Beyond the DiVincenzo Criteria: Requirements and Desiderata for Fault-Tolerance Daniel Gottesman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey on the Bounds of the Threshold For Quantum Decoherence Chris Graves December 12, 2012.
Advertisements

The Threshold for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute.
Noise, Information Theory, and Entropy (cont.) CS414 – Spring 2007 By Karrie Karahalios, Roger Cheng, Brian Bailey.
D.J.C MacKay IEE Proceedings Communications, Vol. 152, No. 6, December 2005.
Sean Traber CS-147 Fall  7.9 RAID  RAID Level 0  RAID Level 1  RAID Level 2  RAID Level 3  RAID Level 4 
F AULT T OLERANT Q UANTUM C OMPUTATION December 21 st, 2009 Mirmojtaba Gharibi.
Quantum Error Correction Joshua Kretchmer Gautam Wilkins Eric Zhou.
A Universal Operator Theoretic Framework for Quantum Fault Tolerance Yaakov S. Weinstein MITRE Quantum Information Science Group MITRE Quantum Error Correction.
Quantum Error Correction SOURCES: Michele Mosca Daniel Gottesman Richard Spillman Andrew Landahl.
KEG PARTY!!!!!  Keg Party tomorrow night  Prof. Markov will give out extra credit to anyone who attends* *Note: This statement is a lie.
Chien Hsing James Wu David Gottesman Andrew Landahl.
ECE 497NC: Unconventional Computer Architecture Lecture 12: Quantum Computers II – Implementation Issues Nicholas Carter.
Quantum Error Correction and Fault Tolerance Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute.
Ion Trap Quantum Computer. Two Level Atom as a qubit Electron on lower orbit Electron on higher orbit.
Quantum Error Correction Michele Mosca. Quantum Error Correction: Bit Flip Errors l Suppose the environment will effect error (i.e. operation ) on our.
Overview Memory definitions Random Access Memory (RAM)
Quantum Computation and Error Correction Ali Soleimani.
Local Fault-tolerant Quantum Computation Krysta Svore Columbia University FTQC 29 August 2005 Collaborators: Barbara Terhal and David DiVincenzo, IBM quant-ph/
Error-correcting the IBM qubit error-correcting the IBM qubit panos aliferis IBM.
Quantum Computing Joseph Stelmach.
BB84 Quantum Key Distribution 1.Alice chooses (4+  )n random bitstrings a and b, 2.Alice encodes each bit a i as {|0>,|1>} if b i =0 and as {|+>,|->}
Memory Hierarchies for Quantum Data Dean Copsey, Mark Oskin, Frederic T. Chong, Isaac Chaung and Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar Presented by Greg Gerou.
Advanced Computer Architecture Lab University of Michigan Quantum Noise and Distance Patrick Cassleman More Quantum Noise and Distance Measures for Quantum.
Dogma and Heresy in Quantum Computing DoRon Motter February 18, 2002.
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation in Multi-Qubit Block Codes Todd A. Brun University of Southern California QEC 2014, Zurich, Switzerland With Ching-Yi.
In Search of a Magic Bottle of Error-Be-Gone Dave Bacon Caltech Department of Physics Institute for Quantum Information Decoherence errosol.
Shor’s Algorithm Osama Awwad Department of Computer Science Western Michigan University July 12, 2015.
Lo-Chau Quantum Key Distribution 1.Alice creates 2n EPR pairs in state each in state |  00 >, and picks a random 2n bitstring b, 2.Alice randomly selects.
A Fault-tolerant Architecture for Quantum Hamiltonian Simulation Guoming Wang Oleg Khainovski.
Hybrid quantum decoupling and error correction Leonid Pryadko University of California, Riverside Pinaki Sengupta(LANL) Greg Quiroz (USC) Sasha Korotkov.
Threshold for Life MIT Media Laboratory Prof. Isaac Chuang.
By: Mike Neumiller & Brian Yarbrough
Dynamic Presentation of Key Concepts Module 2 – Part 3 Meters Filename: DPKC_Mod02_Part03.ppt.
Liquid State NMR Quantum Computing
Quantum Error Correction Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute.
Requirements and Desiderata for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics Beyond the DiVincenzo Criteria.
Quantum Error Correction Jian-Wei Pan Lecture Note 9.
Paraty - II Quantum Information Workshop 11/09/2009 Fault-Tolerant Computing with Biased-Noise Superconducting Qubits Frederico Brito Collaborators: P.
Quantum Error Correction and Fault-Tolerance Todd A. Brun, Daniel A. Lidar, Ben Reichardt, Paolo Zanardi University of Southern California.
Quantum Computing David Dvorak CIS 492. Quantum Computing Overview What is it? How does it work? –The basics –Clarifying with examples Factoring Quantum.
Quantum Error Correction Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute.
Wireless Communication Technologies 1 Outline Introduction OFDM Basics Performance sensitivity for imperfect circuit Timing and.
Quantum computation: Why, what, and how I.Qubitology and quantum circuits II.Quantum algorithms III. Physical implementations Carlton M. Caves University.
An Introduction to Quantum Phenomena and their Effect on Computing Peter Shoemaker MSCS Candidate March 7 th, 2003.
Implementation of Quantum Computing Ethan Brown Devin Harper With emphasis on the Kane quantum computer.
Michael A. Nielsen Fault-tolerant quantum computation with cluster states School of Physical Sciences Chris Dawson (UQ) Henry Haselgrove (UQ) The University.
Introduction to quantum computation Collaboration: University of Illinois Angbo Fang, Gefei Qian (Phys) theoretical modeling John Tucker (ECE) design of.
CS3505: DATA LINK LAYER. data link layer  phys. layer subject to errors; not reliable; and only moves information as bits, which alone are not meaningful.
September 12, 2014 Martin Suchara Andrew Cross Jay Gambetta Supported by ARO W911NF S IMULATING AND C ORRECTING Q UBIT L EAKAGE.
Efficient measure of scalability Cecilia López, Benjamin Lévi, Joseph Emerson, David Cory Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering, Massachusetts Institute.
Quantum Computing: An Overview for non-specialists Mikio Nakahara Department of Physics & Research Centre for Quantum Computing Kinki University, Japan.
Unit 1 Lecture 4.
Programming Fundamentals. Topics to be covered Today Recursion Inline Functions Scope and Storage Class A simple class Constructor Destructor.
Turbo Codes. 2 A Need for Better Codes Designing a channel code is always a tradeoff between energy efficiency and bandwidth efficiency. Lower rate Codes.
Capabilities and limitations of quantum computers Michele Mosca 1 November 1999 ECC ’99.
1 Quantum Computation with coupled quantum dots. 2 Two sides of a coin Two different polarization of a photon Alignment of a nuclear spin in a uniform.
An Introduction to Quantum Computation Sandy Irani Department of Computer Science University of California, Irvine.
Suggestion for Optical Implementation of Hadamard Gate Amir Feizpour Physics Department Sharif University of Technology.
Quantum Bits (qubit) 1 qubit probabilistically represents 2 states
QUANTUM COMPUTING: Quantum computing is an attempt to unite Quantum mechanics and information science together to achieve next generation computation.
A low cost quantum factoring algorithm
Rank Aggregation.
Quantum Error Correction
Quantum Computing Dorca Lee.
RAID Redundant Array of Inexpensive (Independent) Disks
Improving Quantum Circuit Dependability
Probabilistic Databases
Quantum Computing Joseph Stelmach.
Quantum Error Correction
Determining the capacity of any quantum computer to perform a useful computation Joel Wallman Quantum Resource Estimation June 22, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Beyond the DiVincenzo Criteria: Requirements and Desiderata for Fault-Tolerance Daniel Gottesman

The DiVincenzo Criteria 1.A scalable physical system with well- characterized qubits. 2.The ability to initialize the state of the qubits to a simple fiducial state, such as. 3.Long relevant decoherence times, much longer than the gate operation time. 4.A “universal” set of quantum gates. 5.A qubit-specific measurement capability. 6.The ability to interconvert stationary and flying qubits. 7.The ability to faithfully transmit flying qubits between specified locations.

Requirements for Fault- Tolerance 1.Low gate error rates. 2.Ability to perform operations in parallel. 3.A way of remaining in, or returning to, the computational Hilbert space. 4.A source of fresh initialized qubits during the computation. 5.Benign error scaling: error rates that do not increase as the computer gets larger, and no large-scale correlated errors.

Additional Desiderata 1.Ability to perform gates between distant qubits. 2.Fast and reliable measurement and classical computation. 3.Little or no error correlation (unless the registers are linked by a gate). 4.Very low error rates. 5.High parallelism 6.An ample supply of extra qubits. 7.Even lower error rates.

Concatenated Codes Error correction is performed more frequently at lower levels of concatenation. Threshold for fault-tolerance proven using concatenated error-correcting codes. Effective error rate One qubit is encoded as n, which are encoded as n 2, …

Parallel Operations Error correction operations should be applied in parallel, so we can correct all errors before decoherence sets in. Fault-tolerant gates are easily parallelized. Threshold calculations assume full parallelism.

Erasure Errors For instance: loss of atoms Losing one is not too serious, but losing all is fatal. Erasures are a problem for: Quantum cellular automata Encoded universality

Fresh Ancilla States We need a constant source of fresh blank qubits to perform error correction. Thermodynamically, noise introduces entropy into the system. Error correction pumps entropy into cold ancilla states. a)Used ancillas become noisy. b)Ancillas warm up while they wait. Data Ancilla

Fresh Ancilla States Used ancillas can be replaced by new ancillas, but we must ensure ancillas do not wait too long: otherwise, there is an exponential loss of purity. In particular: It is not sufficient to initialize all qubits at the start of computation. For instance, this is a problem for liquid-state NMR.

Large-Scale Error Rates The error rate for a given qubit should not increase when we add more qubits to the computer. For instance: (Short-range crosstalk is OK, since it stops increasing after neighbors are added.) Long-range crosstalk (such as 1/r 2 Coulomb coupling)

Correlated Errors Small-scale correlations are acceptable: We can choose an error-correcting code which corrects multiple errors. Large-scale correlations are fatal: A large fraction of the computer fails with reasonable probability. Note: This type of error is rare in most systems.

Error Threshold The value of the error threshold depends on many factors. With current error-correction circuitry and all other desiderata: Provable threshold for combined gate and storage errors of about Actual threshold: perhaps With better circuits: maybe ? Without desiderata, threshold decreases.

The Meaning of Error Rates Gate errors: errors caused by an imperfect gate. Storage errors: errors that occur even when no gate is performed. Cited error rates are error probabilities; that is, the probability of projecting onto the correct state after one step. E.g.: Rotation by angle  has error probability  . Error rates are for a particular universal gate set.

Long-Range Gates Most calculated thresholds assume we can perform gates between qubits at arbitrary distances. (For instance, this might be possible if we can link to quantum communication lines.) If not, we need better error rates to get a threshold, since we use additional gates to move data around during error correction.

Long-Range Gates Storage threshold with local gates (using topological codes). Most frequent gates are between nearby qubits, so medium-range interactions may be sufficient. Threshold still exists with only local gates: We must arrange computer so error correction can be done with mostly local interactions. Optimal arrangements are not well-studied, but:

Fast Classical Processing Fast measurement and classical processing is very useful for error correction to compute the actual type and location of errors. We can implement the classical circuit with quantum gates if necessary, but this adds overhead: the classical circuit must be made classically fault-tolerant. Threshold unknown in this case.

Correlated Errors Redux Small-scale correlations are not fatal, but are still better avoided. We assume correlated errors can occur when a gate interacts two qubits. Any other source of multiple-qubit errors is an additional error rate not included in the threshold calculations. The worst case is correlated errors within a block of the code, but the system can be designed so that such qubits are well separated.

Not Dangerous: Coherent Errors Threshold calculations assume incoherent errors, so proof requires squaring threshold when coherent errors are dominant. However, EC circuits mix coherent errors between qubits, preventing worst case (unproven). Coherent errors can add error amplitudes, not error probabilities. However, this is only in the worst case; random coherent errors will instead add like probabilities. Rotation by  : Prob. Rotation by 2  :

Not Helpful: Restricted Error Model Error rates assume all kinds of error are possible. However, restricting the types of possible error (or likely error) does not help very much: Performing gates on a state tends to mix different types of error. Difficult to design error-correcting codes and fault-tolerant protocols for other errors. Note: other approaches may help here.

Reasons Your Quantum Computer Doesn’t Work 6. Lowest contractor bid: $19.99 (large gate errors). 7. Computer refuses to start without morning cup of coffee (no initialization). 8. Built from pieces of crashed UFO (not scalable). 9. It’s been in the fridge for longer than the moldy bread (no fresh qubits). 10. The dog ate my computer (correlated errors).

Reasons Your Quantum Computer Doesn’t Work 1. Built with ideal qubit system: neutrinos (no universal gates). 2. Gate queuing designed by Disney (no parallel operations). 3. Qubit union has mob ties (erasure errors). 4. Operated by Florida elections committee (unreliable measurement). 5. Unionized qubits insist on long breaks (short decoherence time).