Realizing the potential of reference ontologies for the semantic web Jim Brinkley June 29, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intelligent Technologies Module: Ontologies and their use in Information Systems Revision lecture Alex Poulovassilis November/December 2009.
Advertisements

IPAW'08 – Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2008 Data lineage model for Taverna workflows with lightweight annotation requirements Paolo Missier, Khalid Belhajjame,
A component- and message-based architectural style for GUI software
CSI5112 Software Engineering Team: Andrei Anisenia Margi Fumtiwala.
Template and information based on data provided by DERI 1 Mondeca ITM presentation & possible (?) collaboration Semantic Web Portal Project Michael Stollberg.
Research topics Semantic Web - Spring 2007 Computer Engineering Department Sharif University of Technology.
Human Language Technologies. Issue Corporate data stores contain mostly natural language materials. Knowledge Management systems utilize rich semantic.
TAMBIS Transparent Access to Multiple Biological Information Sources.
ICS (072)Database Systems Background Review 1 Database Systems Background Review Dr. Muhammad Shafique.
11/8/20051 Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web D. Dou, D. McDermott, P. Qi Computer Science, Yale University Presented by Z. Chen CIS 607 SII, Week.
Graphical Ontology Viewer/Editor Gary Yngve. Goals Easy to use, interactive Hide most of the ontology Keep user aware of what transformations have been.
Ontology translation: two approaches Xiangkui Yao OntoMorph: A Translation System for Symbolic Knowledge By: Hans Chalupsky Ontology Translation on the.
MDC Open Information Model West Virginia University CS486 Presentation Feb 18, 2000 Lijian Liu (OIM:
Connected Vehicle Design Review Southwest Research Institute
Formalizing and Querying Heterogeneous Documents with Tables Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan and Trivikram Immaneni Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
BiodiversityWorld GRID Workshop NeSC, Edinburgh – 30 June and 1 July 2005 Metadata Agents and Semantic Mediation Mikhaila Burgess Cardiff University.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Towards Translating between XML and WSML based on mappings between.
1 CMPT 275 High Level Design Phase Architecture. Janice Regan, Objectives of Design  The design phase takes the results of the requirements analysis.
The Integration of Peer-to-peer and the Grid to Support Scientific Collaboration Tran Vu Pham, Lydia MS Lau & Peter M Dew {tranp, llau &
December 15, 2011 Use of Semantic Adapter in caCIS Architecture.
3 April SOA: Services Oriented Architecture MDA: Model Driven Architecture.
A REFACTORING TOOL FOR DESIGN PATTERNS WITH MODEL TRANSFORMATIONS Zekai Demirezen Yasemin Topaloğlu Ege University Department of Computer Engineering
Interoperability in Information Schemas Ruben Mendes Orientador: Prof. José Borbinha MEIC-Tagus Instituto Superior Técnico.
Mobile Topic Maps for e-Learning John McDonald & Darina Dicheva Intelligent Information Systems Group Computer Science Department Winston-Salem State University,
2. Database System Concepts and Architecture
Ontology Views An Update A BISTI Collaborative RO1 with the National Center for Biomedical Ontology James F. Brinkley, PI Structural Informatics Group.
September 30, 2002EON 2002Slide 1 Integrating Ontology Storage and Ontology-based Applications A lesson for better evaluation methodology Peter Mika:
C2-SENSE T.3.5 & WP4 Organizational Interoperability Ankara.
Validated Model Transformation Tihamér Levendovszky Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Automation and Applied Informatics Applied.
Košice, 10 February Experience Management based on Text Notes The EMBET System Michal Laclavik.
10/18/20151 Business Process Management and Semantic Technologies B. Ramamurthy.
WSMX Execution Semantics Executable Software Specification Eyal Oren DERI
September Technical Meeting Slovenia September Session: Application 2. Animal Tracking Santiago Zazo – Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
1 Don Brutzman Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) Modeling, Virtual Environments & Simulation (MOVES) Institute Naval Postgraduate School 8 June 2006 NPS.
FlexElink Winter presentation 26 February 2002 Flexible linking (and formatting) management software Hector Sanchez Universitat Jaume I Ing. Informatica.
SPARQL Query Graph Model (How to improve query evaluation?) Ralf Heese and Olaf Hartig Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Department of computer science and engineering Two Layer Mapping from Database to RDF Martin Švihla Research Group Webing Department.
Knowledge Representation of Statistic Domain For CBR Application Supervisor : Dr. Aslina Saad Dr. Mashitoh Hashim PM Dr. Nor Hasbiah Ubaidullah.
GREGORY SILVER KUSHEL RIA BELLPADY JOHN MILLER KRYS KOCHUT WILLIAM YORK Supporting Interoperability Using the Discrete-event Modeling Ontology (DeMO)
Using Several Ontologies for Describing Audio-Visual Documents: A Case Study in the Medical Domain Sunday 29 th of May, 2005 Antoine Isaac 1 & Raphaël.
Semantic Computing Research Group 1 UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY OntoViews – A Tool for.
APPLY FUNCTIONAL MODELING TO CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS IN SUPERVISION SYSTEMS Present by Xinxin Zhang 1 Morten Lind 1, Giulio Gola 2,
Building a Topic Map Repository Xia Lin Drexel University Philadelphia, PA Jian Qin Syracuse University Syracuse, NY * Presented at Knowledge Technologies.
Citation Linking in Federated Digital Libraries Eike Schallehn, Martin Endig, Kai-Uwe Sattler Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg Institute for Technical.
Information Integration BIRN supports integration across complex data sources – Can process wide variety of structured & semi-structured sources (DBMS,
User Profiling using Semantic Web Group members: Ashwin Somaiah Asha Stephen Charlie Sudharshan Reddy.
Shridhar Bhalerao CMSC 601 Finding Implicit Relations in the Semantic Web.
Distributed Data Analysis & Dissemination System (D-DADS ) Special Interest Group on Data Integration June 2000.
A Resource Discovery Service for the Library of Texas Requirements, Architecture, and Interoperability Testing William E. Moen, Ph.D. Principal Investigator.
Jens Hartmann York Sure Raphael Volz Rudi Studer The OntoWeb Portal.
Ontology-Based Interoperability Service for HL7 Interfaces Implementation Carolina González, Bernd Blobel and Diego López eHealth Competence Center, Regensurg.
Lecture VIII: Software Architecture
Architectural Considerations for Semantic Support Group Name: WG5 Source: Martin Bauer (NEC), Joerg Swetina (NEC) Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Concept mining for programming automation. Problem ➲ A lot of trivial tasks that could be automated – Add field Patronim on Customer page. – Remove field.
Automating programming via concept mining, probabilistic reasoning over semantic knowledge base of SE domain by Max Talanov.
Part of the Cronos Group 4C/kZen 4 th EcoTerm meeting, Vienna, April 18, 2007 Jef Vanbockryck Research & Development “Risk Assessment ontologies and data.
Versatile Information Systems, Inc International Semantic Web Conference An Application of Semantic Web Technologies to Situation.
Sharing personal knowledge over the Semantic Web ● We call personal knowledge the knowledge that is developed and shared by the users while they solve.
Database Environment Chapter 2. The Three-Level ANSI-SPARC Architecture External Level Conceptual Level Internal Level Physical Data.
Ganga/Dirac Data Management meeting October 2003 Gennady Kuznetsov Production Manager Tools and Ganga (New Architecture)
1 Copyright © 2008, Oracle. All rights reserved. Repository Basics.
Conceptual Comparison WSMO/OWL-S 1st F2F meeting SDK cluster working group on Semantic Web Services Wiesbaden, Germany, Rubén Lara, (Dumitru.
Fuzzy Logics.
Chattrakul Sombattheera
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Scalable and Efficient Reasoning for Enforcing Role-Based Access Control
Lecture 8 Information Retrieval Introduction
Scalable and Efficient Reasoning for Enforcing Role-Based Access Control
Social Practice of the language: Describe and share information
ONTOMERGE Ontology translations by merging ontologies Paper: Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web by Dejing Dou, Drew McDermott and Peishen Qi 2003.
Presentation transcript:

Realizing the potential of reference ontologies for the semantic web Jim Brinkley June 29, 2007

Motivation Large number of application ontologies Need to link them together into the semantic web Reference ontologies as one way to do this But reference ontologies are (or will be) too large for practical use How can reference ontologies be made practical for applications, yet retain potential to link application ontologies?

Approach Application ontologies as views over one or more reference ontologies A view is a query that defines a formal transformation from one or more source ontologies to a target application ontology

Main advantage of views View query describes the specific operations used to create the application ontology –Therefore the connection to the source(s) are not lost –If the query can be made bidirectional (a mapping) then application ontologies can be related to each other via views

Secondary advantages View query can be re-run at any time as the reference ontology changes The query is formal so can be manipulated by a GUI Application ontology need not be materialized, so the update problem is not an issue (but there may be other reasons to materialize views)

VGen R1 W1 V1 A1 VQP Basic Architecture

VGen R1 W1 VGen Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 V1 A1 VQP V2 A2 VQP R2 W2

Web Services FMA PRO Ontologies Query & Visualization Services Editors & Tools VQP Wrappers VGen Presentation Layer Service Layer Data and Knowledge Layer

Problems to solve (aims) 1.How to define the view 2.How to implement the view query processor 3.How to graphically generate views

R1 FMA (ref) R1 FMA (ref) R2 PRO (ref) R2 PRO (ref) physiologist Use case 1: RadLex A1 CV anatomy (app) A1 CV anatomy (app) anatomist VGen A2 CV physiology (app) A2 CV physiology (app) Use case 3: simulation expt’l data expt’l data model inputs model inputs model outputs model outputs Use case 2: BIRNLex V1 V2

Aim 1: Investigate view-based approaches:Tasks 1.Catalog ad hoc application ontologies 2.Select query and view definition language (VDL) 3.Extend VDL 4.Query processing over a single view 5.Query processing over multiple views 6.Optimize for efficiency 7.Evaluate

Aim 2: Implement VQP: Tasks 1.Design system architecture 2.Source wrappers 3.VQP 4.Optimize for efficiency 5.Evaluate

Aim 3: VGEN: Tasks 1.Methods for visualizing and selecting subgraphs 2.Visual mapping methods 3.Methods for viewing the effect of mappings 4.VGEN 5.Optimize 6.Evaluate

Goals for this meeting Understand and agree on goals, use cases and tasks of the grant Get to know each other and our expertise Create the basis for smaller group collaborations

Agenda