Lindgren Quadridge Feeds S. Weinreb and W. Imbriale SKA Antenna Working Group May 6, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chalmers University of Technology Development of a Coolable Decade Bandwidth Eleven Feed System for SKA & VLBI 2010 Radio Telescopes Per-Simon Kildal Chalmers.
Advertisements

TDP Progress Report, June 4, 2010
Radio Frequency Fundamentals Wireless Networking Unit.
Sinusoidal Waves. Objective of Lecture Discuss the characteristics of a sinusoidal wave. Define the mathematical relationship between the period, frequency,
Antenna, Reflector and Radome
3mm amplitude test by Cheng-Jiun Ma. Observation Source : Orion SiO Frequency: GHz 256 channels within 64MHz bandwidth Ant 3 & Ant 4 no Tsys correction.
Microstrip Reflectarrays Myths and Realities JINA Conference David M
2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001.
Satellite Communications A Part 2
Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 Antennas & Receivers in Radio Astronomy Mark McKinnon.
Investigate 1. Draw a dot on a piece of paper 2. Draw a second dot 3. Connect the dots with a straight line 4. Draw a third dot – draw as many straight.
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.
Fiber-Optic Communications James N. Downing. Chapter 10 Fiber-Optic Test and Measurement.
SKA TDP Receiver Antenna Interface March 21, 2008 Total system noise contributions Choice of operating temperature Wideband feeds.
Calculating the Beam Position at the Ecal for DESY Run (Independent of Tracking) Hakan Yilmaz.
Aperture-coupled Stacked Coplanar Patch Antenna Presented by: Mohamed Morsy Date: October 19,2006.
Receiver TDP Report to US SKA Consortium Nov 17, 2008, Emphasis in Caltech TDP Meeting the 35K Tsys goal,
ATA Antennas Feeds and Systems NSF Review 8/05/08 Jack Welch.
Receiver TDP Report to US SKA Consortium May 22, 2008 Sandy Weinreb, Joe Bardin, Glenn Jones, and Hamdi Mani California Institute of Technology
Antenna, Feed, and LNA Integration S. Weinreb, May 7, 2009, LAX Antenna Working Group Meeting 1.Issues 2.Feed Summary 3.LNA Summary 4.Differential LNA’s.
EE 198 B Senior Design Project. Spectrum Analyzer.
National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center © Germán Cortés M 2008 SKA TDP Antenna Optics By Germán Cortés M. Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853, USA National.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
SJD/JJAdvisory - Sept Fiber Phase Stability Status Steven Durand & Jim Jackson September 8, 2003 National Radio Astronomy Observatory a facility.
1 Shower maximum detector (SMD) is a wire proportional counter – strip readout detector using gas amplification. SMD is used to provide a spatial resolution.
Antennas The primary elements of a synthesis array M. Kesteven ATNF 25/September/2001.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier.
P.Napier, Synthesis Summer School, 18 June Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier Interferometer block diagram Antenna fundamentals Types of antennas.
R. HaywardEVLA Feeds CDR - System Requirements 17 Feb EVLA Feeds CDR System Requirements.
Booster Cogging Upgrades Craig Drennan, Kiyomi Seiya, Alex Waller.
US SKA TDP DVA-1 June 28-29, 2012Dish Verification Antenna No. 1 Critical Design Review, Penticton, BC Overview Of DVA-1 Optics Lynn Baker Bill Imbriale.
Proposed Versatile 1.2 to 14 GHz Radio Telescope Receiver S. Weinreb, JPL/Caltech, Draft July 5, 2005 Contents 1.Introduction and intended applications.
 Voltage can be produced such that, over time, it follows the shape of a sine wave  The magnitude of the voltage continually changes.  Polarity may.
GraphingSubstitutionEliminationNon-LinearInequalities
S. SrikanthEVLA Feed/FE PDR February 12-13, 2002 EVLA FEEDS DESIGN S. Srikanth NRAO/Charlottesville.
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
© EMSS Antennas, TDP AWG, LAX, 6-7/5/2009 The KAT-7 feed package 1.
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop Socorro, June 10-17, 2008 Antennas and Receivers in Radio Astronomy Mark McKinnon.
16 August 2005PT for US BC Task Force1 Two Stage Bunch Compressor Proposal Snowmass WG1 “It’s the latest wave That you’ve been craving for The old ideal.
Distributed Adaptive Control and Metrology for Large Radar Apertures PI: James Lux Co-Is: Adam Freedman, John Huang, Andy Kissil, Kouji Nishimoto, Farinaz.
June 3,4 2010Lynn Baker USSKA Consortia Washington, DC1 TDP / AWG Update Lynn Baker USSKA Consortia Meeting Washington DC June 3,4, 2010.
An Instrumental test observation for 22GHz and 43GHz quasi-optical circuit of KVN receivers March 18 th 2009 Seog-Tae Han, Jung-Won Lee, Jiman Kang, Sang-Sung.
Reflector Antennas Antenna and Microwave Laboratory In the name of God
Antenna II LN07_Reflector Antennas 1 /34 Reflector Antennas.
Requirements for Single-Dish Holography Parameter Specification Goal Measurement error
US SKA TDP Antenna Design Progress US SKA AWG Meeting May 6, 2009, Los Angeles. California Matt Fleming Contributions from Jack Welch Roger Schultz Sandy.
Gustavo Cancelo Analysis of the phase shift error between A and B signals in BPMs BPM project.
1) A binary transmission system uses a 8-bit word encoding system. Find the Bandwidth and the SNR dB of the system if the channel capacity is bps.
SKA – MID Sensitivity Mike Jones Jamie Leech Angela Taylor University of Oxford with data from Miroslav Pantaleev (Chalmers) Isak Theron (EMSS) Yang.
Antenna Matching Techniques
Hanyang University 1/15 Antennas & RF Devices Lab. MODERN ANTENNA HANDBOOK by CONSTANTINE A.BALANIS ch Jeong Gu Ho.
Hanyang University 1/15 Antennas & RF Devices Lab. MODERN ANTENNA HANDBOOK by CONSTANTINE A.BALANIS ch Jeong Gu Ho.
Single Cryocooler 1.2 to 116 GHz Receiver for ngVLA S. Weinreb, A. Soliman, and H. Mani July 30, Rationale 2.Synergistic Reflector Design 3.Dewar.
ngVLA Receiver/Feed Options: Overview
Antennas in Radio Astronomy
Modern Interferometric Arrays
Imaging and Calibration Challenges
Choice of Cassegrain Geometry
Pin-fed back to back pyramidal horn antenna
Overview Calibration Exciter Receiver Oscillators
Reflector & Single Pixel Feed Panel Discussion
Comparison of Fundamental and Dual Harmonic RF Buckets
Feed & Front End PDR—Sys. Reqts
Parabolic Reflector Antenna Dr Jaikaran Singh. Contents General Properties Parabolic Reflector Antenna Reflector Type Cylindrical Parabolic Reflector.
X-, Ku-, S-Band Feed Design
Agenda, Day 1, Tuesday, June 19
Calculate points from this table and plot the points as you go.
Notes Over 5.8 Writing a Quadratic Function in Vertex Form
Translate 5 squares left and 4 squares up.
Practice Geometry Practice
Presentation transcript:

Lindgren Quadridge Feeds S. Weinreb and W. Imbriale SKA Antenna Working Group May 6, 2009

Peak Gain On-axis Gain Peak Cross-pol On-axis cross-pol Lindgren Quadridge Feed measured performance (0,45,90,135 cuts - amplitude, phase, principle and cross polarizations)

Freq = 5.3 GHz Principle Pol

Freq = 5.3 GHz Cross Pol

Freq = 10.0 GHz – Principle Pol

Freq = 10.0 GHz – Cross Pol

DSS-28 Geometry 60 degree offset design Parabola at vertex Geometry of Tertiary

Two Feeds with switchable optics

Predicted GAVRT performance (with no geometry errors) Return Loss Strut Blockage RMS Loss Overall Physical Optics

Comparisons of measured (Venus) versus calculated (with geometry errors) Measured (blue dots) Calculated (red line)

Comparison of GAVRT design with a front fed parabola Assumes no surface RMS loss GAVRT F/D = 0.6 F/D = 0.5 F/D = 0.4

Comparison of GAVRT design with a front fed parabola Assumes no surface RMS loss GAVRT F/D = 1.0 F/D = 0.9 F/D = 0.8

Lindgren feed with shaped 12-meter Cassegrain antenna Return Loss Physical Optics Overall

Comparison of GAVRT with Shaped design Shaped design GAVRT