MEMBERS Introduction Architect: Angela Ribas UC Berkeley Engineer: Matthias Niebling Bauhaus-University Weimar, Germany Construction Manager: Kevin Coyne Stanford University Product Manager: Torsten Schluesselburg FH Aargau, Switzerland Owner: David Steinbach Weimar, Germany BAY TEAM 2002

BAY AREA / SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA / SAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO MAIN CAMPUS AT FULTON STREET MAIN CAMPUS AT FULTON STREET CAMPUS LOCATION SURROUNDING: GOLDEN GATE PARK GOLDEN GATE PARK (HUGE GREEN AREA) RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODRESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD HILL AREAHILL AREA

N CAMPUS VIEW FULTON STREET GOLDEN GATE AVE.

TEXTURES AREA ANALYSIS N

SITE PANORAMIC VIEW SITE MAP FLAT GROUND FACING FULTON STREET N BUILDING LOCATION

Matrix DECISION MATRIX $5.9 Mil$6.8 Mil PROS: CONS: Extended footprint Interesting structure and details Base Isolation System costly Daylight / Green area inside Owners preference Large glass facade Construction Sequencing More unusual design Interesting structure EBF system is cost efficient More conventional design Relatively simple box - structure Retractable roof/Glass facade costly A A E E C C FORESTPLAZA

A_First concept CORE VIEW DESIGN CONCEPT “AN OPEN AND FRIENDLY SPACE WHERE PEOPLE CAN INTERACT” FOREST

PLAN N Technical support Large classrooms Computer room Mechanical room Storage Restrooms Auditorium BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN

PLAN Seminar rooms Small classrooms Large classrooms Restrooms N FIRST FLOOR PLAN

Faculty office Student office Instructional lab Seminar rooms Small classrooms Storage Restrooms N SECOND FLOOR PLAN

THIRD FLOOR PLAN N Chair’s office Faculty lounge Secretaries ADM offices Faculty office Restrooms THIRD FLOOR PLAN

A A BB C C SECTIONS SECTION CC SECTION BB N SECTION CC SECTIONS SECTION AA

NORTH FACADE 3-D FACADES SOUTH FACADE EAST FACADE WEST FACADE

LOUVER DETAIL VERTICAL / HORIZONTAL LOUVERSGLASS SECTION

EVALUATION

Structural System (general) STRUCTURAL SYSTEM HEB 260 HEB x180x10 [mm] HEB 240 Concrete Walls: 30cm All members: Grade 50 steel

Gravity System (1) GRAVITY SYSTEM HEB ,16m 30,48m HEA 220 HEB 300

Gravity System (2) GRAVITY SYSTEM Concrete Walls: 30cm HEB 240 O 457x10 [mm] Q 180x10 [mm]

Moments MOMENT DIAGRAM 780 kNm 480 kNm 150 kNm Moments My (design) according to the ASCE Standard including: 1.2D + 1.0E + 0.5L + 0.2S

Connection Details CONNECTION DETAILS 250 kN 150 kN Screws: M20, 5.6

Lateral System LATERAL SYSTEM Symmetrical Lateral System

Foundation FOUNDATION Ground Plate: 40cm

Earthquake Deformation EARTHQUAKE-DEFORMATION Maximum Deformation: 2.8cm

Staircases STAIRCASE Structural System of the Staircase 1,80m 2,50m Max. 9 mm Frequency: 10,6 Hz Max. 560 mm Frequency: 1,25 Hz 400x60x10 [mm] 1800x200x10 [mm]

Staircase_MomentResistingGirderConstr. STAIRCASE LOCATION HEB300

Detail of StaircaseConnection STAIRCASE CONNECTION DETAILS Moment: 58,4 kN Shear: 30,9 kN N= +/- 315 kNLever arm: 19cm Screws: M22, 8.8 pre-tensioned

Roof Construction ROOF DETAIL

Roof Constr. Detail STRUCTURAL SYSTEM CONNECTION DETAIL Q120x4.5mm Q100x4.0mm Q60x4.0mm

AEC-Facade Girder STRUCTURAL TRUSS ITERATION ` AE C Framework Truss in the Main Facade Use joists (cost) Gravity deformations are too big Use 4 cables to hold each joist up Cables are too expensive, no benefit compared to 3D-Truss 3D-Truss satisfies load requirements

Existing Buildings Site Access (Fulton) Project Office Material Laydown & Storage Building Perimeter Site Perimeter Crane Site Plan Fulton street

Materials and Methods EXTERIOR FACADE: Hollow-Core Concrete Panels Glass/Louver Curtain Wall System SUPERSTRUCTURE: Steel Moment Frame Cast-in-Place Composite Concrete/Steel Floor System FOUNDATION: Poured Reinforced Concrete Mat Slab w/ 4 Interior Column Footings EXCAVATION: 18’ Hard Strata

Construction Method Pros/Cons

Schedule Start: 9/20/2015 – End: 7/7/2016 Schedule Duration = 9 months MILESTONE #3: 9/30/16 – Move-In MILESTONE #1: 3/01/16 – Foundation Complete MILESTONE #2: 5/10/16 – Shell Complete

Cost Total: $5,423,956 Per Square Foot: $164.4

MEP/Life-Cycle Cost

4-D Model

FINAL PRESENTATION FISHBOWL #2 WINTER Q. PRESENTATION FISHBOWL #1 KICK - OFF TEAM INTERACTION / OUTPUT Apprentice

- Great learning experience ADVANTAGES - Software solutions - Kick off - Other disciplines - Different ways of working - Other cultures - Good mix between disciplinary, bi- disciplinary and multi disciplinary work

ADVANTAGES (ctd.) - Group space

ADVANTAGES (ctd.) - Group space - Very effective - Easy access - Expandable - Granularity - Inventory file

- Information Gathering PROBLEMS / DIFFICULTIES - Information Technology - Geography

The discussion forum should be used more often We should announce team-meetings (with all the members) once a week The notification mechanism should be improved Discussing with everybody (other disciplines) brings an improved learning experience Importance of knowing if an , attachment arrived and was useful Process Improvement The discussion forum should be used more often Heavy initial use of discussion forum was lessened for a reliance on . We should announce team-meetings (with all the members) once a week Discussion with everyone (other disciplines) brings an improved learning experience. The notification mechanism should be improved Importance of knowing if an , attachment arrived and was useful.

THANK YOU Thank yous All the mentors of the AEC program Humberto Cavallin \ Architect Robert Alvarado \ Architect Daniel Gonzales Dr. Greg Luth \ Prof. Frank Werner \ Prof. Juergen Ruth ECW Weimar \ BGS Ingenieursozietaet Weimar \ Infograph Software Solutions THANKS TO: