Clinical trials methodology group Simon Gates 9 February 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kirsty McCormack.
Advertisements

Appraisal of an RCT using a critical appraisal checklist
Introduction to the unit and mixed methods approaches to research Kerry Hood.
Protocol Development.
Early stages of research programmes: pilot and feasibility studies From Scoping to Activity Rehabilitation Conference A Byrne.
Evidence Based Practice: I ntervention for people with lower limb amputations Karl Schurr March 2007.
Overview of N-of-1 study suite – lessons learned from three aggregated N-of-1 trials. Geoff Mitchell*, Jane Nikles, Sue-Ann Carmont, Janet Hardy, Phillip.
Systematic Review of Literature Part XIX Analyzing and Presenting Results.
Doug Altman Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK
‘Cohort multiple RCT’ design workshop Clare Relton & Jon Nicholl School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) Faculty of Medicine University of Sheffield.
Succesful implementation of a multi- modal pressure ulcer prevention program in nursing homes Eva, Nuria, Luk, Theo, Cecile, Niina, Vivi, Antoinette.
Recruitment to Trials. Background Recruitment of participants is a VERY important issue. The general consensus is that most trials under recuit.
The role of economic modelling – a brief introduction Francis Ruiz NICE International © NICE 2014.
Evidence-Based Medicine Week 3 - Prognosis Department of Medicine - Residency Training Program Tuesdays, 9:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m., UW Health Sciences Library.
Economic Analysis and Management Todd Wagner, PhD.
Re-randomisation in trials Simon Gates 25 April 2007.
1Carl-Fredrik Burman, 11 Nov 2008 RSS / MRC / NIHR HTA Futility Meeting Futility stopping Carl-Fredrik Burman, PhD Statistical Science Director AstraZeneca.
Pre-randomisation consent (Zelen’s method)
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Cohort Studies Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff, Research Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
Quantitative Research
Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.
Discussion Gitanjali Batmanabane MD PhD. Do you look like this?
School Counselors Doing Action Research Jay Carey and Carey Dimmitt Center for School Counseling Outcome Research UMass Amherst CT Guidance Leaders March.
Intervention Studies Principles of Epidemiology Lecture 10 Dona Schneider, PhD, MPH, FACE.
18 th to 21 st June 2013 Primary Care Sciences Keele University RUNNING RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS For further enquiries contact Debbie Cooke Tel: +44(0)1782.
Objectives: To optimize the delivery of EN by implementing the PEP uP protocol in sites across North America. We provide practitioners the opportunity.
What is a research proposal? Plan to test hypothesis using research Write research Proposal (plan) Carry out research Apply for grant/ethics Clinical.
Background to Adaptive Design Nigel Stallard Professor of Medical Statistics Director of Health Sciences Research Institute Warwick Medical School
How to write a research protocol Corlia van Vuuren February 2011.
THE COCHRANE LIBRARY ON WILEY INTERSCIENCE. Presentation Agenda Brief introduction of Evidence-Based Medicine theories The Cochrane Collaboration – origins,
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Introduction to Evaluation Odette Parry & Sally-Ann Baker
EBC course 10 April 2003 Critical Appraisal of the Clinical Literature: The Big Picture Cynthia R. Long, PhD Associate Professor Palmer Center for Chiropractic.
Plymouth Health Community NICE Guidance Implementation Group Workshop Two: Debriding agents and specialist wound care clinics. Pressure ulcer risk assessment.
Title of Scholar Project Month day, year Presenter: Supervisor(s): Critical Care Western.
Clinical Writing for Interventional Cardiologists.
FOLLOW-UP Simon Gates 13 April Contents Definition of follow-up Problems with follow-up Power Bias How much loss is acceptable? Prevention of losses.
2nd Concertation Meeting Brussels, September 8, 2011 Reinhard Prior, Scientific Coordinator, HIM Evidence in telemedicine: a literature review.
Hayat Mushcab, B.Sc. M.Sc. W. George Kernohan, PhD Jonathan Wallace B.A., M.Sc. Roy Harper, M.D, and Suzanne Martin, PhD THE JOURNEY TOWARDS SUCCESSFUL.
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
WHO GUIDANCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EVIDENCE-BASED VACCINE RELATED RECOMMENDATIONS August 2011.
Comparative Effectiveness Research : Rethinking Therapeutic Evaluation in Chronic Diseases Ph Ravaud.
11/8/ Kirsten Bennett MS RD LD November 8, 2013 Asthma Educator Institute Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Multifaceted intervention to improve health worker adherence to Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines in Benin* * Published in American.
PTP 661 EVIDENCE ABOUT INTERVENTIONS CRITICALLY APPRAISE THE QUALITY AND APPLICABILITY OF AN INTERVENTION RESEARCH STUDY Min Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Can patients be too mild, too severe or too old for thrombolysis? Professor Peter Sandercock University of Edinburgh ESC Hamburg 27 th May 2011 Disclosures.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Ethical and practical challenges of organising clinical trials in small populations.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when and how to do them Andrew Smith Royal Lancaster Infirmary 18 May 2015.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
HTA Efficient Study Designs Peter Davidson Head of HTA at NETSCC.
Who is involved in making NICE guidance recommendations and what evidence do they look at? Jane Cowl, Senior Public Involvement Adviser Tommy Wilkinson,
Why are systematic reviews important? Iain Chalmers Editor, James Lind Library Cochrane Workshop Independent University, Bangladesh.
Trouble? Can’t type: F11 Can’t hear & speakers okay or can’t see slide? Cntrl R or Go out & come back in 1 Sridhar Rajappan.
Is a meta-analysis right for me? Jaime Peters June 2014.
Focus on health and care of mothers and infants ChiMat conference, 2009 Professor Mary Renfrew Mother and Infant Research Unit.
LifeCIT Development and pilot evaluation of a web-supported programme of Constraint Induced Therapy following stroke (LifeCIT) Meagher C 1, Conlon A 2,
R ESEARCH PLANNING. Research planning is a process through which we transform our ideas into a well-planned, ethical and realistic research project.
Evidence-Based Mental Health PSYC 377. Structure of the Presentation 1. Describe EBP issues 2. Categorize EBP issues 3. Assess the quality of ‘evidence’
Developing a proposal Dónal O’Mathúna, PhD Senior Lecturer in Ethics, Decision-Making & Evidence
Kris McGill, Jon Godwin, Catherine Sackley, Marian C Brady
Writing research and grant applications – from idea to submission
Randomized Trials: A Brief Overview
Problem & Purpose Statements
Strategies to incorporate pharmacoeconomics into pharmacotherapy
Evidence Based Practice: Intervention for people with lower limb amputations Karl Schurr March 2007.
Study within a Trial (SWAT) to increase the evidence for trial recruitment and retention in decision making -Shaun Treweek From the UK Trial Managers.
How to apply successfully to the NIHR HTA Board?
Presentation transcript:

Clinical trials methodology group Simon Gates 9 February 2006

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Agenda Presentation Discussion –Format of meetings –Important issues in trials methodology –Actions for next meeting (if any) AOB Finish at 11am

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Contents RCT methodology –What is included? –Why is it important? –What are the major issues? Clinical Trials Methodology Group –What is it for? –How will it operate?

RCT methodology

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation What might be included All aspects, including (not a complete list): Trial design Obtaining funding Ethics and R&D approvals Recruitment of clinicians and patients Informed consent Follow-up Outcome measurement Statistical methods Methods for economic evaluations Dissemination and impact of results on clinical practice.

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Why is methodology important? Should use the best methods (always room for improvement) Efficiency: trials need to be conducted by the most cost-effective methods

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Why is methodology important? Thousands of trials need to be conducted Increasing pressure on limited funding Improving efficiency will enable more trials to be conducted Good for triallists Good for patients

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Why is methodology important? Lots of problems occur during the conduct of RCTs Often we do not have evidence about how to solve them We should approach these problems in the same way as clinical questions Evidence-based approach

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Why is methodology important? Should aim to use high quality research evidence to solve problems in RCT conduct Where possible, we need randomised evidence and systematic reviews

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Major methodological issues Recruitment of patients Retention of patients Recruitment and retention of clinicians

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Recruitment of patients Poor recruitment very common Take longer than expected or fail to reach planned sample size Results delayed, more expensive, less useful Unlikely to get easier (in UK at least)

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Recruitment of patients In ISIS-2 (streptokinase and aspirin for acute MI), estimated that delays to recruitment resulted in up to 10,000 deaths. Collins R, Doll R, Peto R. Ethics in clinical trials. In: Williams CJ, editor(s). Introducing New Treatments For Cancer: Practical, Ethical and Legal Problems. Chichester: John Wiley, 1992:49-56.

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Recruitment of patients Not clear what is the best strategy when faced with poor recruitment Many possible interventions but little evidence about their effectiveness Likely that different strategies are needed in different situations

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Recruitment of patients Cochrane methodology review (Mapstone et al 2002) 15 studies, all interventions aimed at patients Some non-randomised studies or studies of “mock trials” RCTs of other interventions needed

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Retention of patients Losses to follow up always cause a problem Potentially introduce bias Best to prevent by achieving high follow-up rates Difficult in some populations Best ways to achieve this unknown

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Recruitment & retention of clinicians May have major impact on recruitment of patients Clinicians may be reluctant to participate if they perceive it will involve extra work Or they may agree to participate but fail to recruit any patients

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Recruitment & retention of clinicians Protocol for Cochrane methodology review (Rendell et al 2005) No randomised studies known

Clinical trials methodology group

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation What is this group for? Discussion: Triallists who have particular problems – opportunity to discuss and get input from colleagues Research: identify, design and conduct research projects Contribute to setting the research agenda for RCT methodology and building up the literature

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation What research might we do? RCTs of interventions to improve trial conduct Systematic reviews (e.g. Cochrane methodology reviews) Observational studies Surveys e.g. of triallists or published literature Testing of methods and recommendations for best practice Re-analysis of trial data sets

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Methodological research Potentially very influential Assmann et al. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials Lancet 355 (9209): Times Cited: 131 Hollis S, Campbell F What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 319 (7211): 670+ Times Cited: 174

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation How will it work Meetings Research projects Website

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Meetings Opportunity to discuss particular issues At present scheduled for about once every 2 months Each meeting to have a specific topic

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Meetings - format Short presentation outlining the issues Discussion Action plan Feedback/results from ongoing projects

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Research projects Groups of interested people to develop and run research projects Seek funding if necessary Report back to the whole group

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Website Link from Clinical Trials Unit website Notes and slides from meetings Information and documents for future meetings Information about ongoing projects Anything else of interest – ideas?

Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation Tasks Short paragraph about any ongoing trials methodology projects Ideas for topics for next meetings and volunteers to present