Standard 4 Faculty. Committee Membership Marta Meana Carryn Bellomo Andrew Bell Skip Swerdlow.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Advertisements

Psychology Graduate Student Orientation. Graduate Students.
MRFA General Meeting 27 October Agenda Approvals Approval of Minutes (Sept 27, 2010) Officer’s Reports President Treasurer Audit Completion Part-time.
Accreditation: Alignment and Assessment of Outcomes for a Learning College OPCOM PRESENTATION October ACCREDITATION ALIGNMENT ASSESSMENT.
Personnel Policies Workshop Best Practices for Personnel Committees.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
College of Business Spring 2013 Advisory Council Meeting AACSB Standards Update.
Research Involving Human Subjects Review of Risk and Protection from Harm.
Training for Implementation of CEC§ Creating AA-T and AS-T (SB 1440 Transfer Degrees) Spring 2011 February 1, 2011.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Faculty Evaluation Policy Why: – Needed to comply with SACS accreditation guidelines – Must comply with UL System requirements – Needed to improve the.
Access & Privacy Chairs’ Compliance Workshop January 10, 2013.
DRAFT 1 University of Miami Quality Enhancement Plan Proposal: Communication Across the Curriculum April 18, 2007.
Best Practices for Graduate Supervision December 10, 2014 Your Role in Graduate Studies.
Standard Four: Faculty Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland.
Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Requirements and Expectations of Researchers and Research Staff Moira A Keane, MA, CIP Executive.
The UAO and U M. Fuller, J. Laird, D. Herrmann, University Assessment Office Illinois State University Teaching and Learning Symposium Jan. 6, 2010.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Curriculum Policies Universities should have a policy that enables the creation of new courses and the modification of existing courses in a way that ensures.
MRFA Vision Statement Review Committee. Membership Gerry Cross, MRFA Elaine Mullen, ADC and English Jeremy Berry, Public Relations Jim Fischer, Business.
CBPA Criteria For Faculty Teaching Graduate Courses 4/10/09.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Standards 1,6, & 9 Bill Bonaudi Big Bend Community College.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
Sustain currency and relevance through scholarship and related activities Scholarly Academics (SA) sustain currency and relevance through professional.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
SCC Tenure Process November 13, Goal: Ensure Faculty Excellence  Faculty excellence supports Shoreline’s vision of being a world-class institution.
Mark Potter Mary Alice Sawaya.  Workshop participants will  Identify how the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) relates to the standard categories.
23 July 02IP Policy Update1 Status Report on IP Policy Review Process to the Executive Board 23 July 02 Gisele Welch.
1 Office of the Vice President for Planning and Policy Overview of Policy Administration.
1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.
Hiring and Evaluation Processes Greg Granderson & Pat James Hanz.
College-wide Meeting November 19, 2014 – 12:45PM Gateway A Photo Courtesy of James Hassett.
Academic Standards Review Committee Fall 2014 Team members: Dillon Carr, Daniel Gendler, Pamela Laureto, Harold Lee, Thomas Street, Fred Zomer.
October 15, 2015 Presented by: Tom Friedman– TRUFA President.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
Revision of Policy on Academic Misconduct Academic Integrity Committee
Accreditation, Strategic Planning, SPOL Implementation Sigrid Davison Associate Director, Analytics & Research, Office of Institutional Effectiveness Audrey.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
The Departmental Performance Review Committee
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
HLC
EDU 675 STUDY Education for Service-- edu675study.com.
Administrative Review Process
The Departmental Performance Review (PR)
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview

Accessibility Updates
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Proposed New Process Department Chairs have the important role to
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Shared Governance Territorial Act (1889): The faculty, the president, and the regents are jointly responsible for governing the university. NWCCU, Standard.
Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit
Curriculum & Instruction
Faculty Senate President’s Report
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Extension Title Series
Faculty Evaluation Policy
Academic Standards Review Committee
University Policy Management Program
The Role of the Academic Senate President and Effective Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Standard 4 Faculty

Committee Membership Marta Meana Carryn Bellomo Andrew Bell Skip Swerdlow

Major expectations of NWCCU Faculty Selection, Evaluation, Roles, Welfare, and Development – Employs qualified faculty whom represent various disciplines – Participate in planning and evaluation of academics and governance – Appropriate workloads and benefits – Appropriate evaluation of performance – Protection of academic freedom

Major expectations of NWCCU Scholarship, Research and Artistic Creation – Engagement – Ethical considerations – Development of research policies and practices – Appropriate resources provided – Consistent workload assignment – OSP and IRB involvement – Academic freedom

Committee Progress Identified areas in which data collection was necessary from Colleges, Departments, Office of Research and Human Resources, Helped design questionnaires sent to relevant units

Plans for this Fall Data collection Organization of data as per standard 4 categories Merging of related data Commencement of writing of first draft

Plans for Spring 2009 Complete writing of first draft Send draft out for feedback and revisions Incorportate revisions into next draft Refine and polish final draft

Questions?

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.