Child Welfare Practice Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana IV-E Waiver Original Demonstration 1998 – 2002 Informal Extension 2002 – 2005 Current Extension
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
DHR-DFCS Statewide Community Forum Atlanta, Georgia December 19, 2006.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
“Yes We Will”: From Placements to Permanency – The 2020 Vision Catalyst for CARE 9 th Annual Child Placement Conference November 12-14, 2008 Dr. Page Walley,
One Chance at Childhood Every Child Deserves the Best Start.
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Permanency Roundtables -Texas Style! October 2012 Jenny Hinson, Division Administrator for Permanency Carol Self, Lead Permanency Program Specialist.
Addressing Disproportionality in Texas A Committed Community Collaboration Presented by: Carolyne Rodriguez, Director of Texas State Strategy, Casey Family.
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
Inspiration  Ideas  Improvement Practice Improvement Unit District Practice Improvement Specialists District Automation Liaisons Inspiration An agent.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
The Virginia Story COLLABORATING WITH FOSTER CARE.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Minnesota’s CJI: Collaboration on Using Data to Improve Outcomes Christeen Borsheim Director, Child Safety and Permanency Division, Department of Human.
The New Mexico Experience Practice Model Peer Network Webinar September 10, 2012.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care John Elliott Hilary Shager April 25 th, 2013.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Technical Assistance and Mini Grants Information Session
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES
Children’s Trust Network 19 October 2011 Developments in Safeguarding Anthony May Corporate Director for Children, Families and Cultural Services.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Erwin McEwen, Director 1 The Future of IL DCFS: Supporting & Strengthening Families Erwin McEwen, Director IDCFS Director, Erwin McEwen
Promoting school connections for youth in child welfare Joan Rock, Implementation Coordinator Kristen Hayden-West, Implementation Coordinator Jessica Strolin-Goltzman,
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Division of Family Services Update on Children’s Services Transformation August 18, 2010.
A New Approach to Servicing Families.  Introduction to the practice of kinship care specific to A Second Chance Inc.  An Overview of how kinship care.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
Presented by: Utah Department of Human Services Utah Department of Workforce Services.
Integrating Substance Abuse Competency Within A Child Welfare System Kim Bishop-Stevens LICSW Loretta Butehorn PhD Jan-Feb 2007.
Family Findings: Making Successful Kin Placements and Connections for Children in Care Presenter: Elisa Esh, Diakon Adoption and Foster Care.
Statewide Compilation of Common Themes from Regional Group Reports A Conversation: Virginia’s Social Services System Roles · Responsibilities · Funding.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Permanency Outcomes for Children in Erie County Department of Social Services Brett Loschiavo, Public Administration · Project Advisor – Dr. Suparna Soni.
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Lilliput Family Finding & Relative Support Efforts Karen Alvord, CEO, Beverly Johnson, CPO,
 Legislative mandate*: ◦ Reform Group Homes & FFAs with robust & diverse stakeholder input ◦ Legislative report with recommendations  Continuum of Care.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Child Welfare Permanency and Racial Equity Efforts in Illinois Angela Baron-Jeffrey Center for Child Welfare and Education Child Welfare Advisory Council.
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Butte County Overview December 2016 ~ Cathi Grams, Director Department of Employment and Social.
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
NEXT STEPS IN DEVELOPING CULTURALLY-COMPETENT
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA)
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Presentation transcript:

Child Welfare Practice Model http://vafamilyconnections.com/#.shtml Practice Model Peer Network Call 9/13/11 VDSS - Division of Family Services

Children’s Services History Overview: Since December of 2007, Virginia DSS has been working on an initiative called the Virginia Children’s Services System Transformation. This is an intensive effort to create systemic change and aims to: increase the number and rate at which youth in foster care move into permanent family arrangements, increase the number of at-risk children and youth placed with kin and foster parents, devote more resources to community-based care, reduce the number of group care placements, and embrace data and outcome-based performance management.

Motivation to Transform For Keeps initiative begun by First Lady Anne Holton to focus on ensuring that all of Virginia's children have permanent, stable family connections and the community support to sustain them. 2007 Child Trends, report that revealed that Virginia had a high percentage of children in foster care exit the system without permanent connections to family. Additional data from 2007 confirmed the need to dramatically improve the ways in which children and families receive services, including: 23% of Virginia’s children aged out of foster care without permanent connections 43.7% of teens (12 & older) achieved permanence 25% of foster care youth were in a group care setting (congregate care) 52% of initial placements for youth 12 and older were in a group care setting Fewer than 5% of children in foster care were being placed with relatives

VDSS Strategies Focus on building capacity and improving the agency’s internal structure by: Identifying best practices in family engagement and implementing a formal model that is specific to Virginia, Providing strong support around policy and regulation, Developing external partnerships – practice model implementation, Improving communication, Realigning division structure in order to fully support local departments in the Transformation, Improving the use of data to drive decision-making(SafeMeasures), and Providing strong support to local agencies in order to increase capacity to recruit, develop, and support resource families. Recent additions: Family Partnership Incentives; Accurint to all localities

State Supervised, Locally Administered Local DSS Strategies Regional Efforts Council on Reform or CORE was established to pilot the first phase of the Transformation CORE is made by thirteen geographically diverse localities that account for nearly 50% of statewide foster care population Second phase of Transformation includes all 120 Local DSS agencies to implement reform statewide Peer Cooperatives around Recruitment, Development, Support of Resource Families Regional Family Engagement Teams Regional training on policy that incorporated Practice Model principles

Children’s Services System Transformation Since implementation of Transformation reform initiatives Virginia has increased performance in all child welfare outcomes. Virginia has safely reduced the number of children in foster care Virginia has increased the number of children exiting to permanency (adoption, custody transfer to relative, reunification) Virginia has increased family based placements and has reduced the number of children placed in group settings Entry cohort analysis shows that children’s experiences in Virginia’s Foster Care System are improving.

DFS Critical Outcome Measure 12/07 07/11 Percent Change Difference Safely Reduce Foster Care Caseload 7557 4718 -37.57% -2839 Re-Entries within 12 months of Exit 9.59% 5.40% -43.71% -4.19% Increase Discharges to Permanency 1743 2180 25.07% 437 64.29% 72.76% 13.18% 8.47% Increase the Number of Children in Family Based Placements 5398 4060 -24.79% -1338 Increase the Percentage of Family Based Placements 71.43% 86.05% 20.47% 14.62% Decrease the Number of Children in Group Care 1922 702 -63.48% -1220 Decrease the Percentage of Children in Group Care 25.43% 14.88% -41.49% -10.55% Increase the Number of Children in Kinship Care 425 262 -38.35% -163 Increase the Percentage of Children in Kinship Placements 5.62% 5.55% -1.19% -0.07% Virginia has seen positive movement in nearly every measure. Virginia has reduced the foster care population by nearly 3000 children and has reduced recidivism by nearly half. More than 1300 children have been placed in family based placements.

Continuing to Reform Adoptions have increased in each year of the Transformation jumping from 706 in SFY 2010 to 820 in SFY 2011. A 16.1% increase in one year. While the numbers of adoption are increasing there are currently 1297 children with the goal of adoption. 48% of these children have had Termination of Parental Rights (TPR) and are awaiting an adoptive placement New initiatives for SFY 2012 seek to increase Virginia’s already improving permanency rate with a heavy focus on adoption

A Focus on Permanency Implementation of Custody Assistance – by April 2012? - Will allow for a new permanency option for children when reunification and adoption have been ruled out. - Discharges to Custody Assistance like programs average 15% nationally - Would push Virginia’s permanency rate above the national average Partnering with Non Profits and Faith Based Organizations - VDSS is currently exploring opportunities to partner with both non profit and faith based organizations to increase the number of available families willing to adopt.

Practice Model (PM) Implementation Issues Change in Administration has interrupted collaboration between state departments – now more a DSS PM While included in CPS and FC policy, PM not a major focus of the Transformation Imbedding of PM not always well-planned – policy discussions, posters Loss of Family Engagement program manager Training system transition Looking for strategies…