Ultrafine Particles and Climate Change Peter J. Adams HDGC Seminar November 5, 2003
Overview Introduction climate effects of aerosols aerosol size distribution, mass / number concentrations Ultrafine particles and clouds
Overview Introduction climate effects of aerosols aerosol size distribution, mass / number concentrations Ultrafine particles and clouds Theme: Aerosol (particulate matter) models developed for PM regulations / visibility are inadequate for newer issues
Theme Regulations based on mass concentrations (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ) less attention to modeling number concentrations (i.e. ultrafines)
Theme Regulations based on mass concentrations (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ) less attention to modeling number concentrations (i.e. ultrafines) Ultrafines cause concern health effects climate change
Theme Regulations based on mass concentrations (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ) less attention to modeling number concentrations (i.e. ultrafines) Ultrafines cause concern health effects climate change Sources of ultrafines poorly understood: direct (primary) emission by combustion atmospheric formation from supersaturated gases (nucleation)
Earth’s Energy Budget J.T. Houghton: “The science of climate change” Anthropogenic GHGs 2.5 W m -2
Aerosols and Climate: Direct Effect Direct Effect: Scattering and absorption by particles photo: SeaWifs website
Aerosols and Climate: Direct Effect Direct Effect: Scattering and absorption by particles photo: SeaWifs website Roughly proportional to aerosol mass concentration
Indirect Effect on Climate Aerosol Particles Cloud Droplets activation / nucleation
Indirect Effect on Climate Clean Air Polluted Air Aerosol Particles Cloud Droplets
Indirect Effect on Climate Clean Air Polluted Air Aerosol Particles Cloud Droplets Brighter, more persistent clouds “First” indirect effect: albedo “Second” indirect effect: lifetime
Aerosols and Climate: Indirect Effect AVHRR observation of indirect effect Red: visible Green: 3.7 m solar IR Blue: infrared
Aerosols and Climate: Indirect Effect AVHRR observation of indirect effect Red: visible Green: 3.7 m solar IR Blue: infrared Power plant Lead smelter Port Oil refineries
Aerosol Activation Diameter Number “Activation” = formation of cloud droplet involves a competition between solute and surface tension effects
Aerosol Activation Diameter Number “Activation” = formation of cloud droplet involves a competition between solute and surface tension effects Depends on number concentration above “critical diameter”
Source: IPCC Third Assessment Report
Typical Number Distribution
Typical Mass Distribution
Previous Work Sulfate Mass ( g m -3 ) Cloud Droplets (cm -3 ) Boucher & Lohmann, 1995 Mechanistic: number of cloud drops depends on number of particles large enough to activate Empirical: number of cloud drops correlated with sulfate mass based on observations Ultrafine CCN
Previous Work I: Martin et al. [1994]: W/m 2 II: Martin et al. with background CCN: W/m 2 III: Jones et al. [1994]: W/m 2 IV: Boucher and Lohmann [1995]: W/m 2 “It is argued that a less empirical and more physically based approach is required…” Cloud Droplets (cm -3 ) Sulfate Mass ( g m -3 ) Kiehl et al. [2000]
Aerosol Microphysics Diameter Number Nucleation Emissions Coagulation Condensation Deposition
This work: two moments of the size distribution (mass and number) are tracked for each size bin. Air quality “regulatory” model: tracks mass in each size bin Two-Moment Sectional Algorithm m o 2m o … Mass M1N1M1N1 M2N2M2N2... Tzivion et al., JAS 44, 3139 – 3149, 1987 Adams et al., JGR /2001JD001010, 2002
This work: two moments of the size distribution (mass and number) are tracked for each size bin. Air quality “regulatory” model: tracks mass in each size bin Two-moment method conserves both mass and number precisely Prevents numerical diffusion present in single- moment methods Excellent size resolution: 30 sections from.01 m to 10 m Two-Moment Sectional Algorithm m o 2m o … Mass M1N1M1N1 M2N2M2N2... Tzivion et al., JAS 44, 3139 – 3149, 1987 Adams et al., JGR /2001JD001010, 2002
Aerosol Microphysics Coagulation: General Dynamic Equation Condensation: ~30,000 grid cells 1 year Adaptive time steps
Model Structure Aerosol composition Current: Sulfate / Sea-salt Development: Organic / Elemental carbon Future: Mineral dust Processes Emissions Chemistry Microphysics Cloud processing Size-resolved dry / wet deposition
Size Distributions
Van Dingenen et al., 1995 JGOFS cruise Sep/Oct, 1992
CCN (cm -3 ): 0.2% Supersaturation
Uncertainties Particulate Emissions Most sulfate aerosol mass results from gas- phase SO 2 emissions Particulate sulfate: <5% of anthropogenic sulfur emissions Nucleation of new aerosol particles Important uncertainties in mechanism and rate Both processes contribute significant numbers of small particles insignificant contribution to sulfate mass important contribution to aerosol number concentrations and size distributions
Sensitivity Scenarios Base Case 1985 sulfur emissions all emissions as gas-phase SO 2 nucleation based on critical concentration from binary (H 2 SO 4 -H 2 O) theory Primary Emissions 3% of sulfur emissions as sulfate Enhanced Nucleation critical H 2 SO 4 concentration factor of 10 lower Pre-industrial no anthropogenic emissions
Vertical Profiles
CCN Vertical Profiles
Ultrafine Particles and CCN Diameter Number
Ultrafine Particles and CCN Diameter Number Condensation to accumulation mode does not produce new CCN Growth
Ultrafine Particles and CCN Diameter Number Condensation to accumulation mode does not produce new CCN Growth Additional ultrafine particles result in enhanced CCN formation
Impact of Particulate Emissions SO 2 emissions SO 2 /SO 4 2- emissions
Summary and Conclusions A “regulatory” model (mass concentrations) omits important physics Ultrafine particles have a significant impact on clouds via CCN number concentrations Require better knowledge of sources of ultrafines nucleation “primary” emissions from combustion Future changes in ultrafine emissions?