Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Advertisements

Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Reflection Seismic Processing
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Introduction to GeoProbe
Processing: zero-offset gathers
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Edge diffraction REFLECTED UNDISTURBED Ultra sound.
Seismic Reflection Processing/Velocity Analysis of SAGE 2007 Data Andrew Steen Team Members; Stan, Tim, Josh, Andrew.
Fundamentals Introduction Seismic waves: Propagation Velocity and Amplitudes Seismogram Measurement systems Sources, receivers, Acquisition strategies.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Field layouts  Common-offset & Zero-offset  Common-midpoint method  Up-dip and down-dip shooting  Spread types  Singlefold / Multifold recording 
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
Reflection Field Methods
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 Quality Factor Inversion from Prestack CMP data using EPIF Matching Jing Zhao, Jinghuai Gao Institute of Wave and Information,
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Stacking  Statics  Residual statics in combination with the velocity analysis  Muting  Approximated zero offset section.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
Deconvolution Bryce Hutchinson Sumit Verma Objectives: -Understand the difference between exponential and surface consistent gain -Identify power line.
Fundamentals Introduction Seismic waves: Propagation Velocity and Amplitudes Seismogram Measurement systems Sources, receivers, Acquisition strategies.
Topographic Phase Shift with Applications to Migration and Multiple Prediction Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 18 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Wed 20 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Reflection Data Processing Step.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
SAMPLE IMAGE December 10th 2007 Software Product Management Massy 1 TIKIM “Kirchhoff pre-stack time migration” Overview (Jean-Claude LANCELOT) Meeting.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Dipping layer reflection events and the common midpoint gather
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
T 2 = T X 2 /V 2. It is a hyperbola with apex at X = 0 and T 0 = 2H/V. – –V and H are the layer velocity and thickness. T 2 -X 2 plot is a straight.
Reflection seismograms
Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging References: J.M. Reynolds, An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics, John Wiley & Sons,
1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
. Lakeside Drive and Manzanita Lane to the north corner of Jasper Lane and Manzanita Lane.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 10 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d Dix Equations for multiple layers:
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Efficient modeling and imaging of pegleg multiples Morgan Brown and Antoine Guitton Stanford University, Department of Geophysics Multiples can be bad…
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Marine Reflection Seismology - Geometry
INTRODUCTION STRF: 50m reflection line with dx=1.0m
Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
3D Seismic Processing Eric Verschuur AES 1530.
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
Dipping layer reflection events and the common midpoint gather
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Discussion of problems & Common midpoint gathers
Normal Incidence (coincident source-receiver) Ray-Tracing
Presentation transcript:

Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction Stacking Migration Measurements Navigation Printing/storage CMP-Sorting Prestack Poststack Post-processing Pre-Processing Basic scheme of the seismic data processing

DMO (Dip move-out) A seismic processing operation to correct for the fact that, for dipping reflections, the traces of a CMP gather do not involve a common reflection point. DMO effectively corrects for the reflection-point smear that results when reflectors dip. Events with various dips stack with the same velocity after DMO. (DMO can be performed in a number of ways) Sheriff, 1991

Horizontal Reflector CMP = CDP CMP  CDP Dipping Reflector CMP = common mid point CDP = common depth point Dip move out (DMO)

Loci of reflection points Zero offset: coincident Source (S) and geophone (G) Common offset: offset between Source (S) and geophone (G) Show possible reflection points for one particular traveltime

DMO correction NMO: coordinate transformation from A (y n,t) to B (y n, t n ) DMO: coordinate transformation from B (y n,t n ) to C (y 0 -  0 ) Zero-offset migration: coordinate transformation from C (y 0 -  0 ) to D (y m, 

Dip Move out (DMO)

Marine line over a salt structure Cases of conflicting dip Analysis of data without DMO correction Analysis of data with DMO correction (following pictures are obtained from Yilmaz, 2001)

Selected CMP gathers from a 2D marine dataset Yilmaz, 2001 NMODMONMO -1

Velocity spectrum Without DMO correction (smearing of data) With DMO correction Yilmaz, 2001

Close-up view of the velocity spectrum and CMP gather Without DMO correction Yilmaz, 2001

Close-up view of the velocity spectrum and CMP gather With DMO correction Yilmaz, 2001

Velocity field used to stack the CMP gathers Without DMO correctionWith DMO correction Yilmaz, 2001 With DMO: less smearing: more detailed velocity field

NMO correction of DMO corrected gathers Without lateral varying and with lateral varying velocity Yilmaz, 2001

Field example of DMO correction NMO Stacking Migration DMONMO -1 NMO CMP stack DMO stack Migrated CMP stackMigrated DMO stack

CMP stack and DMO stack Yilmaz, 2001 Amplitudes of reflections off the flanks of the salt have similar amplitude as flat events

Comparison between Migration of CMP stack and DMO stack Yilmaz, 2001 Amplitudes of reflections off the flanks of the salt have higher amplitude

Time migration of CMP and DMO stack Yilmaz, 2001