April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer1 DESY-PROJECT IceCube Digital Optical Module Production.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Baseline Review February 10-12, 2004 Optical Module Production Phil Robl Physical Sciences Laboratory.
Advertisements

The Multi-PMT Optical Module P.Kooijman, University of Amsterdam University of Utrecht Nikhef.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
Kay Graf Physics Institute 1 University of Erlangen ARENA 2006 University of Northumbria June 28 – 30, 2006 Integration of Acoustic Neutrino Detection.
GoldenDOMs Status and analysis plan Shigeru Yoshida (for Hiroko M) Dept. of Physics, Chiba University.
April 26, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer IceCube Spring Meeting 1 IceCube Digital Optical Module Production R. Nahnhauer DESY.
Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
IceCube 1400 m 2400 m AMANDA South Pole IceTop Skiway 80 Strings 4800 PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3 (1 Gt) IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of.
Zurich PhD seminar, August Arno Gadola A new camera concept for Cherenkov telescopes.
Prototype string for a km3 Baikal neutrino telescope Roma International Conference on Astroparticle Physics V.Aynutdinov, INR RAS for the Baikal Collaboration.
Sebastian Böser Acoustic test setup at south pole IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Berkeley, March 2005.
PD Kobe Univ. 06/29/2007 General performance of the IceCube detector and the calibration results I am Mina Inaba from Chiba university. I will.
IceCube System Testing
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
November 24, 2004 Rolf Nahnhauer1 PROJECT : IceCube Digital Optical Module Production at DESY Zeuthen.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
IceTop Tank Calibration Abstract This report outlines the preliminary method developed to calibrate IceTop tanks using through going single muon signals.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
IceCube DAQ Mtg. 10,28-30 IceCube DAQ: “DOM MB to Event Builder”
Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
SINP MSU, July 7, 2012 I.Belolaptikov behalf BAIKAL collaboration.
Data acquisition system for the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Denis Kuleshov Valday, February 3, 2015.
AMANDA and IceCube neutrino telescopes at the South Pole Per Olof Hulth Stockholm University.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
1 N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Operation and performance of the NESTOR test detector.
String-18 New-DAQ Commissioning Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 2002.
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin UW, June 3, 2010 The DM-Ice Test Detector Detector Concept Mechanical Assembly Vessel Options Logistics Considerations.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
Studies on PINGU’s Sensitivity to the Neutrino mass Hierarchy P. Berghaus, H.P. Bretz, A. Groß, A. Kappes, J. Leute, S. Odrowski, E. Resconi, R. Shanidze.
October 20, 2008 Rolf Nahnhauer DESY-PROJECT IceCube Digital Optical Module Production.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review The IceTop component of IceCube Area--solid-angle ~ 1/3 km 2 sr (including angular dependence of EAS.
Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004.
Science Advisory Committee March 30, 2006 Jim Yeck IceCube Project Director IceCube Construction Progress.
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
Muon Tracker Responsibilities This Year South arm commissioning through this year’s run Analysis Software oversight and development North Arm station 2.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Software Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL Chuck McParland.
5 June 2002DAQ System Engineering Requirements 1 DAQ System Requirements DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review David Nygren.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Nov 30, 2003Tom Gaisser The IceTop component of IceCube Perspective from the South Pole.
DOM MB Test Results at LBNL Main Board Readiness Status Review LBNL, July 2003 Azriel Goldschmidt.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Plans to Test HBD Prototype in Run 6 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting March 8, 2006.
Calibration of Under Water Neutrino Telescope ANTARES Garabed HALLADJIAN October 15 th, 2008 GDR Neutrino, CPPM, Marseille.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
IceTop Design: 1 David Seckel – 3/11/2002 Berkeley, CA IceTop Overview David Seckel IceTop Group University of Delaware.
Status of NEWCHOD E.Guschin (INR), S.Kholodenko (IHEP), Yu.Kudenko (INR), I.Mannelli (Pisa), O.Mineev (INR), V.Obraztsov (IHEP), V.Semenov(IHEP), V.Sugonyaev.
Status and Perspectives of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration September.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin UW, June 3, 2010 The DM-Ice Test Detector Detector Concept Mechanical Assembly Vessel Options Logistics Considerations.
The prototype string for the km3 scale Baikal neutrino telescope VLVnT April 2008 Vladimir Aynutdinov, INR RAS for the Baikal Collaboration for.
Status of the Baikal-GVD experiment
completed in austral season South Pole completed in austral season.
IceCube System Testing
White Rabbit in KM3NeT Mieke Bouwhuis NIKHEF 9th White Rabbit Workshop
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
String-21 Flasher Analysis
BESIII EMC electronics
IceCube Construction and Analysis Report
MPPC for T2K Fine-Grained Detector
Nanobeacon: A low cost calibration instrument for KM3NeT
Presentation transcript:

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer1 DESY-PROJECT IceCube Digital Optical Module Production

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer2

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer3 IceCube Status April 2007

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer4 THE ICECUBE OBSERVATORY IceTop air shower array 80 pairs of ice Cherenkov tanks IceCube deep ice array 4800 optical modules on 80 strings instrumented volume : 1 km3 first string deployed : January 2005 ~ atm. per year

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer5 2005, 2006, 2007 Deployments AMANDA IceCube string deployed 12/05 – 01/ DOMs deployed to date Next year looking for 14 to 18 strings. Want to achieve steady state of >= 14 strings / season IceCube string deployed 01/05 IceCube string and IceTop station deployed 12/06 – 01/07 IceCube Lab commissioned = 22 strings to date

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer6 Hotwater drilling: Trend towards increasingly stable operation continued. Experienced crew IceCube Pole Season 2006/2007

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer7 IceCube lab commissioned, South Pole computing system (SPS), all racks and infrastructure installed, 64 bit implemented on SPS and SPTS, About 10 racks of computers and hubs. Working simulation, exp control, PnF IceCube Pole Season 2006/2007

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer8 IceCube Events Neutrino in IC 9Flasher Pulse in IC 22

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer9 IceTop: cosmic-ray physics IceCube: calibration, background tagging IceTop/In-ice coincident events

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer10 Atmospheric neutrinos in IC 9, 2006 John Pretz, Ph.D. thesis Ratio of data to simulation: R= (syst) (stat) given at cut strength upgoing muon events purity of neutrino sample > 95% First IceCube Results

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer11

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer12 PRODUCTION SCHEDULE Numbers from February 2004 slightly changing with time Baseline change: 80 strings  70 strings + 10 strings from contingency xxx

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer13

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer14

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer15 DOM Production DESY IntegrationStatus - PY 07 ( April 2008-March 2009) PYYear# DOMs ready 034/04-3/ /05-3/ /06-3/ /07-3/ /08-3/ ? DOM integration at DESY will finish 7/08 to 11/08 decision how many DOMs for how many strings have to be produced, will come in summer 2007

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer16 FUTURE PRODUCTION and TESTING

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer17 DOM Production and Testing at DESY

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer18 DOM PRODUCTION at DESY Production of up to 1300 Optical Modules until mid 2008 Production comprises: Gel mixing, filling and potting PMTs Collar mounting and assembly of electronics Sealing of DOMs at low pressure Harness DOM with suspension Finally pack DOMs and ship them to the pole

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer19 PROJEKT-ABLAUF

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer20 Dr. H. Waldmann 100% Dr. J. Bolmont ( postdoc) 65% xx S. Henze xxx J. Pieper S. Ladegast

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer21 OMP-Projekt Investitionen #OM

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer22 OMP-Projekt Personalbedarf Weeks kEuro Produktion Physiker Postdoc Ingenieure Techniker/Werkstaetten Produktion Physiker Postdoc Ingenieure Techniker/Werkstaetten

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer23 DOM TESTING Electronic and optical requirements Reboot- and communication over a wide temperature range from +20°C to -45°C Single photo electron detection Wide dynamic signal range – capable to handle large light pulses with up to several 1000 photo electrons per microsecond Time resolution better than 5ns for single photo electron pulses High voltage calibration of the PMT better than 5% Optical sensitivity within low variations for different DOMs Dark noise rates less than 1kHz in ice Mechanical requirements Vibration and pressure fluctuation during transport Rapid temperature variations from +20°C to -45°C Very high environment pressure up to 650 bar

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer24 DOM FINAL ACCEPTANCE TEST XY X + Y > 180 h A full set of different tests is performed for defined temperatures Test of the electronics (mainly running diagnostic programs, checking the hardware components) PMT high voltage calibration Rate monitoring while DOMs are illuminated with light of different wavelength Dark rate monitoring Data taking with a DAQ system similar to the final low level south pole DAQ (Linearity and time resolution tests) Timing scenario:

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer25 DARK FREEZER LAB Large cooling chamber (4 x 6 x 2 m) Temperature control with cooling aggregate and heaters Minimal temperature for test cycle is -45°C (in the US -55°C for IceTop DOMs) Optical fibers and mirror system installed on each test station DOMs sit on top of cylindric cans Cans are taped with aluminum foil to distribute the light DOMs are covered with black plastic bags to keep them as dark as possible for the measurements

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer26 TEST ENVIRONMENT SETUP Dark Freezer Lab (DFL) with 64 test stations Same DAQ and wiring as for the South Pole system Simulated cable length up to 3km Light is distributed equally to the DOM stations via optical fibers Time synchronization of multiple domhubs with a global GPS clock Light system allows event simulation Different light sources: Laser for time calibration, pulsed LED for linearity test, DC lamp with monochromator for optical sensitivity test

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer27 DFL STATION CALIBRATION Light yield differs for all stations There is a wavelength dependence of the optical system For studies of the optical sensitivity the stations have to be calibrated During test runs a well characterized monitor PMT takes direct signals from the light sources Together with the calibration information the relative optical sensitivity of the DOMs can be evaluated

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer28 ELECTRONIC TESTS A self test of the electronic components runs on the DOM  performed on bare mainboards before delivering  performed on integrated DOMs as functional test Reboot tests are performed during the complete test cycle DOMs are turned on and off more than 100 times over a test run in addition tests of software uploads are performed For the tests of the local coincidence chain the DOMs in the DFL are connected pairwise like on a real string

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer29 DOM CALIBRATION I ATWD Calibration : Reconstruction of PMT voltage waveform from ATWD data requires: Voltage calibration of ATWD Measurement of amplifier gain for ch0, ch1, and ch2 Frequency calibration of ATWD Baseline measurement Performed using the internal pulser and oscillator

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer30 DOM CALIBRATION II Dark noise events are used to record the charge spectrum of single photo electron events Calculation of the mean charge for different PMT high voltage settings reveals the gain Finally this results in a linear fit of the gain versus high voltage relation Working voltage yields gain = 10 7 Requirements: Peak to valley ratio > 2.5 Gain > 5  10 7 at 2000 V overall relative error < 5% Charge Spectrum of single photo electron events at 1400 V Gain versus voltage[V]

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer31 TIME SYNCHRONIZATION Each DOM runs with an individual clock A global time synchronization has to be performed regularly to match the DOM-time to a global time including signal run-time The RapCal method : Time stamped bipolar pulses are sent from the DOR card to the DOM and vice versa This gives a coarse time synchronization of the order of 50ns (local clock speed) In order to improve the time synchronization accuracy the bipolar pulses are fitted at arrival, giving an exact time e.g. for zero crossing of the waveform With that information the round trip time can be calculated and the accuracy of the time calibration is improved to better than 5ns

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer32 TIME RESOLUTION Pulse laser sends accurate signals (~75ps wide) to the DOMs A bare mainboard records the absolute pulse time (sync pulse) Analyze the distribution of time differences of DOM’s and sync pulse The width of the distribution gives an upper limit for the DOM time resolution Fraction of late pulses identify noise and time calibration problems An overall comparison of the signal time offsets of all DOMs give information about the time resolution stability Light and signal travel time

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer33 LINEARITY DOMs are illuminated with different light intensities using a pulsed LED with different power settings Different filters are brought into the light path to attenuate the amount of light Plots show the charge distribution for different filter settings (low to high attenuation) Plotting the mean charge versus light intensity gives the linearity characteristic for a DOM

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer34 OPTICAL SENSITIVITY Sensitivity of integrated DOMs differs due to transmission characteristic of glass (sphere,PMT), gel and the PMT quantum and collection efficiency Do rate measurements while the DOM is illuminated with light of varying wavelength Data has been already recorded, analysis is in preparation Measure behaviour of subsystems: e.g. transmission of gel samples with respect to air Allows relative comparison of different production batches

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer35 DARK NOISE Readout on board scaler – discriminator crossings of PMT signal Requirements: Mean noise rate < 3kHz No outliers within 5σ (Noise rate in ice is much lower (~700Hz)) Search for spikes in noise rate background – maybe an indication for problematic PMTs or HV generators Coincidence spikes are likely caused by some outside influences [Hz] Histogram of the dark noise rates for a single DOM

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer36 DOM - Passport Decision June 2005: use formalized DOM-passport for characterization and qualification of DOM’s (ready early 2006)

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer37 DOM-Production Year DOMs produced DOMs OK  final DOMs shipped only ~1% of DOMs are cannibalized – goal was 5% or better good components are used in next years production

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer DOM TESTING + USAGE timeloadgoodbadcomment FAT gel, 1 MB, 1 HV FAT gel, 1 MB FAT MB,3 FB,1 HV FAT use 5 CAEN HV locationnumberqualitypurpose Pole42gooddeploy DFL3goodstandard Madison8badCheck Dortmund1badHV-tests -6badcannibalize Production efficiency:  P 2004 = 75 % Wanted:  P = 95 %

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer DOM TESTING Timeloadgoodbad  FAT FAT FAT FAT FAT FAT *) in all cases +3 permanent DOM’s from FAT3 for comparison FAT5 FAT6 FAT7 FAT8 FAT9

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer DOM TESTING timeloadgoodbad  FAT FAT FAT FAT FAT FAT FAT FAT10 FAT11 FAT12 FAT13 FAT14 FAT15

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer DOM TESTING timeloadgoodbad  FAT FAT FAT FAT xx.yy34 FAT16FAT17 No dominant error source could be identified in FATs Different small problems appeared for all FATs

April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer42 Summary DOM first year mass production is running without problems Production team well trained Delivery of components mostly smooth Storage space sufficient but at the limit, many transports between Zeuthen and Wildau necessary Many small problems contribute to test failure rate Total failure rate after rework sufficiently small (better than expected) DESY well prepared for continuous mass production until autumn 2008