Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
Advertisements

CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado CME.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
ICMEs and Magnetic Clouds Session Summary Charlie Farrugia and Lan Jian.
Solar Erupting Filaments and Magnetic Field Configurations of IP Magnetic Clouds Yuming Wang 1, 2 & Jie Zhang 1 (Presenting) 1 George Mason University.
CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, USTC The Deflection of 2008 September 13 CME in Heliosphere Space ISEST, Hvar, Croatia,2013 June 17 Collaborators:
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Heliospheric Transients and the Imprint of Their Solar Sources.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
SHINE Campaign Event: 1-2 May 1998 Brian Welsch (& Yan Li) Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley Introduction: Data, Context, etc. Work: Completed & Ongoing.
Forecasting Super CME Disturbances 1.Super CMEs, such as the 2000 July 14, 2003 October 28, 2003 October 29, and 2006 December 13 full halo CMEs, generate.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
3-D Pre-Eruption Magnetic Field Configuration Involved in 28 Oct 2003 Fast Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Stanford University 36 Th COSPAR Assembly Beijing, China,
Synoptic maps and applications Yan Li Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, CA HMI team meeting, Jan 27, 2005, Stanford.
My 20 Years of Service at Stanford Solar Physics Group I. Improvement of inner boundary condition for data-based coronal models (WSO, MDI, HMI). II. Development.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
Relationship Between Magnetic Clouds and Earth-Directed CMEs: Space Weather Research in Stanford Solar Group Xuepu Zhao The Second International Space.
Identifying and Modeling Coronal Holes Observed by SDO/AIA, STEREO /A and B Using HMI Synchronic Frames X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema, Y. Liu, P. H. Scherrer.
Progenitors to Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejections: Filaments and Sigmoids David McKenzie, Robert Leamon Karen Wilson, Zhona Tang, Anthony Running Wolf.
1Yang Liu1997 May 12 Event The 1997 May 12 Event Yang Liu – Stanford University
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
ZEC Model parameters of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Jan. 18, 2011.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
THE FORMATION OF FILAMENT CHANNELS K. Muglach, Y.-M. Wang Naval Research Laboratory.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Absence of a Long Lasting Southward Displacement of the HCS Near the Minimum Preceding Solar Cycle 24 X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema and P. H. Scherrer Stanford.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
The global character of the Earth-directed coronal mass ejection and its trigger Xuepu Zhao and J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University The Firs.
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
The First Space-Weather Numerical Forecasting Model & Reconstruction of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao NAOC Oct.
Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,
Review of Conditions for the Formation and Maintenance of Filaments Paper by Sara F. Martin, 1998 Review presented by Samuel Tun October 13, 2005
Quick changes of photospheric magnetic field during flare-associated surges Leping Li, Huadong Chen, Suli Ma, Yunchun Jiang National Astronomical Observatory/Yunnan.
Proxies of the Entire Surface Distribution of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Xuepu Zhao NAOC, Oct. 18, 2011.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
A Presentation to the SHINE ’02 Workshop by J.G. Luhmann (August 19, 2002) CME initiation: A zoo not an animal (Images from the on-line CDAW CME catalogue.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
Nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field extrapolation scheme for solar active regions Han He, Huaning Wang, Yihua Yan National Astronomical Observatories,
SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.
The Rise of Solar Cycle 24: Magnetic Fields from the Dynamo through the Photosphere and Corona and Connecting to the Heliosphere Part 2: Corona & Heliophere.
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Correlation of magnetic field intensities and solar wind speeds of events observed by ACE. Mathew J. Owens and Peter J. Cargill. Space and Atmospheric.
17 th November, 2005STEREO/Solar-B Workshop 1 Related Solar Imaging and Near-Earth In-situ Observations of an ICME A. N. Fazakerley 1, L.K. Harra 1, J.L.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
Predicting the Probability of Geospace Events Based on Observations of Solar Active-Region Free Magnetic Energy Dusan Odstrcil1,2 and David Falconer3,4.
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
Observations of emerging and submerging regions with ASP and Solar-B
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University
The Second International Space Weather Symposium
A Presentation to the SHINE ’02 Workshop by J.G. Luhmann
Presentation transcript:

Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China July 25, 2006

1. Introduction 1.1 The central axis direction (CAD) of magnetic clouds (MCs) determines the strength and duration of the - Bz component in MCs (Zhao & Hoeksema, 1998), and thus determines the geoeffectiveness of the MCs & their solar counterpart. Prediction of the CAD of MCs is one of key issues in the space weather.

1.2 Many MCs are associated with CMEs that occur in closed field regions underlying the HCS, and the CAD of these MCs may be predicted using the CAD of the associated disappearing solar filaments (DSFs) (Zhao & Hoeksema,1997) or the inclination of the HCS overlying the associated CMEs (Zhao & Webb, 2003).

S1 & ICME1  28 Oct halo CME N  S, left-handed MC (Hu et al, 2005) with low proton density & not-low temperature. S2 & ICME2  29 Oct halo CME There is no southward HMF component (??) (Farrugia et al., 2005, Hu et al., 2005) Fig. 1 Adopted from Farrugia et al., 2005

1.3 The 29 & 31 Oct MCs are originated in NOAA AR486 and there is no DSF or HCS associated with these events. Yurchyshyn et al (2005) studied these events recently. This work is trying to find a unified way to predict the CAD of MCs that are originated in any closed field regions, both underlying or not underlying the HCS.

2. Coronal flux ropes in two kinds of closed field regions 2.1 Magnetic clouds are a segment of coronal flux ropes expanding into the heliosphere as a loop of nested coils connected to the Sun at both ends. The coronal flux ropes are believed to be formed above the polarity inverse line in 3D arcades due to flux cancellation, emergency, or shearing and converging photospheric motions.

2.2 The existence of the correlation between the CAD of MCs and the CAD of SDFs (Marubashi, 1986; Bothmer & Schwenn, 1994) suggests that the CAD of coronal flux ropes remains basically constant while expanding into the heliosphere. 2.3 The CAD of coronal flux ropes is expected to be aligned with the locus of the outmost arcade tops

Fig. 2 Sketched two kinds of closed regions. Adopted from Hundhausen, 1972 Fig. 3 Calculated two kinds of closed regions between holes 2.4 The locus of the arcade tops in “Bipolar” & “Unipolar” closed field regions (Zhao & Webb, 2003) BCR: the base of the HCS UCR: ?

Fig. 4 All magnetic arcades anchored at |Bl| > 50 G and calculated using the MDI _09.35 synoptic frame and the PFSS model with N=200. Blue-red lines denote closed field lines with blue segment upward. The joint between blue and red segments is arch top. 3. Magnetic arcade system calculated above AR486 AR0486

Fig.5 Calculated magnetic arcades anchored all pixes with different top ranges. AR0486 is located in a UCR; The highest arcade top is 1.10 Rs AR0486

Fig. 6 The locus of arcade tops above the X17 flare is parallel to the left-handed EIT bright structure, predicting a MC with a leading northward HMF component, consistent with ACE obs. EIT _13.13 (11.00) 4. Prediction of the CAD of MCs associated with UCR- CMEs

EIT _10.36 (10.18) Fig 7 The locus of arcade top above the M8 flare is parallel to the EIT left-handed bright structure

Movie 1

EIT _22.00 (20.37) Fig. 8 The locus of arcade tops above the X10 flare is parallel to the EIT left-handed arcade, predicting a MC with a northward HMF component, consistent with ACE observation.

Movie 2

5. Summary 5.1 We have shown that AR486 occurred in an unipolar closed field region. The top of calculated magnetic arcades in UCR is significantly lower than in BCR. 5.2 Combining with the observed handedness of the EIT post-flare bright arcade, the magnetic arcade calculated using the PFSS model and the MDI synoptic frame can be used to predict the central axis direction of the 29 and 31 Oct 2003 MCs. This method may be used for BCR- as well as UCR-CME associated MCs. 5.3 High quality arcade images from AIA/SDO & KuaFu are expected to be able to more accurately determine the handedness of magnetic arcades.

Thank you ! Thank you !

Fig. 1 Dependence of D & S of Bs on the orientation of MC