Ethical Theories High-level account of how questions about morality should be addressed. Similar to engineering models? V=IR: a tool to solve many engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 27, 2012 Kantian Deontology. Act Utilitarianism An action is morally wrong if and only if there is an alternative action that produces a greater.
Advertisements

What is deontology?.
Kant Are there absolute moral laws that we have to follow regardless of consequences? First we want to know what Kant has to say about what moral rule.
Introduction to Ethics
Kantian Ethics (Duty and Reason)
Immanuel Kant The Good Will and Autonomy. Context for Kant Groundwork for Metaphysics of Morals after American Revolution and Before French- rights.
Utilitarianism, Deontology and Confidentiality
Secular Responses Use of the Embryo. Utilitarianism Based on the idea of the greatest happiness for the greatest number or majority Also based on hedonism.
Phil 160 Kant.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Deontological Ethics Deontological theory—Asserts that the rightness of actions is determined partly or entirely by their intrinsic value Consequentialist.
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions
Kant’s deontological ethics
THEORIES ABOUT RIGHT ACTION (ETHICAL THEORIES)
Kant’s Ethics of Duty 3 insights form the basis for his theory  An action has moral worth if it is done for the sake of duty. (DUTY)  An action is morally.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
What is the right thing to do?
Introduction to Ethical Theory I Last session: “our focus will be on normative medical ethics, i.e., how people should behave in medical situations” –
Kant’s Deontological Ethics. The Plan  What is Deontology?  Good Wills and Right Actions  The Categorical Imperative  Examples and Applications.
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Kant and Moral Duties.  We don’t require moral theory(ies) to tell us that lying and homicide are wrong, and helping those in need is a good thing.
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Categorical and Practical Imperative
Immanuel Kant Duty Ethics The moral worth of an action depends on motive (do the right thing for the right reason)
DEONTOLOGY “DUTY” ETHICS IMMANUEL KANT
The Categorical Imperative Kantian Ethics. Learning Intentions and Outcomes You will: Investigate the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative.
Ethical Principles: “Good” vs. “Right” Current Issues – LHS.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant By David Kelsey.
The Sheriff’s Dilemma How to structure your answer.
Kant Deontology Categorical Imperative. Immanuel Kant Profile: Dead German Time of Berkley, Rousseau, Hume, Bentham Not a fan of music or arts.
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
Class 6 Kant. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) From Königsberg, Germany.
Utilitarianism Act Utilitarianism: The right act is that which maximizes happiness (only version we’ve been discussing thus far) Rule Utilitarianism: The.
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l to describe an.
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Morality in the Modern World
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Utilitarianism Utilitarians focus on the consequences of actions.
Kant and Kantian Ethics: Is it possible for “reason” to supply the absolute principles of morality?
Standard Form ► 1. State your position ► 2. 1 st Premise (Fact 1: State fact and source) ► 3. 2 nd Premise (Fact 2: State fact and source) ► 4. 3 rd Premise.
LO: I will know about the hypothetical and categorical imperatives Hmk: Part a essay question ‘Give an account of Kant’s theory of ethics’ (25)
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
KANTIAN ETHICS Immanuel Kant ( ).
Immanuel Kant and the Enlightenment Immanuel Kant: German ( ) Enlightenment: 1700's (18th Century) Applies the new rational scientific method of.
Lecture 13 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
What is the opposite of Utilitarianism? We are still addressing the question of HOW we should be moral.
EECS 690 January 27, Deontology Typically, when anyone talks about Deontology, they mean to talk about Immanuel Kant. Kant is THE deontologist.
“The only thing that can be good, without qualification, is an action performed solely because it is our duty.” (Boatright (2004) p52)
Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.
What is the right thing to do?
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant
Kant’s theory of imperatives
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
The Categorical Imperative
“DUTY” ETHICS IMMANUEL KANT
Kant and Kantian Ethics:
Deontology Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Kantian Ethics.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
The Categorical Imperative
Deontology Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology.
History of Philosophy Lecture 17 Immanuel Kant’ Ethics
Presentation transcript:

Ethical Theories High-level account of how questions about morality should be addressed. Similar to engineering models? V=IR: a tool to solve many engineering problems. V=IR is not a law of nature; neither is F=ma: think about scale Ethical theories also do not describe the world – only some good answers to moral dilemmas  Ethical problems are not clear and people and society are unpredictable and messy Many ethical theories to choose from

Some traditional ethical theories Consequentialist: Evaluate acts, policies and institutions according to consequences. Right action is the one that has the best consequences  Utilitarianism: Only happiness is good in itself. Everything else is a means to happiness. (pain, suffering == - happiness) An act is right if it tends to increase the sum of human happiness; wrong if reverse. (Or RULE utilitarianism … ) Most decision-making strategies and models originate with utilitarianism: cost-benefit analysis, game theory, risk-benefit analysis  What is the chief problem these theories face? Various forms: ethical egotism, nationalism, (altruism? – really maximizes total happiness? Gift of the Magi (O. Henry))

Other traditional ethical theories Deontological theories  Certain actions are right or wrong regardless of consequences Immanuel Kant: Follow universal principles that require respect for persons – absolute value of persons. Categorical Imperative: (for example, truth telling) Act only according to that maxim that you could at the same time will to become a universal law Kant formulated DUTY ethics – saying how persons have the DUTY to act Another deontological theory: Theory of rights (of persons). E.g. right to life, right of choice. John Locke: natural rights – life, liberty, property. We exchange our natural state of anarchy for the liberty and security of the society – social contract.

Kant’s Perfect and Imperfect Duties When violating a “maxim” would, under the Categorical Imperative (first form): lead to a logical contradiction (if universalized), we have a “perfect duty” not to violate the maxim (example – universalizing stealing  meaninglessness of “property”) lead to an undesirable condition (if universalized), we have an “imperfect duty” not to violate the maxim (example – universalizing not helping others except for one’s own good  wouldn’t ever want to ask anyone for help one couldn’t then repay, so we SHOULD help others without regard for our own repayment, when possible)

A Second Form of Kant’s Categorical Imperative "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means" -- Kant, Immanuel; trans. Ellington, J.W. [1785] (1993), p.36

KCI – Third Formulation "Therefore, every rational being must so act as if he were through his maxim always a legislating member in the universal kingdom of ends." Ibid., p. 43