Organizational Update: The Next IMS/GLC Ed Walker NLII 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
18 March 2004 Colin Milligan funded by. © RELOAD 2003, funded by Workshop Structure Session I Introduction: Interoperability and Reload Session II Content.
Advertisements

1 The Networked Learning Environment. 2 Blackboards Product Strategy Leading institutions are harnessing the power of information networks to connect.
RELOAD Reusable E-Learning Object Authoring and Delivery Phil Beauvoir Colin Milligan funded by.
Copyright © 2001 Bolton Institute Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards CETIS an introduction and overview Lisa Corley CETIS Pedagogy.
Overview of IMS Content Packaging Sheila MacNeill.
Near East Plant Protection Network for Regional Cooperation & Knowledge Sharing Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations An Overview on.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
EU-funded Digital Preservation Research APA 2014 Conference Brussels, 22 October 2014 Dr. Manuela Speiser European Commission DG CONNECT, unit "Creativity"
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
© Copyright 2006 IMS/GLC All Rights Reserved. Innovation · Adoption · Learning 1 Update on IMS Enterprise Services v2 and Sakai Linda Feng & Michael Feldstein.
Some Basic Ideas Behind IMS Learning Design Prof. Dr. Rob Koper Director of R&D into Learning Technologies Keynote 2 nd Scientific LORNET Conference Vancouver,
Supporting education and research E-learning tools, standards and systems Sarah Porter Head of Development, JISC.
IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.
E-Learning: No Standards; No Coalitions - No Boom Ed Walker 7 December 2000.
Open Library Environment Designing technology for the way libraries really work November 19, 2008 ~ ASERL, Atlanta Lynne O’Brien Director, Academic Technology.
WP5 – Knowledge Resource Sharing and Management Kick-off Meeting – Valkenburg 8-9 December 2005 Dr. Giancarlo Bo Giunti Interactive Labs S.r.l.
A sustainable approach to developing e- learning technologies Howard Noble University of Oxford, Learning Technologies Group 16 th June 2004.
Thee-Framework for Education & Research The e-Framework for Education & Research an Overview TEN Competence, Jan 2007 Bill Olivier,
Eleventh Edition 1 Introduction to Information Systems Essentials for the Internetworked E-Business Enterprise Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2002, The.
Who does what and when? Mary Rowlatt MDR Partners.
1 EuropeanaLocal- Europeana Knowledge Sharing Workshop EuropeanaLocal- Europeana Knowledge Sharing Workshop 13/14 January 2009 Rob Davies, Scientific Co-ordinator.
Networks ∙ Services ∙ People John DYER TF-MSP Video Conference Community Procurement Support Building on the SPOT-ON Proposal Smart Procurement,
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
Update: © Copyright 2002, Carnegie Mellon University All Right Reserved 1/59 ADL/SCORM - What Does it Mean for Developers of ICT Projects? Daniel.
IT Standards for Learning
SIF Association Membership – what does it mean for your district?
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.
IMS Europe Kevin Riley IMS, European Development
IMS Overview and ePortfolio Specification 3 Nov 2004 Steve Griffin Executive Dir. Int’l Developer and Adopter Support, Co-Founder IMS Global Learning Consortium.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Niall Sclater, and Lorna M. Campbell,
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Deakin Richard Tan Head, Information Technology Services Division DEAKIN UNIVERSITY 14 th October 2003.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Edward Walker IMS Global Learning Consortium IMS: Status Report February.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Identification and Selection of Development Projects.
UK Repository Search Project Phase II Project Overview Phil Cross Vic Lyte September 2006.
An Overview of Learning Technology Specifications and Standards Bill Olivier Director, CETIS.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-01 Advancing the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles.
LTSC Report 6 – February LTSC Status No significant change Next meeting (plenary): March co-located with ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36 and CEN/ISSS TC-Learning.
11 ALCTS RDA Forum American Library Association Annual Conference Anaheim, California, June 23, 2012 U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee Update Beacher.
LETSI* *Learning Education and Training Systems Interoperability.
Weston November The BECTA/ISB Content Packaging Profile Crispin Weston.
Measured Progress ©2011 Guide to the Smarter Balanced IT Architecture Connecticut Assessment Forum August 14, 2012.
IEEE IT (Information Technology) Strategy – 2005 Unapproved.
GEO Standards and Interoperability Forum SIF First Organizational Meeting 27 July 2007 Barcelona, Spain.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Educational Strategies Presented by: Christina Worrall Vice President, The Lewin Group, Inc PHDSC Annual Meeting March 18, 2004.
CCRESA Rubric Presentation Jeni Corn, Malinda Faber, Friday Institute, NC State University.
Overview Collected learning resources Competencies Registry/ Authority Course Delivery system Student Pedagogy Tests/ assessment Activities Communication.
CETIS Educational Content SIG, Learning and Teaching Scotland, September 2004 Content Specifications Update Wilbert Kraan Lorna M. Campbell CETIS.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
© Copyright 2006 IMS/GLC All Rights Reserved. Page 1 Accelerating Innovation in the Learning Enterprise Course Management AssessmentDigital Content Search.
Modélisation de l’apprenant Roger Nkambou. Introduction Les approches Les services Les techniques Le modèle de l’apprenant et la standardisation : Le.
Eduprise, Inc. April 2001 Funding provided by the National Science Foundation DLI-Phase 2 NSF Award # A Digital Library of Reusable Science and.
The International Coastal Atlas Network (ICAN) Overview and Recent Activities Ned Dwyer Dawn Wright.
1 Open Discovery Space Overview Argiris Tzikopoulos, Ellinogermaniki Agogi Open Discovery Space [CIP-ICT-PSP ][elearning] A socially-powered and.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
How to use C OBI T implementation resources Brian Selby Director of C OBI T Initiatives ISACA.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
Europortfolio Europass CV ePortfolio interop IMS ePortfolio Interoperability (ZIP IMS eP CP Import/Export) Model based on Europass CV Application Profile.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Lorna M. Campbell and Boon Low CETIS and the University of Strathclyde LMC, SURF Presentation, April 2002.
PIRUS PIRUS -Publisher and Institutional Repository Usage Statistics
IMS Update Content Packaging; InterActive Content SIG
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
LETSI The Vision and the Plan
Bridging the ITSM Information Gap
Presentation transcript:

Organizational Update: The Next IMS/GLC Ed Walker NLII 2005

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 Success Means - Learning is … Convenient: “easy to use” - low end-user effort to access, use, etc. - think Amazon front-end Effective: “does what I want” - meets learner/teacher objectives for learning outcomes; meets learning provider objectives for learning outcomes and volume of usage Affordable: “reasonable cost/benefit” - meets learning supplier objectives for acquisition, installation, and maintenance cost/benefit; meets learner/teacher objectives for time and effort viz outcome Profitable: “successful business” - meets supplier business objectives for market size, production cost, margins, etc.

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3 Released specifications 1.Meta-data v Content Packaging v Question and Test v Learner Information v Enterprise v Simple Sequencing v Learning Design v Digital Repositories v Competencies v Accessibility for LIP v Vocabulary Definitions v Shareable State Persistence v Enterprise Services v Resource List Interoperability v AccessforAll Meta-data v1.0

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4 Downloads

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5 Activities Communications —Newsletters —Member Website - Forums/Collaboration —Public Website Member Activities —Member Surveys —Quarterly Meetings —Technical Exchanges —Open Technical Forums Project Management Document Production

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6 Results IEEE SCORM SIF IMS/GLC Metadata, CP LIP Competencies QTI Simple Sequencing Content Packaging BSI SIFA NCAM HR/XML DCMI,W3C ACC ADL Metadata eGIF CP, QTI, LIP, Ent, LD, SS, RDCEO Sakai ACC, QTI Sharable State EDS LIP ISO ACC ELF Framework

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7 Non-financial Equity Body of work products P roven processes Contributing Members (49) Board of Directors Staff Affiliates Relationships

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8 Renewed Vision and Objectives Consolidated by IMS/GLC Board —Board meetings Sept 2003, March 2004, July 2004 —Planning meetings Sept 2004, Jan 2005 (with facilitator) Input by IMS/GLC members, affiliates, and others —Meetings: alt-I-lab 2003; Anaheim (Oct 2003); Zurich, Amsterdam, London (Feb 2004); alt-I-lab 2004 —Survey of members: Fall 2003 —Facilitated interviews/surveys: June-July 2004

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9 Elements of 2005 Plan Destination —Vision, Mission, Goals Map and compass —Objectives, tasks and schedules Dials and gauges —Milestone deliverables, metrics of progress

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10 Vision Convenient, effective, affordable, and profitable learning is available to every learner and teacher in the world.

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11 Mission To promote the development of global distributed learning by facilitating and leading cooperative and collaborative efforts to develop, evolve and use advanced distributed learning environments

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12 Goals Serve vendors, buyers, and the community of practice to a high professional standard of effectiveness and efficiency.

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 13 Objectives Remove technical problems slowing adoption Content and tool interoperability, tools, techniques Facilitate implementation by users Compliance, communication forums Increase marketplace acceptance and demand Open Technical Forums, alt-i-lab Maintain on-going processes and activities

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 14 General Metrics Economic impact —Profit margins/acquisition cost —Product lifetime/life cycle cost —Overall production cost and cost of use Policy/Program Impact —Learner/Teacher goals (number, type) —Quality goals (test scores, employment) —“Market share”

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 15 Measures of Progress Scenarios (from critical use cases) —Implementation: functional requirements, acceptance test, cost/benefit outcomes —Development: UML Models, system design, performance metrics, interoperability reqs, product testing Implementation milestones —TBD examples - eGIF, SCORM, Sakai, SIF, 1M teachers, 20M learners, sales/use targets, etc.

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 16 External Metrics Interoperable assessment and data management Distributed Repository interoperability Integrated instruction & assessment Flexible author- ing, review, & distribution in the hands of professionals Life long learning for anyone anywhere anytime Growth in Overall Function Annual Demonstrator and Implementation Milestones Products Adoptions Awareness etc Products Adoptions Awareness etc Products Adoptions Awareness etc Products Adoptions Awareness etc Products Adoptions Awareness etc

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 17 Fulfilling the IMS/GLC Role Higher Ed Tech Training K-12/Schools Life Long Learning Prof. Training Perf. Support

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 18 Task breakdown World-wide eLearning Community

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 19 Spec Development In Process —QTI (item) v2 —General Web Services —ePortfolio —Meta-data v1.3 —CP v1.1.4 update Other Activities —Packaged versions of IMS specifications —Review completed: SS & LIP/ACCLIP —Evaluated binding automation

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 20 Timeline February - (Melbourne) May - US alt-i-lab UK November - North America

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 21 IMS TB Work Programme

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 22 Tool Interoperability Goal – achieve “on the wire” runtime interoperability Metric – value to educators at the chalk-face

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 23 Tool Interoperability Approach Select a “value-add” tool Target two or more Learning Environments Define functional scope of interaction Agree technical tasks Do it Document and communicate how it was done

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 24 Tools Interoperability Outputs Recommendations for working practice Example code extracts An interoperable tool Two or more “tool ready” Learning Environments Demonstration of tool interoperability at Alt-I- Lab 2005

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 25 Packaging Consolidation - I Types of packages —Learning materials —Composite object e.g. ePortfolio, QTI Assessment, LIP records, etc. —Collections of composite objects e.g. QTI Items, LIP records, etc. Service model for packaging —Service interface definition cf. OSIDs —Binding to web-services using IMS GWS

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 26 Packaging Consolidation- 2 Data model clean-up —Sub-manifests —Alternative resources —External meta-data & metadata aggregation —Table of contents only —…

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 27 Packaging Consolidation - 3 Specification integration phase 1 —Content Packaging —LIP/ACCLIP —QTI Assessment —ePortfolio Specification integration phase 2 —Simple Sequencing —Learning Design

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 28 Techniques & Tools Use the UML for specification development Use the auto-generation tools to support WSDL and XSD binding creations Release version 1 of the ‘IMS Specification Development Methods & Best Practices’ document

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 29 Implementation Goal – support tool and content developers and end user organizations (i.e. adopters) as they implement specifications in their products and organizations Activities Compliance Program Outreach and Training

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 30 Compliance Program Compliance is based on Self-testing —Phase 1 —Each Vendor responsible for its self-testing methodology —Phase 2 —Vendors self-test against reference data and a reference implementation IMS manages reference data, compliance list and mark

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 31 Communication Forums Developer Support – specification training, technical overviews, reference information, online developer communities End User Support – procurement advice, case studies, white papers, online adopter communities Specific activities are motivated by Member priorities and resource availability

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 32 Adopter and Developer Support Past HR-XML adoption of RDCEO and ePortfolio Workshops at eLearning Results Summit ePortfolio funding via EC Project Established European IMS Supported ePortfolio Secretariat Presentations Future Compliance Educational materials, guidance documents, workshops, links to Centres, Listservs Glossary proposal European IMS Board and planning

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 33 Questions & comments ?

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 34 The Paradox Everyone wants the benefits of broad interoperability, but … Everyone must meet narrow legal, cultural, business needs Resolution: Framework, standards, profiles and flexibility System Framework Standards Local Profiles

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 35 Suggestions for Interoperability Metrics Performance —Time/cost of installation, operation, migration Effectiveness —Demonstrations, marketplace results Satisfaction —Surveys, outcomes data

© Copyright 2004 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 36 Suggestions for Impact Metrics Performance —Baseline - U of Wisc conversion data Effectiveness —alt-i-lab Demonstrator Scenarios, case studies Satisfaction —Surveys, outcomes data