Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Breakout Session: Controls Physics Requirements and Technology Choices for LCLS Instrumentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patrick Krejcik May 3-6, 2004 Patrick Krejcik R. Akre, P. Emma, M. Hogan, (SLAC), H. Schlarb, R. Ischebeck (DESY), P. Muggli.
Advertisements

Stephanie Allison LCLS Event System 14 June LCLS Event System Outline HW Block Diagram Timing Requirements Time Lines EVG.
Mark Heron Diamond Light Source Oct 2007 EPICS EPICS Interface to the Libera Electron Beam Position Monitor.
Digital RF Stabilization System Based on MicroTCA Technology - Libera LLRF Robert Černe May 2010, RT10, Lisboa
26-Sep-11 1 New xTCA Developments at SLAC CERN xTCA for Physics Interest Group Sept 26, 2011 Ray Larsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory New xTCA Developments.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Pohang Accelerator Laboratory POSTECH EPICS Collaboration Meeting RICOTTI, Tokai, JAPAN EPICS collaboration meeting 2004 Dec , 2004 RICOTTI,
Test of LLRF at SPARC Marco Bellaveglia INFN – LNF Reporting for:
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
R. Akre, P. Emma, P. Krejcik LCLS April 29, 2004 LCLS RF Stability Requirements LCLS Requirements The SLAC Linac.
Patrick Krejcik LCLS April 16-17, 2007 Breakout Session: Controls Controls Commissioning Experience.
Patrick Krejcik LCLS April 29, 2004 Breakout Session: Controls Physics Requirements Overview P. Krejcik.
Juhao Wu Feedback & Oct. 12 – 13, 2004 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Longitudinal Feedback with CSR as Diagnostic.
R. Akre XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and July 26, 2004 LCLS Drive Laser Timing Stability Measurements XFEL Short Bunch Measurement.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
P. Krejcik LCLS Diagnostics and Commissioning September 22-23, 2004 LCLS Diagnostics and Commissioning Workshop Injector,
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – Cavity BPM October 12, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
Ron Johnson Beam Position October 29-31, Beam Position Monitors FAC Review October 29-31, 2007 Stripline BPM.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Laser to RF synchronisation A.Winter, Aachen University and DESY Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
RF Synchronisation Issues
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Ron Akre, Dayle Kotturi LCLS LLRF April 16, 2007 Linac.
Hamid Shoaee LCLS FAC Review – October Control System Overview Hamid Shoaee Controls System Manager Injector control system commissioning & Support.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – BPM April 20, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status and Plans.
Patrick Krejcik LCLS April 7-8, 2005 Breakout Session: Controls Physics Requirements and Technology Choices for LCLS Instrumentation.
Patrick Krejcik LCLS November 11-12, 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Post-commissioning Controls Enhancements.
Stefan Simrock 3 rd LC School, Oak Brook, IL, USA, 2008, Radio Frequency Systems 1 Timing and Synchronization S. Simrock and Axel Winter DESY, Hamburg,
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
LLRF Phase Reference System The LCLS linac is broken down into 4 separate linac sections. The LCLS injector will reside in an off axis tunnel at the end.
1 Timing and RF Distribution NLC -> ILC Josef Frisch.
18. June 2003EPICS WS Control of Digital Power Supplies Andreas Lüdeke Swiss Light Source / PSI 20 May 2003 EPICS Collaboration Meeting.
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen 24 August 2015PSI,24 August 2015PSI, Paul Scherrer Institut Status WP 8.2 RF Low Level Electronic Manuel Brönnimann.
SNS Integrated Control System EPICS Collaboration Meeting SNS Machine Protection System SNS Timing System Coles Sibley xxxx/vlb.
Beam Instrumentation for Orbit Stability I. Pinayev.
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Micro-Research Finland Oy MRF Timing System Jukka Pietarinen Timing Workshop CERN February 2008.
S. De Santis “Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal Profile in a Storage Ring by Non-Linear Laser Mixing” - BIW 2004 May, 5th Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal.
R. Akre RF / Timing August 11, 2004 LCLS Drive Laser Timing Stability Measurements Department of Energy Review of the Linac.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
SNS Integrated Control System Timing Clients at SNS DH Thompson Epics Spring 2003.
K. Luchini LCLS Injector /BC1 Magnet PS Final Design Review, March 30, Injector and BC1 Magnet PS Controls K. Luchini.
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing J. Frisch 7/22/15.
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
PSI Power Supply Controls MedAustron Controls Workshop 1 PR a-FMO-PSI_Power_Supply_Controls.pptx F. Moser - PSI Power Supply Controls 1.
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
K. Luchini LCLS Injector /BC1 Magnet PS Final Design Review, March 30, Injector and BC1 Magnet PS Controls K. Luchini.
Sept 16-17, 2003 Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Controls.
Timing System R+D for the NLC Josef Frisch. NLC and PEPII Phase and Timing Requirements (approximate)
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
S. Smith LCLS Facility Advisory October 12, Beam Position Monitors Facility Advisory Committee October 12, 2006.
RF Synchronisation Issues
Electronics requirements for special diagnostics for the XFEL
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
LLRF Control System Outline Scope Requirements Design Considerations
LCLS Drive Laser Timing Stability Measurements
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
LCLS RF Stability Requirements
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) LLRF Preliminary Design Review LLRF Monitor and Control System September 26, 2005 Ron Akre.
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Breakout Sessions SC1/SC2 – Accelerator Physics
Breakout Session SC5 – Control Systems
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Breakout Session SC5 – Control Systems
Breakout Session SC1/SC2 – Accelerator System
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Breakout Session: Controls Physics Requirements and Technology Choices for LCLS Instrumentation & Controls

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Accelerator Physics Driving Controls Design Precision beams Low emittance Short bunch Single pass Every shot different Simultaneous Single shot Read all devices PS control Process/respond in < 1/120 th sec. Feedback Trajectory Bunch length Energy Timing distribution RF Phase control Applications Machine tuning Compatibility Other programs Old controls

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Critical design choices for instrumentation Power supply control and regulation Stability and latency time for fast feedback control Beam position monitor signal processing Resolution, drift, calibration Timing distribution Precision, stability, synchronization, SLC compatibility RF stabilization Beam based feedback Single-shot CSR bunch length monitors

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Power supply system requirements Stability requirements 10 ppm in the chicane bends Response time Low control-system latency for feedback <1 ms Commercial components Reliability

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Digital PS controller developed by SLS PWM digital regulation loop controls AC converter power module PWM is a digital process already Avoids unnecessary digital => analog => digital conversion Only source of drift in an all digital system is ADC reference voltage High-speed links, minimal latency Fully developed at SLS with proven performance Fully integrated into EPICS controls Now adopted by several large accelerator projects, including Diamond Light Source

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Power supply controller system layout IOCIOC EPICS Power Supply DSP Controller ADC Card PWM AC Converter load DCCT 8 ch VME card AC line 5MHz Optical fiber PWM signal Monitor signals

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Courtesy F. Jenni, PSI

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 PSI Digital Power Supplies ADC/DAC Card DSP Controller DCCT 0..6 Slaves Magnet PWM Signal Fast Optical Link (5 MHz) DIO U 1..4 I Power Converter Master Optical Trigger Courtesy A. Luedeke, PSI

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Enhancements to the SLS PS Design Diamond Light Source exploits the following capabilities of the SLS system Works with any PWM power converter so use commercial units (OCEM, Bruker) One controller can drive multiple, load-sharing AC converter power modules So use multiples of standard units to customize, e.g. 4 x 25 A modules for one 100 A supply Add an extra module to take up load if one fails Modules are hot-swappable Reliability, with minimal downtime from PS

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Beam Position Monitoring requirements

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Beam Position Monitors Stripline BPMs in the injector and linac (existing) and in the LTU Differencing large numbers Mechanical precision Fabrication by printing electrodes on ceramic tubes Drift in electronics Digital signal processing Cavity BPMs in the undulator, LTU launch Signal inherently zero at geometric center C-band (inexpensive) signal needs to be mixed down in the tunnel

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Stripline versus Cavity BPM Signals P f 700 MHz 500 MHz BP filter ADC x4 119 MHz Clock 24 th harmonic Digital processing RF in Control system /4 Stripline Mixer LO sync’ed to RF IF noise (resolution) minimized by removing analog devices in front of ADC that cause attenuation drift minimized by removing active devices in front of ADC noise (resolution) minimized by removing analog devices in front of ADC that cause attenuation drift minimized by removing active devices in front of ADC C-band cavity Dipole mode coupler ~5 GHz

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Simplistic View of Digital BPMs Is the purely digital approach the best way to go? Must always maximize signal to noise for best resolution So minimize any cause of attenuation: couplers, hybrids, active devices etc. This also eliminates drift which causes offsets Other approaches also try to do this: e.g. AM to PM conversion with a hybrid and then digitize Might as well digitize first, eliminate the middle men, and do the conversions digitally Ultimately left with calibrating the drift in the BPM cables, because ADCs are now very stable.

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Linac stripline BPMs Need to replace old BPM electronics Commercially available processing units look promising Beam testing of module (on order) can begin soon

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Analysis of Test Signals in the “Libera” module – S. Smith Measured signal to noise ratio implies resolution of 7  m in a 10 mm radius BPM Identified fixable artifacts in data processing

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Pros and Cons of the Libera concept Complete, integrated commercial package which comes close to requirements RF processing, digitization, calibration, control software and feedback DSP all in one box Makes it hard for us get inside and tweak it Access to fast signals for feedback systems Difficult to provide timestamps and interrupts in their O/S Might be better to separate out the functions into different modules

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Fabricating a Digital BPM processor out of commercially available modules – Till Straumann RF filter, local oscillator and mixer stage VME based ADC board e.g. Joerger, Echotek handle 8 channels IOC Calculates signal amplitude & beam position, tmit. interfaces to EPICS, procedures for calibration, process feedback algorithm

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Signal losses in long BPM cables versus placing electronics in the tunnel We are choosing a high frequency component of the BPM signal to maximize amplitude But this is rapidly attenuated in long cable runs Can down-convert next to the BPM with a local oscillator and a mixer Unacceptable to put electronics in the linac tunnel, pay for better cables But may be acceptable to put down-converter electronics in the undulator and LTU tunnels Highest resolution required there

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Timing system requirements Synchronization of fiducials in low-level RF with distribution of triggers in the control system 1/360 s Linac 476 MHz Main Drive Line Sector feed Fiducial detector Master Pattern Generator SLC Control System Event Generator 360 Hz Triggers 8.4 ns±10 ps 128-bit word beam codes 119 MHz 360 Hz fiducials phase locked to low level RF

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Digital distribution of SLAC timing 10 GBit ethernet hardware but not ethernet protocol. RF master oscillator 476 MHz MDL Divide by 4 Fiducial detector Event generator EVG VME module Fan out 8 ch Event receiver EVR VME module fiber 8.4 ns 16 bit word 8.4 ns Clock 119 MHz FPGA Triggers 3 ps stability Triggers Technology developed at SLS Commercialized, refined, adopted at Diamond Optional vernier module

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, Levels in the Timing System “coarse” triggers at 360 Hz with 8.4 ns delay step size and 10 ps jitter Gated data acquisition (BPMs) Pulsed devices (klystrons) Phase lock of the low-level RF 0.05 S-band (50 fs) phase stability Timing measurement of the pump-probe laser w.r.t. electron beam in the undulator 10 fs resolution

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 LCLS Machine Stability Tolerance Budget X-band X-X-X-X- From P. Emma: RMS tolerance budget for <12% rms peak-current jitter or <0.1% rms final e− energy jitter. All tolerances are rms levels and the voltage and phase tolerances per klystron for L2 and L3 are  Nk larger, assuming uncorrelated errors, where Nk is the number of klystrons per linac. 125 fs tolerance on X-band system

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Beam based feedback will stabilize RF  A Against drift and jitter up to ~10 Hz But no diagnostic to distinguish drift of X-band Linearization, higher-harmonic RF has the tightest tolerance No unique beam measurement Energy and Bunch Length Feedback Loops L0 L1 DL1 Spectr. BC1 BC2 L2L3 BSY 50B1 DL2 V rf (L0) Φ rf (L2) V rf (L1) Φ rf (L3) EEE Φ rf (L2) zz Φ rf (L1) zz E

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 CSR Single-shot Bunch Length Detector Off-axis synchrotron radiation Reflected through a port to: Fixed BW detector Autocorrelator Prototype at SPPS THz autocorrelator THz power detector B4 Bend Bunch Compressor Chicane CSR Vacuum port with reflecting foil

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 End of presentation! Additional backup material follows

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Linac type stripline BPMs LCLS range Resolution achievable with existing processor New BPM processor design challenges: large dynamic range Low noise, high gain 20 ps timing jitter limit

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Cavity beam position monitors for the undulator and LTU Coordinate measuring machine verification of cavity interior X-band cavity shown Dipole-mode couplers X-band cavity shown Dipole-mode couplers R&D at SLAC – S. Smith X-band cavity shown Dipole-mode couplers X-band cavity shown Dipole-mode couplers NLC studies of cavity BPMs, S. Smith et al

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 C-band beam tests of the cavity BPM – S. Smith 25  m 200 nm Raw digitizer records from beam measurements at ATF cavity BPM signal versus predicted position at bunch charge 1.6 nC plot of residual deviation from linear response << 1  m LCLS resolution requirement plot of residual deviation from linear response << 1  m LCLS resolution requirement C-band chosen for compatibility with wireless communications technology

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Synchronization of the Laser timing Jitter in the laser timing effects Electro optic bunch timing measurement Pump-probe timing for the users Enhancement schemes using short pulse lasers Jitter in the laser timing effects Electro optic bunch timing measurement Pump-probe timing for the users Enhancement schemes using short pulse lasers

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 SPPS Laser Phase Noise Measurements – R. Akre 476 MHz M.O. x MHz to linac MDL 3 km fiber ~1 km VCO Ti:Sa laser osc diode EO scope Phase detector 2856 MHz

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Electro-Optical Sampling at SPPS – A. Cavalieri et al. Single-Shot <300 fs 170 fs rms Timing Jitter ErEr Line image camera polarizer analyzer Pol. Laser pulse Electron bunch EO crystal Bunch length scan

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Antidamp Damp Gain bandwidth for different loop delays - L. Hendrickson Closed Loop Response of Orbit Feedback

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Control of Digital Power Supplies Andreas Lüdeke Swiss Light Source / PSI 20 May 2003 EPICS Collaboration Meeting

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 PSI Digital Power Supplies ADC/DAC Card DSP Controller DCC T 0..6 Slaves Magne t PWM Signal Fast Optical Link (5 MHz) DIO U 1..4 I Power Converter Master Optical Trigger Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Why use Digital Power Supplies? Single source of drifts: ADC voltage reference All PS at the SLS proved to have excellent stability Flexibility of the power supplies Regulation loop can be adapted to load Easy to add new power supply features on DSP Good reproducibility, reliability PWM is digital, modern DCCT will be digital Why not? Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Hardware Overview Linux PC Consoles IOCEVRCarrier IP Orbit DSP Timing Trans.Mod. VME T.Mod Power Supply Controller Parallel fast access (10k frames per sec) IOC  IP DSP  IP … Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Power Supply Hardware DSP Controller Card Euro card size Shark DSP Shark links on backplane ADC/DAC card 2 ADC, 16 Bit, 50 kHz 4 ADC, 12 Bit 2 DAC for debugging Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Fast and precise ADC µV + 20 µV - 40 µV 33 min t [s] U ADC [V] Umax Umin 1 kHz Filter 10 µV  1 ppm  20 th Bit 600 µV Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 VME Hardware Industry Pack Carrier VME64x 4 slot boards “off-the-shelf”: Greenspring Vipc664 Hytec 8002 VME64x Transition module for 8 power supplies Industry Pack Module for 2 power supplies Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 DSP Software Local intelligence: 50 kHz pulse width modulation loop Sophisticated alarms, like change in load resistance Triggered current waveform (DSP ramp) Scaleable, arbitrary waveform times 80 µsec steps  > 1 second waveform The same DSP program for all PS Locally stored parameter settings for each PS Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 EPICS device/driver Carrier board independent by use of drvIpac Read and write 256 power supply registers DSP waveform and program downloads Softramps: synchronised current waveforms Arbitrary clock rate (<1kHz) for 8000 setpoints Synchronised by timing system Diagnostic records Statistics of optical fibre link and IP failures Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 EPICS database One template for 500 power supplies Each power supply supports Download and save of DSP programs, parameter sets, DSP ID current waveform: download, scaling, offset, length, … reading max. and min. current from PS reading actual magnet resistance from controller... Magnet cycling configurable for each PS Detailed fault diagnostic for PS, link and driver Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Software Management DSP software is documented by Excel sheets Script transforms sheets into a C include file Easy upgrade of the driver for new PS functions Identical DSP and EPICS software for all PS Configuration by parameter set Andreas Lüdeke

Patrick Krejcik LCLS October 12-13, 2004 Outlook PSI type digital PS are “en vogue” Each manufacturer can get a PSI licence Diamond will use exclusively digital PS for magnets Soleil is evaluating the PSI digital PS Industry Pack module can be used on CPCI Driver source can be reused for Tango Customized DSP programs For specific application To drive several PS with one DSP card Andreas Lüdeke