تطوير خطط البرامج الأكاديمية لدعم تحقيق متطلبات الاعتماد الاكاديمي ا. د. عدنان نايفة رئيس جامعة الزرقاء الاردن.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,
Advertisements

Merit Award Program The School District of Lee County Merit Award Program Training November 2007.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Closing the Loop UNLV School of Nursing BSN Program Susan Kowalski, RN, PhD November 6, 2008 Academic Assessment Symposium.
 I would like to thank my dear teachers who have taken all the trouble to come to this remote place in upper Egypt.
IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.
Assessing Students Preparedness to Compete and Succeed in a Global Economy Through Written Communications Robert A. Chin & Carolyn Dunn Donna Hollar Department.
Assurance of Learning The School of Business and Economics SUNY Plattsburgh.
EECS Faculty Retreat ECE Assessment Report August 22, 2014.
A Process for the Direct Assessment of Program Learning Outcomes Based on the Principles and Practices of Software Engineering Robert W. Lingard California.
COURSE ASSESSMENT REPORT Fakulti Kejuruteraan Elektrik Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
The status The CHED along with other KSU engineering departments, is seeking ABET’s accreditation. The department has matured enough and feels the need.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
Why You Should Care About ABET And how you can help with ABET accreditation of the Civil and Environmental Engineering undergraduate degrees A quick orientation.
1 Southern Connecticut State University Graduate Council Academic Standards Committee Procedures for Southern Connecticut State University.
1 American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference St. Louis, MO June 18-21, 2000.
Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
Assessing Students Ability to Communicate Effectively— Findings from the College of Technology & Computer Science College of Technology and Computer Science.
Department of Humanities College of Sciences and Liberal Arts Writing Program Assessment at New Jersey Institute of Technology Carol Siri Johnson Associate.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
Collaboration I nstruction Assessment 1st AnalysisReflection Intervention Assessment 2nd COMING FULL CIRCLE Mallard Creek and UNCC PDS Work Plan Outcomes.
1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer
Computer Science Course Assessment Feb 15, 2012 / Dan Duchamp.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
1 Applications of Quality Function Deployment for curriculum design and redesign: Review and analysis DO THANH LUU Industrial and Systems Engineering Dept.
ISEP Conference ’08 Cooperating to Meet the Challenge of Credit Transfer: U.S. and International Perspectives.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Pradeep Singh Southeast Missouri State University.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday May 30,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.5 Guidelines on: I ASSESSMENT DATA REPORT FORMAT. II COURSE ASSESSMENT CHART.
Mapping Student Learning Outcomes
Grading System in the US Nataliya Lishchenko. Grading System in the US The educational system in the US does not used the numerical grading system which.
Dr. Fred Siewers, Department of Geography and Geology, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY Supporting Student Success through Intentional Professional.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Academic Year.  Still working well 17 reports submitted, 1 missing  9 of 18 departments expressed concerns about assessment 4 departments reported.
An-Najah National University Faculty Of Engineering Industrial Engineering Department Implementation Of Quality Function Deployment On Engineering Faculty.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Final Update on the New Faculty Course Evaluation & Online System November, 2003.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH. Outcomes assessment can tell us if our students are really learning what we think they should be able to do.
Assessment measures Training Subcommittee University Assessment Committee University of Toledo
Improving the Institutional Effectiveness Process 1.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
From Inputs to Process to Outcomes: the Quality Management Program at the American University in Bulgaria Steven F. Sullivan Dean of Faculty.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Establishing an Assessment Process for a Computing Program Cheryl Aasheim, Georgia Southern University Art Gowan, Georgia Southern University Han Reichgelt,
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report College of Technology.
FECS 2007 Assessment and its Role in Accreditation Deborah Whitfield Frances Bailie Adel Abunawass.
Continuous Improvement System B.S. Metallurgical Engineering Program F03 Curriculum The following items are thought by program faculty members to be the.
How Technologically Literate are EMCC Students ?.
1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.
Use of Surveys N J Rao and K Rajanikanth
Student Learning Time (SLT).  Effective learning time or student effort of learning in order to achieve the specified learning outcomes.  Inclusive.
Anna Parkman New Faculty Orientation ◦ ACCOUNTABILITY in Higher Education ◦ ASSESSMENT as validation of learning ◦ ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION ◦
Understanding ABET.
CURRICULUM DESIGN Part 2 of 2 PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES PROGRAM OUTCOMES COURSE OUTCOMES.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
GEF Assessment Pilot Basic Training
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
A Process for the Direct Assessment of Program Learning Outcomes Based on the Principles and Practices of Software Engineering Robert W. Lingard California.
Presentation transcript:

تطوير خطط البرامج الأكاديمية لدعم تحقيق متطلبات الاعتماد الاكاديمي ا. د. عدنان نايفة رئيس جامعة الزرقاء الاردن

الخطط الدراسية Curriculum Seeking continuous improvement, the department underwent many previous re-evaluations of its B.S. program: The current B.S. program is a five year (10 semesters) program that requires successful completion of 160 credit hours. The program is divided into: 12 hours of university requirements; 51 hours of college requirements; and 97 hours of department requirements Students are required to complete a sixty days summer training requirement in an area related to Chemical Engineering.

العملية التعليمية الطلاب كمدخلات الخريجون التغذية الراجعة التقييم الاهداف ≥ 5 سنوات مخرجات التعليم

الخطط الدراسية Curriculum من الخطاء الاعتقاد ان يكون هناك خطة دراسية موحدة ومتبناة محليا او اقليميا او عالميا لبرنامج دراسي ما الخطط المتبناة تعتمد الى حد كبير على عوامل لها علاقة بخصوصية الجامعة من حيث رسالتها ورؤيتها واهدافها المعلنة وحيث ان اهداف البرامج تاتي لتلبية متطلبات اسواق العمل المستهدفة فمن السهل تفهم تباين الخطط الدراسية صاحبة العلاقة

الخطط الدراسية Curriculum هذا التباين ياخذ اشكالا متعددة ربما من اهمها قدرة الخطط على الحركة الديناميكة للتكيف ومواكبة التغيرات العصرية فهناك جامعات تحرص على مواكبة المستجدات وتكثر من تطوير خططتها لاستيعابها والتكيف معها ولعل من ابرز هذه المستجدات هو التسارع في انتشار العولمة وما يرافقها من التقدم السريع في التكنولوجيا عدد الساعات المطلوبة لاستكمال البرنامج فمن الملاحظ عالميا ان عدد الساعات المطلوبة لدرجة البكالويوس يزداد اذا لم يكن هناك برامج دراسات عليا على مستوى المجستير والدكتوراة في الجامعة في نوعية محتوي المواد المطروحة وذلك لخدمة اهداف البرامج المختصة

Assessments Because the program outcomes are produced directly from the department educational objectives, assessment of the outcomes will also implicitly accomplish these educational objectives. Mapping of educational objectives to outcomes are given below

Curricula-Outcome Mapping Also because outcomes can be realized by adopting appropriate curricula, Curricula is mapped against appropriate outcomes as

D. Relationship of Courses in the Curriculum to the Program Outcomes

Assessment Tools Curricula – Course Grades Tool Various Surveys Tools

Assessment of outcomes using Curricula and student grade Courses are mapped against appropriate, but weighted, outcomes in terms of assigned credit hrs for each course Next, the total contribution of all core courses to each outcome is obtained from the sum of the individual course contribution. This means that the total credit hrs are distributed among the various outcomes reflecting the importance of each outcome. These divisions are shared and adopted by all program faculty and constitute the core for the program assessment. Samples are shown below for a single course and average of all courses

The instructor’s role The faculty member who teaches a course will design his exams, home works, in-class discussions in proportional to credits assigned for each outcome of his course After assigning his final grades to his students and obtaining their average, he multiplies the fractional percentage of this average grade with the outcome portions of the credit hrs and compare them with the target as shown below By adopting a pinch mark, the comparison then shows from the degree the program outcomes are achieved from the point of view of curricula involvement

Outcome-Grade Assessment for a Typical Course

Curricula-Grade Assessment for all Courses The ABET Committee then integrates the individual contribution of each outcome of all courses and map them against the target. A typical comparison is shown below The results are then discussed by all faculty and improvement measure are taken whenever is appropriate

Survey Assessment Table

Survey Tools Student, faculty, alumni, employers, etc all contribute in the assessments process by filling surveys at the end of each semester or each year as appropriate to the degree of achieving the program outcomes and consequently the its objectives. A scale of 1-5 with 5 is the best score is adopted. The scores of each outcome are then averaged in a single number.

Weighted Outcomes 1.Once the surveys are completed, most programs have a weighted contribution to their achieving their goals. For example, they may assign different percentages to their assessment tool involved say 20% to alumni, -- --totaling 100%. Using this approach they can finally reach to a single number for each outcome. 2.An average of each outcome for all surveys is then obtained in the form of a single number. This number then represents the input for each outcome as shown below

Total Typical Assessment

Achieving Objectives Since each outcome is mapped against objectives, the outcome averages are then incorporated in the outcome-objective mapping matrix The results for each objective are further averaged to a single number as shown below. These results are then compared with a target number on a scale of 1-5 and then decided on the degree of achieving the objectives.

Numerical Mapping of Outcomes Against Objectives

The Two Loops of EC 2000 Outcomes to achieve objectives How to achieve outcomes Outcomes assessment Indicators for objectives achievement Formal instruction Evaluate and assess Educational Objectives Constituencies input

EDUCATIONAL PROCESS STUDENTS AS INPUT GRADUATES FEEDBACK ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES ≥ 5 YEARS OUTCOMES