature in  T n Density Scale Height v ||e  B/n eff

Keiling et al. ‘03 VisibleFUV Downward Poynting Flux Upward Poynting Flux Auroral Morphology as seen in

Carlson et al. ‘01 Alfvénic Acceleration Regions

Intense, field-aligned Poynting fluxes flow earthward along the “lobe-plasma sheet” interface Polar FAST MPA UVI Lobe Plasma Sheet Polar Cap Auroral Zone Wygant et al. ’00

CISM All Hands Meeting 15 Sep 2003 LFM Low-Altitude Boundary TING High-Altitude Boundary

LFM Low-Altitude Boundary TING High-Altitude Boundary

“Quasi-static” Alfvén waves Alfvén-wave Lorentz Force

Banks and Holzer ‘69

Questions LFM BCs on , T? Inner boundary at r = constant where r  b  0  r  v E  0, i.e., v E has a component normal to the boundary. TING Ion energy and momentum equations? Same ion composition in E and F layers?

Grid Specification MM RCM TIM MIC CHART LEGEND Source of Numerical Data Magnetospheric Model Ring-Current Model Thermosphere-Ionosphere Model M-I Coupler “Variable A from MM on the MM grid and variable A from RCM on the RCM grid are interpolated onto the MIC grid” MIC RCMMM A

seconds minutes MIC MM RCM MM RCM MM RCM MIC 1½-way LFM-RCM coupling MM Empirical SWM Precip W ||, E 0 j || s B RCM s M-I Coupler

iterate minutes MM RCM MM RCM TIM MIC TIM MIC Convergent, iterative, 1-way TING coupling MM TIM Empirical SWM Precip W ||, E 0 j || s m B RCM s M-I Coupler

Auroral Electrodynamics Opgenoorth et al. ‘02

Ionospheric Feedback Atkinson ’70; Sato ‘78 Polarization  Field-Aligned Current

Two-fluid MHD model of the magnetosphere Electron parallel momentum equation Electron parallel momentum equation Density continuity equation Density continuity equation Current continuity equation Current continuity equation where v ||e - electron parallel speed; IC - electron collision frequency; AR - effective collision frequency representing the effects of plasma anomalous resistivity. where ρ i - ion Larmour radius.

Model of the auroral ionosphere Density Continuity Equation where n = n 0 + n 1 - plasma number density; - ionization source maintaining equilibrium density n 0 outside the region of auroral precipitations; j || - field-aligned current;  - recombination coefficient. Current Continuity Equation where  P and  H are height-integrated ionospheric Pedersen and Hall conductances.

“Feedback” Unstable Alfvén Waves Growth rate vs  P, E  and k  Two resonant cavities Large-Scale Resonator Small-Scale Resonator Pokhotelov ‘02

Feedback Instability Ionospheric Alfvén Resonator E Layer J   J    N e +–  N e 2 +–  P +–  E  – + Stable? yesno Streltsov and Lotko ‘ s 297 s 281 s 266 s 251 s 235 s 220 s 204 s 188 s 173 s 157 s 141 s E NS 670 mV/m equator ionosphere L =

Streltsov and Lotko ‘ mV/m E NS B EW nT distance, km (mV/m) 2 km k , km -1 (nT) 2 km PEPE PBPB Time Step = 297 s E NS B EW j  670 mV/m 270 nT 80  A/m 2 ionosphere equator “Satellite” Measurements

E NS (mV/m) L = IONOSPHERE 1 R E 44 R E Animation sequence from 0 < t < 300 s