First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

Oscillation formalism
Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
MINOS sensitivity to dm2 and sin2 as a function of pots. MINOS sensitivity to theta13 as a function of pots Precision Neutrino Oscillation Physics with.
Soudan 2 Peter Litchfield University of Minnesota For the Soudan 2 collaboration Argonne-Minnesota-Oxford-RAL-Tufts-Western Washington  Analysis of all.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Andy Blake Cambridge University Wednesday June 13 th 2007 Combined Atmospheric Analysis: Study of 6 Month’s Data.
MINOS Feb Antineutrino running Pedro Ochoa Caltech.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University June 2004.
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
Far Detector Fiducial Volume Studies Andy Blake Cambridge University Saturday February 24 th 2007.
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
Partially Contained Atmospheric Neutrino Analysis Andy Blake Cambridge University March 2004.
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University September 2003.
CC/NC SEPARATION STUDY Andy Blake Cambridge University Friday February 23 rd 2007.
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
Partially Contained Atmospheric Neutrino Analysis Andy Blake + John Chapman Cambridge University January 2004.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
NEW RESULTS FROM MINOS Patricia Vahle, for the MINOS collaboration College of William and Mary.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Present status of oscillation studies by atmospheric neutrino experiments ν μ → ν τ 2 flavor oscillations 3 flavor analysis Non-standard explanations Search.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Latest Results from The MINOS Experiment
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
2 Atmospheric Neutrinos Atmospheric neutrino detector at Kolar Gold Field –1965.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
1 MACRO constraints on violation of Lorentz invariance M. Cozzi Bologna University - INFN Neutrino Oscillation Workshop Conca Specchiulla (Otranto) September.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
The ANTARES neutrino telescope is located on the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea, 40 km off the French coast. The detector is installed at a depth of 2.5.
The Status of MINOS Mike Kordosky University College London for the collaboration.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Mass Hierarchy Study with MINOS Far Detector Atmospheric Neutrinos Xinjie Qiu 1, Andy Blake 2, Luke A. Corwin 3, Alec Habig 4, Stuart Mufso 3, Stan Wojcicki.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
E. W. Grashorn and A. Habig, UMD, for the MINOS Collaboration The Detectors of The Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) Experiment The MINOS.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Phenomenology and Detection p 00 ++  e+e+ e-e- ++  Michelangelo D’Agostino Physics C228 October 18, 2004.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
A different cc/nc oscillation analysis Peter Litchfield  The Idea:  Translate near detector events to the far detector event-by-event, incorporating.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
The Latest MINOS Results Xinjie Qiu Stanford University (for the MINOS Collaboration) International Symposium on Neutrino Physics and Beyond Sept
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
NuMI MINOS Seasonal Variations in the MINOS Far Detector Eric W. Grashorn University of Minnesota Thursday, 5 July, 2007.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
E. W. Grashorn, for the MINOS Collaboration Observation of Shadowing in the Underground Muon Flux in MINOS This poster was supported directly by the U.S.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
DOE review slide 1 MINOS Software and Data Analysis Peter Litchfield, U. of Minnesota DOE Review, 28 th August 2003  Progress on Offline Software  Detector.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
6. Preliminary Results from MINOS
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, J.J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, United Kingdom. down-going fitup-going fit ABOVE travel length 10~30 km p, He BELOW travel length up to 13,000 km Studying Atmospheric Neutrinos at MINOS       cosmic muons PCUP PCDN FC Overview Selecting Atmospheric Neutrinos (a) Fully Contained or Down-Going Partially Contained Events. (b) Up-Going Partially Contained Events. Results of Event SelectionOscillation Analysis Charge RatioSeparating Neutrinos and Anti-Neutrinos Example Events: The complete MINOS far detector has been collecting atmospheric neutrino data since August The detector is a 5.4 kT steel-scintillator calorimeter located at a depth of 700m (2100 mwe) in the Soudan Underground Laboratory, Minnesota. It is the first massive underground detector to possess a magnetic field, making the separation of atmospheric  and  possible for the first time. This poster presents the first MINOS observations of separated  and  charged current neutrino interactions based on a detector exposure of 418 days (6.18 kT-Yrs). The ratio of  to  is calculated and compared to the Monte Carlo expectation. An extended maximum likelihood analysis of the observed L/E distribution is used to fit the neutrino oscillation parameters  m 23 2 and sin 2 2  23. High energy cosmic ray interactions at the top of the atmosphere produce an intense flux of neutrinos that can be detected on the earth. In recent years, the deficit observed in the atmospheric  flux has become firmly established, with the favoured interpretation being  →  oscillations. oscillations. The MINOS far detector can be used to study atmospheric neutrino oscillations. Its deep location 700m underground provides shielding against the high flux of cosmic rays incident on the surface of the earth, and its large 5.4 kT mass ensures that a high rate of atmospheric neutrinos can be observed in the detector. space The MINOS far detector, located in the Soudan mine, is a sampling calorimeter composed of many planes of steel and plastic scintillator. The detector is magnetized by a current-carrying coil running through its centre. This allows the charge of muons produced in neutrino interactions to be identified, enabling the separation of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos. A scintillator veto shield is constructed above the main detector to tag cosmic muons entering the detector. space Atmospheric neutrinos are incident on the MINOS detector from all directions. The signature for  →  oscillations is a deficit in the observed flux of up-going  events, since these events correspond to large neutrino path lengths and therefore large oscillation probabilities. In order to perform an accurate measurement of these oscillations, a clean sample of  CC events must be selected. The signature used to identify these events is a muon track whose interaction vertex is contained inside the fiducial volume of the detector. space The contained vertex  CC events are divided into three classes: The selection of contained atmospheric  events is hampered by the large background of cosmic muon events appearing contained or up-going. This background must be reduced by a factor of ~10 6 in order to obtain a clean neutrino signal. space Events are reconstructed using software specially designed for this analysis. A pre-selection is applied requiring a clean muon track. The events are then divided into the FC/PCDN and PCUP classes and separate selection criteria are applied. The planar structure of the detector allows cosmic muons to enter the detector between planes and appear contained. These events tend to travel nearly parallel to the planes or to contain large energy deposits at the track vertex. A series of topology cuts are applied to the FC and PCDN events to separate the signal and background. space The following topology cuts are applied: The dominant background in the PCUP selection arises from cosmic muons reconstructed as up- going rather than down-going. Up-going events are identified using timing information. After careful calibration a single-hit timing resolution of 2.3 ns is achieved. Selection cuts are applied to the timing information to ensure that the events are up-going. space The event direction is determined by applying fits to the measured times along the muon track, assuming that the muon is travelling upwards and then downwards at the speed of light. The RMS of each fit is calculated, and a cut is placed on the quantities RMS up, RMS down, and RMS up – RMS down to select a clean sample of up-going events. The MINOS detector is magnetized with a mean field of 1.3T. This allows the charge sign of muons to be determined from the curvature of their tracks. A track fitting algorithm is used to determine the best fit value of Q/p and its error  Q/p, where Q is the muon charge and p is the muon momentum. An event is classified as having a well-measured charge sign if (Q/p)/(  Q/p ) < 50%. A total of 52 events are found to have a well-measured charge, with 34  and 18  events. The  -  ratio is: From 418 days detector exposure, a total of 107 candidate events are selected from the data. This compares with an expectation of 127±13 events assuming no oscillations, and 96±10 events assuming  m 23 2 =0.0024eV 2 and sin 2 2  23 =1.0. The background contribution from cosmic muons is measured to be 4.4±0.5 events using the shield. space A total of 77 events are found to have a well- measured direction, with 49 down-going and 28 up-going events. The up-down double-ratio is: This is ~2 standard deviations away from unity. The MINOS Far Detector Fully Contained Events (FC). Downward-Going Partially Contained Events (PCDN). Upward-Going Partially Contained Events (PCUP). _ The reconstructed track is first extrapolated back to the outside of the detector and a cut placed on the distance traversed perpendicular to the planes. For events travelling parallel to the planes a cut is placed on the energy deposited at the track vertex. The background is tagged using the veto shield. cosmic muon background left: illustration of cosmic muon background event; middle: distribution of perpendicular distance between track vertex and edge of detector; right: energy deposited at track vertex vs. reconstructed direction for MC signal and background events, showing the cut regions. above: The reconstructed zenith angle distribution for the 77 events with well-measured direction, compared with the MC expectation. above: The reconstructed log 10 L/E distribution for the 77 events with well-measured direction, compared with the MC expectation. reference: Phys. Rev. D73, (2006) __ FC up-going  PC down-going  PC up-going  __ An extended maximum likelihood analysis of the observed L/E distribution is used to fit the parameters  m 23 2 and sin 2 2  23 assuming two-flavour  →  oscillations. The sensitivity of the L/E distribution to neutrino oscillations depends on the L/E resolution. Therefore a Bayesian method is used to calculate a log(L/E) probability density function for each event and the resolution  log(L/E) of each event is given by the rms of this distribution. space The data is binned in terms of log(L/E) and  log(L/E) and a likelihood fit to the oscillations is performed. The maximum likelihood occurs at:  m 23 2 = eV 2, sin 2 2  23 = 0.90 The 68% and 90% confidence limits are determined using the Feldman-Cousins method. The data are consistent with a wide range of oscillation parameters, but disfavour the null oscillation hypothesis at the 98% confidence level. above: the reconstructed log(L/E) resolution binned in regions of log(L/E) resolution (  ). right: confidence limits calculated for the oscillation parameters  m 23 2 and sin 2 2  23. The ratio of  to  events in the data compared to the MC expectation (which assumes the same oscillation parameters for both neutrinos and anti-neutrinos) is calculated to be: Although the current statistics are limited, the data are found to be consistent with the hypothesis that neutrinos and anti-neutrinos oscillate with the same parameters. above: the distribution of (Q/p)/  (Q/p) for selected neutrino events. The two broad peaks correspond to neutrinos and anti-neutrinos. _ above: the up-down distributions of selected neutrino and anti-neutrino events, showing the MC expectations for three different neutrino oscillation scenarios. Summary _ _ _ The MINOS detector has been taking atmospheric neutrino data since August 2003, and an analysis of 418 days (6.18 kT-Yrs) data is presented. A total of 107 atmospheric neutrino events are observed compared with an expectation of 127±13 events. The background is estimated to be 4.4±0.5 events. space The  and  events are separated using the curvature of muons in the MINOS magnetic field. From the events containing a well-measured muon, a total of 34  and 18  events are observed. This represents the first observation of separated atmospheric neutrino and anti-neutrino interactions. _ _ primary cosmic rays /κ/κ  e   e ~20 km p/He

First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, J.J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, United Kingdom. _