1 of 13 May 26, 2000 Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop Department of Computer and Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CRM 3.0 Whats New in Microsoft CRM 3.0 – Technical.
Advertisements

24HR USC Ticket Sale Team #4 Shao-Hung Chen 0979 Campus Yat-Wei Edward Lee 2547 Campus Jing Ma Campus.
WP 2 Usability Attributes Affected by Software Architecture Deliverable D2 – Usability Patterns Presenter: Robert Chatley - ICSTM.
FLEET User Manual July 1, Part One – User Names & Passwords I.User Names & Passwords A. Creating an Account B. Forgot Password C. Updating .
1 Arizona Grade 8 Science Online Field Test Test Administrator Training March 23 – April 2, 2007.
Preliminary Design: Smart Scheduling Client: Dr. Robert Yoder.
Installation and Deployment in Microsoft Dynamics CRM 4.0
The art and science of measuring people l Reliability l Validity l Operationalizing.
1 Owais Mohammad Haq Department of Computer Science Eastern Michigan University April, 2005 Java Script.
Viewing Changes Monitoring with Treemaps Steve Betten Catherine Plaisant Ben Bederson.
Think-aloud usability experiments or concurrent verbal accounts Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information.
Reducing the Energy Usage of Office Applications Jason Flinn M. Satyanarayanan Carnegie Mellon University Eyal de Lara Dan S. Wallach Willy Zwaenepoel.
1 Music Connection. 2 3 Music School Project Team A Music Connection Project Manager: Mari Reyes Deputy Project Manager: Richard Chun Operations Manager:
Web-based Gene Network Analysis in five minutes. Alex Williams.
1 of 16 March 30, 2000 Bus Access Optimization for Distributed Embedded Systems Based on Schedulability Analysis Paul Pop, Petru Eles, Zebo Peng Department.
Art 128 Interface Programming 1 In-class Presentation Week 16A.
Calculus Review Project Team 9 Presentation 1 February 13, 2003.
Recognizing User Interest and Document Value from Reading and Organizing Activities in Document Triage Rajiv Badi, Soonil Bae, J. Michael Moore, Konstantinos.
Requirements Specification: Smart Scheduling Client: Dr. Robert Yoder.
Jesper Kjeldskov Mikael B. Skov Jan Stage HCI-Lab Department of Computer Science Aalborg University Denmark Does Time Heal? A Longitudinal Study of Usability.
Professor Michael J. Losacco CIS 1150 – Introduction to Computer Information Systems Databases Chapter 11.
Distributed Software Development
WebQuilt and Mobile Devices: A Web Usability Testing and Analysis Tool for the Mobile Internet Tara Matthews Seattle University April 5, 2001 Faculty Mentor:
Tracking Services for ANY websites and web applications Zhu Xiong CSE 403 LCO.
Appointment Scheduler. Overview Create Appointment Types Create Administrator Availability Viewing/Booking Appointments as Administrator Viewing/Booking.
Self-Adaptive QoS Guarantees and Optimization in Clouds Jim (Zhanwen) Li (Carleton University) Murray Woodside (Carleton University) John Chinneck (Carleton.
Requirements Engineering
Google Apps.
 Increasing the amount of hours spent studying and doing homework on a daily basis  Increasing the amount of work completed while studying on a daily.
Leonardo da Vinci BeLT - Blended Learning Transfer On line collaboration Previous experience and proposal Confindustria Veneto SIAV SpA Mestre, Fabruary.
Unit B: Expanding Your Productivity Page: 24 to 37.
Publish Calendars to the Web. CCUweb Presentation (10 Minutes) 1 Demonstration of published calendars (10 minutes) 2 Demonstration of importing calendar.
Part 1. Persistent Data Web applications remember your setting by means of a database linked to the site.
An Intuitive Collaboration Tool for Teachers and Students By Cassie Dove T - BOX PLANET.
Eric Holtel.  Introduction  Project Description  Demonstration  Deliverables  Conclusion.
Module Info Web Application and Development Digital Media Department Unit Credit Value : 4 Essential Learning time : 120 hours
Texas Law Enforcement Best Practices Mid Year Training Conference.
1 ADP Algebra II End-Of-Course Online Field Test Test Administrator Training September, 2007.
Software Engineering Chapter 16 User Interface Design Ku-Yaw Chang Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science and Information.
NMED 3850 A Advanced Online Design January 12, 2010 V. Mahadevan.
Surviving the Information Explosion Christine Alvarado and Jaime Teevan.
Hana Lab Reservax System. Introduction——HanaLab Behavioral Lab (DBH 6F) A place to run o Systematic behavioral experiments o Usability studies o Focus.
MyBLAST standalone installation Lab of Systems Biology & Network Biology website Download link. 1.Click the Download link.
MIS 424 Professor Sandvig. Overview  Why Analytics?  Two major approaches:  Server logs  Google Analytics.
A Case Study of Interaction Design. “Most people think it is a ludicrous idea to view Web pages on mobile phones because of the small screen and slow.
Our goal is to make a web based multi-user organizer that can be accessed via cellular devices. There are three main component for this project: A main.
Free, online, technical courses Take a free online course. Microsoft Virtual Academy.
Server Browser Network Complex pages Too many web parts Large payload Too many files Large distance to server Complex pages Busy computer.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration LibQUAL+® Exchange Northumbria Florence, Italy August 17, 2009 Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics.
BIF713 Operating System Concepts MS Windows. Agenda 1. What is an Operating System (definition)? 2. Types of Operating Systems 3. Basic Operations: –
Word a Day Calendar TEKS 3.8 B 3.8 C 3.8 D. Today’s Word *
CompSci 4 Starting Alice Sep 2, 2010 Prof. Susan Rodger Alice is named in honor of Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland.
GHA911 Enhancements A Brief Overview **Note: Data shown in these slides is from the development system and may not match data on the main system.
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Information Session.
Research into content management systems List of Options 1. Web Based CMS 2. Database Based 3. Web based solutions.
Dextrosoft SCHEDULED PHONE BACKUP Backup your mobile life Version Copyright © 2015 Dextrosoft Private Limited. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved
Texas Law Enforcement Best Practices Mid Year Training Conference.
CS415 Project Team 7 G - Squad Steve Culver Kevin Gorski Jenny Harris Tim Hunt Leon Organ Katie Overton Arin Sarros.
1 Outlook web app مریم جعفری. Preface 2 Webmail (or web-based ) is any client implemented as a web application running on a web server. Examples.
Cofax Scalability Document Version Scaling Cofax in General The scalability of Cofax is directly related to the system software, hardware and network.
School of Engineering and Information and Communication Technology KIT305/607 Mobile Application Development Week 7: Usability (think-alouds) Dr. Rainer.
EAGLE Hands-On Training Workshop
Information Architecture
Web Application.
Grades4sure PDF Dumps CompTIA Security + Certification Exam
Teacher: Alison Roberts Northern Sydney Institute of TAFE
For Computer-Based Testing
Data science online training.
For Computer-Based Testing
Presentation transcript:

1 of 13 May 26, 2000 Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop Department of Computer and Information Science Linköping University Sweden

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 2 of 13 May 26, 2000 Motivation and Objective Drawbacks of desktop applications: development done on multiple platforms, have to downloaded before their use, administration and maintenance. Web applications: thousands implemented in recent years, used by millions of users. Usability of web applications compared with desktop applications.

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 3 of 13 May 26, 2000 Definitions Desktop application: WIMP, direct manipulation. Web application: runs on a server and presents itself through a web browser. Examples: web based , bookmark managers, personal information managers, web calendars, online banking.

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 4 of 13 May 26, 2000 Calendaring Application Our specifications for an application: cost and size. Calendaring applications: overview of a day, week, year; add, delete and move events; find free slots and events; reminders, meeting planners, sharing, “to do” lists.

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 5 of 13 May 26, 2000 Microsoft Calendar

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 6 of 13 May 26, 2000 Yahoo!Calendar

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 7 of 13 May 26, 2000 Study Setup: Tasks Training tasks. Tasks: Go ToFrom today, go to July 17. Add Add “Buy tickets” from 2pm, for 30 min. MoveMove two consecutive events 1 hour. UndoUndo the previous move task. Time per task in seconds, errors. Small pilot study. Record and Playback: ScreenCorder.

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 8 of 13 May 26, 2000 Study Setup, Continued Six subjects: five male and one female. On average 48 minutes with the study. Allowed to abort tasks. Questionnaire: age from 25 to 27 years, median of 26.3 years, more than 5 years experience with computers, used computers more than 20 hours per week, three used the web applications, one used calendaring applications before. Limitations: subjects, statistical analysis.

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 9 of 13 May 26, 2000 Average Time per Task

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 10 of 13 May 26, 2000 Error Rates

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 11 of 13 May 26, 2000 Usability Problems

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 12 of 13 May 26, 2000 Discussion Hypothesis (confirmed): the performance of users will be significantly reduced. 3 factors: limited interaction mechanisms provided by web browsers, mismatch: user’s mental model and the application, delays from downloading the web pages.

Comparing Web Applications with Desktop Applications: An Empirical Study Paul Pop 13 of 13 May 26, 2000 Conclusions and Future Work Users are twice as slow when using web applications: interaction mechanisms provided by the web browsers, lack of delimitation between browsers and web applications. Future work: predicting the performance degradation, guidelines for web applications, mapping existing desktop applications to web.