In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.
Advertisements

J. T. Gosling Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics
Electron Heating Michael Shay Department of Physics and Astronomy
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Comparing the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at Mercury and Saturn A. Masters Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration.
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland Magnetic Reconnection Theory 2004 Newton Institute.
Auxiliary slides. ISEE-1 ISEE-2 ISEE-1 B Locus of  = 90 degree pitch angles Will plot as a sinusoid on a latitude/longitude projection of the unit.
Five Spacecraft Observations of Oppositely Directed Exhaust Jets from a Magnetic Reconnection X-line Extending > 4.3 x 10 6 km in the Solar Wind Gosling.
Studying Solar Wind Magnetic Reconnection Events using the Cluster 4-point Measurement Capability A.C. Foster 1, C.J. Owen 1, A.N. Fazakerley 1, C. Forsyth.
The Structure of the Parallel Electric Field and Particle Acceleration During Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake M.Swisdak M. Shay M. Hesse C. Cattell University.
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling Magnetic reconnection In most solar system environments magnetic fields are “frozen” to the plasma - different plasmas.
J. T. Gosling LASP / University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado, USA
Solar Flare Particle Heating via low-beta Reconnection Dietmar Krauss-Varban & Brian T. Welsch Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley Reconnection Workshop.
OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California,
Magnetic Reconnection in the Solar Wind Gosling, Phan, et al.
Competing X-lines During Magnetic Reconnection. OUTLINE o What is magnetic reconnection? o Why should we study it? o Ideal MHD vs. Resistive MHD o Basic.
A Fermi Model for the Production of Energetic Electrons during Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake H. Che M. Swisdak M. A. Shay University of Maryland NRL.
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
Magnetic Reconnection in Multi-Fluid Plasmas Michael Shay – Univ. of Maryland.
A Model for Emission from Microquasar Jets: Consequences of a Single Acceleration Episode We present a new model of emission from jets in Microquasars,
Location of Magnetopause Reconnection S M Petrinec 1, S A Fuselier 1, K J Trattner 1, and J Berchem 2 1 Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo.
Kinetic Modeling of Magnetic Reconnection in Space and Astrophysical Systems J. F. Drake University of Maryland Large Scale Computation in Astrophysics.
Multiwavelength observations of a partially occulted solar flare Laura Bone, John C.Brown, Lyndsay Fletcher.
Studying Solar Wind Magnetic Reconnection Events using Cluster. A.C. Foster 1, C.J. Owen 1, A.N. Fazakerley 1, I. J. Rae 1, C. Forsyth 1, E. Lucek 2, H.
Structure and Detection of Rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz Vortices in the Tail Flank of the Magnetosphere H. Hasegawa, M. Fujimoto, T. K. M. Nakamura, K. Takagi.
Chromospheric Magnetic Reconnection from an Observer’s Point of View Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea.
1 Cambridge 2004 Wolfgang Baumjohann IWF/ÖAW Graz, Austria With help from: R. Nakamura, A. Runov, Y. Asano & V.A. Sergeev Magnetotail Transport and Substorms.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling processes reflected in
14 May JIM M. RAINES University of Michigan DANIEL J. GERSHMAN, THOMAS H. ZURBUCHEN, JAMES A. SLAVIN, HAJE KORTH, and BRIAN J. ANDERSON Magnetospheric.
Small Scale Magnetic Reconnection in the Solar Wind. A.C. Foster 1, C.J. Owen 1, A.N. Fazakerley 1, I. J. Rae 1, C. Forsyth 1, E. Lucek 2, H. Rème 3 1.UCL,
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
Cold plasma: a previously hidden solar system particle population Mats André and Chris Cully Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala.
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Chapman Conference “Fundamental Properties and Processes of Magnetotails” 12 March 2013, Tuesday, p.m. Structure of Magnetic Reconnection in the.
Ion pickup and acceration in magnetic reconnection exhausts J. F. Drake University of Maryland M. Swisdak University of Maryland T. Phan UC Berkeley E.
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland presented in honor of Professor Eric Priest September 8, 2003.
17th Cluster Workshop May 2009 R. Maggiolo 1, M. Echim 1,2, M. Roth 1, J. De Keyser 1 1 BIRA-IASB Brussels, Belgium 2 ISS Bucharest, Romania Quasi-stationary.
Authors: S. Beyene1, C. J. Owen1, A. P. Walsh1, A. N. Fazakerley1, E
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
Observation of high kinetic energy density jets in the Earth’s magnetosheath E. Amata 1, S. P. Savin 2, R. Treuman 3, G. Consolini 1, D. Ambrosino, M.F.
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas; a Celestial Phenomenon in the Laboratory J Egedal, W Fox, N Katz, A Le, M Porkolab, MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA.
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
The Geomagnetic Cusps: Magnetic Topology and Physical Processes Antonius Otto Thanks to: Eric Adamson, Katariina Nykyri, Julia Pilchowski, Jason McDonald.
SEPT/STEREO Observations of Upstream Particle Events: Almost Monoenergetic Ion Beams A. Klassen, R. Gomez-Herrero, R. Mueller-Mellin and SEPT Team, G.
二维电磁模型 基本方程与无量纲化 基本方程. 无量纲化 方程化为 二维时的方程 时间上利用蛙跳格式 网格划分.
What is the Origin of the Frequently Observed v -5 Suprathermal Charged-Particle Spectrum? J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona Presented at SHINE, Zermatt,
Magnetotail Reconnection T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology Harry Petschek Symposium on Magnetic Reconnection March 22, 2006 Wednesday 12:00 – 12:30.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Chapman Conference “Fundamental Properties and Processes of Magnetotails” 12 March 2013, Tuesday, p.m. Structure of Magnetic Reconnection in the.
This work was supported by NASA grants: Wind grant NNX13AP39G and Cluster grant NNX11AH03G. Motivating Questions Observational Study of Ion Diffusion Region.
Magnetic reconnection present and future of in situ observations Andris Vaivads Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala Workshop, Magnetic reconnection.
Cluster observation of electron acceleration by ULF Alfvén waves
1. What controls the occurrence of reconnection. 2
NASA’s MMS Uncovers Dance of Electrons in Space
Characterization of Field Line Topologies Near the Magnetopause Using Electron Pitch Angle Measurements D. S. Payne1, M. Argall1, R. Torbert1, I. Dors1,
Progress Toward Measurements of Suprathermal Proton Seed Particle Populations J. Raymond, J. Kohl, A. Panasyuk, L. Gardner, and S. Cranmer Harvard-Smithsonian.
THEMIS multi-spacecraft observations of a 3D magnetic
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Series of high-frequency slowly drifting structure mapping the magnetic field reconnection M. Karlicky, A&A, 2004, 417,325.
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
THEMIS Dayside Lessons learned from the coast phase and the 1st dayside season Current plans for the 2nd dayside season and the extended phases.
Marit Øieroset UC Berkeley
Evidence for magnetic reconnection in the high corona
Presentation transcript:

In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive) versus quasi-steady reconnection b.Conditions for the onset of reconnection c.Particle energization d.Extent of X-line

- Reconnection occurs at the dayside magnetopause and in the magnetotail - The properties of reconnection are vastly different in the two regions - Parameter regime: B~ G, Density~ 1-10 cm -3, Energy~ keV jet Locations of reconnection in the magnetosphere t1t1 t2t2 t3t3 Dungey [1961]

In-situ measurements of B, E, and particle distributions (Density, T, V) Advantages with in-situ observations: - Conclusive evidence for reconnection - Detailed properties of reconnection - Quantitative comparisons with theory Disadvantage: Global context and consequences often not known In-situ observations jet

Outline 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive) versus quasi-steady reconnection b.Conditions for the onset of reconnection c.Particle energization d.Extent of X-line

1. Signatures of reconnection Diffusion region jet I. Exhaust (outflow region): > 99% of reconnection encounters - Ion (Alfvenic) jets: most basic and universal signature II. Diffusion regions: Rare encounters - Ions and electrons decoupled from the magnetic field inflow t1t1 t2t2 t3t3 jet 50 km

Reconnection signature: Alfvenic outflow jets B LMN (nT) |B||B| VpVp (km/s) NpNp (cm -3 ) TpTp ( eV ) predicted Diffusion region jet spacecraft  V predicted = ±  B/(μ 0 ρ 1 ) 1/2 [Paschmann et al., Nature, 1979] density compression heating T p|| TpTp |B| ↓ BLBL UT

Geotail and Equator-S detections of bi-directional reconnection jets [Phan et al., Nature, 2000]

Outline 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive) versus quasi-steady reconnection b.Conditions for the onset of reconnection c.Particle energization d.Extent of X-line

Dayside Magnetopause: - Can be quasi-steady - Maintain thin (ion skin depth) current sheet due to constant solar wind compression Magnetotail: - Always bursty: Storing and releasing magnetic energy (similar to solar flares) - Generally thick current sheet (of many ion skin depths thick) - Requires accumulation of magnetic flux to compress current sheet Bursty (Explosive) versus Quasi-Steady Reconnection Thin current sheet Usually thick current sheet (no reconnection)

Magnetotail: Bursty reconnection Vx (km/s) Reconnection jets

Outline 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive) versus quasi-steady reconnection b.Conditions for the onset of reconnection c.Particle energization d.Extent of X-line

Conditions for the onset of Reconnection Thin current sheet (~ 1 ion skin depth) Reconnection occurrence depends also on plasma  and magnetic shear Reconnection jet not always seen at the magnetopause => Thin current sheet is a necessary but not sufficient condition for reconnection Paschmann [1996] found that reconnection events tend to occur for low 

Reconnection occurrence dependence on  and magnetic shear in asymmetric reconnection [Swisdak et al., ApJ. 2003, 2010] Magnetic Shear  (degrees)  < 2 tan(  /2) (L/ i ) density gradient scale reconnection no reconnection L = i Physics: Diamagnetic drift of X-line prevents reconnection if drift speed > V A Diffusion region Introduction L        

Occurrence of solar wind reconnection vs.  and magnetic shear Wind 197 reconnection events Phan et al. [ApJL, 2010] - At  reconnection can occur for magnetic shear down to 10 o - At  reconnection requires magnetic shear >100 o Diffusion region L    

(Collisionless) Reconnection requires: Thin current sheet (~ 1 ion skin depth) Satisfies  and magnetic shear condition: - Low  allows low magnetic shear - High  requires large magnetic shear Tangential velocity shear across the current sheet < V A Other conditions? With all these strict conditions, triggering reconnection is not easy !

Outline 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive) versus quasi-steady reconnection b.Conditions for the onset of reconnection c.Particle energization d.Extent of X-line

Particle Energization by Reconnection (mechanisms still not well understood) Diffusion region jet Magnetic energy => Particle energy Alfvenic ion jet thermal heating non-thermal heating t1t1 t2t2 t3t3 jet inflow 400 km/s = 1 keVup to 300 keV electrons

f (electrons) (s 3 m -3 ) V X (km s -1 ) Maxwellian f E -k near diffusion region center k=4.8 outflow k=5.3 Energy densities near X-line: - Ion jet: 95% - Thermal ions+electrons: 4% - Electron power law tail: 1% [Øieroset et al., Nature, 2001] [Øieroset et al., PRL, 2002] An example of electron acceleration to 300 keV Wind

Betatron and Fermi accelerations far downstream of the reconnection site In flow breaking region: substantial energy density in the power law tail Conclusions: - Electrons are accelerated to hundreds of keV near the X-line, but the energy density of the energetic electron population is low compared to the ion jet - However, additional energization occurs at flow breaking Hara and Nishida [1981]

Outline 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive) versus quasi-steady reconnection b.Conditions for the onset of reconnection c.Particle energization d.Extent of X-line

How extended is the reconnection X-line?

Extremely extended Extremely extended ( i ) X-lines in Solar Wind X-line up to 600 R E (10 5 i ) Phan et al. [Nature, 2006]: 390 Earth radii Gosling et al. [GRL, 2008]: 600 R E Stereo-A Stereo-B

All 3 spacecraft encountered the same solar wind current sheetAll 3 spacecraft encountered the same solar wind current sheet All 3 spacecraft detected reconnection jets in the current sheetAll 3 spacecraft detected reconnection jets in the current sheet To Sun ACE ClusterWind 220 R E 331 R E current sheet The 390 R E (3x10 4 i ) X-line event

Summary 1. X-line can be extremely extended (> 10 5 ion skin depths) 2. Both bursty and quasi-steady behaviors have been seen - Quasi-steady requires maintaining thin current sheet. 3. Not easy to trigger reconnection in current sheets. Requirements: - Thin (ion skin depth scale) current sheet - Low  (<1) allows strong guide field reconnection. High  reconnection requires large magnetic shear (small guide field). 4. Reconnection can accelerate electrons to non-thermal energies, but the additional obstacle downstream helps energize electrons further.

Pitch angle spectrum near diffusion region center Counter-streaming at low energies Isotropic at higher energies ( > 6 keV)

Interpenetrating ion beams as further evidence for reconnection left right Inside Gosling et al. [2005] Diffusion region spacecraft 2 V A left rightInside