3D CTM Study of Arctic Ozone Loss and Denitrification Effect  Arctic ozone loss for 13 winters  DLAPSE Coupled to SLIMCAT  Denitrification effect on.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Arctic ozone loss 2011 John Pyle Scientific Assessment Panel National Centre for Atmospheric Science, UK & Centre for Atmospheric Science Department of.

Advertisements

Rossana Dragani Using and evaluating PROMOTE services at ECMWF PROMOTE User Meeting Nice, 16 March 2009.

January 6. January 7 January 8 January 9 January 10.

REFERENCES Alexander et al (2008): Global Estimates of Gravity Wave Momentum Flux from HIRDLS Observations. JGR 113 D15S18 Ern et al (2004): Absolute Values.

Ozone and the Ozone Hole Heather Raven & Stefanie Spayd.

Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science SCHOOL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT 3D SLIMCAT Studies of Arctic Ozone Loss Wuhu Feng Acknowledgments: Martyn.

Antarctic Ozone “Hole” Review 2012 Craig S. Long 1 Larry Flynn 2, Bryan Johnson 3 NOAA 1-NWS/NCEP/Climate Prediction Center 2-NESDIS/STAR/Satellite Meteorology.

W. Neff, et al. NOAA/Environmental Technology Laboratory Boulder Colorado AWS Meeting, Wednesday, June 8, 2005, Columbus OH The Meteorology of High Nitrogen-

Chemistry and Transport in the Lower Stratosphere Wuhu Feng 1, Martyn Chipperfield 1, Howard Roscoe 2 1. Institute for Atmospheric Science, School of the.

24/6/05Dr. J.J. Remedios, EOEP review, 27/6/ Highlights of Atmospheric Science from ESA Satellites J.J. Remedios EOS-SRC, Physics and Astronomy,

Review of Northern Winter 2010/11

Diagnosis of the Ozone Budget in the SH Lower Stratosphere Wuhu Feng and Martyn Chipperfield School of the Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK,

METO 621 Lesson 23. The Ozone Hole Decline in mean October ozone levels over Halley Bay.

Testable sensitivities of CTM simulations to meteorological fields Yuhang Wang Georgia Tech.

Stratospheric NO y Studies with the SLIMCAT 3D CTM Wuhu Feng, Stewart Davies, Jeff Evans and Martyn Chipperfield School of the Environment, University.

3D CTM Study of Arctic Ozone Loss and Denitrification Effect Wuhu Feng 1, Martyn Chipperfield 1, Stewart Davies 1, V.L. Harvey 2, C.E. Randall 2 1. School.

. Sensitivity Studies of Ozone Depletion with a 3D CTM Wuhu Feng 1, M.P. Chipperfield 1, S. Dhomse 1, L. Gunn 1, S. Davies 1, B. Monge-Sanz 1, V.L. Harvey.

Wuhu Feng and Martyn Chipperfield

Three-Dimensional Chemical Transport Model Studies of Arctic Ozone Depletion Wuhu Feng and Martyn Chipperfield School of the Earth and Environment, University.

Larger Chemical Ozone Loss in 2004/2005 Arctic Winter/Spring Wuhu Feng and Martyn Chipperfield School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds Acknowledgments.

Introduction. A major focus of SCOUT-O3 is the tropics and a key issue here is testing how well existing global 3D models perform in this region. This.

 2003 Antarctic Match campaign June-Oct 2003 nine Ozonesonde stations Measure Chemical O 3 loss rate  SLIMCAT 3D CTM  Ozone and loss rate comparison.

Institute for Atmospheric Science SCHOOL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Comparison of Measurements from the SCOUT-O3 Darwin and AMMA Campaigns with a 3-D Chemical.

Studies of Stratospheric NO y Chemistry with Three- Dimensional Chemical Transport Model Wuhu Feng 1, Martyn Chipperfield 1, Stewart Davies 1, B. Sen 2,

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Evolution of Stratospheric.

Effect of Stratospheric Water Vapor Change on Ozone Layer and Climate Wenshou Tian Martyn P. Chipperfield 1 Collage of the Atmospheric Science Lanzhou.

Brief Climate Discussion William F. Ryan Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania State University.

Dynamical control of ozone transport and chemistry from satellite observations and CCMs Mark Weber 1, Ingo Wohltmann 2, Veronika Eyring 3, Markus Rex 2,

Objectives Explain how the ozone layer shields Earth from much of the sun’s harmful radiation. Explain how chlorofluorocarbons damage the ozone layer.

QUESTIONS Based on the major source of OH described last class where do you expect OH formation to be high? 2. The Chapman mechanism includes a fifth.

Y. J. ORSOLINI Norwegian Institute for Air Research – NILU C. RANDALL LASP, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA G. MANNEY NASA Jet Propulsion.

Chemical Box Models Markus Rex Alfred Wegener Institute Potsdam Germany (1) Basic concepts, simplified systems (Sunday) (2) The O x, NO y /NO x, HO x,

How is total ozone distributed over the globe?

1. Introduction 3. Global-Scale Results 2. Methods and Data Early spring SWE for historic ( ) and future ( ) periods were simulated. Early.

IV. Ozone Hole Observations Heterogeneous chemistry Decadal ozone loss.

Satellite Observations and Simulations of Subvortex Processing and Related Upper Troposphere / Lower Stratosphere Transport M.L. Santee, G.L. Manney, W.G.

March total ozone from GOME/SCIAMACHY –High inter-annual ozone variability during winter/spring NH –Combined effect from ozone transport and polar ozone.

1 HIRDLS Science Team Meeting 26,27 June 2008 To be held in the Dobson Room, Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Department of Physics, Oxford.

Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.

Common ozone depletion myths There is overwhelming evidence that humans are responsible for the Antarctic ozone "hole". And there is strong evidence that.

REFERENCES Alexander et al (2008): Global Estimates of Gravity Wave Momentum Flux from HIRDLS Observations. JGR 113 D15S18 Ern et al (2004): Absolute Values.

Improvement in forecast skill from for ECMWF 5-km hemispheric flow pattern Highlights of the past recent decades.

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Ozone Change at the South Pole: A Forty-Year Record of Observations Samuel Oltmans, Bryan Johnson, Robert.

An analysis of Russian Sea Ice Charts for A. Mahoney, R.G. Barry and F. Fetterer National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado Boulder,

Arctic Sea Ice – Now and in the Future. J. Stroeve National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences.

Model Simulation of tropospheric BrO Xin Yang, J. Pyle and R. Cox Center for Atmospheric Science University of Cambridge 7-9 Oct Frascati, Italy.

Stratospheric Ozone : Depletion and Recovery Eun-Su Yang 1, Ross J. Salawitch 2, Derek Cunnold 3, Michael J. Newchurch 1, M. Patrick McCormick 4, James.

Investigations of long and short term changes in Total Ozone at the Sonnblick Observatory (3106 m, Austria) S. Simic, P. Weihs and G. Rengarajan and W.

Dynamical Influence on Inter-annual and Decadal Ozone Change Sandip Dhomse, Mark Weber,

Global Modeling Status Thomas Lachlan-Cope 1 and Keith M. Hines 2 1 British Antarctic Survey Cambridge, UK 2 Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar Research.

Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSC) Patrick Shaw SIO 209 May 15, 2009.

Development and Applications of the TOMCAT/SLIMCAT 3-D CTM Wuhu Feng and Martyn Chipperfield NCAS, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds,

slide 1 Polar Ozone: Past and present Chapter 4 of WMO 2006 Ozone Assessment Summary Part 1 Polar stratospheric observations update Part 2 Progress.

Understanding The Effect Of Anthropogenic Aerosol Weekly Cycles Upon The Climate Using A Global Model Of Aerosol Processes (GLOMAP) Introduction GLOMAP.

Page 1 SAOZ EUREKA Feb-Mar 05 Post campaign Meeting - Eureka 2005,- 30 May 2005 Outline Objectives Results Florence Goutail Service d’Aeronomie / CNRS,

Dynamical control of ozone transport and chemistry from satellite observations and coupled chemistry climate models Mark Weber 1, Sandip Dhomse 1, Ingo.

Improving Air Quality Modeling for the Wasatch Front/Cache Valley Winter Air Pollution Episodes Erik Crosman 1, John Horel 1, Lance Avey 2, Chris Foster.

Ozone loss in the Arctic in winter 2015/2016

Controls on the Past and Future Depletion of Antarctic Ozone and the Emergence of Healing Susan Solomon Richards Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry and.

Twenty-two years of Arctic ozone depletion observations and simulations. Is there a trend ? F. Goutail, F. Lefèvre, A. Pazmiño, J. P. Pommereau, LATMOS/IPSL/UVSQ.

Interannual variability of transport via the Asian Summer Monsoon

Classroom Catalyst.

Wuhu Feng, John Plane, Martyn Chipperfield, Dan Marsh,

The winter of 2013/2014- What happened to Climate Change? Part 1

Section 2: The Ozone Shield

Section 2: The Ozone Shield

Section 2: The Ozone Shield

Presentation transcript:

3D CTM Study of Arctic Ozone Loss and Denitrification Effect  Arctic ozone loss for 13 winters  DLAPSE Coupled to SLIMCAT  Denitrification effect on O3 loss Wuhu Feng, Martyn Chipperfield, Stewart Davies, V.L. Harvey, C.E. Randall School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, UK IASP, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA

Updated from Feng et al. (2007)

Chlorine Activation and denitrification Updated from Feng et al. (2007)

Modelled Arctic Ozone Loss  Year-to-year variations of ozone loss due to different meteorological conditions  Arctic ozone loss is initially limited by the availability of sunlight in early winter and curtailed by the breakdown on the vortex in late winter/spring  Arctic ozone loss would have more severe and continued if followed by a cold long-lasting polar vortex condition, such as 1997 Updated from Feng et al. (2007)

 More ozone loss if the Arctic winter 2004/05 after late February was followed by 1997 and 2000 meteorological conditions  Arctic ozone loss would have been even more severe and complete loss would have occurred around late March if the winter 2004/05 was followed by 1997 conditions which had a record long-lasting cold polar vortex  No “Arctic ozone hole” structure if the winter 2004/05 followed by 2000 meteorological conditions. However, the “Arctic ozone hole” would have happened if followed by a spring like 1997 with a long-lasting cold polar vortex. Sensitivity experiments Minimum temperature (K) at 456K from March to April for 2005, 2000 and 1997 from ECMWF analyses. (b) Maximum modelled local ozone loss (%) at 456 K for winter 2004/05 and two sensitivity runs where the simulation for 2004/05 was continued with meteorology for 1997 and 2000 after February 28. (c) As panel (b) but for minimum column O3 along with TOMS data for 2005 for any point poleward of 65 o N. From Feng et al. (2007)

Denitrification effect

Comparison with AURA MLS data

Conclusion  Ozone loss is initially limited by the availability of sunlight in early winter and curtailed by the breakdown on the vortex in late winter/spring  Severe ozone loss occurred during Arctic winter 06/7 which is comparable to 04/5 and 1999/2000  Stronger denitrification in Arctic winter 2006/07  SLIMCAT with detailed DLAPSE microphysical scheme is less denitrified while model with equilibrium scheme has stronger denitrification, however, there is only small effect on ozone loss between these two schemes.