Model Training Components for Staff and Inmates National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law March 9-14, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Advertisements

BEST PRACTICES: IMPLEMENTATION OF PREA IN THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice April 6, 2008 Washington,
1 Overview of the 2003 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) These materials were developed by The Moss Group, Inc.under cooperative agreement #03P21G1Y4.
Policy Development. Objectives What makes a good policy? Definitions Challenges and dilemmas. Writing policy and procedure. Triage your agency’s policies.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 The National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law July 10-15, 2005 Investigating Allegations of.
Policy Development. Objectives What makes a good policy? Definitions Challenges and dilemmas. Writing policy and procedure. Triage your agency’s policies.
 National Awareness  International Awareness  Systemic Pressures.
Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders ACTION PLANNING The American University, Washington.
Management and Operational Practices Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders March 2006.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003: Implications for Juvenile Justice Agencies Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody Kentucky Department.
Staff Sexual Misconduct With Inmates Action Planning Work Guide The American University, Washington College of Law National Institute of Corrections Washington,
Agency/Institution Culture. Training Objectives: Identify why and how agency culture plays a role in misconduct Who is most vulnerable for involvement.
Training. Objectives: Discuss “Why Train”? Discuss “Why Train”? Identify decisions About Training Identify decisions About Training Who, what, whenWho,
Training Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youthful in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice Lexington, KY.
Staff Sexual Misconduct Agency or Institutional Culture National Institute of Corrections/American University, Washington College of Law July 7-12, 2002.
Policy Development Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders March 2006.
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 11-16, 2004.
Investigative Training Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders July 2005.
Developed by Dan Dunne under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1.
Legal Responses to Staff Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody: Elements of Good State Laws National Institute of Corrections and The Washington.
Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National Institute of Corrections American University Washington.
Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth In Custody Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth In Custody ACTION PLANNING Addressing Staff Sexual.
Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National Institute of Corrections American University Washington.
Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National Institute of Corrections and Washington College of Law July , 2004.
Module Eight1 Module Eight - Training. Module Eight2 Who Wants to be the Boss? Overcoming Objections to Orienting Offenders.
Developed by Brenda Smith under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct.
Developed Under NIC Cooperative Agreement #06S20GJJ1 Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders Investigating Allegations of Staff.
Agency Culture: Impact on Investigations of Staff Sexual Misconduct Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders The National Institute.
 National Awareness  International Awareness  Systemic Pressures.
Legal Responses to Staff Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody: Elements of Good State Laws National Institute of Corrections and The Washington.
 National Awareness  Systemic Pressures. What is Sexual Misconduct? Any Behavior or act of a sexual nature by an employee, contractor, service provider,
Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct With Inmates Action Planning Work Guide The American University, Washington College of Law National.
Court Technology and Court Performance Professor Byrne Nov.10,2010.
Staff Sexual Misconduct Agency or Institutional Culture Prepared by: A.T. Wall March 2003.
Developed by Brenda V. Smith under NIC Cooperative Agreement #06S20GJJ1 Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders.
Legal Responses to Staff Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody: Elements of Good State Laws Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National.
Staff Sexual Misconduct Agency Culture Prepared by: A.T. Wall March 7-12, 2004.
Policy Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice Lexington, KY.
Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Inmates National Institute of Corrections/American University Washington.
Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders ACTION PLANNING The American University, Washington.
Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct With Inmates Action Planning The American University, Washington College of Law National Institute.
1 Training. 2 Why Have A Training Program? Prevention  Public backlash  Employee backlash  Litigation Protection  Employees  Offenders  Agency 
Management and Operational Practices Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice.
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
Term coined by Auguste Comte in The scientific study of human social behavior Content + Methods What do we mean by scientific? What do we mean by.
Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Law: Module 4: Reporting and the Role of the Child Welfare Professional Transfer of Learning The Pennsylvania Child.
Tammy Westcott, Assistant District Attorney Director of Alternative Courts Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
UNM and Health System Internal Audit Departments Internal Audit Department Orientation Manu Patel, Internal Audit Director Purvi Mody, Executive Director,
Special Prison Populations
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 12 - Prison Life.
Custodial Sexual Misconduct – Statute – Sexual misconduct with offenders and juveniles. Iowa’s law is in the Sexual Abuse section of the Criminal.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
[JAIL NAME] Prison Rape Elimination Act Pamphlet This brochure was produced with support from Grant No RP-BX-0001 awarded by the Bureau of Justice.
FAUQUIER COUNTY. OFFICE OF ADULT COURT SERVICES WHAT THE HECK IS IT ANYWAY?
TBI Caregiver Curriculum: A collaboration in progress Traci Adair, TBI/MH Program Manager and TBI Grant Director Washington State Aging and Disability.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 11 - Prisons and Jails.
Investigative Policy Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders The National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law.
BOP REENTRY STRATEGY Inmate Skills Development & Offender Workforce Development Harley G. Lappin Director Federal Bureau of Prisons Washington, DC December.
Partners in Diversion: Crisis and Criminal Justice Initiatives Safe Harbor Behavioral Health & Erie County Adult Probation/Parole.
Prison Rape Elimination Act The Prison and the Community.
1 Technical Assistance Project Update Sonja Armbruster Public Health Initiatives Coordinator Center for Community Support and Research 10/30/2013.
1 Leveraging Corrections Information for Intelligence Purposes CTA Conference Colorado Springs May 5, 2008 CTA Conference Colorado Springs May 5, 2008.
VHA Veterans Justice Programs: Presentation to Executive Committee - ASCA Joel Rosenthal, Ph.D. National Training Director, VHA Veterans Justice Programs.
AJS 502 Academic professor/tutorialrank.com For more course Tutorials
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 13-18, 2003.
Dating Violence and Abuse SRCSB Policy 5.325
Legal Liability.
PRETRIAL JUSTICE IDAHO
Presentation transcript:

Model Training Components for Staff and Inmates National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law March 9-14, 2003

Why Train Staff and Inmates about Sexual Misconduct First line of defense Staff-Inmate relations define the culture of an institution Line staff and inmates have finger on pulse of information in institution Prevention

Other Reasons Staff Role Model Behavior Divide/Conquer Mentor each other Inmates Encourage reporting Define expectation for other inmates

Important decisions What kind of materials will staff and inmates receive? How long will the training last? How often will you hold the training? Where will the training be held? When will the training be held? Who will receive training?

Important decisions …………. Who will do the training? What do you do with the information you receive in the training? What will be the content of training

Group Work:Outline for Training Group One – Newly hired employees; Group Two – In-serviced training; Group Three - Volunteers; Group Four - Contractors and vendors; Group Five – Stakeholders (prosecutor, criminal justice partners, community, advocates)

Basic Components Review Investigative policy What happens and when Separation Housing Retaliation Medical Implications Mental Health Discuss institutional culture Staff-staff Staff-inmate Inmate-inmate Communication Risk Factors Staff inmate

Basic Components for staff and Inmates Define purpose of training Overview of the problem Focus on local context Discussion of federal and state laws Examine local law Review past and current relevant litigation Be specific about any court ordered requirements Review institutional policy on staff- inmate misconduct

Components individual to: Staff Human Resources implications Duty to report Role in Investigations Operational concerns EAP Inmates Institutional implications Sanctions if any Medical and mental health concerns

Resources: Video conference, curriculum, reports Training curriculum 16 hour “101” program for jail administrators + 8 hour T for T 16 hour jail investigation program 24 hour community corrections – agency administrators

Resources, continued Videos Colorado, Arizona Others Offender interviews Video from “the boss” Technical assistance On-site Training