Function and Organization: Comparing the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection Phyllis Illari and Jon Williamson University of Kent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanisms and Explanation Phyllis McKay and Jon Williamson University of Kent.
Advertisements

Evidence for Complex Causes
Mechanisms and Causality in Sociology
Bacterial Genetics. Prokaryotic Cell Circular (and naked) double stranded DNA Bacteria have very short generation spans (ex. E.coli divides every 20 minutes)short.
DNA and RNA.
Nucleic Acids and Protein Synthesis
DNA.
12/29/102 Functional segments of DNA Code for specific proteins Determined by amino acid sequence One gene-one protein hypothesis (not always true)
Mechanisms and the Metaphysics of Causation Peter Fazekas Peter Fazekas School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh.
DNA Past Paper Questions. 1. Draw as simple diagram of the molecular structure of DNA. 5 marks.
Microbial Genetics: DNA and RNA What chemical carries the genetic instructions in cells, and how is this chemical reproduced? How is this chemical used.
DNA Replication and Protein Synthesis
Copyright © John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.  When DNA is transcribed, the result is an RNA molecule.  RNA is then translated into a sequence.
The Structure and Function of DNA CHAPTER 10 Transcription (DNA  RNA) RNA Polymerase Processing of Eukaryotic RNA Translation (mRNA  Protein) The Three.
Compare and contrast prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.[BIO.4A] October 2014Secondary Science - Biology.
Microbial Genetics: DNA Replication Gene Expression
CHMI E.R. Gauthier, Ph.D. 1 CHMI 2227E Biochemistry I Gene expression.
NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEIN SYNTHESIS. QUESTION 1 DNA.
Population Dynamics Humans and malaria. Science (2010), v.328:841.
Genetics: Chapter 7. What is genetics? The science of heredity; includes the study of genes, how they carry information, how they are replicated, how.
KEY CONCEPT DNA structure is the same in all organisms.
1 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSLATION. 2 Central Dogma of Gene Expression.
Molecular Genetics gene: specific region of DNA that determines the type of proteins to be made.
Chapter 3 The Biological Basis of Life. Chapter Outline The Cell DNA Structure DNA Replication Protein Synthesis Cell Division: Mitosis and Meiosis New.
Noneukaryotic Genetic Information
Chapter 3 The Biological Basis of Life. Chapter Outline  The Cell  DNA Structure  DNA Replication  Protein Synthesis.
Structure of RNA  Structure  Nucleic acid made up of nucleotides  composed of Ribose, phosphate group, and nitrogenous base  Nitrogenous bases  Adenine.
A Biology Primer Part III: Transcription, Translation, and Regulation Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou University of Texas at Dallas.
Chapter 8: Microbial Genetics
DNA. DNA RNA DNA Backbone Structure Alternate phosphate and sugar (deoxyribose), phosphate ester bonds.
Nucleic Acids and Protein Synthesis 10 – 1 DNA 10 – 2 RNA 10 – 3 Protein Synthesis.
Johnson - The Living World: 3rd Ed. - All Rights Reserved - McGraw Hill Companies How Genes Work Chapter 8 Copyright © McGraw-Hill Companies Permission.
DNA was discovered in 1953 by James Watson and Francis Crick.
DNA – Chromosomes & DNA replication – RNA & Protein Synthesis – Mutations – Gene Regulation Chapter 12 Pages DNA & RNA.
Biochemical Composition Evidence of Evolutionary Relationships.
Biochemical Composition Evidence of Evolutionary Relationships.
KEY CONCEPT 8.5 Translation converts an mRNA message into a polypeptide, or protein.
CHAPTER 10 “HOW PROTEINS ARE MADE”. Learning Targets  I will compare the structure of RNA with that of DNA.  I will summarize the process of transcription.
What’s all this fuss about mechanisms? Phyllis McKay University of Kent.
DNA. DNA Vocabulary 0 DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid 0 Trait: Inherited characteristic that DNA codes for 0 Heredity: The passing of traits from one generation.
Ch 12 DNA and RNA 12-1DNA 12-2 Chromosomes and DNA Replication 12-3 RNA and Protein Synthesis 12-4 Mutations 12-5 Gene Regulation 12-1DNA 12-2 Chromosomes.
DNA and RNA Structure of DNA Chromosomes and Replication Transcription and Translation Mutation and Gene Regulation.
Model for DNA Replication Semiconservative model: Daughter DNA molecules contain: one parental strand and one newly-replicated strand.
DNA/RNA Test Review 1. What are produced through the translation process? 2. Transcribe this DNA segment, AATCGC, to mRNA. 3. What are the three components.
13/11/
GENETICS.
Inheritance and the Structure of DNA
Biomedical Technology I
Unit 8 – DNA Structure and Replication
DNA Foldable Directions:
DNA & RNA 1) DNA Basics 2) DNA Structure & Function 3) DNA Replication
Biology Unit 3 Warm Ups Mrs. Hilliard.
GENETICS.
Chapter 3 The Double Helix.
Nucleotide.
Ch 12 DNA and RNA.
KEY CONCEPT DNA structure is the same in all organisms.
UNIT 5 Protein Synthesis.
DNA, RNA, & Proteins Vocab review
How Proteins are Made Biology I: Chapter 10.
Review JEOPARDY! History DNA structure Replication Transcription
GENE EXPRESSION / PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
KEY CONCEPT DNA structure is the same in all organisms.
Chapter 10 DNA, RNA, and Protein Synthesis
Chapter 10 DNA, RNA, and Protein Synthesis
credit: modification of work by NIH
DNA, RNA, & Proteins Vocab review
12-3 RNA & Protein Synthesis
Unit 3: Genetics Part 1: Genetic Informaiton
Presentation transcript:

Function and Organization: Comparing the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection Phyllis Illari and Jon Williamson University of Kent

Mechanisms and the problem with natural selection Current mechanisms literature agrees that mechanistic explanation: 1.Begins with a description of the phenomenon to be explained. 2.Involves decomposition into parts 3.Specifies how the organization of those parts produces the phenomenon. (See MDC 2000; Bechtel and Abrahamsen 2005, 2008; Craver 2007; Darden 2006, Glennan 2002.) BUT Skipper and Millstein (2005) argue that natural selection does not decompose into organized parts.

Protein SynthesisNatural Selection

Summary of survey paper by Janis Faye Hutchinson (2001)

Mechanisms and the problem with natural selection Current mechanisms literature agrees that mechanistic explanation: 1.Begins with a description of the phenomenon to be explained. 2.Involves decomposition into parts 3.Specifies how the organization of those parts produces the phenomenon. (See MDC 2000; Bechtel and Abrahamsen 2005, 2008; Craver 2007; Darden 2006, Glennan 2002.) BUT Skipper and Millstein (2005) argue that natural selection does not decompose into organized parts.

1 Functional individuation

‘It bears emphasizing that the project of providing explanations, including mechanistic explanations, starts with the identification of a phenomenon. This is where the functioning structure gets determined, constraining what will count as a successful identification of relevant parts and operations and their organization.’ (Bechtel 2006 p29.)

2 Decomposition

Decomposition in Protein Synthesis Entities: DNA, RNA, ribosome, operator, enhancer, promoter, RNA polymerases, repressor, activator, Watson-Crick base pair, covalent bond, replication fork, codon, anticodon. Structures: Loop, cleft, lobes, two-stranded, helical, ring, backbone, hairpin, wound, segment, position on gene, wrapped, elongation, strand, ‘hairpin’ or stem-loop structure, globular or dumbbell shape, helix-loop-helix structure, chain. Activities: Replicating, transcribing, translating, trigger, binding, phosphorylates, modifying, wrapping, folding, cutting, catalyse, protect, opening, unwinding, supercoiling, breaking, inhibiting, stabilizing. (Gleaned from Adams et al, Voet and Voet, Whitford)

Skipper and Millstein arguments Consider and reject organisms, the environment, and populations as parts of NS stable enough to satisfy Glennan. Contra MDC, activities and entities can be found that are relevant to NS, but not components of NS. ‘The problem is that the activities of surviving and reproducing do not constitute selection. Differently put, the ways in which the finches and moths engage in survival and reproductive activities are elemental of selection. But just enumerating those entities and activities does not result in an articulation of the mechanism of natural selection.’ (SM 2005 p341.)

Functional decomposition in Protein Synthesis Entities: DNA, RNA, ribosome, operator, enhancer, promoter, RNA polymerases, repressor, activator, Watson-Crick base pair, covalent bond, replication fork, codon, anticodon. Structures: Loop, cleft, lobes, two-stranded, helical, ring, backbone, hairpin, wound, segment, position on gene, wrapped, elongation, strand, ‘hairpin’ or stem-loop structure, globular or dumbbell shape, helix-loop-helix structure, chain. Activities: Replicating, transcribing, translating, trigger, binding, phosphorylates, modifying, wrapping, folding, cutting, catalyse, protect, opening, unwinding, supercoiling, breaking, inhibiting, stabilizing. (Gleaned from Adams et al, Voet and Voet, Whitford)

Natural selection: mechanisms and sub-mechanisms Kinds: directional, stabilizing, disruptive selection. Varieties: frequency-dependent selection and sexual selection. Phases: sorting, new variation and re-sorting, existing constraints open to change. Many sub-mechanisms creating variation, heritability of traits, and means of reproduction structure the population and the selection process itself: –Gene linkage, pleiotropy and epistasis; autoselection, meiosis, recombination, mutation and further lower-level mechanisms such as transduction, transformation and conjugation.

Functional decomposition in natural selection Vast explanatory resource: –Activities: directional selection, stabilizing selection, disruptive selection, sorting, sexual selection, frequency-dependent selection, recombination, reproduction, meiosis, epistasis. –Entities: Populations, organisms, cells, DNA, chromosomes, alleles. Explanation of particular case: parts of natural selection are spatiotemporally located, structured, and stable enough to produce adaptation.

HIV: The War in the World

3 Organization

Skipper and Millstein arguments ‘The claim that mechanisms are organized implies (1) that mechanisms are comprised of various elements and (2) that those elements are structured in some way.’ (SM 2005 p336.) They say that organisms and populations do not need to do things in any particular location, can change in structure and orientation, and events need not have any particular temporal order. They conclude: ‘In other words, we can give no general account of organization in populations undergoing natural selection. And if that is right, then there is no general mechanism, sensu MDC and Glennan, of natural selection to be found.’ (SM 2005 p338-9, emphases in original.)

Mechanistic Organization Organization goes beyond simple spatial and temporal relations. Bechtel considers feedback and control systems, and homeostatic mechanisms. Mitchell is concerned with self- organization. In mechanistic explanation, we are interested in whatever features of the entities and activities actually produce the phenomenon. This stretches from the simple spatio-temporal to the studies of complex systems theroy. Quantitative descriptions of dynamic organization are more vital than is recognized.

HIV: The War in the Body HIV virions surrounding a T-cell

Summary 1.We identify a phenomenon to be explained 2.We identify those entities that engage in activities relevant to that phenomenon. 3.We discover what kinds of relations the entities and activities stand in that produces that phenomenon. There is no reason to suppose that the kinds of entities that produce one kind of phenomenon will be the same as those which produce a different kind of phenomenon. There is also no reason to suppose that the kinds of relations activities and entities stand in that produce one kind of phenomenon will be the same as those which produce a different kind of phenomenon.

References Adams, RL; Knowler, DP & Leader, JT (1992). The Biochemistry of the Nucleic Acids (11th ed.). London: Chapman and Hall. Bechtel, W (2006). Discovering Cell Mechanisms: the Creation of Modern Cell Biology. Cambridge: CUP. Bechtel, W & Abrahamsen, A (2008). From Reduction Back to Higher Levels. In Love, BC; McRae, K & Sloutsky, VM (Eds.). Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp ). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Bechtel, W & Abrahamsen, A (2005). Explanation: a mechanist alternative. In Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, pp421–441. Darden, L (2006). Reasoning in Biological Discoveries. Cambridge: CUP. Darden, L & Craver, C (2002). Strategies in the interfield discovery of the mechanism of protein synthesis. In Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 33, pp1–28. Glennan, S (2002). Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation. In Philosophy of Science, 69, ppS342– S353. Hutchinson, JF (2001). The Biology and Evolution of HIV. In Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 30, pp Machamer, P; Darden, L & Craver, C (2000). Thinking about Mechanisms. In Philosophy of Science, 67, pp1-25. Mitchell, SD (2003). Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: CUP. Skipper, RA (Jr.) & Millstein, RL (2005). Thinking about evolutionary mechanisms: natural selection. In Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, pp327– 347. Voet, D and Voet, JG (2004). Biochemistry. USA: John Wiley and Sons. Whitford, D (2005). Proteins: Structure and Function. Sussex: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Infected cell (orange)HIV budding off a cell HIV: The War in the Cell