Critical Listening Does what the other person says make sense?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Theories and Evolution Catalyst: How does macroevolution/speciation occur? When you hear the word theory, what do you think? What are the two criteria.
Advertisements

Argument ad Ignorantiam
Last week Change minds; influence people Premises Conclusion
So That I May God help me to empty my mind of every earthly distraction So that I may, so that I may always be in you.
Lesson 12: The Closing Arguments
The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify the types of fallacious reasoning discussed in Chapter 6. Chapter 6 discusses fallacies of insufficient.
Q3,J4 A) “Hitler was a vegetarian, therefore, I don’t trust vegetarians.” B) “You can’t prove that there aren’t Martians living in caves under the surface.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
What you could say… It’s difficult to know God as he is infinite You could discuss language people use to explain what he is like – father… Could say.
Belief in God’s Testimony Lamont, J. Faith in God’s Revelation in the Bible 2011 pp.1-7.
John Oakes 2011 ICEC Christianity and the Paranormal.
By Ryan Davis and Nick Houska. Fallacies  Fallacies- are defects in an argument that cause an argument to be invalid, unsound or weak  Example: Hasty.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
Faith 101 Discovering the Faith
EGOISM AND CRITIQUE 8.5 Forensic Philosophy December 16, 2013.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Conversational Apologetics Class 2 Winning Disciples, Not Arguments.
Knowing God Through Creation Chapter 1 Lesson 1. Read Daniel 3:52 When did you first realize that God exists? How do you know that God exists?
1 Lesson 11: Criteria of a good argument SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
Critical Listening Does what the other person says make sense?
Knowing God Through Creation
WHATCHRISTIANSBELIEVEWHATCHRISTIANSBELIEVE really.
The Good Shepherd John 10:1-42 Review Some Pharisees had asked Jesus if they were blind (Jn 9:40) –Jesus told them... (Jn 9:41) If they had been blind.
Arguments Minds and Machines. Arguments When people think of an argument, they usually think of a fight between two people (‘they’re having an argument’).
A Conversation Between an Agnostic and a Christian.
Conversational Apologetics Pointed Questions – Part 1.
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
Why Apologetics? Apologetics Introduction. What is Apologetics? The branch of theology that is concerned with defending or proving the truth of Christian.
Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.
He did just about everything. Everything that’s important anyway.
Belief in God’s Testimony Lamont, J. Faith in God’s Revelation in the Bible 2011 pp.1-7.
Joseph Smith It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the Character of God, and to know that we may converse with him as one man.
Interpreting the Bible Lesson Aim To consider the different Christian approaches to interpreting the Bible – focusing on Genesis
FALLACIES COMMON AND RECURRENT ERRORS IN REASONING
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Let’s see some more examples!
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
The First Person We Believe 1 Holy Trinity - 2. Experience 2 Make a list of 10 things you believe. Examples… Do you believe the sun will rise tomorrow.
A Conversation Between an Agnostic and a Christian (Con’t)
Conversational Apologetics The Problem of Evil – Part 2.
Session 6 THE DEFENSE OF THE FAITH. A particular method for defending the faith. Presuppositionalism pre = before, prior to in rank supposition = a proposition.
Apologetics: Other Syllogisms Presented by Eric Douma.
Lesson 6: The General Argument for Christianity. Figure 6-1.
Standard: Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text… identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Our life will make more sense We will discover the truth We will avoid being lied to or used by others.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Argumentum Ad Hominem Attacking the person’s character or personal traits rather than the argument at hand Rejecting a claim based on the person defending.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
Higher RMPS Spot Test October 2015 Answers. 1. What is meant by Revelation? Revealing a truth – uncovering God revealing Himself to mankind General and.
Circular Reasoning. What is Circular Reasoning? A fallacious form of argument in which someone assumes that parts (or all) of what a person claims to.
Chapter 14 The Seven Deadly Logical Sins Tim Holmes, Thomas Kim, Joseph Heyman.
Discipleship: An Introduction to Systematic Theology and Apologetics The Doctrines of Creation: The Heights Church February 21, 2016.
Notes for the Exam.  is just a fancy way of saying that you're stating your main point.  A claim tells what you think is true about a topic based on.
Summary of Religious Experience People claim to experience God in miracles, answered prayers, the numinous and conversion. Religious experience makes.
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Talking points 1. Would Neil still have committed suicide if Mr. Keating had never come into his life? Who is most to blame for Neil’s death? Mr. Keating?
Logical Fallacies Overview Logical fallacies are instances of “broken reasoning.” Fallacies avoid the actual argument. We want to avoid fallacies, be.
Believing in God Unit 1 Religion and Life.
College English Yichun Liu
Topic: Logical Fallacies Objective: I will identify various logical fallacies EQ: What are the most common logical fallacies and where do they appear?
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
Informal Logical Fallacies
More on Argument.
Fallacies of Reasoning
Matters of Life and Death Quiz
Presentation transcript:

Critical Listening Does what the other person says make sense?

Conversational Apologetics Open Questions  To understand and know them Pointed Questions  To remove the “roof” of their irrational assumptions Explain the Gospel  Only when asked Nurture The Relationship  Help unbelievers grow towards Christ  Help believers to grow IN Christ

Fallacies of Distraction False Dilemma: A limited number of options is given, when more exist.  Example: George Bush either lied to the American people, or he was just plain stupid.  Pointed Question: Are smart people always right?

Fallacies of Distraction Argument from ignorance: Lack of evidence to the contrary is given as proof.  Example: Since you cannot prove that Intelligent Design is true, it must be false.  Pointed Question: Did the earth really go around the Sun, even before scientists discovered that it did?

Fallacies of Distraction Slippery Slope: A series of unacceptable events is predicted to occur.  Example: If the School Board allows the teaching of Intelligent Design, it won’t be long before Darwin is banished from the class room, and science classes will be taught by fundamentalist Pastors.  Pointed Question: How would the School Board allowing Intelligent Design to be taught result in Darwin being banished, let alone Pastors teaching science classes?

Motives in Place of Support Prejudicial Language: value or moral goodness is attached to believing the author  Example: I can’t understand how any reasonable person can believe God would condemn people to everlasting torment, just because they don’t believe in Him.  Pointed Question: Do you think justice is “reasonable?”

Fallacies of Distraction Complex Question: Two unrelated points are joined as if they are one.  Example: Do you support the teaching of evolution and the separation of church and state?  Pointed Question: What does the separation of church and state have to do with teaching evolution?

Fallacies of Explanation Limited Depth: The theory does not rely on underlying causes.  Example: You are just saying that the Bible is God’s Word because you’re a Christian!  Pointed Question: Yes, Christians do think the Bible is God’s Word. Why do you think we do?

Fallacies of Explanation Untestability: The argument cannot be tested.  Example: In John 20:28, Thomas calls Jesus “my God” not because Jesus really is God, but because Jesus had become the full embodiment of God on earth.  Pointed Question: How could we know if Jesus really was God, as opposed to just being called “God” because He embodied God on earth?

Fallacies of Missing the Point Begging the Question: A circular argument in which the conclusion is assumed in the premise.  Example: In John 17:3, Jesus calls the Father, “the only true God;” therefore Jesus cannot be the true God, and the Trinity is proven false.  Pointed Question: If the Trinity is true, why can’t Jesus call the Father “the only true God?”

Fallacies of Missing the Point Irrelevant Conclusion: An argument in defense of one conclusion instead proves a different conclusion  Example: You should support a woman’s right to choose an abortion; there are too many unwanted babies in this world as it is.  Pointed Question: There may be too many unwanted babies, but you wouldn’t advocate we kill them after they’re born, would you?

Fallacies of Missing the Point Strawman: The argument against your position is different than (and weaker than) your best argument.  Example: The reason you don’t accept Joseph Smith as a prophet of God is because you don’t believe in latter-day revelation; but that is just begging the question on your part.  Pointed Question: What is the Biblical criterion for a true prophet of God (Deut. 18:22)?