Hutch Neilson NCSX Project Manager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Oak Ridge National Laboratory NCSX Research Forum #1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PPPL Perspective on Ten Year Planning S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
Advertisements

NCSX Vacuum Vessel Overview Paul Goranson WBS 12 Manager Vacuum Vessel Manufacturing Study Kickoff meeting April 29, 2003.
MCZ Introduction to NCSX Physics and Research Plans M.C. Zarnstorff For the NCSX Team NCSX Research Forum 1 7 December 2006.
Steps Toward a Compact Stellarator Reactor Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Team Meeting October 3, 2002.
Compact Stellarator Configuration Development Planning Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Team Meeting October 4, 2002.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 Plan for Engineering Study of ARIES-CS Presented by A. R. Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting UCSD San.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
Magnet System Definition L. Bromberg P. Titus MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting November 4-5, 2004.
March 3-4, 2008/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: TRL for Heat and Particle Flux Handling A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
ARIES Town Meeting On Physics of Compact Stellarators as Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team September 15-16, 2005 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Stellarator Team Meeting 18 January 2012 Stellarator Program Update.
pkm- NCSX CDR, 5/21-23/ Power and Particle Handling in NCSX Peter Mioduszewski 1 for the NCSX Boundary Group: for the NCSX Boundary Group: M. Fenstermacher.
ASIPP EAST Overview Of The EAST In Vessel Components Upgraded Presented by Damao Yao.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
Kaname Ikeda, October Status of the ITER Project Status of the ITER Project Kaname Ikeda ITER Nominee Director-General October 2006.
NCSX 1 NCSX Engineering Overview Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Manager On behalf of the NCSX Team.
1 Dimensional Control for the National Compact Stellarator Experiment R. Ellis, A. Brooks, T. Brown, W. Reiersen, S. Raftopoulos, B. Stratton Presented.
Update on NNSA’s Inertial Confinement Fusion Program Presented to: Fusion Power Associates 32nd Annual Meeting and Symposium Washington, DC Presented by:
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Stellarator Team Meeting 3 March 2011 Stellarator Program Update.
Presented by Brad Nelson Tom Brown, Mike Cole, Paul Fogarty, Paul Goranson, Phil Heitzenroeder, Wayne Reiersen, Dave Williamson, and others NCSX PAC Meeting.
Maingi p.1 Supported by Office of Science The Edge Physics Program During Initial Operation in NCSX Rajesh Maingi Oak Ridge National Laboratory For the.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science 20 th Meeting of the IEA Large Tokamak ExCo, May th Meeting of the IEA Poloidal Divertor ExCo, May.
NCSX Metrology. Goals –Need to accurately make measure measurements for several NCSX systems Modular coil –As-built measurements of coil form –Conductor,
Metrology Milestones Metrology Task Force –Vacuum vessel manufacture - P. Goranson –Mod. Coil Form manufacture - D. Williamson –Mod. Coil winding- S. Raftopoulos.
Progress to Date PPPL Advisory Board Meeting May 20101NSTX Upgrade – R. L. Strykowsky CD-0 Approved February 2009 The NSTX Upgrade Project organization.
Brent Stratton for the NCSX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Oak Ridge National Laboratory NCSX Program Advisory Committee Meeting #8 Princeton.
Conceptual Design Requirements for FIRE John A. Schmidt FIRE PVR March 31, 2004.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
U.S. Fusion Energy Sciences Program Fusion Program Summary for Program Leaders February 7, 2005 E xcellent S cience in S upport of A ttractive E nergy.
NCSX Project Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager For the NCSX Team NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 21, 2002.
1 Stability Studies Plans (FY11) E. Fredrickson, For the NCSX Team NCSX Research Forum Dec. 7, 2006 NCSX.
NCSX B. Nelson for the NCSX Engineering Team NCSX modular coil cooling workshop June 10-11, 2004 PPPL NCSX Modular Coil Cooling Requirements and Initial.
FIRE Engineering John A. Schmidt NSO PAC Meeting February 27, 2003.
NCSX NCSX CDR May 21-23, 2002 H.W. Kugel Slide 1 Conceptual Design for NCSX Auxiliary Systems Heating, Fueling,Wall Conditioning and Vacuum Systems.
1 Field Period Assembly Office of Science Project Review Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ November 2, 2005 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
NCSX NCSX Vacuum Vessel R&D, Risk Management and Manufacture NCSX Preliminary Design Review October 7-9, 2003 Princeton, NJ Mike Viola, Phil Heitzenroeder,
QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor
MCZ Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2,
Comments on Fusion Development Strategy for the US S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory FPA Symposium.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Cryogenics Systems WBS-62 Steve Raftopoulos NCSX Cryogenic Systems WBS(62) Manager.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Machine Assembly E. D. Perry.
MCZ MCZ NCSX Mission Acquire the physics data needed to assess the attractiveness of compact stellarators; advance understanding.
1 Stellarator Core Metrology issues NCSX WBS-1 Meeting April 2, 2003 What are we measuring? When? How do we take the measurements? How do we correlate.
AWB Dimensional Control Requirements for the Modular Coils and TF coils Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006 Art Brooks.
Study of Electric Field and Turbulence using Heavy Ion Beam Probe (HIBP) Proposal of International Cooperation for Transport Study Shoichi Okamura, Akihide.
Field Period Assembly Wayne Reiersen SC Project Review PPPL May 2006.
1 PFC requirements  Basic requirements  Carbon based  Provisions for adding (interface design included in research prep budget)  NBI armor  Trim coil.
NCSX 21 March 2003 Reiersen - 1 PDR Preparations Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Meeting 21 March 2003.
9/28/20051 Mike Viola 1, T. Brown 1, P. Heitzenroeder 1, F. Malinowski 1, W. Reiersen 1, L. Sutton 1, P. Goranson 2, B. Nelson 2, M. Cole 2, M. Manuel.
Engineering Operations Outage Status: New shielding of HHFW/in-vessel components has been completed. Fit-ups of OH bus lead upgrades to reduce error fields.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Cost and Schedule Rebaseline April 25, 2005 NCSX Project Re-baseline Review April 25, 2005 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
1 Recent Progress on QPS D. A. Spong, D.J. Strickler, J. F. Lyon, M. J. Cole, B. E. Nelson, A. S. Ware, D. E. Williamson Improved coil design (see recent.
Stellarator Core Machine Configuration NCSX Project Meeting Dec 19-20, 2000 B. Nelson, M. Cole, P. Fogarty P. Goranson, G. Jones, D. Williamson O AK R.
PPPL Stellarator Program Overview Hutch Neilson NCSX Project Manager NCSX Program Advisory Committee Meeting #6 Princeton, NJ December 9, 2002.
Stellarator-Related MHD Research H. Neilson MHD Science Focus Group meeting December 12, 2008 MHD Science Focus Group, Dec. 12, 2008.
1 The Five Year Plan review went well on all counts Review held June 30 - July 2 > 1.5 days of presentations by the Team Panel of nine (Hooper, Bravenec,
Boundary Physics Breakout Session was a Good Start Breadth of topics: many issues pointed out in three plenary talks: pedestal, SOL/div/PFC, and technology,
PEER Review of Coil Tolerances and Trim Coil Requirements plus Magnetic Material in Test Cell April 19, 2004 Art Brooks.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office December 2012 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 C. A. Gentile NCSX Startup (WBS 85) C.A.Gentile NCSX CD-4 Startup.
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Fabrication
Pilot Plant Study Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting 19 May 2010.
First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:
Stellarator Program Update: Status of NCSX & QPS
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
Presentation transcript:

Hutch Neilson NCSX Project Manager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Oak Ridge National Laboratory NCSX Research Forum #1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory December 7, 2006 NCSX Project and Management

2 Outline NCSX History Construction Status Plans for Completing Construction and Starting Research

3 NCSX is the Key Element of the U.S. Program to Develop Compact Stellarators, Proposed in 1998 Program Goal “Develop the knowledge base needed to evaluate compact high-beta confinement-optimized stellarators as attractive fusion power plants.” – proposal, “Determine the attractiveness of a compact stellarator.” –FESAC, Since 1998, all elements of the program have moved forward. Stellarator physics development –Theory and international collaboration on stellarators Reactor studies –ARIES-CS study now nearing completion. Experiments targeting specific issues –HSX (U. Wisconsin), CTH (Auburn U.), QPS (ORNL) National Compact Stellarator Experiment (PPPL-ORNL) –Integrated physics test of a compact stellarator configuration. –NCSX research campaigns to start in 2009.

4 NCSX Research Mission Acquire the physics data needed to assess the attractiveness of compact stellarators; advance understanding of 3D fusion science. Understand… Beta limits and limiting mechanisms. Effect of 3D magnetic fields on disruptions Reduction of neoclassical transport by QA design. Confinement scaling; reduction of anomalous transport. Equilibrium islands and neoclassical tearing-mode stabilization. Power and particle exhaust compatibility w/good core performance. Alfvénic mode stability in reversed shear compact stellarator. Demonstrate… Conditions for high-beta, disruption-free operation. High , good confinement, compatible w/st. state. NCSX mission and basic configuration were approved in 2001

5 The Stellarator is Being Constructed in Accordance with Mission Requirements Requirements R = 1.4 m,  a  = 0.3 m B = T / pulse 0.5 – 2 s. Mod coil current center geometry as specified by optimization. Plasma configuration flexibility. Initial trim coil set. Field errors minimized (±1.5 mm coil accuracy, low , low eddy currents, stellarator symmetry) Diagnostic and heating port access. Embedded magnetic loops. VV bakeable to 350 C. Acceptance Tests at Completion First B=0.5 T, I P = 25 kA. e-beam B= 0.1 T Project started- April, Component fab. started- Oct., 2004 First plasma milestone- July, 2009.

6 Coil Design Reduces Field Error Risks Robust structural shell minimizes deflections. Toroidal and poloidal breaks inhibit eddy currents.  ≈ 17 ms. Winding form stays with the coil as a permanent structure. Modular Coil System Winding Modular coil winding form (MCWF) one per coil.

7 Winding Forms Are Manufactured to ±0.25 mm Tolerance on Critical Surfaces All 18 Have Been Cast 11 Have Completed Machining and Shipped to PPPL. “Tee”-shaped winding surface

8 Flexible copper “rope” wound on “tee” winding surface. Current center is accurately positioned and secured in place. Completed assembly is epoxy-impregnated by VPI. Coils are tested for insulation strength, resistance, cooling line leaks. 6 coils have been completed. Coil Construction Achieves ±0.5 mm Accuracy

9 Vacuum Vessel Was Fabricated to ±5 mm Accuracy All 3 Sectors at PPPL! Material: inconel Low  (  1.02  0 ), Low eddy currents (  ≈ 3 ms) 1 2 3

10 Assembly Activities Have Started Mounting locations for flux loops and heating/cooling hoses are transferred from CAD model to vessel using laser scanner.

11 Coil-to-Coil Fit-Up Tests Have Started Inboard I.D. Outboard I.D. Testing handling and metrology techniques.

12 NCSX is On Schedule for July, 2009 First Plasma Construction Project Budget: $92.4M Scope is tightly focused on first plasma objectives.

13 NCSX Experimental Campaigns Start in FY-09 Research Phases: 1. Stellarator Acceptance Testing & First Plasma (Fab. Project) 2. Magnetic configuration studies –electron-beam mapping studies 3. Initial Heating Experiment –1.5-3 MW of NBI MW of ECH. –B  1.2T –Partial PFC coverage 4. High beta Experiments –6MW heating –B = 2T. –Divertor. FY-06FY-07FY-08FY-09FY-10 Fabrication Project Phase 1 & 2 Equipment 21 FY-11FY-12FY-13 1st Plasma Phase 2 Equipment Full field, more diags. 4 Full PFCs & divertor 3 NCSX will operate every other year, alternating with NSTX.

14 Research Planning is Consistent With DOE’s Five-Year Plan (FY07-11) NCSX-NSTX planning budgets Basis for input to DOE planning and budgets. Science = Research Diagnostic Equipment Facilities = Construction (ends in 09) Upgrade Equipment Facility Ops Alternation Plan Maintains Diversity of Science and Opportunities for Upgrades within Tight Budgets.

15 How NSTX-NCSX Alternation Will Work Both NSTX & NCSX Research are national/international collaborations. –NCSX Research led by PPPL-ORNL partnership Joint facility operation staff, alternating between NSTX & NCSX. Will share equipment when sensible (some already envisioned). Shared research staff –Most will participate in both experiments, alternating U.S. Collaborators that participate on both NSTX & NCSX will increase efficiency, highly desirable.

16 NCSX Research Program Management NCSX is managed by PPPL and ORNL as partners. Arrangement has worked well for the construction project. –Strong institutional support from two DOE Science labs. PPPL-ORNL management responsibilities for the research program –Program planning and execution. –Host research collaborations (e.g., human and technical interfaces) –Facility operations (PPPL) and upgrades (PPPL-ORNL). Research Preparation Tasks Maintain an up-to-date research plan. Set hardware requirements and schedules consistent with research goals and expected funding profiles. Ensure a cost-effective transition to research operations. Responsible people: M. Zarnstorff, Head R. Maingi, Deputy Head.

17 Starting from FY-11, About 1/4 to 1/3 of NCSX Science Will Be Done by Collaborators Process will be similar to NSTX’s Annual Research Forums to inform plans and identify collaborator interests. Project identifies collaboration needs in a “program letter” to DOE. Proposers & project coordinate to ensure common understanding of requirements. Proposals go to DOE. DOE decides and provides funding. Plan NCSX and NSTX will issue joint program letters, encouraging collaboration on both experiments. First NCSX program letter and proposal call are expected in FY08 for funding in FY09–12. (Note transition to 4-year cycles.) Limited NCSX collaborations planned for FY Main focus is FY11 and beyond. At this Research Forum: –Project will present its current plans, including envisioned collaborator roles. –Input from the community is sought. oFeedback on the project’s plans. oIdeas and suggestions, including collaboration interests. oQuestions and concerns. First NCSX program letter will go out after next year’s Research Forum.

18 Summary NCSX is being constructed to mission requirements. Construction is on schedule for July, 2009 First Plasma. Research program planning is under way. Goals for this meeting: –Broaden community involvement in NCSX planning. –Begin discussing possible collaborations.