I Like This !!!!!!!!!!!!. Kennecott Copper Mine (North Zone) April 20, 2004 By: Ben Chadwick, Shweta Mehta, Purvi Patel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
Advertisements

Society for Risk Analysis Workshop 3: Application of Web-based Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) Leslie Galloway, University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge.
Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
By Hung Nguyen Lime Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage at Leviathan Mine, California.
Confined Disposal Facilities and In Situ Capping Site characterization / selection Engineering design Operational considerations Contaminant pathways and.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Proposed Plan for Site Cleanup.
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
Kabwe is the second largest city in Zambia. 150 kilometres north of the nation’s capital, Lusaka. ≈ of population 58% of the population are living.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Risk Assessment.
Environmental Risk Assessment for “Facet Enterprises”, New York, USA Presentation by Marie, Seun, and Deb.
1 Risk assessment: overview and principles –Risk principles –Steps in risk assessment –Risk calculation –Toxicology.
Assessing Dose and Potency of Chemicals Robert Blaisdell, Ph.D, Chief Exposure Modeling Section Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.
Human Health Risk Assessment Libby, MT Superfund Site Texas A&M University CVEN610/PHEO650 April 29, 2004 Presented by: Cristina Baker, Fuman Zhao, Dhananjay.
Iron Mountain Mine California Acid Mine Drainage Discharge Stuart Gaunt Guy Laurie.
Status More on gardening pathway & historic fill proposals – situations addressed under the “Permanent Solutions with Conditions (No AULs)” MCP Public.
L. Hasselbach, J. M. Ver Hoef, J. Ford, P. Neitlich, E. Crecelius, S. Berryman, B. Wolk and T. Bohle Spatial patterns of cadmium and lead deposition on.
RISK ANALYSIS,EVALUATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DIXIE OIL PROCESSORS INC., FRIENDSWOOD,TEXAS CVEN 610/PHEO 650 APRIL 22,2004 BY OKE NWANESHIUDU ABHIRAM.
Human Health Risk Assessment: World Trade Centre Disaster Clinton S Young Itza Mendoza Sanchez Vaishali Kushwaha.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
29 th International conference SEGH, 8-12 July Toulouse, FRANCE 2013 Health risk estimate for groundwater and soil contamination in the.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
SOUTHWEST DIVISION Evaluation of Ambient Metals in the San Francisco, California Area Presentation for the NDIA Conference G. Patrick Brooks, R.G. NAVFAC,
Screening Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment Poplar Point, Washington, DC.
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
1 School Siting Environmental Health and Safety Considerations J. Brad Peebles Ph.D.,C.E.P
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
Cristina González-Maddux Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals Northern Arizona University.
(IAQ). What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures.
Former Monsanto Chemical Tip Wrexham County Borough Council.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
Ronald Warren Ecological & Environmental Monitoring National Security Technologies, LLC Community Environmental Monitoring Program Workshop July 26, 2011.
The Use of the Risk Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) Program to evaluate 13 Counties of Northwest Florida TRI & RSEI Evaluations.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
Examples of Health Risk Assessment Applications for Contaminated Sites in the Upper Silesia, Poland Eleonora Wcislo Institute for Ecology of Industrial.
Berkeley Pit The Deadly Mine of Butte, Montana. The Pit The Town County Seat of Silver Bow County, Montana One of the largest and most notorious copper.
Contaminated Soil Monitoring Pornsri Suthanaruk, Ph.D Pollution Control Department (PCD) Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Thailand Workshop.
Lead Contamination in the Belledune Area: Past and Present Prepared by Inka Milewski Conservation Council of New Brunswick October 2003.
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department Presents… The Arsenic Project.
By Mitch Cooper & Haley Herbert January 1987 Vertac site manufactured herbicides 1978 National Dioxin Survey 1983 Site placed on the National.
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety Stephanie Simstad The Ohio State University Extension Clermont County AFCEE, 2002.
I RIS E NVIRONMENTAL Independent Review of Documents Pertaining to the Lehigh Southwest Cement Permanente Facility Rob Balas & John McLaughlin February.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design and Cleanup Plans September 2014.
FAIR Meeting April 6, Groundwater Results – Fall 2003 Benzene ND 1,000 ug/L Product.
Part 1b Part 1b NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND POPULATIONS; BASIC CONCEPTS OF EXPOSURE, DOSE AND RISK.
Environmental Risk Assessment and Risk Management Kevin L. Long ENVIRON International Corporation Academy Park High School May 12, 2010.
Marian Anderson Place Site Update City Commission Special Workshop December 14, 2015.
Key Concepts on Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
The Palmerton Zinc Superfund Site EPA Response In 1980 the U.S. finally addressed the issue of hazardous wastes Comprehensive Environmental Response,
An Overview DCC Annual Retreat February 20, 2012.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
Brownfields 2011 Philadelphia, PA – April 5, 2011 Vanessa Steigerwald-Dick, Ohio EPA Amy Yersavich, Ohio EPA Urban Gardens on Brownfields: Making Them.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Re-imagining Mining Sites: Kennecott North and South Zones
Abandoned uranium mine
Some Quiz Questions Unit: Risk Assessment.
Presentation transcript:

I Like This !!!!!!!!!!!!

Kennecott Copper Mine (North Zone) April 20, 2004 By: Ben Chadwick, Shweta Mehta, Purvi Patel

Site Location Located near the south shore of the Great Salt Lake Approximately 15 miles west of Salt Lake City Mine is located in the north end of the Oquirrh mountains Next to the community of Magna

Site Description Kennecott North Zone consists of 4 primary areas: Magna Great Salt Lake Park Tooele Valley West Valley City

Site Description Owned by Kennecott Copper Corporation Site involves smelting and refining of concentrated copper ore The mine is so big that it can be seen from the space.

Site History 1863 – Initial exploration and mining of mineral resources 1906 – Large scale open-pit mining begins 1930 – The “Hill” becomes the “Pit” 1945 – Mine produces 1/3 of copper used during World War II

Site History 1960 – $100 million modernization of the mine 1991 – EPA’s involvement at the site begins 1994 – Proposed for the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) 1995 – Kennecott, EPA & the State of Utah signed an agreement, saying that Kennecott will continue the cleanups.

Site Characterization Magna: Approx. 20,000 residents Primary airborne contaminants Arsenic Cadmium Site contains a 5,700 acre tailing pond

Site Characterization Cont….. Great Salt Lake Park: Occupies about 3½ miles of shoreline Approx. 700,000 visitors per year Recreation near the site includes lakeshore swimming, wading, sunbathing, & bird watching. Surface water and air contamination occurs from sludge ponds, slag piles, & other smelter waste.

Site Characterization Cont….. Tooele Valley: Tooele Valley extends between the Stansbury Mountains and Oquirrh Mountains. Population about 17,000 Airborne contaminants are released from the facility’s smelter stacks

Site Characterization Cont….. West Valley City: Located east of Magna It is considered an off-site area Approximate population 109,000 Potential route of exposure – Soil, Air

Data Collection & Evaluation Maximum concentration values were used for this risk assessment Contaminant concentration values came from EPA sampling data Heavy metals are of primary concern Particulates and Sulfur Dioxide were not considered in the risk assessment

Data Collection & Evaluation Chemicals of Concern (COCs) Carcinogens Arsenic Lead Beryllium Cadmium Non-Carcinogens Aluminum Copper Barium Manganese Vanadium Zinc Selenium

Exposure Assessment Exposure Routes: Ingestion Inhalation Dermal Contact Potential Receptors: Adult (workers/non-workers) Child

Exposure Assessment Cont….. Magna : Exposure Pathways PATHWAYAmbient AirSoil Source:Kennecott facilities, other emission sources Kennecott facilities, naturally occurring metals Medium:AirPrincipally soil Exposure Point:Magna vicinity, plus parts of Salt Lake and Tooele Counties Magna vicinity Exposure Route:InhalationIncidental ingestion, Dermal Contact Receptor Population:Residents (also transient workers and visitors) Residents (perhaps transient workers and visitors) Contaminants Selected for Detailed Evaluation: Arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, zincAluminum, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, copper, lead, manganese, vanadium, zinc

Exposure Assessment Cont….. Great Salt Lake Park : Exposure Pathway PATHWAYAmbient AirSurface Water--Great Salt Lake Source:Kennecott smelter stacks, plus other sources Principally geologic and evaporative processes. Some discharge from Kennecott via groundwater Medium:AirWater Exposure Point:Great Salt Lake Park vicinity Exposure Route:InhalationIncidental ingestion, Dermal Contact Receptor Population:Principally visitors, some workers Contaminants Selected for Detailed Evaluation: Arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, zinc Arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, zinc, selenium

Exposure Assessment Cont….. Tooele Valley : Exposure Pathways PATHWAYAmbient Air Source:Currently Kennecott, plus other sources; in the past, also the former International Smelter Medium:Air Exposure Point:Tooele Valley and elsewhere Exposure Route:Inhalation Receptor Population:Residents, transient workers and visitors Contaminants Selected for Detailed Evaluation: Arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, zinc

Exposure Assessment Cont….. West Valley City : Exposure Pathways PATHWAYAmbient AirSoil Source:Kennecott smelter stack facilities, other emission sources Kennecott facilities, naturally occurring metals Medium:AirPrincipally soil Exposure Point:West Valley City vicinity, plus parts of Salt Lake County West Valley City vicinity Exposure Route:InhalationIncidental ingestion, Dermal contact Receptor Population:Residents (also transient workers and visitors) Residents (perhaps transient workers and visitors) Contaminants Selected for Detailed Evaluation: Copper, leadAluminum, arsenic, barium, beryllium, copper, lead, manganese, vanadium, zinc

Kennecott Smoke Stack & Mine Vicinity

Toxicity Assessment Exposure Pathway: Inhalation (Air) SiteContaminant Maximum concentration(ug/m3) Comparison Value(ug/m3) Magna (Onsite) Arsenic Cadmium Copper Lead Zinc West Valley City (Offsite) Copper Lead Great Salt Lake Park (Offsite) Arsenic Cadmium Copper Lead Zinc Tooele Valley (Onsite) Arsenic Cadmium Copper Lead Zinc

Toxicity Assessment Cont….. Exposure Pathway: Ingestion & Dermal (Soil) Contaminant Maximum concentration (mg/kg) Comparison Value (mg/kg) MagnaWest valley Aluminum , Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium1.5ND1 Copper Lead NONE Manganese Vanadium Zinc

Toxicity Assessment Cont….. Exposure Pathway: Ingestion & Dermal (Water) SiteContaminant Maximum Concentration ( ug/L) Comparison Value ( ug/L) Great Salt Lake Park (Offsite) Arsenic Cadmium 30 7 Copper 1, Lead Zinc Selenium 0.5

Risk Characterization After collecting all the data, the risk characterization is conducted using SmartRISK SmartRISK Input: Chemicals of concerns Concentrations of COC’s Exposure routes & Scenarios Certain assumptions SmartRISK Output: Cancer & Non-cancer risks

Risk Characterization Cont….. Assumptions The values used for the RfD & SF come from SmartRISK Due to the unavailable data for lead, we made assumptions for the SF value For the Great Salt Lake Park, the below assumptions were made for recreation Ingestion rate =0.1 L/day EF = 12 days/year ET = 3 hours/day

Results: Cancer & Non-cancer Risk SiteScenario AdultChild CancerNon-CancerCancerNon-Cancer Magna Industrial4.12E E Residential1.88E E E E+00 Great Salt Lake Park Recreational1.43E E E E+00 Tooele Valley Industrial4.13E E Residential2.08E E E E-07 West Valley City Residential1.85E E E E+00

Results: Bar Chart Magna: Cancer (residential, adult)

Results: Bar Chart Great Salt Lake Park: Non-cancer (recreational, adult)

Results: Bar Chart Tooele Valley: Cancer (residential, adult)

Results: Bar Chart West Valley City: Non-cancer (residential, child)

Risk Assessment Summary Approximately 98% of cancer risk comes from Arsenic The actual cancer risk < calculated risk because high dose animal CSF data has been used for low dose exposure in humans. The higher risk values found in the Great Salt Lake Park are due to our conservative approach (assumptions). The greatest risk comes from ingestion of soil

Any Questions?