1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vision: Develop and continuously improve a model system of family safety that: has the confidence of the citizens of Florida; is effective and efficient.
Advertisements

1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
The Child and Family Services Review: An Agenda for Change Kathy Yurchisin Krista Hudson Kentucky CFSR Stakeholders Advisory Group.
Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs). 2 Child Welfare Final Rule (excerpt from Executive Summary) The child and family services reviews … [focus]
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.
State Standards and Practices for Content of Caseworker Visits with Children in Foster Care DHHS-OIG Report OEI December 2005.
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
1 Strategic Planning. 2 Elements of the Strategic Planning Process Strategic planning is a continual process for improving organizational performance.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
1 What Is Child Welfare? Child Welfare in the United States Background for understanding the public child welfare system The Service Array Process National.
Engaging Community Stakeholders and Building Community Partnerships
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
 By Amie Little  EDU 644 Discussion 1 week 2. The mission of DCFS is to protect children who are reported to be abused or neglected and to increase.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Training Agenda Continuous Quality Improvement Section Federal CFSR Oklahoma CFSR Oklahoma Program Improvement Plan (PIP) CFSR/Case Review Instrument.
1 Strategic Planning Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center Tribal Convening August 27-28, 2009 Steven Preister National Child Welfare Resource Center.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Making CWLA Work for You Presentation to CWLA Southern Region and Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children Membership October 5, 2006 Atlanta,
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
PowerPoint Presentation for Family Finding: Evaluation.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN INC. Non- Profit Agency for Children At Risk 4534 Lovers Lane Suite #378 Plano, TX (972)
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Common Goals: Child Safety, Permanency and Well-Being Citizen Review Panel National Conference May 21-23, 2008 St. Paul, Minnesota Christeen Borsheim,
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Helping Youth in Indiana. Indiana Department of Child Services Child Protection Services “protects Indiana's children from further abuse or neglect and.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
STRONG FAMILIES SELF- SUFFICENT STABLE RELIANT SUPPORTIVE.
PIP effective January 1, 2017 & runs through December 31, 2018
Commit to Agency Mission and Values
Office of Children's Services
Children, Youth and Families Department
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Safety #1--Protect Children from Abuse and Neglect
Place Matters Nothing Matters More to a Child Than a Place to Call Home 11/30/2018.
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Safety #2--Maintain Children in Their Home Safely
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Place Matters Nothing Matters More to a Child Than a Place to Call Home 4/6/2019.
BARBARA NEEDELL, MSW, PhD
Insert Meeting Date and Presenters
Permanency #2--Continuity of Relationships and Connections Preserved
Permanency #1--Permanency and Stability in Living Situation
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement A Service of the Children’s Bureau, U.S.D.H.H.S. April 28, 2008

2 What Is the CFSR? A periodic review by the Federal Government in partnership with the State Child Welfare System. Seven child welfare outcomes in the areas of Safety, Permanency, and Well-Being, seven systemic factors, and 45 items/indicators are evaluated. Areas needing improvement need to be addressed in a Program Improvement Plan (PIP). Meant to be a continuous quality improvement process. Best hope for an accountable child welfare system that continuously improves the achievement of good outcomes for children and families in child welfare.

3 The Seven CFSR Outcomes in Safety, Permanency, and Well-Being Safety Outcome #1: Children are, first and foremost, protected from abuse and neglect. Safety Outcome #2: Children are safely maintained in their own homes whenever possible and appropriate. Permanency Outcome #1: Children have permanency and stability in their living situations. Permanency Outcome #2: The continuity of family relationships and connections is preserved for children. Well-Being Outcome #1: Families have enhanced capacity to provide for their children’s needs. Well-Being Outcome #2: Children receive appropriate services to meet their educational needs. Well-Being Outcome #3: Children receive adequate services to meet their physical and mental health needs.

4 The Seven Systemic Factors: Infrastructure Needed in Child Welfare Information System Capacity Case Review System Quality Assurance System Training System Service Array Agency Responsiveness to the Community Foster and Adoptive Parent Licensing, Recruitment, and Retention

5 The CFSR Requirements about the Service Array Item 35: The State has in place an array of services that assess the strengths and needs of children and families and determine other service needs, address the needs of families in addition to individual children in order to create a safe home environment, enable children to remain safe with their parents when reasonable, and to help children in foster and adoptive placement achieve permanency.

6 The CFSR Requirements about the Service Array (cont’d) Item 36: The services in item 35 are accessible to families and children in all political jurisdictions covered in the State’s Child and Family Services Plan. Item 37: The services in item 35 can be individualized to meet the unique needs of children and families served by the agency.

7

8